What's new

Only solution for Afghanistan - US forces get out’

So ISIS is better than the Taliban? Is the NA, a group that supports foreign invaders and is filled with rapists, pedophiles and the corrupt a better choice? If you prefer those guys, there is something wrong with you.

Yes.. I do prefer the NA over the Taliban. NA were elected by the people of Afghanistan as their rulers. Their govt has legitimacy that the talibs would never have. The Taliban do have the option of laying down their arms and their vicious, venomous ideology and join the democratic process. If they get elected by the people, then they would have legitimacy to be rulers too.. Otherwise, all of these monsters should be dispatched to where they belong... Jahannum..!!

And no, there's nothing “wrong" with me.. Actually, those hypocrites who want the Afghans to suffer under a brutal 6th century Jihadi rule while rejecting the same animals in their own country are the real scum. These Taliban sympathizers are just as fcuked up in the head as the Talibitches themselves..

There are rapists, murderers, launderers, criminals and corrupt goons in Pakistani politics too.. Does that mean Democracy is a bad choice for Pak. Pak should accept the TTP to be their rulers..??
 
.
Or simply Pakistan can stop interfering in the Internal affairs of its neighbours and try to look after its wrecked to hell economy...Just a thought
 
.
Yes.. I do prefer the NA over the Taliban. NA were elected by the people of Afghanistan as their rulers. Their govt has legitimacy that the talibs would never have. The Taliban do have the option of laying down their arms and their vicious, venomous ideology and join the democratic process. If they get elected by the people, then they would have legitimacy to be rulers too.. Otherwise, all of these monsters should be dispatched to where they belong... Jahannum..!!

And no, there's nothing “wrong" with me.. Actually, those hypocrites who want the Afghans to suffer under a brutal 6th century Jihadi rule while rejecting the same animals in their own country are the real scum. These Taliban sympathizers are just as fcuked up in the head as the Talibitches themselves..

There are rapists, murderers, launderers, criminals and corrupt goons in Pakistani politics too.. Does that mean Democracy is a bad choice for Pak. Pak should accept the TTP to be their rulers..??

Only 30% of Afghanistan is literate, democracy only works in countries where the people are educated enough to make a decision. Also, you will find a large amount of Afghans that actually support the Taliban, but they can't vote for them because they aren't an option. The NA will try to harm you if you don't support them against the Taliban, that's the reality of things.

Also, the NA support NATO, the same NATO that occupied Afghanistan killed 20,000 Afghan civilians. They are disgusting for supporting a foreign occupier that killed their own women and children. Imagine if Pakistan conquered India whilst killing thousands of civilians, and then you had some Indians come into power who supported Pakistans actions. You wouldn't support them, would you? Same principal applies here.

As for the Taliban being evil, a lot of the stuff used against them is just made up propaganda by the US, used as an excuse to fight a war in Afghanistan. Also, under the Taliban, crime was at its lowest in Afghan history. They had managed to make Afghanistan peaceful and actually stable, the NA hasn't been able to do that now have they?

When it comes to Pakistan, the army intervenes whenever the leaders we elect turn out to be crazy. That system is fine, if Afghanistan had a similar one that would be great, but they don't.

The Taliban is the best choice, not the right one, not the wrong one, the best one.
 
.
Only 30% of Afghanistan is literate, democracy only works in countries where the people are educated enough to make a decision. Also, you will find a large amount of Afghans that actually support the Taliban, but they can't vote for them because they aren't an option. The NA will try to harm you if you don't support them against the Taliban, that's the reality of things.

Also, the NA support NATO, the same NATO that occupied Afghanistan killed 20,000 Afghan civilians. They are disgusting for supporting a foreign occupier that killed their own women and children. Imagine if Pakistan conquered India whilst killing thousands of civilians, and then you had some Indians come into power who supported Pakistans actions. You wouldn't support them, would you? Same principal applies here.

As for the Taliban being evil, a lot of the stuff used against them is just made up propaganda by the US, used as an excuse to fight a war in Afghanistan. Also, under the Taliban, crime was at its lowest in Afghan history. They had managed to make Afghanistan peaceful and actually stable, the NA hasn't been able to do that now have they?

When it comes to Pakistan, the army intervenes whenever the leaders we elect turn out to be crazy. That system is fine, if Afghanistan had a similar one that would be great, but they don't.

The Taliban is the best choice, not the right one, not the wrong one, the best one.
Well it is for the Afghans to decide what is best for them so keep your suggestion to yourself.. Also what will happen when the Army that intervenes in your country becomes crazy??
 
.
Well it is for the Afghans to decide what is best for them so keep your suggestion to yourself.. Also what will happen when the Army that intervenes in your country becomes crazy??

The Afghans did decide, they chose the Taliban but then NATO came, screwed them over, pinned it on the Taliban and setup a pro NATO government.

As for what happens when our army becomes crazy, civil war. That's what happens. But don't worry, they have proven to be trustworthy so far.
 
.
Come on your lies are starting to sound ridiculous... The only people who wanted the taliban in power are Pakistan,Saudi Arabia and a hanful of countries...

The Afghans did decide, they chose the Taliban but then NATO came, screwed them over, pinned it on the Taliban and setup a pro NATO government.

As for what happens when our army becomes crazy, civil war. That's what happens. But don't worry, they have proven to be trustworthy so far.
Last i checked two wars of our wars have happened when the ruling military became crazy...
 
. .
Come on your lies are starting to sound ridiculous... The only people who wanted the taliban in power are Pakistan,Saudi Arabia and a hanful of countries...


Last i checked two wars of our wars have happened when the ruling military became crazy...

The Taliban have support from the locals, otherwise they wouldn't be so powerful now would they?

As for wars between us, Musharaf was not in power in 1999, and in 1965 our military was right in doing what it did.
 
.
NATO killed 20,000 civilians, put Afghanistan into a civil war again, caused the rise of ISIS in Afghanistan among other brutal groups, and made some of the militants decide to setup shop in Pakistan and other central Asian countries.



We won't, because we have better options.

The fact is, Afghanistan does not have a better option. Believe me I would love a better option, but there isn't one. The NA are crooked, weak and riddled with rapists, and ISIS is... well ISIS. The Taliban is the only option left.

except it wasn't NATO but the futile designs of Pakistani ISI. If they had not played double games the wot would have been over within months; there would have been very little civilian deaths; but Pakistan decided to shelter terrorists and encourage them even. All that blood of innocents is squarely on Pakistan and which is why the terrorists in a karmic effect are blowing the insides of Pakistan up.
 
.
The Taliban have support from the locals, otherwise they wouldn't be so powerful now would they?

As for wars between us, Musharaf was not in power in 1999, and in 1965 our military was right in doing what it did.
The Talis had locals support!!! Wonder where you got that idea!
 
.
Except that Pakistan didn't have control of KP for a few years while Afghanistan has been in chaos and anarchy for 30 years.

Well,some countries become power struggle of different powers.

Tell me one thing....why Afghanistan is in such poor state?Answer is power struggle of USSR,USA,Pakistan.For Afghanistan's failure,every single one needs to be blamed.
 
.
Or simply Pakistan can stop interfering in the Internal affairs of its neighbours and try to look after its wrecked to hell economy...Just a thought


Says who whose country is involved it self and Financing TTP in Afghanistan and using it against us



The Talis had locals support!!! Wonder where you got that idea!


If they didn't have local support they wouldn't control Afghanistan before US invasion survived now also from NATO US ANA. And for your info Afghanistan is
 
.
The Talis had locals support!!! Wonder where you got that idea!

When they ruled Afghanistan, how much dissent did they have compared to the NA now? If they weren't supported by locals, where do they get their soldiers from? Australia?

except it wasn't NATO but the futile designs of Pakistani ISI. If they had not played double games the wot would have been over within months; there would have been very little civilian deaths; but Pakistan decided to shelter terrorists and encourage them even. All that blood of innocents is squarely on Pakistan and which is why the terrorists in a karmic effect are blowing the insides of Pakistan up.

Disgusting, NATO kills 20,000 civilians and you have the audacity to blame us? Get real, did the ISI start throwing Afghans at American Humvee's? No, we didn't. The civilian casualties are on NATO, don't use your stupid propaganda to blame this on us. Although, I do feel like you complemented us by saying we were the ones who defeated the US in Afghanistan.

When it comes to terrorists in Pakistan, they are getting wiped out so things are getting better slowly but surely.
 
.
Talibs and their supporters shit in their pants by just hearing of US army and their favorite bird, predator drones
An indian living in a cave, otherwise they would known history little better.

Yes.. I do prefer the NA over the Taliban. NA were elected by the people of Afghanistan as their rulers.

Sure NA was elected ( i mean selected) by indians, Na does not have any broad support in Afghanistan nor they have what it take to rule and purge indian funded and trained terrorists.
 
.
Disgusting, NATO kills 20,000 civilians and you have the audacity to blame us? Get real, did the ISI start throwing Afghans at American Humvee's? No, we didn't. The civilian casualties are on NATO, don't use your stupid propaganda to blame this on us. Although, I do feel like you complemented us by saying we were the ones who defeated the US in Afghanistan.

When it comes to terrorists in Pakistan, they are getting wiped out so things are getting better slowly but surely.

it is disgusting shameful and immoral what Pakistan has been and is still doing to its own people. Even today your generals are supplying us with targets and coordinates of Pakistani civilians and opposition to be drone bombed - except they cloak it as terrorists. For their own measly luxury they sold out the integrity of Pakistan by creating terrorism; they even traded islam in the market to make money!

If you still feel complimented it only shows the degree your country has made you people stoop down to
 
.
Back
Top Bottom