What's new

Officials reject Xi Jinping’s ‘solution’

ChineseTiger1986

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
23,530
Reaction score
12
Country
China
Location
Canada
‘ONE COUNTRY, TWO SYSTEMS’:DPP legislators excoriated Chinese President Xi Jinping for his stance on cross-strait ‘unification’ and solving the ‘Taiwan problem’

The government cannot accept the so-called “one country, two systems” arrangement described by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) as Beijing’s solution to solving the “Taiwan problem,” Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) said yesterday.

During a meeting with pro-unification groups from Taiwan led by New Party Chairman Yok Mu-ming (郁慕明) in Beijing yesterday morning, Xi said that “peaceful unification and the ‘one country, two systems’ policy are [China’s] basic guidelines for solving the ‘Taiwan problem.’”

It was the first time Xi discussed China’s “one country, two systems” framework with visitors from Taiwan since he took office in November 2012.

Xi emphasized that “unification” would be “an end to the political standoff, rather than about rebuilding territory or sovereignty.”

He also slammed the movement for Taiwanese independence.

Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators berated Xi’s remarks, saying that Hong Kong’s example shows that the proposed system is already a failure.

“What’s happening in Hong Kong now shows that ‘one country, two systems’ is a failure. Beijing should try to solve the problems in Hong Kong first, because its handling of the political situation in Hong Kong is a slap in its own face,” DPP caucus whip Tsai Chi-tsang (蔡其昌) said in the legislature.

“Before talking about ‘one country, two systems,’ Beijing had better ask how Hong Kongers feel about it first,” Tsai said.

DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said that he suspected that Xi was responding to Ma’s erroneously reported call for eventual “unification” under the German model.

The Presidential Office said on Thursday that a Chinese-language report by Deutsche Welle was a misrepresentation of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) interview with several European media outlets.

“The Chinese Communist Party [CCP] and the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] apparently give each other support to attract pro-unification, pan-blue camp supporters,” Chen said. “But it is not going to succeed, as most Taiwanese would not buy it.”

Academia Sinica assistant research fellow Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), who is also one of the leaders of the Sunflower movement, called Xi’s remarks “ridiculous,” saying they are only suitable to “slaves wanting to gain favor with the CCP and should not be made public.”

“We understand that different people might have different interpretations of history, but China must not overlook the universal values of democracy and rule of law,” DPP spokesperson Huang Di-ying (黃帝穎) said. “Taiwanese insist on making cross-strait exchanges only on the basis of democracy, freedom and the rule of law. The DPP insists that the future of Taiwan should be decided solely by its 23 million citizens.”
Jiang, responding to DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling’s (管碧玲) questions on the matter during a legislative question-and-answer session, said that the Republic of China (ROC), as a sovereign country, has never deemed the “one country, two systems” formula acceptable.

Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) said the call for peaceful “unification” has long been the Chinese government’s directive, but it has drawn public attention this time because it was the first time since Xi took office that he mentioned it before Taiwanese visitors.

“Of course we do not agree with it,” Wang said. “We would reiterate our position [to the Chinese government] on an appropriate occasion.”

Kuan asked Jiang whether he agrees that the territory of the ROC is confined to Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu.

Jiang rephrased the question by replacing “territory” with “effective rule.”

KMT Legislator Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) asked Jiang whether Xi was “expressing goodwill” and “recognizing our sovereignty and territory” when he said that “unification” would not be a reinstitution of sovereignty.

Wang said it would require further observation to determine whether the Chinese government is really “expressing goodwill.”

Presidential Office spokesperson Ma Wei-kuo (馬瑋國) told reporters that the ROC is a 103-year-old sovereign state, and both the government and the people would not accept the “one country, two systems” framework.

In related news, the Chinese-language China Times newspaper published a report before Xi met the group from Taiwan, citing a source as saying that Xi might “reveal a certain message during the meeting,” which, according to a Chinese academic, would probably be a decision on a meeting between Xi and Ma.
According to Xi’s speech released by Xinhua news agency, he did not mention such a meeting.

Officials reject Xi Jinping’s ‘solution’ - Taipei Times

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Good, those stupid Taibazi can't see what will happen when the PLA hawkish Generals are running out of patience.

We also hate the stupid One Country Two Policies system, and now they are doing what we want to see.
 
.
‘ONE COUNTRY, TWO SYSTEMS’:DPP legislators excoriated Chinese President Xi Jinping for his stance on cross-strait ‘unification’ and solving the ‘Taiwan problem’

The government cannot accept the so-called “one country, two systems” arrangement described by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) as Beijing’s solution to solving the “Taiwan problem,” Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) said yesterday.

During a meeting with pro-unification groups from Taiwan led by New Party Chairman Yok Mu-ming (郁慕明) in Beijing yesterday morning, Xi said that “peaceful unification and the ‘one country, two systems’ policy are [China’s] basic guidelines for solving the ‘Taiwan problem.’”

It was the first time Xi discussed China’s “one country, two systems” framework with visitors from Taiwan since he took office in November 2012.

Xi emphasized that “unification” would be “an end to the political standoff, rather than about rebuilding territory or sovereignty.”

He also slammed the movement for Taiwanese independence.

Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators berated Xi’s remarks, saying that Hong Kong’s example shows that the proposed system is already a failure.

“What’s happening in Hong Kong now shows that ‘one country, two systems’ is a failure. Beijing should try to solve the problems in Hong Kong first, because its handling of the political situation in Hong Kong is a slap in its own face,” DPP caucus whip Tsai Chi-tsang (蔡其昌) said in the legislature.

“Before talking about ‘one country, two systems,’ Beijing had better ask how Hong Kongers feel about it first,” Tsai said.

DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said that he suspected that Xi was responding to Ma’s erroneously reported call for eventual “unification” under the German model.

The Presidential Office said on Thursday that a Chinese-language report by Deutsche Welle was a misrepresentation of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) interview with several European media outlets.

“The Chinese Communist Party [CCP] and the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] apparently give each other support to attract pro-unification, pan-blue camp supporters,” Chen said. “But it is not going to succeed, as most Taiwanese would not buy it.”

Academia Sinica assistant research fellow Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), who is also one of the leaders of the Sunflower movement, called Xi’s remarks “ridiculous,” saying they are only suitable to “slaves wanting to gain favor with the CCP and should not be made public.”

“We understand that different people might have different interpretations of history, but China must not overlook the universal values of democracy and rule of law,” DPP spokesperson Huang Di-ying (黃帝穎) said. “Taiwanese insist on making cross-strait exchanges only on the basis of democracy, freedom and the rule of law. The DPP insists that the future of Taiwan should be decided solely by its 23 million citizens.”
Jiang, responding to DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling’s (管碧玲) questions on the matter during a legislative question-and-answer session, said that the Republic of China (ROC), as a sovereign country, has never deemed the “one country, two systems” formula acceptable.

Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) said the call for peaceful “unification” has long been the Chinese government’s directive, but it has drawn public attention this time because it was the first time since Xi took office that he mentioned it before Taiwanese visitors.

“Of course we do not agree with it,” Wang said. “We would reiterate our position [to the Chinese government] on an appropriate occasion.”

Kuan asked Jiang whether he agrees that the territory of the ROC is confined to Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu.

Jiang rephrased the question by replacing “territory” with “effective rule.”

KMT Legislator Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) asked Jiang whether Xi was “expressing goodwill” and “recognizing our sovereignty and territory” when he said that “unification” would not be a reinstitution of sovereignty.

Wang said it would require further observation to determine whether the Chinese government is really “expressing goodwill.”

Presidential Office spokesperson Ma Wei-kuo (馬瑋國) told reporters that the ROC is a 103-year-old sovereign state, and both the government and the people would not accept the “one country, two systems” framework.

In related news, the Chinese-language China Times newspaper published a report before Xi met the group from Taiwan, citing a source as saying that Xi might “reveal a certain message during the meeting,” which, according to a Chinese academic, would probably be a decision on a meeting between Xi and Ma.
According to Xi’s speech released by Xinhua news agency, he did not mention such a meeting.

Officials reject Xi Jinping’s ‘solution’ - Taipei Times

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Good, those stupid Taibazi can't see what will happen when the PLA hawkish Generals are running out of patience.

We also hate the stupid One Country Two Policies system, and now they are doing what we want to see.
Taiwanese :hitwall:
 
.
Academia Sinica assistant research fellow Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), who is also one of the leaders of the Sunflower movement, called Xi’s remarks “ridiculous,” saying they are only suitable to “slaves wanting to gain favor with the CCP and should not be made public.”

Poignant commentary, indeed.

Taiwanese :hitwall:

Put yourself in their shoes, my friend. Do you like it when some Imperialist elements in India call for the forcible reunification of Bangladesh to Greater India?
 
Last edited:
.
Put yourself in their shoes, my friend. Do you like it when some Imperialist elements in India call for the forcible reunification of Bangladesh to Greater India?
China is not pushing, taiwan is crying foul and china is giving solution.

Talking about greater india ? no, if the proposal comes about union of south asia. i will take it.
 
.
China is not pushing, taiwan is crying foul and china is giving solution.

Talking about greater india ? no, if the proposal comes about union of south asia. i will take it.

So you are in favor of a South Asian Union?
 
.
China is not pushing, taiwan is crying foul and china is giving solution.

Talking about greater india ? no, if the proposal comes about union of south asia. i will take it.
:woot::woot::woot:are you really a bangladeshi. Most members of BD on this forum hates India.
 
.
So you are in favor of a South Asian Union?
Yes, more big economy, more power, more military power :devil:
58ebb9ce4b6896e74a96a0938402197f.gif


:woot::woot::woot:are you really a bangladeshi. Most members of BD on this forum hates India.
i am realistic, i hate india for some of its actions, i also like india for some of its actions
 
.
Yes, more big economy, more power, more military power :devil:
View attachment 88742


i am realistic, i hate india for some of its actions, i also like india for some of its actions
aarey yaar tu ab unification of greater india bol bol ke dara mat...
those are our line and jst for saying.. akhand bharat and all... not for reality...:lol::lol:
 
. . .
:woot::woot::woot:are you really a bangladeshi. Most members of BD on this forum hates India.

Come on, man. Have you been to the states or abroad? Indians, Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis are like butter on toast. They stick together. Its only on political defense forums where there's some 'issues'.
 
.
aarey yaar tu ab unification of greater india bol bol ke dara mat...
those are our line and jst for saying.. akhand bharat and all... not for reality...:lol::lol:
A unified South Asia would be a force to be reckoned with. Definitely.
i have bigger plan:

ASEAN+China+Japan+Russia+South Korea+SAARC :oops:

tell me who will wants to mess with this block ? :devil:
 
. .
i have bigger plan:

ASEAN+China+Japan+Russia+South Korea+SAARC :oops:

tell me who will wants to mess with this block ? :devil:
ya now say earth as a unit ..
who want to mess with this block.... hehehe...
by taking Japan and korea in.. u are inevitably invited USA... who is left now...:D
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom