Now study show Britain drained $10 trillion from India during the years 1765 to 1938
- Thread starter Gadkari
- Start date
RPK
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,862
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
They did LOL
On the other side of India the East India Company had since 1611 been based at Masulipatam on the Coromandel coast of India. By 1626 it had extended its activities further south and established a settlement at Armagon taking advantage of the cheapness of cloth there. However the new site had disadvantages and the Company accepted an invitation from the ruler of the district around Madraspatam to establish a factory there in 1640. The factory was called Fort St George and rapidly grew in importance as a centre for the Company’s trading activity in the east, replacing Bantam in 1682 as the headquarters of the eastern trade.
http://www.ampltd.co.uk/collections_az/EIC-Factory-3/description.aspx
A factory was eventually established at Surat in 1612 when the Portuguese fleet was defeated by the English.
Madras was the second corporation after london in the world
LOL Indeed.
Your OWN link says that the British first arrived in Surat in 1608, so they clearly had a base there then. Their first factor was established in Surat in 1612.
https://www.mintageworld.com/history/detail/13-British-Colony---East-India-Company/
The British East India Company was established in 1600 CE under the name ‘The Company of Merchants of London Trading into the East Indies’. The Company first established its foothold in Masulipatnam in India in 1611 CE. In 1612 CE, they secured the rights to establish a factory in Surat. These rights were granted to them by the Mughal Emperor, Jehangir. A second factory was established at Madras after having secured the rights from the Vijayanagara ruler.
So In effect, Andhra Pradesh was where they settled FIRST, THEN Gujarat and THEN Madras.
Also are you saying that cities in India did not have municipal corporation to take care of its affarids Before the british came ? ??
RPK
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,862
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
On the other side of India the East India Company had since 1611 been based at Masulipatam on the Coromandel coast of India.
It is Madras back then no Andhra Pradesh
RPK
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,862
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
LOL Indeed.
Your OWN link says that the British first arrived in Surat in 1608, so they clearly had a base there then. Their first factor was established in Surat in 1612.
https://www.mintageworld.com/history/detail/13-British-Colony---East-India-Company/
The British East India Company was established in 1600 CE under the name ‘The Company of Merchants of London Trading into the East Indies’. The Company first established its foothold in Masulipatnam in India in 1611 CE. In 1612 CE, they secured the rights to establish a factory in Surat. These rights were granted to them by the Mughal Emperor, Jehangir. A second factory was established at Madras after having secured the rights from the Vijayanagara ruler.
So In effect, Andhra Pradesh was where they settled FIRST, THEN Gujarat and THEN Madras.
Also are you saying that cities in India did not have municipal corporation to take care of its affarids Before the british came ? ??
See your link LOL
. The Company first established its foothold in Masulipatnam in India in 1611 CE. In 1612 CE, they secured the rights to establish a factory in Surat. These rights were granted to them by the Mughal Emperor, Jehangir. A second factory was established at Madras after having secured the rights from the Vijayanagara ruler.
RPK
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,862
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Masulipatnam comes under Greater Madras. You teaching me history of madras aka Chennai LOL
Also are you saying that cities in India did not have municipal corporation to take care of its affarids Before the british came ? ??
https://www.thehindu.com/news/citie...t-corporation-in-the-world/article5180124.ece
Can you even read you freaking Idiot ?
A second factory was established at Madras after having secured the rights from the Vijayanagara ruler.
So yeah, it was Vijaynagar empire and not "Greater Madras"
I will never bother teaching an idiot like you. That would be a waste of time.
LOL... what does it say ? THat Cities in India did not have municipal corporations to run them ? ? ?
RPK
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,862
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
LOL... what does it say ? THat Cities in India did not have municipal corporations to run them ? ? ?
Back then there no city as established like Madras. Thats want happen when you study pirated history
RPK
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,862
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
The first proposals for railways in India were made in Madras in 1832.[6] The first train in India ran from Red Hills to Chintadripet bridge in 1837
St Thomas was last buried in Chennai
SMS Emden bombed chennai during world war-1 only place in India
1. This was a cargo train used to carry rocks into chennai.
2. St. Thomas rotting body is buried in Jacobin Convent in Toulouse, France.
His head is in rome,
He never came anywhere close to India.
3. What is so special about someone bombing chennai ? Chennai has been bombed every time there was war for the last 2000 years.
This is like a nun claiming to be special because she was raped by Bishop Franko.
RPK
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 6,862
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Yeah ..... posting lies on WIki will not create multiple st. thomas. Anybody can modify wiki based on any radome book which can claim fantastic things.
Even the syrian christians came to India in the footsteps of the Jews who landed here first. Not st. thomas.
So unless st. thomas knew how to fly, he is buried in france and his head is in rome. Boldly marked st. thomas body and head.
Similar threads
