Nuclear weapons only for strategic deterrence: Army chief

[Chinese-Dragon]

Good, that is what any sane country would do. And that is what India has tried for the past few decades. Hasn't worked. They didn't even acknowledge that the miscreants were pakistanis, until they couldn't keep up the facade any longer. Some pakistanis on this forum still can't admit that.

You think India hasn't asked? You ought to be more informed.

Obviously they aren't going to do such favours for an enemy nation now would they?

They help China with our militants because we are friendly with them.

If India solves the Kashmir dispute, then India-Pakistan relations might become more friendly. And then you could negotiate for a similar extradition agreement to the one we have.

 

[janon]

According to your logic, we should bomb Dharamsala decades ago.

It is really hard to believe a country like India talking something so chauvinistic as if they were John Bull. Any movement by the Indian side against any target in Pakistan will be understood as a part of full scale open war and maybe nuclear war. China, no matter willingly or not, will be involved as well.

Accordiong to my logic? Definitely not, unless you are claiming that there are terrorist trainign camps in Dharamshala and gunmen from Dharamshala have been walking around shooting civilians in your cities. Unless that is the case, I'm not sure how the comparison is valid.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

The entire sane world believes it and world leaders have made statements supporting it.

Find me ONE single world leader (apart from India's) who says that the Pakistani STATE (i.e. government) has been proven responsible for the Mumbai attacks.

Or maybe an official statement from the United Nations?

Only you Indians.

 

[janon]

Obviously they aren't going to do such favours for an enemy nation now would they?

They help China with our militants because we are friendly with them.

If India solves the Kashmir dispute, then India-Pakistan relations might become more friendly. And then you could negotiate for a similar extradition agreement to the one we have.

Now you are getting there. Earlier you said we should ask nicely, thats what we should do. And you said that in a very patronising tone. When I pointed out that that hasn't worked, you are saying it is "obvious" that they wont do it for an enemy nation. Then why did you bring up the asking nicely part?

 

[oct605032048]

Why would the Pakistani government behind the Mumbai attack? How could the Pakistani government benefit from the Mumbai attack?

But the god da*m Dalai will definitely gain from any chaos they made in Xizang. And there are evidence such as weapons that we captured from the exile terrorists provided by CIA and the Indians in the 70s.

 

[Ganga]

I just hope there is no Pakistani general stupid enough to use tactical nukes against our armored formations.If used the results will be disastrous.

 

[oct605032048]

Accordiong to my logic? Definitely not, unless you are claiming that there are terrorist trainign camps in Dharamshala and gunmen from Dharamshala have been walking around shooting civilians in your cities. Unless that is the case, I'm not sure how the comparison is valid.

Of course there are training camps. It just we need to send some agents or maybe drones to find out.

By the way, didn't G.W. Bush found any WMD in Iraq? Probably we can at least try the same way.

 

[ares]

Obviously they aren't going to do such favours for an enemy nation now would they?

They help China with our militants because we are friendly with them.

If India solves the Kashmir dispute, then India-Pakistan relations might become more friendly. And then you could negotiate for a similar extradition agreement to the one we have.

Have you ever wondered..why most the worlds terrorists end up in Pakistan?

It seems you, have some problems .
Americans and other NATO countries have some
Hell even Iran and Afghanistan ..also not happy.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Now you are getting there. Earlier you said we should ask nicely, thats what we should do. And you said that in a very patronising tone. When I pointed out that that hasn't worked, you are saying it is "obvious" that they wont do it for an enemy nation. Then why did you bring up the asking nicely part?

I thought you would have got my point by now.

The point is to improve relations with Pakistan to the point where you can get an extradition treaty with them, like we have.

Surely it is not healthy living on the "most dangerous border in the world" (according to The Economist), and the world's most dangerous nuclear flashpoint.

 

[janon]

Of course there are training camps. It just we need to send some agents or maybe drones to find out.

By the way, didn't G.W. Bush found any WMD in Iraq? Probably we can at least try the same way.

Complete off topic trolling, with nothing useful to contribute to the discussion. Save it for a china related thread. Try to read the article on the first page and understand what the discussion is about. If you want to keep suggesting invading dharamshala and bring in iraq and nicaragua, do it in MS word. Don't derail the thread.

 

[oct605032048]

Have you ever wondered..why most the worlds terrorists end up in Pakistan?

It seems you, have some problems .
Americans and other NATO countries have some
Hell even Iran and Afghanistan ..also not happy.

You should ask where the terrorists starts from? Israle, mideast. And why? Israle occupied the land that belong to the Arabs.

 

[ares]

Why would the Pakistani government behind the Mumbai attack? How could the Pakistani government benefit from the Mumbai attack?

But the god da*m Dalai will definitely gain from any chaos they made in Xizang. And there are evidence such as weapons that we captured from the exile terrorists provided by CIA and the Indians in the 70s.

Then why did not you provide that "evidence" to United Nation for all the world to see and get Dalai Lama declare a terrorist?
I am sure ..we would not harbor a UN declared terrorist.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Then why did not you provide that "evidence" to United Nation for all the world to see and get Dalai Lama declare a terrorist?
I am sure ..we would not harbor a UN declared terrorist.

How about LTTE?

 

[janon]

General request to everyone: Stick to the topic at hand.

 

[ares]

You should ask where the terrorists starts from? Israle, mideast. And why? Israle occupied the land that belong to the Arabs.

So you could not come up with a reply..hence you thought to divert the topic towards Israel!!
What do I care about Israel or Palestine!..Terrorist from Israel have never harmed my country or yours ..terrorist from Pakistan have.