What's new

Nuclear Artillery

Yara, first of all people on this forum don't even understand the detonation physics of mini-nukes.... there is a way for enemy armored columns to escape with minimal damage....... I don't want to get into it, however, the math exists, and PA and IA are well versed in it.

The scenarios we speak of are most dire of circumstances.

Makes sense.
 
. . . .
Actually, no one would go that far. They will be used as surgical tactical weapons. Tactics are being evolved as we speak. Btw, it is a beautiful weapon, got some sugary details.... :D

@Hyperion Some folks intend to use enough warheads to stop 3-4 strike corps? Please tell our friend how much area that would cover. You would have ruined all of Punjab and Cholistan.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
He is right. They are very very very safe. Think of it like this. A modern warhead is inside a Suzuki Mehran, and two sixteen wheelers crush it from the opposite sides, there will be no detonation. Trust me.

That's what they say which is a theory that no one has had the guts to try out physically :D

Of course without a trigger the reaction doesn't happen.
 
.
@Hyperion Some folks intend to use enough warheads to stop 3-4 strike corps? Please tell our friend how much area that would cover. You would have ruined all of Punjab and Cholistan.

Don't know about warheads but they should have intended on using your avatat, that would do a pretty good job of getting people to run away :rofl: :P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Actually, no one would go that far. They will be used as surgical tactical weapons. Tactics are being evolved as we speak. Btw, it is a beautiful weapon, got some sugary details.... :D

Someone had better tell the babus to purchase a theater ABM. Make things more difficult. Given its range and nature (surgical) it will require more than the average INS and all- terminal guidance (SAR sensor?)?

Don't know about warheads but they should have intended on using your avatat, that would do a pretty good job of getting people to run away :rofl: :P

Darling that's Butt, don't insult him! :angry:
 
.
well take it as a warning that if your invade us we will bomb you with nasr and if your willing to escalate the conflict by ordering a nuclear attack on pakistan then you will get a much worse response, we have twice the nukes you have and we will bomb india over twice and still have bombs left over.

If India attacked with nuclear weapons and Pakistan still had huge quantities of nuclear weapons surviving, then India certainly deserves to be bombed twice over or whatever(though you fail to see the corelation between geographical size & no. of weapons, we'll let that pass...) In a real situation, any massive Indian attack will severely degrade Pakistani capacities. That is why tactical nukes against India is a stupid proposition. Giving India an excuse to attack massively would be imbecelic. Relying on Indian goodwill after you attack with tactical nukes is even more stupid.

well I'm just saying india won't respond to an attack on their forces with nasr as long as its in our territory so there will be nothing to digest.

:lol: You have no control of the situation once you have shown your card. You cannot assume anything even if you do so from the relative safety of another country.
 
.
@Hyperion Some folks intend to use enough warheads to stop 3-4 strike corps? Please tell our friend how much area that would cover. You would have ruined all of Punjab and Cholistan.

not all of indian forces and like i said that is a last resort. but if indian forces come inside pakistan then the army will be the last of their worries, well see india indian army hasn't experienced pakistani insurgency yet lol, something that didn't exist in 65 or 71.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
About the last part...............ahem ahem................... about the first part, yes, however, yara implementation of a theater ABM is a pain in the arse. The point of Nasr was to avoid a cold start, objectives achieved, I would say.

Someone had better tell the babus to purchase a theater ABM. Make things more difficult. Given its range and nature (surgical) it will require more than the average INS and all- terminal guidance (SAR sensor?)?



Darling that's Butt, don't insult him! :angry:
 
.
Someone had better tell the babus to purchase a theater ABM. Make things more difficult. Given its range and nature (surgical) it will require more than the average INS and all- terminal guidance (SAR sensor?)?



Darling that's Butt, don't insult him! :angry:

Never insulted.....t'was a compliment :D :D lol
 
.
If India attacked with nuclear weapons and Pakistan still had huge quantities of nuclear weapons surviving, then India certainly deserves to be bombed twice over or whatever(though you fail to see the corelation between geographical size & no. of weapons, we'll let that pass...) In a real situation, any massive Indian attack will severely degrade Pakistani capacities. That is why tactical nukes against India is a stupid proposition. Giving India an excuse to attack massively would be imbecelic. Relying on Indian goodwill after you attack with tactical nukes is even more stupid.



:lol: You have no control of the situation once you have shown your card. You cannot assume anything even if you do so from the relative safety of another country.

so what do you think will happen if india orders an attack? soon as indian missiles go in the air so will pakistan missiles.
 
.
Never insulted.....t'was a compliment :D :D lol

That's just the still image, catch the gif on Naswar to see Butt's shenanigans.
@Hyperion True, You will need some form of terminal guidance and IR might not work- dunno might too. You or Oscar would know better about that. But a x-band monopulse SAR sensor would make sense. Depends though, all the infantry regiments in strike formations have been converted to rapids- IF they hit Lahore quick enough then it will become difficult.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom