genmirajborgza786
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2006
- Messages
- 4,303
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
True. Fully agree and I guess on these points, all Bangladeshis barring ultra awami lunatics have a unanimous opinion.
Actually they knew what they were doing and the possible consequences. They simply didn't want to go to an election under a neutral CT system fearing defeat. (yes they would have lost, as the 4 party didn't do all that bad in those 5 years.) Also they took part in the power sharing ceremony of moin-fakir gov. It was as if they were all pre-planned.
I want to hold an ambiguous opinion on this matter. None of those charges against him are proved yet. Facts about concoction and fabrication about Koko's money laundering case have got lime lights recently.
Astronomical level of media PR went on against BNP in this period bro. And these cases are yet to be proved in a awami controlled court.
I don't think they are pakistanophile anymore. U see even though they opposed Sub-partition they ultimately moved on with PAK accepting reality. Then after 71 they moved on with BD accepting reality. This shows that they are flexible and pragmatic. Their goal is not PAK but Islamic governance in BD. They never said stuff like we want reunion knowing full well that under intl. and dmoestic geopolitics its not possible.
As for moderate bangladeshis, they are mainly neutral and mainly votes for BNP when poll comes. That's the trend. BAL-BNP always shared a vote bank of 30-30 with JI say 10 and this rest 30% as neutral. These neutral 30 % are not secular, that's for sure.
Actually JI walas are being heavily oppressed by BAL over the last 4 years. Imagine, they are not even allowed to hold official party meetings rather they had hold it in secret. How long can someone tap such frustrations and tolerate oppression by state sponsored thugs? In a police state like ours now, this kind of things are bound to happen.
As for writing true history, I agree with U. The Opposition utterly failed in the media related aspects. The media is overwhelming in baised toward BAL. Anyone going against Awami version, is labeled is razakar / jamati so much so that even BNP doesn't want to raise the issue. 40 years of brainwashing doesn't go away easily and correction of history will take time. I think they should start by slowly talking about the 1857 mutiny, bengal partition and muslim under congress-british oppression. Then move on to partition of 47 and Indo-awami schemes. It will take time and can't be done overnight and it will also require strong unity among the oppostion forces, strong ideological and moral character. But I believe it will happen oneday, as truth without a doubt always prevails in the end. Awami-Indian PR is just 40-60 years old. It won't last forever inshallah.
@luffy500 @MBI Munshi as far as i remember begum khaleda zia promoted moin u ahmed to the chief of army staff position i mean this guy proved to the caterpillar on which the BAL is ruling Bangladesh today where it generally seems that the army is tilted to wards it i mean the army & DGFI were traditionally anti BAL then what actually happened which changed the army's to such an extant were there international player behind this moin-fakhrudin CTG game if so did the BNP got trapped or was it betrayed by some of its member who encouraged or misguided begum Khalida Zia to make this guy the army chief could you shed some light on this confusing but interesting angle
i mean lets be honest China has been eager to build up the Chittagong port buts its Bangladesh which is delaying it as a consequences of which Myanmar almost has China involved in the sitwe port not to mention the sri lanka China collaboration i mean Bangladesh could have utilized on the stratagic Chittagong port viz-viz China but it did not & Myanmar cashed in the situation your thoughts on this
Last edited by a moderator: