What's new

On his UK visit, Narendra Modi must be held accountable for his record on human rights in India

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Indian-Prime-Minister-Nar-007.jpg

Narendra Modi prepares to address delegates during the India-Africa Forum summit in New Delhi last month. Modi is due to arrive in the UK on 12 November. Photograph: Money Sharma/Getty/AFP
Letters

Wednesday 11 November 2015 18.00 GMTLast modified on Wednesday 11 November 201518.03 GMT

Save for later
As UK academics researching development in India, we are deeply concerned about Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s official visit to the UK from 12-14 November, and call for the human rights abuses on his watch to be questioned in the public domain (Opinion, 10 November). It is important that the growing economic ties between India and the UK, which will no doubt be applauded during this visit, should not mask acknowledgment of the darker sides of what’s happening in India today.

Since Modi came to power in 2014, minorities and women have experienced rising intolerance and intimidation and cultural and academic freedoms have been eroded. Under his leadership as chief minister of Gujarat in 2002, the Gujarat government watched a pogrom of 1,000 people directed against the minority Muslim community.

There has been an escalation of rapes against women and his cabinet includes several ministers against whom criminal cases, including rape, are pending. Modi’s roots and leadership positions in the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a belligerent rightwing paramilitary organisation, are well established. The RSS is known for both its misogynist and anti-minority views, and its core Hindu-rule ideology has been publicly endorsed by Modi. Politicians with RSS backgrounds dominate his cabinet and current administration.

Under Modi’s rule, inflammatory hate speech and violent acts against Christian and Muslim minorities have steadily increased. Mr Modi’s silence and delayed response to all these crimes does nothing to stem the violence. Additionally, his administration has intimidated environmental and human rights activists and researchers and sought to control key institutions of learning.

We support the recent statements by eminent scientists, academics, artists and writers in India who seek to draw attention to growing intolerance in India. In the past year, various freedoms have been attacked, including what people may think, eat, wear and whom they choose to love. Three secular critics have been brutally murdered and these crimes are linked to extreme rightwing groups. In reaction to this, over 70 prominent Indian citizens have returned national awards in protest. While violence against women and minorities in India has existed in the past, never before has the ruling party encouraged an atmosphere where the plural and secular fabric of India has been under such attack.

Modi now enjoys immunity as prime minister. What happened in Gujarat in 2002 must not be forgotten and it is important that his official visit to the UK does not give him and his administration a further platform to continue to restrict human rights, tolerance and cultural freedoms in India.
Professor Lyla Mehta
Institute of Development Studies, UK
Dr Jaideep Gupte
Institute of Development Studies, UK
Dr Deepta Chopra
Institute of Development Studies, UK
Dr Anuradha Joshi
Institute of Development Studies, UK
Dr Dolf te Lintelo
Institute of Development Studies, UK
Dr Priya Deshingkar
University of Sussex
Dr Vinita Damodaran
University of Sussex

• Since assuming power in May 2014, Narendra Modi’s government and BJP politicians have created in India an atmosphere of intolerance and hatred that has surpassed the worst expectations of his many critics. There has been an escalation of violence against Dalits, Muslims, Christians and women, including the brutal lynching of a Muslim man in Dadri on suspicion of consuming beef, murders of rationalists and dissenters such as Professor Kalburgi, attacks on tourists, the banning of academic books by Hindu fundamentalists, among many other such incidents. These events represent a direct assault on constitutionally protected freedom of speech and expression, and freedom of religion and belief. Mr Modi’s complicit silence in these horrifying acts bodes ill for the future of India.

Mr Modi tours the world extensively as a forward-looking leader focused on India’s economic growth. This is despite agencies such as Moody’s Analytics and papers such as the New York Times warning Mr Modi to rein in his movement’s politics of hatred and violence. It is in the context of trade that Mr Modi is arriving in the UK on 12 November 2015 to meet with British politicians, businessmen and Indian community members. But there has been a sustained undermining by the Modi government of some 13,000 NGOs, including Greenpeace, Amnesty International, ActionAid, Ford Foundation and others working in the areas of environmental justice and human rights. There has been consistent flouting of environmental and resource regulations to serve the interests of the large business houses that Mr Modi has gathered around himself.

We urge members of the international community to call attention to Mr Modi’s human rights abuses and to hold him accountable for violations of freedom of speech and religion. For those of us who uphold human rights, Mr Modi is not welcome to the UK.
Dr Subir Sinha
SOAS, University of London
Dr Rashmi Varma
University of Warwick
Prof Chetan Bhatt
London School of Economics
Prof Gargi Bhattacharya
University of East London
Prof Pablo Mukherjee
University of Warwick
Prof Monojit Chatterjee
University of Cambridge
Prof Shirin Rai
University of Warwick
Prof Patricia Jeffrey
University of Edinburgh
Prof Gilbert Achcar
SOAS, University of London
Prof Sanjay Seth
Goldsmiths, University of London
Dr Sumi Madhok
London School of Economics
Prof Joya Chatterji
University of Cambridge
Dr Hugo Gorringe
University of Edinburgh
Maggie Morrison
University of Edinburgh
Dr Amit S Rai
Queen Mary, University of London
Dr Anderson Jeremiah
University of Lancaster
Dr Dibyesh Anand
University of Westminster
Dr Meena Dhanda
University of Wolverhampton
Dr Bishnupriya Gupta
University of Warwick
Dr Paolo Novak
SOAS, University of London
Dr Shakuntala Banaji
London School of Economics
Prof Pritam Singh
Oxford Brookes University
Dr Sundari Anitha
University of Lincoln
Prof Sayantan Ghosal
University of Glasgow
Dr Brenna Bhandar
SOAS, University of London
Dr Sanchari Roy
University of Sussex
Dr Delwar Hussain
University of Edinburgh
Prof Gautam Appa
London School of Economics
Dr Rohit Dasgupta
University of Southampton
Dr Kalpana Wilson
London School of Economics
Dr Murad Banaji
University of Portsmouth
Dr Richard Whitecross
Edinburgh Napier University
Dr Kanchana N Ruwanpura
University of Edinburgh
Dr Goldie Osuri
University of Warwick
Dr Dania Thomas
University of Glasgow
Prof Phiroze Vasunia
University College London
Dr Nitasha Kaul
University of Westminster
Prof John Holmwood
University of Nottingham
Prof Claire Alexander
University of Manchester
Dr Leena Kumarappan
London Metropolitan University
Prof Ben Rogaly
University of Sussex
Prof Stephen Taylor
Northumbria University
Dr Pallavi Roy
SOAS, University of London
Dr Chandana Mathur
National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Dr Alessandra Mezzadri
SOAS, University of London
Prof Gurminder Bhambhra
University of Warwick
Lauren Wilks
University of Edinburgh
Dr Caleb Johnston
University of Edinburgh
Dr Eurig Scandrett
Queen Margaret University
Dr Shabnum Tejani
SOAS, University of London
Dr Aditya Sarkar
University of Warwick
Dr Peggy Froerer
Brunel University
Prof Alfredo Saad-Filho
SOAS, University of London
Dr Rachel Harrison
SOAS, University of London
Dr Rajesh Venugopal
London School of Economics
Amrita Lamba
SOAS, University of London
Dr Navtej Purewal
SOAS, University of London
Dr Parvathi Raman
SOAS, University of London
Dr Manali Desai
University of Cambridge
Prof Lynn Welchman
SOAS, University of London
Dr Rahul Rao
SOAS, University of London
Prof Chris Fuller
London School of Economics
Sruthi Herbert
SOAS, University of London
Shreya Sinha
SOAS, University of London
Dr Rajyashree Pandey
Goldsmiths, University of London
Dr Feyzi Ismail
SOAS, University of London
Mehroosh Tak
SOAS, University of London
Dr Bhavna Dave
SOAS, University of London
Mary Hanlon
University of Edinburgh
Dr Anandi Ramamurthy
Sheffield Hallam University
Sarah Hodges
University of Warwick
Dr Steve Hughes
SOAS, University of London
Dr Anamik Saha
Goldsmiths, University of London
Lipika Kamra
University of Oxford
Dr Sneha Krishnan
University of Oxford
Kartikeyan Damodaran
University of Edinburgh
Prof Ian Parker
University of Leicester
Dr Debjyoti Ghosh
Central European University
Dr Ayça Çubukçu
London School of Economics
Dr Awol Allo
London School of Economics
Dr Sharad Chari
University of Witwatersrand
Dr Christopher Harding
University of Edinburgh
Dr Rohan Deb Roy
University of Reading
Prof Eleanor Nesbitt
University of Warwick
Mike Cushman
London School of Economics
Dr Marian Mayer
Bournemouth University
Dr Andy Higginbottom
Kingston University
Dr Radha D’Souza
Westminster University
Dr Kalim Siddiqi
University of Huddersfield
Dr Thomas Marois
SOAS, University of London
Dr Leandro Vergara Camus
SOAS, University of London
Dr Adam Hanieh
SOAS, University of London
Dr Laura Hammond
SOAS, University of London
Dr Cosimo Zene
SOAS, University of London
Dr Tim Pringle
SOAS, University of London
MP Dhaneesh
SOAS, University of London
Dr Lorenza Monaco
SOAS, University of London
Dr Misha Wellthuis
SOAS, University of London
Dr Andy Denis
City University
Prof Patrick Ainley
University of Greenwich
Nithya Natarajan
SOAS, University of London
Dr Jonathan Chu
Kingston University
Prof Heidi Mirza
Goldsmiths, University of London
Dr Julian Wells
Kingston University
Dr Rajinder Dudrah
Manchester University
Dr Gurnam Singh
University of Coventry
Dr Erica Wald
Goldsmiths, University of London
Dr Ipshita Basu
University of Westminster
Dr Russell Jackson
Sheffield Hallam University
Dr Les Levidow
Open University
Dr Janroj Yilmaz Keles
Middlesex University
Dr Derek Wall
Goldsmiths College
Dr RM Kathik
University of Essex
Dr Trevor Rawnsley
City and Islington College
Dr Dan O’Connor
University of Edinburgh
Dr Sadhvi Dar
Queen Mary, University of London
Dr Shinjini Das
University of Cambridge
Stephen Cross
University of the Arts, London
Dr Susan Daruvala
University of Cambridge
Dr Divinderjit Singh Sivia
University of Oxford
Dr Thomas Jeffrey Miley
University of Cambridge
Dr Johanna Riha
University of Cambridge
Dr Pippa Virdee
De Montfort University
Prof Jaswinder Dhillon
University of Worcester
Dr Maan Barua
University of Oxford
Dr Sukhwant Dhaliwal
University of Bedfordshire
Prof Suman Gupta
Open University
Dr Manjeet Ramgotra
SOAS, University of London
Dr Karim Murji
Open University
Prof Nick Potts
Southampton Solent University
Prof William Gould
University of Leeds
Prof Mary Davis
Royal Holloway College

• The past decade of Modi’s career has been tainted with accusations about his role in the appalling Gujarat killings, resulting in the death of more than 2,000 women, men and children from the minority Muslim community. Indeed, this resulted in the implementation of a decade-long major diplomatic boycott of India’s current prime minister – banned from the US, UK and many other western countries.

Since becoming PM, Modi has skilfully projected his “cleaner” image with many soundbites on economic development, prosperity and a “digital India” but the reality is that Modi presides over a violent authoritarian regime that seeks to undermine the secular fabric of India, achieving more success in fuelling regional divisions than delivering the real change that swept his party into power.

The Sikh nation in India is adding its voice to these provincial uprisings. Recent sacrilegious acts against the Sikh religious scriptures, Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, and the mindless lynching by a Hindu mob of an Indian Muslim citizen rumoured to have eaten beef, have caused widespread outrage. People of faith and none all over India and the globe have united to demand justice against those who are road-blocking the path to freedoms of belief, faith and democracy.

Together, the citizens of the United Kingdom, including British Sikhs, have crafted and promoted our shared values of democracy, individual rights, mutual respect and tolerance. The time is now to put our shared values into action and display our commitment to the history, ideals and vision of the United Kingdom.
Charandeep Singh
General secretary, Glasgow Gurdwara

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

On his UK visit, Narendra Modi must be held accountable for his record on human rights in India | Letters | World news | The Guardian

@Horus @Oscar @Jango @Jungibaaz @Khafee @Rashid Mahmood @Arsalan and others
 
. .
While Modi will be enjoying the Engish hospitality, who will listen to these Nobel peace prize hopefuls? :partay::partay:
 
. . .
And they have no trouble when the Saudi King visits - whose kingdom has just sentenced a teenager to be crucified in public for making a tweet.

No problems with China where Muslims cannot fast on Ramadan or wear the veil.

No problems with Putin who poisons his political opponents.

The only problem is Modi who didn't do enough to stop Hindu-Muslims riots in Gujurat 13 years ago.

They will sign petitions, come on prime time TV in India every night to call the PM a fascist and then they will go out to dinner with their friends maybe have a drink at the club or go to a poetry reading and then repeat the next day.

In a truly fascist country these people or their families back home would have been in jail or worse.
 
.
Narendra Modi’s visit to the UK is overshadowed by nationalist violence in India
Far from being a model of pluralism and tolerance Modi’s India has seen lynchings of Muslims and divisive rhetoric stirring up the politics of hate


Narendra Modi ‘seems to straddle two absurdly opposing narratives: one where he likes to be embraced by world leaders and tech gurus; and another where he either remains silent over the hounding of his country’s citizens by vigilante squads.’ Photograph: Danish Ismail/Reuters/Corbis
Comments
164

Save for later
As India’s prime minister Narendra Modi prepares to visit Britain, an ominous situation is developing in his country.

In the last few months, mobs of fanatics, some linked to his party, the BJP, have lynched Muslims for eating, carrying or possessing beef, or on mere suspicion of having done so.

The body of the latest victim, Mohammad Hasmat Ali, was discovered last week in the north-east state of Manipur. The slaughter of cows, considered holy by most Hindus, is proscribed in several states, but people of many faiths, including Hindus, still eat beef. It is clear, however, that the Muslims were killed not because they ate or smuggled beef but because they did this while being Muslim.

In other attacks two Dalit children, aged one and two, were burned to death, allegedly by upper-caste men, who doused petrol over their house as the family slept in the northern state of Haryana; and a thinktank director who hosted a former Pakistani minister’s book launch in Mumbai had ink smeared on his face.

Equally disturbing, however, is the reaction from those in the establishment or their supporters. Soon after the lynching of Mohammed Akhlaq, on 28 September, a spokesman for Modi’s ruling BJP, Tarun Vijay, wrote in an editorialmeant to condemn the killing: “Lynching a person merely on suspicion is absolutely wrong” – as if implying that if you’re sure of guilt, lynching is OK. A day after the Dalit children’s murder, India’s junior defence minister appeared to liken the killing of the children to the pelting of dogs.

Most of all, however, critics say it was Modi himself who spawned the narrative of beef as a critical issue during elections last year by warning of a “pink revolution”(a widespread slaughter of cows) if his party didn’t win. Almost every day, a leader from the ruling party makes a provocative statement, mostly targeting Muslims and those who express dissent. One of India’s biggest actors, Shah Rukh Khan, who spoke about the need for tolerance, was called a traitor and Pakistani agent by senior BJP figures.

Amid all this, the party leadership chooses to deny the rise of prejudice altogether, prompting a scathing critique by a former BJP minister and well-known journalist Arun Shourie, who accused Modi of deliberate silence over the lynchings.

This growing atmosphere of hate has sparked an unprecedented protest by scores of writers who have returned their awards to the country’s premier literary body, the Sahitya Akademy, including most recently Arundhati Roy. Hundreds of artists, scientists and historians have now joined the protest. In support of the writers, Salman Rushdie denounced the “thuggish violence” sweeping India. India’s culture minister advised them to stop writing.

This also raises the question of tensions and tyrannies that predate Modi’s India. Critics of the revivalist new Hindu nationalism may perhaps consider their indifference to atrocities committed on the borders for years: in Kashmir Indian troops have filled mass graves and murdered, raped and tortured with impunity. In the north-east the world record-holding hunger striker, Irom Sharmila – the Iron Lady of Manipur – has for 15 years waged a lone battle against a law giving the armed forces draconian powers. And in the Maoist belt in central India, the denial of indigenous people’s rights has triggered a decade-long armed rebellion.

Today, the language in politicians’ speeches and in the hysteria on TV screens bears echoes of the bloody divisiveness of the partition of India in 1947. This rapid descent into chaos, and the unravelling of many certainties within a year of the BJP’s ascension to power, has prompted uncomfortable comparisons withPakistan.

There certainly are obvious similarities, especially with regard to the mainstreaming of the politics of hate. The two countries were separated in a partition that left nearly million 1 dead. Pakistan, unlike India, has only fleetingly had democratic governments; such noble concepts as secularism are not enshrined in the founding laws of the country. India, on the other hand, has always claimed to be a secular democracy. Pakistan doesn’t say secular on the tin;India does.

It took decades for Pakistan to get to the brink (from where it is making attempts to claw itself back) while in India this has taken just over a year. Perhaps the seed was always there, under the surface, waiting for a warm, conducive environment.

Modi, a man with statesmanlike ambitions, seems to straddle two absurdly opposing narratives: one where he likes to be embraced by world leaders and tech gurus; and another where he either remains silent over the hounding of his country’s citizens by vigilante squads, or speaks in platitudes that obscure the nature of the crimes.

During his trip to Silicon Valley in September, Modi was seen hugging a fawning Mark Zuckerberg. Yet, at the same time he was promoting Digital India to Silicon Valley tech-plutocrats, his government turned off the internet in disputed Kashmir for nearly four days.

India is a uniquely diverse country, the form and size of a continent. It was supposed to show the world a new mode of pluralism and tolerance. But it seems its founding principles are being recast at breakneck speed. A new tryst with destiny is being arranged: to turn India into a majoritarian Hindu state.
 
.
I don't know what to say to such one sided news

1. The persons involved in the killing of. Mohamed ali are all caught and undergoing judicial process. The entire country came to a standstill for this one death,.

2. The burning was investigated. It was found to be a short circuit not an intentional burning. Even if it was an intentional burning such crimes are hardly new to India , it has been going on well before the BJP government.

3. Ink was smeared on face as a protest against Pakistanis making money in India after doing what they do. In a democratic country protest are allowed whether you agree with the protestor or not. All he had to do was wash of the ink.

4. Many members of the Congress supporting elite returned their awards. Hundreds of thousands of people in 9 cities around the country marched against them. These. Were ordinary middle class people, students and ordinary workers were dismayed and horrified by the cynical award wapsi.

5 SRK. Protested intolerance 3 days after the ED served notice on him for illegal transfer of money for his IPL games. The bulk of his money he made by these same so called intolerant citizens of india buying tickets for his sappy movies.


Jeez ....I am done . So fed up with this spin doctoring of these Congress nematodes,
 
.
With such news negative and positive it will only end up making modi bigger and bigger day by day.
He is right on the way to become a man of the century.
 
.
These people are jealous that Modi will be having lunch with Queen whereas they have been living for years in UK and are not allowed to cross the gate of Buckingham Palace.
 
.
A pedophile
how comes you come to the conclusion that he is pedophile, you have any person experience or insider knowledge.
Mr. Modi is a confirmed killer of hundreds of Muslim people in India and someone points out that and the mad sanghizz starts calling names.

These people are jealous that Modi will be having lunch with Queen whereas they have been living for years in UK and are not allowed to cross the gate of Buckingham Palace.
Haa Queen is the most beautiful and the most powerful lady that all people becomes jealous Modi a Bigot and killer so sane minded people objects killer being invited to their country. Every body knows this before becoming P.M he was denied US visa but when he becomes P.M of India so for the sake of their relation with India they have to invite this monster.
 
.
how comes you come to the conclusion that he is pedophile, you have any person experience or insider knowledge.
Mr. Modi is a confirmed killer of hundreds of Muslim people in India and someone points out that and the mad sanghizz starts calling names.
He is on video confessing that he was grooming a 14 year old girl for sex.
 
.
With such news negative and positive it will only end up making modi bigger and bigger day by day.
He is right on the way to become a man of the century.
Ya ya bigger and bigger killer and monster how promotes hate, in his rule people being killed for eating beef and dalit children burnt alive. What a big monster he is becoming.

He is on video confessing that he was grooming a 14 year old girl for sex.
Talk about your country where people are busy and patrolling streets for Cow protection and girls are being raped in moving buses.
 
.
No he wont be held accountable let more butt hurt flow through you commies and Congress boot lickers
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom