What's new

Obsessed with NASR

Made a polygon for probable use region of NASR with context of my above post.

nasr region.jpg
 
:laughcry:LOL! You're funny! And clueless too!

A little knowledge about nuclear weapons is a dangerous thing. But then as they say, ignorance is bliss! Now read this and get wise...


Tactical nukes? How many are you going to use to stop an Indian thrust? Here's the maths...

For a max 5KT warhead (max 5KT warhead on Nasr which is between 1 to 5 KT)

– Blast and fireball radius 500m or approx < 2 sq km

Integrated Combat Group frontage < > 10 km with two combat teams up. Depth < > 5 km. Total area covered approx 50 sq km.

How many tactical nukes would be required to destroy one CG?
- 25 Nasrs (with 5KT warhead. 125 nukes with 1KT warhead).

Initial strike with 10 -15 combat groups simultaneously. Total area covered < > 500 sq km.

Minimum battlefield nukes needed to destroy the CGs > 250 Nasrs with 5KT warhead or 1250 Nasrs with 1KT warhead!

That’s a hell of a lot of Nasrs required! Remember, all tanks and personnel carriers are protected from nuclear radiation. There will be no infantry out in the open.

So, going a step further, 250x5 KT = 1250 KT ie, equal to the yield of 65 Hiroshima atom bombs on Pakistani territory (as these will be employed only after the CGs have penetrated deep into Pakistan and would be used as a last resort!!) And I haven't even got started on an Indian nuclear riposte! Add that to the mix and....Curtains!

What would be left of Eastern Pakistan?

It’s like cutting off your nose to spite your face!

Bottom line: Use of tactical nukes? Bad idea!

And by the way, has Pakistan tested this so called mini nuke known as Nasr? If so, when and where? If not, you've got a lemon!


Cheers!
sir this thread is like a week old plus i did not right it i mentioned the source kindly get over it
you are actually proving u r obsessed with it
 
the real thing r the tactical nuke if they can b fit on tiny nasr they can b fitted on babar delivered in multiple # on jets and perhaps even MIRVed on shaheen series or can b fitted on pak/Chinese made ASMs nasr is just a psychological weapon
if conventional forces fail (if) then tactical option will b used away from city center btw mighty usa forces took weeks 2 occupy iraqi cities we r no Iraq & indians r no usa so even conventional imbalance isn’t that severe as u may think & look at our army achievement against taliban insurgency we succeeded where usa failed
Insurgency is not a valid analogue for a conventional conflict.
 
Nasr missile is a double-edged sword, IMO. On one hand, these missiles can demoralize/defeat an advancing Indian column, if employed effectively. On the other hand, these missiles carry a miniaturized nuclear warhead and might trigger a full-blown nuclear war between the two nations. In the end, both sides will be losers.
 
Nasr missile is a double-edged sword, IMO. On one hand, these missiles can demoralize/defeat an advancing Indian column, if employed effectively. On the other hand, these missiles carry a miniaturized nuclear warhead and might trigger a full-blown nuclear war between the two nations. In the end, both sides will be losers.
No Sir if used in deffense within or near border on penetrating armoured columns.
 
Nasr missile is a double-edged sword, IMO. On one hand, these missiles can demoralize/defeat an advancing Indian column, if employed effectively. On the other hand, these missiles carry a miniaturized nuclear warhead and might trigger a full-blown nuclear war between the two nations. In the end, both sides will be losers.

Well who will inform the other party we used it
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom