Nuclear weapons only for strategic deterrence: Army chief

[oct605032048]

Complete off topic trolling, with nothing useful to contribute to the discussion. Save it for a china related thread. Try to read the article on the first page and understand what the discussion is about. If you want to keep suggesting invading dharamshala and bring in iraq and nicaragua, do it in MS word. Don't derail the thread.

You are complete off topic trolling.

Do you know why?

Because India is not US. The US got power so they can bomb anyone that can't bomb them. So they bombed Iraq, Iran, Afganistan and Nicaragua. But you can't.

The bottom line is if Indian crazy launch any missile or drone attack against Pakistan. It will trigger a whole scale war and 200 nuke warheads flying against each other.

 

[ares]

How about LTTE?

What about LTTE ..we directly fought LTTE in Srilanka for three yrs..LTTE assasinated our Prime minster.
Was Prabhakaran residing in India?

 

[oct605032048]

Then why did not you provide that "evidence" to United Nation for all the world to see and get Dalai Lama declare a terrorist?
I am sure ..we would not harbor a UN declared terrorist.

Save your hypocrap to yourself. We saved that bug's live because we don't want another war with India. Unless you guys fancy one.

 

[janon]

You are complete off topic trolling.

Do you know why?

Because India is not US. The US got power so they can bomb anyone that can't bomb them. So they bombed Iraq, Iran, Afganistan and Nicaragua. But you can't.

The bottom line is if Indian crazy launch any missile or drone attack against Pakistan. It will trigger a whole scale war and 200 nuke warheads flying against each other.

"I am complete off topic trolling because India is not US." Makes perfect sense. No more replies to senseless trolls.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

General request to everyone: Stick to the topic at hand.

OK. So considering the thread topic, how can an Indian general tell anyone else what nuclear weapons can and cannot be used for?

 

[oct605032048]

If India really want to get rid of the terrorist. It should work WITH not AGAINST the Pakistan government. You should learn from what China did with the Mekong river countries to protect the business line along the river.

 

[janon]

OK. So considering the thread topic, how can an Indian general tell anyone else what nuclear weapons can and cannot be used for?

He can tell that to his juniors, thats his job. He can't tell that to other countries, and doesnt need to. The general in this article was articulating India's policy, nobody else's.

Did you notice any Indian general telling others what nukes can or cannot be used for? If not, why the question? His point, which you may have missed, is that if pakistan uses nasr as a battlefield weapon, it would be tantamount to taking it to the strategic level. Of course he cant tell them not to do it, but is just pointing out the consequences. He can do that, because he is the one in charge of implementing those consequences.

 

[ares]

Save your hypocrap to yourself. We saved that bug's live because we don't want another war with India. Unless you guys fancy one.

As before could not come up with a sensible reply ..hence decided to take detour towards internet tough guy BS.

Internet macho boys threatening a war..what's next ..you will be farting nukes from computer screen also?

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

If India really want to get rid of the terrorist. It should work WITH not AGAINST the Pakistan government. You should learn from what China did with the Mekong river countries to protect the business line along the river.

Exactly, cooperation always works the best in these kinds of situations.

 

[Smarterthanyou]

Find me ONE single world leader (apart from India's) who says that the Pakistani STATE (i.e. government) has been proven responsible for the Mumbai attacks.

Or maybe an official statement from the United Nations?

Only you Indians.

What do you think we did or the statement we made with the Headley trials or when we helped the Indians with gathering intelligence during Mumbai attacks, show? A decent bit of proof sent to Pakistan was gathered with American help. The statement is made a plenty that Pakistan ISI supports terrorists. Recent one being from Mullen. Again, you are void of reality and filled with hate for that country that makes you troll what seems everyday on their threads . Look here you have gone off topic trolling again.

 

[janon]

As before could not come up with a sensible reply ..hence decided to take detour towards internet tough guy BS.

Internet macho boys threatening a war..what's next ..you will be farting nukes from computer screen also?

Stop feeding the troll and report the off topic posts.

---------- Post added at 12:49 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:48 AM ----------

Exactly, cooperation always works the best in these kinds of situations.

And in situations like kargil too? In which, although the pakistan state denied responsibility first, it was amply proved, and many soldiers were involved? Would cooperation work when their soldiers and terrorists are clearly working together?

 

[Smarterthanyou]

If India really want to get rid of the terrorist. It should work WITH not AGAINST the Pakistan government. You should learn from what China did with the Mekong river countries to protect the business line along the river.

Tells us how Mekong river was the same as ten thousands of Indians dying over almost 2 decades and why don't you apply your advise to China when it came to Tibet ? Also, tell us how we as Americans should have negotiated with Osama. We would like getting rid of terrorist too.

On second thought I guess I let you guys go off topic trolling as usual

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

And in situations like kargil too? In which, although the pakistan state denied responsibility first, it was amply proved, and many soldiers were involved? Would cooperation work when their soldiers and terrorists are clearly working together?

Peace starts with one step.

Pakistan is nervous about India attacking, just like how China was nervous about anyone interfering with Tibet during the last Sino-Indian conflict.

When one or both sides are worried and paranoid, the chances of war go up. With something like "Nasr" or "Cold start", the danger becomes a thousand times worse.

 

[janon]

Peace starts with one step.

Pakistan is nervous about India attacking, just like how China was nervous about anyone interfering with Tibet during the last Sino-Indian conflict.

When one or both sides are worried and paranoid, the chances of war go up. With something like "Nasr" or "Cold start", the danger becomes a thousand times worse.

You are responding to a question about kargil war. You are saying pakistan is nervous that india would attack. It was pak that attacked, after several months of state sanctioned and approved infiltration. You are making the victim the aggressor. Our PM was trying his best to get peace talks going. Learn the reality of who the aggressor was and who was trying for peace.

 

[Black Widow]

Tells us how Mekong river was the same as ten thousands of Indians dying over almost 2 decades and why don't you apply your advise to China when it came to Tibet ? Also, tell us how we as Americans should have negotiated with Osama. We would like getting rid of terrorist too.

Look like we are Deviating from topic. Don't get into red trap..

On Topic: NASR is good missile. It can be used for close combat. One thing I would like to bring here. NASR can carry non-nuclear weapons also So to counter any Indian attack, Pakistan can use non-nuclear NASR.

We saw many war inlast 60 years, Nuclear weapons are not used in last 60 years. I don't think Pakistan is crazy to use it. If Pakistan will use it against Indian forces, It will be considered nuclear attack, and that will be replied accordingly. India can use Bigger Nukes in return to Major Pakistani cities. Which will bring massive destruction...

So use of nuclear NASR is impossible.

Another Point here is "Will India attack Pakistan without provocation???" Big NO.. India has never attacked Pakistan. So in future Its not possible, unless Paksitani does misadventure like "Op Gibraltor" "Op Kargil", "Op parliament" or "Op Mumbai".