What's new

Nuclear Ready F16 a handful for Any Foe

India will catch up pretty soon as Uncle Sam has authorized it to do so by allowing it to use un-safeguarded fissile material in warheads. Rest of the civilian fissile material? Well, Amreeka has opened the doors of Walmart to India! :D

Talk about double standards. Doesn't matter, as far as India is concerned 120 nukes are as good as 500! :cheesy:

Interesting one!!!!! Wonder How long it will take for this ultimate catch up :D
 
.
Anything over 10 or 20 nuclear weapons is gross overkill for both India and Pakistan.
 
.
This thread is hillarious .

You talk about nuclear war heads like potatoes .100 or 200 or 300.

One thermo nuclear warhead is equal to ten times a atom bomb.

Just one warhead or two will bring a country to collapse.

Even use of a small tactile nuke will lead to the other side responding with a thermo nuclear blast.

Once you cross the nuclear threshold one kt or 109kt you better get ready for back lash and Armageddon.

Thats why up until now India has cited no first use.

Nobody can blame India for starting armegeddon

But they well finish it with angni five
 
Last edited:
.
So much talk on how many Nukes one has! In this century no one got balls to use one, not even Uncle sam.

I am happy that India is in the position to flex its muscles by other means and in other domains as well.

Mera pass bangla hai, gadi hai, bank balance hai, tumhare pass kya hai.....(Silence)....Mere pass Bomb haii...
 
.
One has to remind , fan boys not think of Any misadventure into Pakistani Airspace , a subtle but a stern reminder
that Pakistan is a Nuclear power state with an answer for Sea based misadventure and also land based threats
 
. . .
It looks as though the Pakistani Army is hell-bent on destroying not only Pakistan but the entire Northern hemisphere too! They seem to really love going back to the old stone age. :fie: In any case, they have nothing much to lose in a nuclear war! :P

Yup nothing to loose if you put it that way ... hence, that will include india as well so we will all go back to the stone age if we don't come towards peace .
 
.
Being an Indian, it is eye opening to read these postings. I am amazed that the main goal of existence of Pakistan is to nuke India! Where all these hatred coming from?? Islam! If it is about Kashmir, Pakistan will never get an inch of Kashmir with or without Nuclear war.
 
.
It looks as though the Pakistani Army is hell-bent on destroying not only Pakistan but the entire Northern hemisphere too! They seem to really love going back to the old stone age. :fie:

How did you come to that conclusion? They are only reacting from the threat that exists on our Eastern Borders.

In any case, they have nothing much to lose in a nuclear war! :P

Only their lives, families, children, parents, homes and other things that have sentimental value for them.

Idiot

On Topic

Pakistan does not intend to use F16's for nuke delivery. Missiles are far more cheaper, faster and can strike with a lot of precision.
 
.
how much destruction is enough when going nuclear?

I mean suppose India is hit by pakistan nukes in reply how much nukes India will send on Pakistan?
 
.
how much destruction is enough when going nuclear?

I mean suppose India is hit by pakistan nukes in reply how much nukes India will send on Pakistan?

This is the rather usual flawed argument made by most Indians. Pakistan is the play of a total of twenty well placed nukes; and Pakistan will be finished. Which is why if it was for only Pakistan India needs only 30 warheads. However, India requires a lot more nukes and Pakistan HAS a lot more nukes and the means to ensure that 80% of them hit their targets. Targets which include every Indian city with a population over 100000, Almost all military targets.. Certain Dams(to destroy the Indian ecology)..and still keep a few in reserve hidden in the middle of some desert which India cannot get to.

See, a nuclear war IS the end for Pakistan(and most Pakistanis.. of which the ones in cities are totally done for.. say a 100 to a 120 million dead in the first week).. but what awaits India is a MUCH worse nightmare of 400 million instantly dead.. with others joining in as the radiation spreads.. and infects wildlife.. fauna.. flora.. all over. And the nukes will not stop after the first wave.. others will keep coming.. say one every other day as the tens of warheads kept in reserve get launched on and off.
So for all the glee of many Indians.... India will not "win" a nuclear war.. it will much more than Pakistan.. the India that will survive will not be worth or possible to live in anymore.
 
.
This is the rather usual flawed argument made by most Indians. Pakistan is the play of a total of twenty well placed nukes; and Pakistan will be finished. Which is why if it was for only Pakistan India needs only 30 warheads. However, India requires a lot more nukes and Pakistan HAS a lot more nukes and the means to ensure that 80% of them hit their targets. Targets which include every Indian city with a population over 100000, Almost all military targets.. Certain Dams(to destroy the Indian ecology)..and still keep a few in reserve hidden in the middle of some desert which India cannot get to.

See, a nuclear war IS the end for Pakistan(and most Pakistanis.. of which the ones in cities are totally done for.. say a 100 to a 120 million dead in the first week).. but what awaits India is a MUCH worse nightmare of 400 million instantly dead.. with others joining in as the radiation spreads.. and infects wildlife.. fauna.. flora.. all over. And the nukes will not stop after the first wave.. others will keep coming.. say one every other day as the tens of warheads kept in reserve get launched on and off.
So for all the glee of many Indians.... India will not "win" a nuclear war.. it will much more than Pakistan.. the India that will survive will not be worth or possible to live in anymore.

so 30 nukes are enough?

but I have read that 150kt-350kt(likely warheads used in Indo-pak war) nuke warhead exploded at optimum altitude will only take an area of about 5 kms at max(read at wiki not able to post link), so 30 nukes for pakistan will be enough?
and why will India risk wont take out all pakistan at once why will India leave likely storage areas from where nukes will be launched? Why use just 30 when India is already hit why don't spend all your storage cant understand this point.

I think Indian strategic experts should reply by sending nukes area wise like for populated area send say for 10000 sq kms in Punjab send 50 nukes and for not dense areas in Sindh for same area send 5 may be.
 
Last edited:
.
so 30 nukes are enough?

but I have read that 150kt-350kt(likely warheads used in Indo-pak war) nuke warhead exploded at optimum altitude will only take an area of about 5 kms at max(read at wiki not able to post link), so 30 nukes for pakistan will be enough?
and why will India risk wont take out all pakistan at once why will India leave likely storage areas from where nukes will be launched? Why use just 30 when India is already hit why don't spend all your storage cant understand this point.

Because the 30 or so nukes will enough to render any sustainable Pakistan leadership irrelevant.
There is a storage area in the form of a camouflaged truck that moves between every 200km gridline onto various launch and concealments spots.. how will that be taken out?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom