Norway: Terrorism in Oslo and Utoeya by suspected far-right Christian
- Thread starter madooxno9
- Start date
Cloakedvessel
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2010
- Messages
- 800
- Reaction score
- 0
Some more posts of him, extracted from: Utopia Talk - Politics - A 32 year old Norwegian
2009-12-04 20:08:02
Hans,
Well, the essence is that Muslim boys learn æreskodekser, pride in their own religion, culture and cultural conservative values ​​at home while Norwegian men have been feminized and teacher excessive tolerance. This makes them totally unprepared for what awaits them ... The curriculum at the school now consists also largely of the demonization of our ancestors (evil imperialists, big farmers who raped maids, bloodthirsty Crusaders who invaded the peaceful Muslims) as it gives a victim the role of Muslims. The result is that Norwegian girls aged 12-18 are particularly vulnerable and often oppressed. They lack pride, æreskodekser and a correct understanding of Islam.
There have now been a mass exodus of non-Muslims from Oslo East in 20 years, even if the media refuses to cover this trend. The reason is simple. People do not want to be oppressed, they do not want to live like other citizens rangs (dhimmitude). Parents observe but can not do much. There are of course very dependent on the situation. If it is 50% Muslims in school or only 2%. It is often easiest to move in instead of letting your child carry the "integration issue" on their shoulders.
In many ways intensified the polarization between Muslim and non-Muslim youth among the younger generations. There are ten times as many Muslim gangs as non-Muslim. Abuse and harassment is perceived as clear racism and frustration is high because the media ignores this racism in total. 100 racial / Jihadi murder of Norwegians in the last 15 years are totally ignored as a single murder of a Norwegian racist resulting in a torchlight procession in which 50 000 participants and establishing a Memorial Fund.
Many young people are apathetic as a result, others are very racist.
I got the impression that the younger generations in Oslo not quite manage to see the political context here. They see the racist attack but do not fully understand that this is Jihad (political / cultural attacks). They repay why they perceive as racism with racism.
My hope is that they will see the cultural / political context, but one should not ignore the fact that the new generations of young people going in the direction of ethnocentrism.
Young people need solutions, and currently there are no anti-racist youth culture conservative options. Some people choose the options that exist, that it is ethnocentric.
I dare not even think of how many Norwegian children who have been suicide because of these experiences (assault, robbery, rape, psychological terror committed by Muslim youths). There are probably several hundred in the last 15 years.
Well, this is certainly part of the reason that the Progress Party was larger than the AP at the last school elections ...
The special thing here is that if we had removed the Muslim vote at the last school elections in Oslo, the Progress Party ended up about 30-40% support.
2009-12-04 17:01:55
Non-Muslim youth in Oslo aged 12-18 are in a particularly vulnerable situation in terms of harassment of Muslim youth. I myself am born and raised here and chose out of necessity to the friendships / alliances with A and B team to move freely. The alternative is that you stick to your neighborhood or west side. I know of hundreds of incidents where non-Muslims were robbed, beaten and harassed by Muslim gangs. Top My friend aged 12-17 was Pakistan that I was one of the protected sphere "potatoes" who had protection. But I saw hypocrisy at close range and was disgusted. Muslim gangs have / could devastate free (racism / Jihad behavior), while all attempts "potatoes" do / did to make the same thread are systematically stamped on racism and deconstructed by the local police.
No wonder the Progress Party won the school election. It grows up to a new generation dhimmifisert youth who actually know what Islam and dhimmitude is in contrast to the white politicians and journalists who choose to move to Oslo in 20-30 years of age.
I'm glad I've always lived in Oslo West. For it must be hell on the Oslo East: o
Arild,
There's a bunch of no-go zones in most American cities. The LA's most famous - Compton, Crenshaw, Watts, Inglewood, etc. but it can not be directly compared with the situation in Europe while the Afro-Americans are Christians, etc.
2009-12-04 04:10:42
Yellow - here is the definition of an "Islamic no-go zone"
There are more than 30 Islamic no-go zones in Norway and those in other Western European countries, proportional to the Muslim concentrations in various cities. There are probably many more than 751 in France. Guaranteed more than 1000, and it is growing every day!
Here is the definition:
An Islamic no-go zone:
1. There, drunk, scantily clad non-Muslim girls / women can travel without the imminent threat of rape, violence, robbery, harassment.
2. Where non-Muslim young people can travel without imminent danger of harassment, robbery, violence by Muslim gangs and / or individuals.
3. Where non-Muslim people to express individuality in all the free forms (including religious, sexual, cultural) without the imminent threat of physical / psychological harassment or robbery from Muslims.
Parts of Holmlia, Furuset and many other areas of the Oslo East / Oslo is obvious Islamic no-go zones.
Why do you think non-Muslims move from these areas? Why do you think the Muslim enklavisering continue? The existing 30 Islamic no-go zonene in Norway is increasing every day.
Large parts of Serbia is today a no-go zone for non-Muslim Serbs (Kosovo), to name an extreme. Muslims now require passports from the Christians! An Islamic no-go zone is being developed from the first Muslim family moves into an area where non-Muslims must live in a varying degree of dhimmitude. No one accepts this, so they move away from these Islamic no-go zones. This in turn makes it even harder for the remaining dhimmis to live normally. The results is that the Muslim no-go zonene / enclaves are growing dramatically every day!
Non-Muslims want to live in freedom, not under dhimmitude.
Any area where the non-Muslim citizens or those who travel are experiencing varying degrees of dhimmitude (restriction of their freedom, violence, harassment because they are Muslims and follow the sharia, go with the hijab, etc) is by definition an Islamic no-go zone .
Yellow, I'm impressed regardless of your knowledge related to the rhetorical deconstruction and your rhetorical skills in general. We have much to learn from kulturmarxister in this area.
2009-12-03 12:29:47
Donald,
The number is 270-300 million (not billion). Approximately 80 to 150 were Hindus who were killed in the east-Jihad campaigns (Hindu Kush) before and after the conquest of Sindh, which lasted in an organized manner until the British arrived.
Hindus and Buddhists were shown no mercy whatsoever in the first centuries, in contrast to the book.
Today's "space folk / Gypsies" are descendants of the Hindu slaves who were brought over the Hindu Kush. Tens of thousands of these gypsies fled when the Caliphate lost in 1683, in Vienna (they brought about 100,000 slaves in the Vienna-campaign). There were so many of them made it to Europe.
Hindu Kush genocide is the largest in human history. Ironically NOK is the government of India worse when it comes to indulgence than self kulturmarxistene in Western Europe.
To hide the genocide similar Hitler x 45 can not be described as anything but insane.
2009-12-03 01:21:04
Hlund, Fjordman, Hårstad, Rust
I'm NOK much later in the game than him when I have only been politically active for 13 years. I førstegenerasjonsdhimmi (Generation Y). I was active Oslo FrP / FpU in the first 6-7 years (in the cultural conservatives + laissez faire capitalist / liberal camp) and contributed to the Progress Party's success before I stopped. I felt the time was more important to help develop / promote the political doctrines abroad especially British, German, French, American). I ran the business a few years while I studied and earned a few million so I could finance a inntektsløs politically active life. I now use these funds to be able to work full time to further develop / promote the Vienna Academy (Vienna school of thought) that Fjordman, Bat Yeor, Spencer + many others have already contributed so much till. The last three years I worked full time with a cultural conservative works that will help to further develop / promote these political doctrines further.
Anyway, I consider the future consolidation of the cultural conservative forces on all seven fronts as the most important in Norway and in all Western European countries. It is essential that we work to ensure that all these 7 fronts using the Vienna school of thought, or at least parts of the grunlag for 20-70 year-struggle that lies in front of us.
The book is called, by the way 2083 and is in English, 1100 pages).
To sums up the Vienna school of thought:
- Cultural Conservatism (anti-multiculturalism)
- Against Islamization
- Anti-racist
- Anti-authoritarian (resistance to all authoritarian ideologies of hate)
- Pro-Israel/forsvarer of non-Muslim minorities in Muslim countries
- Defender of the cultural aspects of Christianity
- To reveal the Eurabia project and the Frankfurt School (ny-marxisme/kulturmarxisme/multikulturalisme)
- Is not an economic policy and can collect everything from socialists to capitalists
Frankfurt School (kulturmarxisme) is a very ambitious unofficial ideology (and quite unknown to most) and they have succeeded in most areas (except to smash capitalism, European Christianity and European identity, traditions, culture). Vienna school is more a defense against this where we often use the Marxist 'own creations against them (sexual liberation, feminism, liberalism, anti-racism, anti-autoriære arguments).
Vienna school of thought is far from a complete ideology but consists of principles and ideas that are constantly under development. It is unofficial and does not necessarily ever to be recognized.
2009-12-02 19:57:10
I think that people often forget the very definition of the word "conspiracy". What is it?
To conspire is to work in common (among peers) to another group / the other group's interests (conspiracy) or to implement a particular goal / agenda.
All groups with a political agenda conspire directly or indirectly. Whether they will admit this or not is irrelevant. Document, like all other political led entities (such as class struggle, N (A) RK, cnn, daily newspaper. The clue is that everyone working toward a specific political goal conspire (us included, we are cultural conservatives (> 10%), the other is kulturmarxister (> 10%), Muslim (supports kulturmarxistene by default) (> 5%) kapitalistglobalister (> 1%), and so we have the gray mass in the middle (consisting of many humanists, and others who either sympathize with Marxists or the conservative. This is the group (80%) that we all try to "win the favor of."
A large proportion of multiculturalism seats are not Marxists but rather either naive humanists (KrF, V, Cr, half said, half-Right) or gobalist capitalists (half right).
Many of these "true humanists" being manipulated by "false humanists" (Marxists) that so often hides his true agenda by playing on humanism.
This is obvious to me, but still theories. I know that many want to implement a Marxist agenda (they have a Marxist background) but we can not prove it 100%, ergo there will be theories.
People can of course do not prove this unless all from a political group had admitted it (and they are not going to do). It does not mean that the truth about people's political motives are obvious.
Individual's background tells all about their intentions). Eg. It is a known fact that Barroso was a member of the Portuguese Communist Party in the past. But it is harder to roll up and prove that he and hundreds of other central European elites want to implement the Marxist doctrines through the EU. This is where the martyr-ideologues rails. They come with the charges, presents theories, do battle plan, other more moderate helping themselves from this and look at what this theoretical material that can be used at the present time, as appropriate, etc.
To get back to the point. The word "conspiracy theory" is often associated with something very negative. But it is in fact very often the central truths that still lack evidence, only assertions that have not yet been proven. In time the truth will come out for ALL
In the meantime, we share with the mainstream what is "appropriate" at this time
A little theory is appropriate if it is in line with people's perceptions
And of course it's important to consistently (slowly) stretching the elastic to help ensure that these perceptions are moving towards the truth.
Hårstad,
I'm generally quite reluctant to move, and theorize too much ang U.S. due to the conditions which are different from those in Europe. They are dominated by Christian immigration, which is not the case here. We are indigenous to Europe, some Americans are not in the U.S., etc. This does not mean that the development does not unfold the way you describe (though it currently lacks evidence NOK), but I do not think it's necessarily appropriate to put too much emphasis on the U.S. geopolit. at this time. I actually believe the U.S. their fate (and the fate of multiculturalism / kulturmarxisme) will be settled in France in 20-70 years. The indications suggest it.
It is actually essential that people like yourself and Fjordman continues to develop theories of their (our). These are about to lay the foundation for our "Vienna School". What moderate cultural conservatives believe this work should worry less about. They will come after a few years and shout "hallelujah" when "NOK" evidence supporting these claims
2009-12-02 00:56:39
Hårstad / Fjordman,
Do not take it personally but rather as a compliment. You will have to read between the lines sometimes (we have actually gone so far that we have learned some of the Marxists - war is deceit, etc. ..). The truth is there. But do not believe that truth can only benefit us, it can actually harm us if we do not use it properly. The truth is so ugly that it has the potential to scare many moderates cultural conservatives back into apathy. Yes, you (we are right), but we have not such a bad self-image that we have to gloat with it all the time?
To put it another way. It is critical that individuals / ideologues who Fjordman / Hårstad presents the unpackaged truth to other moderate but experienced cultural conservatives. These moderate cultural conservatives will then make their own judgments and take the necessary precautions. If you believe that the broad strata (individuals who do not have the same intellectual conservative culture knowledge like us) are ready for the full packaged truth will take you wrong. I, with several years of study of this truth is still sick and poor to think about it. What do you think an a-political people had been? He had most likely been shocked and moved to Svalbard or continue to lie to themselves.
Dokument.no has the potential to become an even more influential media company if they play their cards right. When the goal is to reach the broad masses must Dokument.no thus moderating them. The purpose of the media companies / NGOs is to convey as much of sanheten that is "appropriate", the goal is after all the important, not the means. Thus, there is also in the cards that they can and want to acknowledge doctrines of very specific individuals ONLY if it is appropriate.
I see such ideologues as a martyr-ideologues (I might be in this category, even with similar theories, even though I was not familiar with Fjord Man's works until 2008). They provide the basic ideological lines to more moderate individuals, the ugly truth beauty, foundation, other more moderate build on this. It will often be expedient to distance himself from these martyr-ideologues for tactical reasons (especially if your goal is to reach out to the large masses). How is the game whether we like it or not. Individuals have different functions. Do not be offended because of that, but take it rather as a compliment
Do you think kulturmarxister will ever be so stupid that they admit that they want to implement Marx's doctrines? The fact that they use humanism to advance a Marxist utopia? No, they distance themselves from Marx for strategic reasons. They are not born yesterday and it is not we.
We were honest once, but Marx and Muhammad has forced us to become more like them, unfortunately.
They had their "Frankfurt School". We are going to develop our own "Vienna School" of necessity.
Embrace it! DE has made the rules, we just follow them.
2009-12-01 12:02:38
Eddy,
Controllers - dominate, not necessarily very big difference. The common denominator in all historical cases, dhimmitude + demographic warfare. Are non-Muslims on Furuset, Holmlia today dhimmis? Yes, of course they do. Why do you think they systematically choose to move?
Why do you think Furuset, Holmlia and other areas in Oslo soon be emptied of non-Muslims? Enklaviseringen in Oslo East continues slowly but surely every day.
For those words must have it with a teaspoon (this may be fine with a small demographic history reminder now and then):
Kosovo demographical development [1]:
1900 40% Islam
1913 50%
1925 60%
1948 72%
1971 79%
1981 85%
2008 93%
Source:
1. Carl Savich Column on Serbianna.com | Front Page # 6
Lebanon demographical development - (Christian / Muslim pop) [1]:
1911 to 21% Islam
1921 to 45%
1932 to 49%
1943 to 48%
1970 to 58% (Civil War 1975-1990 started When Islam reached 60%)
1990 to 65% (Christians lost the war)
2008 to 75%
Source:
1. Tomass Mark, Game Theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln, June 1997.
Bethlehem
Source 1
1948 85% Christian [1]
2006 12% Christian [1]
Source 2
1948 to 60% Christian [2]
1983 to 20% Christian [2]
Source:
1. http://littlegreenfootbal(...)_from_Bethlehem&only
2. http://www.danielpipes.or(...)s-in-the-middle-east
3. http://www.danielpipes.or(...)s-in-the-middle-east
Anatolia (Turkey)
1300 to 99% Christian
1450 to 90% (3 years before the fall of Constantinople)
1600 to 55%
1850 to 35% (Genocide / forceful conversions intensifies)
1900 to 20%
1920 to 15%
1945 to 6% (Focus shift two persecution of Muslim Kurds)
1980 to 3%
2009 to 1%
1. http://home.att.net/ ~ dimostenis / greektr.html
2. See all sources from Historic Balkans and Anatolia demo graphics
Syria [1]
1920 to 33% Christian
2007 to 10% (Would ask for less than 5% if it Were not for the Christian immigration from Iraq).
1. File:Mandate of Syria.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2. Syria - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pakistan (Hindu / Muslim Population) [1]
1941 to 25% Hindus
1948 to 17%
1991 to 1.5%
2007 to 1%
Bangladesh (Hindu / Muslim Population) [1]
1941 to 30% Hindus
1948 to 25%
1971 to 15%
1991 to 10%
2007 to 8%
2008 - Numbers and Percentage of Muslims in many European cities (legal / illegal Including city suburbs) [1] [2] [3]:
Marseilles 38%
Malmo 35%
Brussels 35%
Amsterdam 30%
Stockholm 20%
London 20%
Paris 20%
Oslo 20%
Moscow 16-20%
Berlin 18%
The Hague 17%
Copenhagen 17%
Utrecht 15%
Rotterdam 15%
Antwerp 15%
Hamburg 15%
Sources:
1. Global Politician - Europe Shall Bleed, Once Again
2. Muslim Demographics « Tiny Frog
3. Indymedia.be Notes That Brussels is 25.5% Muslim
What then is the common denominator in all these historical cases?
Islam + dhimmitude + demographic warfare (Jihad)
2009-11-30 19:29:02
This is only the beginning of a protracted campaign of psychological warfare against the Swiss people. The worst of all, it works very effectively, as we saw in Austria a few years ago. The Swiss people will succumb to demonization, as Østerikerne and Serbs before them.
The fact that kulturmarxistene controls the Euro / U.S. MSM, 95% of NGOs and 80% of the political parties is perhaps the main reason that we must expect to struggle with multiculturalism (kulturmarxisme) and the Islamization of at least 20-70 years.
Until this happens, the Hårstad points out further polarization between kulturmarxistene (elites) and the cultural conservatives (the people). Muslims make today 20-25% of the Oslo and similar areas in other European capitals. 50-60% is the magic enklaviseringsgrensen and there are several cities that gradually approaches this. Marseilles is the worst example in Western Europe at the moment with 38% Muslims. The city will have a Muslim majority within 20 years. It is thus conceivable that the battle for Islam's future in Europe will unfold in just France within 20 years. Perhaps the consequence that France breaks out of the nåværeden U.S. / Euro dominated multiculturalism wonderful world order and seeking a new political alliance with Russia and some other mini-nations (hopefully followed by several European nations).
20 years earlier, my bet (70 years maximum). So change will come, guaranteed, we just have to smear us with a little patience.
2009-11-30 02:32:30
The attack was most likely carried out by Muslims of Ingushetia, Dagestan and Chechnya.
There are now several key Jihadists who are wanted.
No "bomb" in other words ..., p
http://www.dagbladet.no/2(...)r/togulykke/9247105/
I do not understand why cnn mention the extreme right and the National Socialists? I have never ever heard of a right extreme or NS terrorist attacks of importance on European soil. This sounds like kulturmarxistisk wishful thinking.
2009-12-04 20:08:02
Hans,
Well, the essence is that Muslim boys learn æreskodekser, pride in their own religion, culture and cultural conservative values ​​at home while Norwegian men have been feminized and teacher excessive tolerance. This makes them totally unprepared for what awaits them ... The curriculum at the school now consists also largely of the demonization of our ancestors (evil imperialists, big farmers who raped maids, bloodthirsty Crusaders who invaded the peaceful Muslims) as it gives a victim the role of Muslims. The result is that Norwegian girls aged 12-18 are particularly vulnerable and often oppressed. They lack pride, æreskodekser and a correct understanding of Islam.
There have now been a mass exodus of non-Muslims from Oslo East in 20 years, even if the media refuses to cover this trend. The reason is simple. People do not want to be oppressed, they do not want to live like other citizens rangs (dhimmitude). Parents observe but can not do much. There are of course very dependent on the situation. If it is 50% Muslims in school or only 2%. It is often easiest to move in instead of letting your child carry the "integration issue" on their shoulders.
In many ways intensified the polarization between Muslim and non-Muslim youth among the younger generations. There are ten times as many Muslim gangs as non-Muslim. Abuse and harassment is perceived as clear racism and frustration is high because the media ignores this racism in total. 100 racial / Jihadi murder of Norwegians in the last 15 years are totally ignored as a single murder of a Norwegian racist resulting in a torchlight procession in which 50 000 participants and establishing a Memorial Fund.
Many young people are apathetic as a result, others are very racist.
I got the impression that the younger generations in Oslo not quite manage to see the political context here. They see the racist attack but do not fully understand that this is Jihad (political / cultural attacks). They repay why they perceive as racism with racism.
My hope is that they will see the cultural / political context, but one should not ignore the fact that the new generations of young people going in the direction of ethnocentrism.
Young people need solutions, and currently there are no anti-racist youth culture conservative options. Some people choose the options that exist, that it is ethnocentric.
I dare not even think of how many Norwegian children who have been suicide because of these experiences (assault, robbery, rape, psychological terror committed by Muslim youths). There are probably several hundred in the last 15 years.
Well, this is certainly part of the reason that the Progress Party was larger than the AP at the last school elections ...
The special thing here is that if we had removed the Muslim vote at the last school elections in Oslo, the Progress Party ended up about 30-40% support.
2009-12-04 17:01:55
Non-Muslim youth in Oslo aged 12-18 are in a particularly vulnerable situation in terms of harassment of Muslim youth. I myself am born and raised here and chose out of necessity to the friendships / alliances with A and B team to move freely. The alternative is that you stick to your neighborhood or west side. I know of hundreds of incidents where non-Muslims were robbed, beaten and harassed by Muslim gangs. Top My friend aged 12-17 was Pakistan that I was one of the protected sphere "potatoes" who had protection. But I saw hypocrisy at close range and was disgusted. Muslim gangs have / could devastate free (racism / Jihad behavior), while all attempts "potatoes" do / did to make the same thread are systematically stamped on racism and deconstructed by the local police.
No wonder the Progress Party won the school election. It grows up to a new generation dhimmifisert youth who actually know what Islam and dhimmitude is in contrast to the white politicians and journalists who choose to move to Oslo in 20-30 years of age.
I'm glad I've always lived in Oslo West. For it must be hell on the Oslo East: o
Arild,
There's a bunch of no-go zones in most American cities. The LA's most famous - Compton, Crenshaw, Watts, Inglewood, etc. but it can not be directly compared with the situation in Europe while the Afro-Americans are Christians, etc.
2009-12-04 04:10:42
Yellow - here is the definition of an "Islamic no-go zone"
There are more than 30 Islamic no-go zones in Norway and those in other Western European countries, proportional to the Muslim concentrations in various cities. There are probably many more than 751 in France. Guaranteed more than 1000, and it is growing every day!
Here is the definition:
An Islamic no-go zone:
1. There, drunk, scantily clad non-Muslim girls / women can travel without the imminent threat of rape, violence, robbery, harassment.
2. Where non-Muslim young people can travel without imminent danger of harassment, robbery, violence by Muslim gangs and / or individuals.
3. Where non-Muslim people to express individuality in all the free forms (including religious, sexual, cultural) without the imminent threat of physical / psychological harassment or robbery from Muslims.
Parts of Holmlia, Furuset and many other areas of the Oslo East / Oslo is obvious Islamic no-go zones.
Why do you think non-Muslims move from these areas? Why do you think the Muslim enklavisering continue? The existing 30 Islamic no-go zonene in Norway is increasing every day.
Large parts of Serbia is today a no-go zone for non-Muslim Serbs (Kosovo), to name an extreme. Muslims now require passports from the Christians! An Islamic no-go zone is being developed from the first Muslim family moves into an area where non-Muslims must live in a varying degree of dhimmitude. No one accepts this, so they move away from these Islamic no-go zones. This in turn makes it even harder for the remaining dhimmis to live normally. The results is that the Muslim no-go zonene / enclaves are growing dramatically every day!
Non-Muslims want to live in freedom, not under dhimmitude.
Any area where the non-Muslim citizens or those who travel are experiencing varying degrees of dhimmitude (restriction of their freedom, violence, harassment because they are Muslims and follow the sharia, go with the hijab, etc) is by definition an Islamic no-go zone .
Yellow, I'm impressed regardless of your knowledge related to the rhetorical deconstruction and your rhetorical skills in general. We have much to learn from kulturmarxister in this area.
2009-12-03 12:29:47
Donald,
The number is 270-300 million (not billion). Approximately 80 to 150 were Hindus who were killed in the east-Jihad campaigns (Hindu Kush) before and after the conquest of Sindh, which lasted in an organized manner until the British arrived.
Hindus and Buddhists were shown no mercy whatsoever in the first centuries, in contrast to the book.
Today's "space folk / Gypsies" are descendants of the Hindu slaves who were brought over the Hindu Kush. Tens of thousands of these gypsies fled when the Caliphate lost in 1683, in Vienna (they brought about 100,000 slaves in the Vienna-campaign). There were so many of them made it to Europe.
Hindu Kush genocide is the largest in human history. Ironically NOK is the government of India worse when it comes to indulgence than self kulturmarxistene in Western Europe.
To hide the genocide similar Hitler x 45 can not be described as anything but insane.
2009-12-03 01:21:04
Hlund, Fjordman, Hårstad, Rust
I'm NOK much later in the game than him when I have only been politically active for 13 years. I førstegenerasjonsdhimmi (Generation Y). I was active Oslo FrP / FpU in the first 6-7 years (in the cultural conservatives + laissez faire capitalist / liberal camp) and contributed to the Progress Party's success before I stopped. I felt the time was more important to help develop / promote the political doctrines abroad especially British, German, French, American). I ran the business a few years while I studied and earned a few million so I could finance a inntektsløs politically active life. I now use these funds to be able to work full time to further develop / promote the Vienna Academy (Vienna school of thought) that Fjordman, Bat Yeor, Spencer + many others have already contributed so much till. The last three years I worked full time with a cultural conservative works that will help to further develop / promote these political doctrines further.
Anyway, I consider the future consolidation of the cultural conservative forces on all seven fronts as the most important in Norway and in all Western European countries. It is essential that we work to ensure that all these 7 fronts using the Vienna school of thought, or at least parts of the grunlag for 20-70 year-struggle that lies in front of us.
The book is called, by the way 2083 and is in English, 1100 pages).
To sums up the Vienna school of thought:
- Cultural Conservatism (anti-multiculturalism)
- Against Islamization
- Anti-racist
- Anti-authoritarian (resistance to all authoritarian ideologies of hate)
- Pro-Israel/forsvarer of non-Muslim minorities in Muslim countries
- Defender of the cultural aspects of Christianity
- To reveal the Eurabia project and the Frankfurt School (ny-marxisme/kulturmarxisme/multikulturalisme)
- Is not an economic policy and can collect everything from socialists to capitalists
Frankfurt School (kulturmarxisme) is a very ambitious unofficial ideology (and quite unknown to most) and they have succeeded in most areas (except to smash capitalism, European Christianity and European identity, traditions, culture). Vienna school is more a defense against this where we often use the Marxist 'own creations against them (sexual liberation, feminism, liberalism, anti-racism, anti-autoriære arguments).
Vienna school of thought is far from a complete ideology but consists of principles and ideas that are constantly under development. It is unofficial and does not necessarily ever to be recognized.
2009-12-02 19:57:10
I think that people often forget the very definition of the word "conspiracy". What is it?
To conspire is to work in common (among peers) to another group / the other group's interests (conspiracy) or to implement a particular goal / agenda.
All groups with a political agenda conspire directly or indirectly. Whether they will admit this or not is irrelevant. Document, like all other political led entities (such as class struggle, N (A) RK, cnn, daily newspaper. The clue is that everyone working toward a specific political goal conspire (us included, we are cultural conservatives (> 10%), the other is kulturmarxister (> 10%), Muslim (supports kulturmarxistene by default) (> 5%) kapitalistglobalister (> 1%), and so we have the gray mass in the middle (consisting of many humanists, and others who either sympathize with Marxists or the conservative. This is the group (80%) that we all try to "win the favor of."
A large proportion of multiculturalism seats are not Marxists but rather either naive humanists (KrF, V, Cr, half said, half-Right) or gobalist capitalists (half right).
Many of these "true humanists" being manipulated by "false humanists" (Marxists) that so often hides his true agenda by playing on humanism.
This is obvious to me, but still theories. I know that many want to implement a Marxist agenda (they have a Marxist background) but we can not prove it 100%, ergo there will be theories.
People can of course do not prove this unless all from a political group had admitted it (and they are not going to do). It does not mean that the truth about people's political motives are obvious.
Individual's background tells all about their intentions). Eg. It is a known fact that Barroso was a member of the Portuguese Communist Party in the past. But it is harder to roll up and prove that he and hundreds of other central European elites want to implement the Marxist doctrines through the EU. This is where the martyr-ideologues rails. They come with the charges, presents theories, do battle plan, other more moderate helping themselves from this and look at what this theoretical material that can be used at the present time, as appropriate, etc.
To get back to the point. The word "conspiracy theory" is often associated with something very negative. But it is in fact very often the central truths that still lack evidence, only assertions that have not yet been proven. In time the truth will come out for ALL
In the meantime, we share with the mainstream what is "appropriate" at this time
A little theory is appropriate if it is in line with people's perceptions
And of course it's important to consistently (slowly) stretching the elastic to help ensure that these perceptions are moving towards the truth. Hårstad,
I'm generally quite reluctant to move, and theorize too much ang U.S. due to the conditions which are different from those in Europe. They are dominated by Christian immigration, which is not the case here. We are indigenous to Europe, some Americans are not in the U.S., etc. This does not mean that the development does not unfold the way you describe (though it currently lacks evidence NOK), but I do not think it's necessarily appropriate to put too much emphasis on the U.S. geopolit. at this time. I actually believe the U.S. their fate (and the fate of multiculturalism / kulturmarxisme) will be settled in France in 20-70 years. The indications suggest it.
It is actually essential that people like yourself and Fjordman continues to develop theories of their (our). These are about to lay the foundation for our "Vienna School". What moderate cultural conservatives believe this work should worry less about. They will come after a few years and shout "hallelujah" when "NOK" evidence supporting these claims
2009-12-02 00:56:39
Hårstad / Fjordman,
Do not take it personally but rather as a compliment. You will have to read between the lines sometimes (we have actually gone so far that we have learned some of the Marxists - war is deceit, etc. ..). The truth is there. But do not believe that truth can only benefit us, it can actually harm us if we do not use it properly. The truth is so ugly that it has the potential to scare many moderates cultural conservatives back into apathy. Yes, you (we are right), but we have not such a bad self-image that we have to gloat with it all the time?
To put it another way. It is critical that individuals / ideologues who Fjordman / Hårstad presents the unpackaged truth to other moderate but experienced cultural conservatives. These moderate cultural conservatives will then make their own judgments and take the necessary precautions. If you believe that the broad strata (individuals who do not have the same intellectual conservative culture knowledge like us) are ready for the full packaged truth will take you wrong. I, with several years of study of this truth is still sick and poor to think about it. What do you think an a-political people had been? He had most likely been shocked and moved to Svalbard or continue to lie to themselves.
Dokument.no has the potential to become an even more influential media company if they play their cards right. When the goal is to reach the broad masses must Dokument.no thus moderating them. The purpose of the media companies / NGOs is to convey as much of sanheten that is "appropriate", the goal is after all the important, not the means. Thus, there is also in the cards that they can and want to acknowledge doctrines of very specific individuals ONLY if it is appropriate.
I see such ideologues as a martyr-ideologues (I might be in this category, even with similar theories, even though I was not familiar with Fjord Man's works until 2008). They provide the basic ideological lines to more moderate individuals, the ugly truth beauty, foundation, other more moderate build on this. It will often be expedient to distance himself from these martyr-ideologues for tactical reasons (especially if your goal is to reach out to the large masses). How is the game whether we like it or not. Individuals have different functions. Do not be offended because of that, but take it rather as a compliment
Do you think kulturmarxister will ever be so stupid that they admit that they want to implement Marx's doctrines? The fact that they use humanism to advance a Marxist utopia? No, they distance themselves from Marx for strategic reasons. They are not born yesterday and it is not we.
We were honest once, but Marx and Muhammad has forced us to become more like them, unfortunately.
They had their "Frankfurt School". We are going to develop our own "Vienna School" of necessity.
Embrace it! DE has made the rules, we just follow them.
2009-12-01 12:02:38
Eddy,
Controllers - dominate, not necessarily very big difference. The common denominator in all historical cases, dhimmitude + demographic warfare. Are non-Muslims on Furuset, Holmlia today dhimmis? Yes, of course they do. Why do you think they systematically choose to move?
Why do you think Furuset, Holmlia and other areas in Oslo soon be emptied of non-Muslims? Enklaviseringen in Oslo East continues slowly but surely every day.
For those words must have it with a teaspoon (this may be fine with a small demographic history reminder now and then):
Kosovo demographical development [1]:
1900 40% Islam
1913 50%
1925 60%
1948 72%
1971 79%
1981 85%
2008 93%
Source:
1. Carl Savich Column on Serbianna.com | Front Page # 6
Lebanon demographical development - (Christian / Muslim pop) [1]:
1911 to 21% Islam
1921 to 45%
1932 to 49%
1943 to 48%
1970 to 58% (Civil War 1975-1990 started When Islam reached 60%)
1990 to 65% (Christians lost the war)
2008 to 75%
Source:
1. Tomass Mark, Game Theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln, June 1997.
Bethlehem
Source 1
1948 85% Christian [1]
2006 12% Christian [1]
Source 2
1948 to 60% Christian [2]
1983 to 20% Christian [2]
Source:
1. http://littlegreenfootbal(...)_from_Bethlehem&only
2. http://www.danielpipes.or(...)s-in-the-middle-east
3. http://www.danielpipes.or(...)s-in-the-middle-east
Anatolia (Turkey)
1300 to 99% Christian
1450 to 90% (3 years before the fall of Constantinople)
1600 to 55%
1850 to 35% (Genocide / forceful conversions intensifies)
1900 to 20%
1920 to 15%
1945 to 6% (Focus shift two persecution of Muslim Kurds)
1980 to 3%
2009 to 1%
1. http://home.att.net/ ~ dimostenis / greektr.html
2. See all sources from Historic Balkans and Anatolia demo graphics
Syria [1]
1920 to 33% Christian
2007 to 10% (Would ask for less than 5% if it Were not for the Christian immigration from Iraq).
1. File:Mandate of Syria.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2. Syria - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pakistan (Hindu / Muslim Population) [1]
1941 to 25% Hindus
1948 to 17%
1991 to 1.5%
2007 to 1%
Bangladesh (Hindu / Muslim Population) [1]
1941 to 30% Hindus
1948 to 25%
1971 to 15%
1991 to 10%
2007 to 8%
2008 - Numbers and Percentage of Muslims in many European cities (legal / illegal Including city suburbs) [1] [2] [3]:
Marseilles 38%
Malmo 35%
Brussels 35%
Amsterdam 30%
Stockholm 20%
London 20%
Paris 20%
Oslo 20%
Moscow 16-20%
Berlin 18%
The Hague 17%
Copenhagen 17%
Utrecht 15%
Rotterdam 15%
Antwerp 15%
Hamburg 15%
Sources:
1. Global Politician - Europe Shall Bleed, Once Again
2. Muslim Demographics « Tiny Frog
3. Indymedia.be Notes That Brussels is 25.5% Muslim
What then is the common denominator in all these historical cases?
Islam + dhimmitude + demographic warfare (Jihad)
2009-11-30 19:29:02
This is only the beginning of a protracted campaign of psychological warfare against the Swiss people. The worst of all, it works very effectively, as we saw in Austria a few years ago. The Swiss people will succumb to demonization, as Østerikerne and Serbs before them.
The fact that kulturmarxistene controls the Euro / U.S. MSM, 95% of NGOs and 80% of the political parties is perhaps the main reason that we must expect to struggle with multiculturalism (kulturmarxisme) and the Islamization of at least 20-70 years.
Until this happens, the Hårstad points out further polarization between kulturmarxistene (elites) and the cultural conservatives (the people). Muslims make today 20-25% of the Oslo and similar areas in other European capitals. 50-60% is the magic enklaviseringsgrensen and there are several cities that gradually approaches this. Marseilles is the worst example in Western Europe at the moment with 38% Muslims. The city will have a Muslim majority within 20 years. It is thus conceivable that the battle for Islam's future in Europe will unfold in just France within 20 years. Perhaps the consequence that France breaks out of the nåværeden U.S. / Euro dominated multiculturalism wonderful world order and seeking a new political alliance with Russia and some other mini-nations (hopefully followed by several European nations).
20 years earlier, my bet (70 years maximum). So change will come, guaranteed, we just have to smear us with a little patience.
2009-11-30 02:32:30
The attack was most likely carried out by Muslims of Ingushetia, Dagestan and Chechnya.
There are now several key Jihadists who are wanted.
No "bomb" in other words ..., p
http://www.dagbladet.no/2(...)r/togulykke/9247105/
I do not understand why cnn mention the extreme right and the National Socialists? I have never ever heard of a right extreme or NS terrorist attacks of importance on European soil. This sounds like kulturmarxistisk wishful thinking.
Cloakedvessel
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2010
- Messages
- 800
- Reaction score
- 0
009-11-30 02:13:40
Very well written, Hans
Euro / US kulturmarxistisk MSM is now working on a comprehensive motkampanje consisting of psychological warfare against the Swiss people (as we saw against Østerikerne a few years ago). They will be latterligjort, mocked, and threatened to change his point of view. They will be portrayed as Nazis, racists and fascists (monsters) and they are going to be intimidated into silence. It is possibly a new referendum in a few months where only 40% ish is going to vote for. This is how game works, unfortunately.
We should not underestimate the MSM and their highly efficient power to shape people's opinions.
2009-11-29 22:39:59
Daniel Pipes: Leftism and Islam. Muslims, the warriors Marxists Have Been praying for.
Bekijk deze YouTube-video
The following summarizes the agenda of many kulturmarxister with Islam, it explains also why those on death and life protecting them. It explains so well why we, the cultural conservatives, are against Islamization and the implementation of these agendas.
Yellow,
I have great respect for kulturmarxister that are tough NOK to admit his true intentions. It is very annoying however, that 90% of all kulturmarxister directly lying to the people by hiding / hide their agenda behind the "humanism and human rights".
Are you tough NOK to admit that this is your agenda, Yellow, or claiming you are still you run of "humanism"? It is the sense to discuss if one side refuses to admit his true intentions.
Most of us cultural conservatives are honest NOK to admit that we are working towards Marxism and Marxist principles (which is the main reason we are against the ongoing Islamization when we look at the Ummah as an entity that promotes the Marxist principles, among others). So why can not you be tough NOK to admit that it really your agenda is to work for the implementation of Marxist principles and that you look at Muslims as a natural ally (for practical reasons and not the humanities).
We know by the way all of what happened to the Christians Marxists in Lebanon. Lebanon was once a Christian country (80% in 1911). When the Muslims were in majority in 1970 (an increase of 40% in just 60 years), they declared war. The reason that they were in that situation was due to the Marxist's appeasement policy (they allowed demographic warfare). Marxists thought that they would get an extra special dhimmi status, which of course did not happen. There are now fewer than 25% Christians in Lebanon and even the Christian Marxists living in a difficult situation. Do you really think you will get a special dhimmistatus few decades in Western Europe when all the historical examples show that Christians Marxists being stabbed in the back end again and again?
It is strange why they never learn from historical examples? Kulturmarxister have much in common with Muslims, but at the end of the day the matter considered by the Ummah as gudshatende and gay-loving infidel, which is incompatible with Islam. The result is that they once again will be betrayed by the Ummah.
It is quite ironic that the Ummah has more respect for their opponents, the cultural conservative, than their allies, kulturmarxistene, they only see as "temporary" useful idiots.
They get to enjoy the alliance as long as it lasts
2009-11-29 03:34:23
The document was intended to be "approved" stamp by Lars M and yellow, they immediately become irrelevant. It is reasonably safe
Most people here have nothing against Muslims in general, Muslims do not follow the Quran that is. It is the political doctrine of Islam is the problem.
The problem is that key Islamic concepts such as al-taqiyya and naskh (Quranic abrogation) makes it more or less impossible to distinguish "moderate Muslims" (individuals who do not follow the Quran) from orthodox Muslims.
Who do you first introduced the concept of "War is deceit "?.
Lars M. and Yellow,
What are your reflections on the political concepts of al-taqiyya and naskh?
2009-11-28 18:04:44
The document was intended to be "approved" stamp by Lars M and yellow, they immediately become irrelevant. It is reasonably safe
Most people here have nothing against Muslims in general, Muslims do not follow the Quran that is. It is the political doctrine of Islam is the problem.
The problem is that key Islamic concepts such as al-taqiyya and naskh (Quranic abrogation) makes it more or less impossible to distinguish "moderate Muslims" (individuals who do not follow the Quran) from orthodox Muslims.
Who do you first introduced the concept of "War is deceit "?.
Lars M. and Yellow,
What are your reflections on the political concepts of al-taqiyya and naskh?
2009-11-28 00:00:55
I assumed that the attackers were Muslims immediately south Philippines was mentioned. Everyone knows that the Southern Philippines is one of the world's 40 Jihad Fronts.
It makes little difference whether the victims were Christians or Muslims. Muslims in the continent is known to use very brutal methods.
There are a number of extremely brutal Islamist groupings in southern Philippines - Abu Sayyaf Islamists (Al-Harakat al-Ansar) are one of them. They fund their organizations through kidnappings and avkapping of heads of civilian Christians are part of their methods. Now, of course not kulturmarxistiske Euro / U.S. MSM attempt to find connections between these groups and attacked. Again, we ordinary citizens have to do journalistic work FOR them ...
Again, try European and U.S. MSM to lead his people deceived. I have not yet read a single place in the MSM that the attackers were Muslims.
So what was it that happened? A more conservative Muslim clan that made an example out of a more secular clan for unknown reasons?
Here you can read more about the Abu Sayyaf and other Islamist groupings in Southern Philippines:
Abu Sayyaf - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For almost 30 years Various Muslim groups Have Been Engaged in an insurgency for an independent province in the country.
Abu Sayyaf-al Qaeda group
The group Received funding from Al-Qaeda in the early 1990s through Mohammad Jamal Khalifa, a brother-in-law of Osama bin Laden. [17] [18] Al-Qaeda Collaborator Ramzi Yousef operated in the Philippines in the mid-1990s and Trained Abu Sayyaf soldiers. The 2002 edition of the United State Department's Patterns of Global Terrorism mention links to Al Qaeda.
Abdurajik Abubakar Janjalani's first recruit were soldiers of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). However, the M.I.L.F. and M.N.L.F. HAVING deny links with Abu Sayyaf. Both officially distance restriction elves from Abu Sayyaf Because of its Attacks on Civilians and its supposed profiteering. The Philippine military, however, ha claimed That element of bothering groups Provide support to the Abu Sayyaf.
2009-11-26 20:47:00
Sanobet,
Mini Nations such as Norway has never recognized an independent, sovereign foreign policy.
They, however, has always followed the big three European heavyweights - France, UK, Germany, to the letter. In other words, Norway has always copied these heavyweights and will always do so.
It is like comparing Belarus and Russia. We will always be Belarus and Russia are our three tigers.
UK is no different from Germany and France have all chosen to multiculturalism. The fact that the UK is wary of the EU is not about multikulti but more that the UK will continue to have a special relationship with the U.S. (which is also 100% multikulti).
The only "Western" nations that refused to implement multikulti were Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and partly Finland.
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan have been protected from the EU / US 's witch hunt because they are not Europeans.
If they had been Europeans had been demonized as the Nazis, fascists and racists.
Why Norway is "more European" than the EU has something to do with "Little Man Syndrome". It can be likened to a "convert to Islam," which often is much more fundamentalist than even conservative Arab Muslims because they themselves feel they have much to prove ("Little Man Syndrome").
2009-11-24 07:33:49
The main problem when cultural conservatives and kulturmarxister debate is that the perception of reality are too different.
Many kulturmarxister look at Israel as a "racist" state.
Cultural conservatives disagree when they believe the conflict is based on Islamic imperialism, that Islam is a political ideology and not a race. Cultural conservatives believe Israel has a right to protect themselves against the Jihad.
Kulturmarxistene refuses to recognize the fact that Islam's political doctrine is relevant and essential. They can never admit to or support this because they believe that this is primarily about a race war - that Israel hates Arabs (breed).
As long as you can not agree on the fundamental perceptions of reality are too naive to expect that one to come to any conclusion.
Before one at all can begin to discuss this conflict must first agree on the fundamental truths of Islam's political doctrine.
Most people here have great insight in key Muslim concepts that al-taqiiya (political deceit), naskh (Quranic abrogation) and Jihad. The problem is that kulturmarxister refuses to recognize these concepts.
They can not recognize these key Muslim concepts. For if they do so erodes the primary argument that Israel is a "racist state" and that this is a race war (Israelis vs. Arabs) and not defense against Jihad (Kafr vs. Ummah).
The fact that there are 40 different Jihad Fronts (wars) throughout the world chooses to ignore. For those do not exist Jihad. For them, this 40 ethnic fronts (40 race wars) that does not have anything to do with Islam.
The Marxist theory is very poorly conceived. F example, the so-called Bosnian Swedes are ethnic Serbs. The only thing that separates the two groups is Islam. The examples are many.
2009-11-22 23:43:08
Do not know quite where to take it up but our own Fjordman is about to be cut to 3 position among the most recognized / influential European intellectuals anti-Jihad/anti-multikulti/anti-Marxist / bloggers.
Very well written, Hans
Euro / US kulturmarxistisk MSM is now working on a comprehensive motkampanje consisting of psychological warfare against the Swiss people (as we saw against Østerikerne a few years ago). They will be latterligjort, mocked, and threatened to change his point of view. They will be portrayed as Nazis, racists and fascists (monsters) and they are going to be intimidated into silence. It is possibly a new referendum in a few months where only 40% ish is going to vote for. This is how game works, unfortunately.
We should not underestimate the MSM and their highly efficient power to shape people's opinions.
2009-11-29 22:39:59
Daniel Pipes: Leftism and Islam. Muslims, the warriors Marxists Have Been praying for.
Bekijk deze YouTube-video
The following summarizes the agenda of many kulturmarxister with Islam, it explains also why those on death and life protecting them. It explains so well why we, the cultural conservatives, are against Islamization and the implementation of these agendas.
Yellow,
I have great respect for kulturmarxister that are tough NOK to admit his true intentions. It is very annoying however, that 90% of all kulturmarxister directly lying to the people by hiding / hide their agenda behind the "humanism and human rights".
Are you tough NOK to admit that this is your agenda, Yellow, or claiming you are still you run of "humanism"? It is the sense to discuss if one side refuses to admit his true intentions.
Most of us cultural conservatives are honest NOK to admit that we are working towards Marxism and Marxist principles (which is the main reason we are against the ongoing Islamization when we look at the Ummah as an entity that promotes the Marxist principles, among others). So why can not you be tough NOK to admit that it really your agenda is to work for the implementation of Marxist principles and that you look at Muslims as a natural ally (for practical reasons and not the humanities).
We know by the way all of what happened to the Christians Marxists in Lebanon. Lebanon was once a Christian country (80% in 1911). When the Muslims were in majority in 1970 (an increase of 40% in just 60 years), they declared war. The reason that they were in that situation was due to the Marxist's appeasement policy (they allowed demographic warfare). Marxists thought that they would get an extra special dhimmi status, which of course did not happen. There are now fewer than 25% Christians in Lebanon and even the Christian Marxists living in a difficult situation. Do you really think you will get a special dhimmistatus few decades in Western Europe when all the historical examples show that Christians Marxists being stabbed in the back end again and again?
It is strange why they never learn from historical examples? Kulturmarxister have much in common with Muslims, but at the end of the day the matter considered by the Ummah as gudshatende and gay-loving infidel, which is incompatible with Islam. The result is that they once again will be betrayed by the Ummah.
It is quite ironic that the Ummah has more respect for their opponents, the cultural conservative, than their allies, kulturmarxistene, they only see as "temporary" useful idiots.
They get to enjoy the alliance as long as it lasts
2009-11-29 03:34:23
The document was intended to be "approved" stamp by Lars M and yellow, they immediately become irrelevant. It is reasonably safe
Most people here have nothing against Muslims in general, Muslims do not follow the Quran that is. It is the political doctrine of Islam is the problem.
The problem is that key Islamic concepts such as al-taqiyya and naskh (Quranic abrogation) makes it more or less impossible to distinguish "moderate Muslims" (individuals who do not follow the Quran) from orthodox Muslims.
Who do you first introduced the concept of "War is deceit "?
. Lars M. and Yellow,
What are your reflections on the political concepts of al-taqiyya and naskh?
2009-11-28 18:04:44
The document was intended to be "approved" stamp by Lars M and yellow, they immediately become irrelevant. It is reasonably safe
Most people here have nothing against Muslims in general, Muslims do not follow the Quran that is. It is the political doctrine of Islam is the problem.
The problem is that key Islamic concepts such as al-taqiyya and naskh (Quranic abrogation) makes it more or less impossible to distinguish "moderate Muslims" (individuals who do not follow the Quran) from orthodox Muslims.
Who do you first introduced the concept of "War is deceit "?
. Lars M. and Yellow,
What are your reflections on the political concepts of al-taqiyya and naskh?
2009-11-28 00:00:55
I assumed that the attackers were Muslims immediately south Philippines was mentioned. Everyone knows that the Southern Philippines is one of the world's 40 Jihad Fronts.
It makes little difference whether the victims were Christians or Muslims. Muslims in the continent is known to use very brutal methods.
There are a number of extremely brutal Islamist groupings in southern Philippines - Abu Sayyaf Islamists (Al-Harakat al-Ansar) are one of them. They fund their organizations through kidnappings and avkapping of heads of civilian Christians are part of their methods. Now, of course not kulturmarxistiske Euro / U.S. MSM attempt to find connections between these groups and attacked. Again, we ordinary citizens have to do journalistic work FOR them ...
Again, try European and U.S. MSM to lead his people deceived. I have not yet read a single place in the MSM that the attackers were Muslims.
So what was it that happened? A more conservative Muslim clan that made an example out of a more secular clan for unknown reasons?
Here you can read more about the Abu Sayyaf and other Islamist groupings in Southern Philippines:
Abu Sayyaf - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For almost 30 years Various Muslim groups Have Been Engaged in an insurgency for an independent province in the country.
Abu Sayyaf-al Qaeda group
The group Received funding from Al-Qaeda in the early 1990s through Mohammad Jamal Khalifa, a brother-in-law of Osama bin Laden. [17] [18] Al-Qaeda Collaborator Ramzi Yousef operated in the Philippines in the mid-1990s and Trained Abu Sayyaf soldiers. The 2002 edition of the United State Department's Patterns of Global Terrorism mention links to Al Qaeda.
Abdurajik Abubakar Janjalani's first recruit were soldiers of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). However, the M.I.L.F. and M.N.L.F. HAVING deny links with Abu Sayyaf. Both officially distance restriction elves from Abu Sayyaf Because of its Attacks on Civilians and its supposed profiteering. The Philippine military, however, ha claimed That element of bothering groups Provide support to the Abu Sayyaf.
2009-11-26 20:47:00
Sanobet,
Mini Nations such as Norway has never recognized an independent, sovereign foreign policy.
They, however, has always followed the big three European heavyweights - France, UK, Germany, to the letter. In other words, Norway has always copied these heavyweights and will always do so.
It is like comparing Belarus and Russia. We will always be Belarus and Russia are our three tigers.
UK is no different from Germany and France have all chosen to multiculturalism. The fact that the UK is wary of the EU is not about multikulti but more that the UK will continue to have a special relationship with the U.S. (which is also 100% multikulti).
The only "Western" nations that refused to implement multikulti were Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and partly Finland.
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan have been protected from the EU / US 's witch hunt because they are not Europeans.
If they had been Europeans had been demonized as the Nazis, fascists and racists.
Why Norway is "more European" than the EU has something to do with "Little Man Syndrome". It can be likened to a "convert to Islam," which often is much more fundamentalist than even conservative Arab Muslims because they themselves feel they have much to prove ("Little Man Syndrome").
2009-11-24 07:33:49
The main problem when cultural conservatives and kulturmarxister debate is that the perception of reality are too different.
Many kulturmarxister look at Israel as a "racist" state.
Cultural conservatives disagree when they believe the conflict is based on Islamic imperialism, that Islam is a political ideology and not a race. Cultural conservatives believe Israel has a right to protect themselves against the Jihad.
Kulturmarxistene refuses to recognize the fact that Islam's political doctrine is relevant and essential. They can never admit to or support this because they believe that this is primarily about a race war - that Israel hates Arabs (breed).
As long as you can not agree on the fundamental perceptions of reality are too naive to expect that one to come to any conclusion.
Before one at all can begin to discuss this conflict must first agree on the fundamental truths of Islam's political doctrine.
Most people here have great insight in key Muslim concepts that al-taqiiya (political deceit), naskh (Quranic abrogation) and Jihad. The problem is that kulturmarxister refuses to recognize these concepts.
They can not recognize these key Muslim concepts. For if they do so erodes the primary argument that Israel is a "racist state" and that this is a race war (Israelis vs. Arabs) and not defense against Jihad (Kafr vs. Ummah).
The fact that there are 40 different Jihad Fronts (wars) throughout the world chooses to ignore. For those do not exist Jihad. For them, this 40 ethnic fronts (40 race wars) that does not have anything to do with Islam.
The Marxist theory is very poorly conceived. F example, the so-called Bosnian Swedes are ethnic Serbs. The only thing that separates the two groups is Islam. The examples are many.
2009-11-22 23:43:08
Do not know quite where to take it up but our own Fjordman is about to be cut to 3 position among the most recognized / influential European intellectuals anti-Jihad/anti-multikulti/anti-Marxist / bloggers.
Cloakedvessel
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2010
- Messages
- 800
- Reaction score
- 0
After Gates of Vienna (No. 1) and New English Review (2). Ovverraskende NOK Fjordman is actually possible to turn himself Brussels Journal!
In other words. Those who have not yet read Fjord Man's book, "Defeating Eurabia" has not been followed by an hour. I know it's hard to be prophet in his own country but this is beyond all expectations. Congratulations Fjordman
See the list here: The Infidel Blogger Awards
2009-11-17 22:04:20
New Muslim riots in Marseilles
Check the youtube video
2009-11-06 17:24:40
January Hårstad.
You have of course absolutely right. What I was referring to were individuals Yellow (leader of the Humanist Association), which only attacks Christianity while ignoring the spread of Islam.
It is tragicomic that an important NGO that NHA has been the coup of a cultural Marxist, then it should be led by a liberal anti-Jihadist-type Bruce Bawer.
The next 20 years, we must work hard to regain control of at least five major NGOs. The fact that the Progress Party has been living clean makes this task easier.
It is wonderful to reflect that multiculturalism is a self-destructive ideology. The European cultural conservative movement is small at the moment but we are growing every day. And within 70 years, it's time for regime changes in Europe. At this point, the multi-cultural neo colonial regimes either imploded or become very Stalinist.
Before that, we must focus on the following:
1. Creating a cultural conservative newspaper with national distribution
2. Regaining control of several NGOs
3. Develop and consolidate the cultural conservative intellectual movement
4. Build an "EDL" type of youth
2009-11-05 06:57:21
Lars Gule, "This is simply unacceptable in a modern and democratic state, based on religious freedom and other human rights."
The problem is that many kulturmarxister actually cares very little about religious freedom and human rights. They are kulturmarxister driven by contempt and hatred for the cultural conservatives, for European cultures, etc. Many are hiding behind the false allegations of human rights and religious freedom as it serves as the perfect obfuscation of their true motives.
Where have they been for the past 20 years with regard to criticism of Islam? Why have they been totally absent in this area? They have however, spent much of your time to attack Christian ...
It is very difficult to deal with individuals who deliberately use deception to advance their agenda. Kulturmarxistene has for 40 years hiding behind the humanistic principles as their real agenda was to crush the European tradition, culture, identity and sovereignty of nations. All in the name of human rights ...
You can not have a dialogue if one side deliberately lying, again and again.
2009-11-04 17:07:25
National Socialism has always been an extreme left ideology then why are they trying constantly to strategically place it on the right side?
If you hate capitalism and the free market, such as Marxists, Nazis and Islamists do, attained the left side, period.
2009-11-02 01:05:02
Hate propaganda against Italy and Denmark is incredibly hypocritical. Norway's own violent "Marxist / Islamist Jugend" (Red Youth, SOS Racism, Blitz, in partnership with Jihad youth) that have harmed and terrorized hundreds of cultural conservatives in recent years in Oslo is not mentioned with one word ... It may be fine as long as multiculturalism seat control the violent mob?
It is unacceptable that the Labour Party, Socialist Party, Left, SP, CDP financing these violent extremists.
Funny to see every single European cultural Marxist "foam around the mouth" of hatred against Denmark and Italy. The only Western European countries that have a hint of wise leadership.
It is our duty to make sure to support the only anti-racist cultural conservative organization that has the guts NOK to walk the streets of Oslo - SIOE. FpU is another anti-racist cultural conservative organization. Unfortunately they have not the guts to demonstrate to other than tolls and high gas prices, etc.
However, it is understandable. No one dares because they know they are being harassed and attacked. But people are getting tired of this insecurity. The result is organizations such as the EDL and other forms of vigilante.
2009-10-31 09:43:58
The problem is fairly under-analyzed.
If we are working to "temporary secular" Islam in Europe by supporting individuals Kokkvold, it will be the same as shooting ourselves. The only thing that will be secular, the "visual aspect" of Islam while the destructive aspects - the demographic warfare will continue in silence. This war is accepted as long as the "visual" is a factor.
Moderate multiculturalists who Kokkvold may thus prove to be even more destructive for Europe than the more extreme multiculturalists.
2009-10-31 08:39:09
What most people still do not understand is that the ongoing Islamization (secondary process) of Europe can not be stopped before taking a settlement with the political doctrines that allow this (and the individuals who fronts these doctrines). There must be more focus on multicultural doctrines (multiculturalism = kulturmarxisme) as it is this ideology that allows the political mechanisms that result in continued Islamization (Islamic demographic warfare). People must learn what multiculturalism wonderful doctrines do with Europe:
Systematic breakdown:
- European Christianity
- European tradition
- European Cultures
- European (a national) identity
- Sovereigns
Of course, it is known that kulturmarxistene and humanities in Europe think they are going to reform Islam but they will fail like all before them have done. We, for our part, the cultural conservatives and anti-Marxist liberal, must focus on the basic problem - multiculturalism (kulturmarxisme) and how to combat this hatideologien. Multiculturalism can only be stopped through the continued consolidation of the cultural conservatives and accountability of individuals as fronts ideology. We need to focus more on defending the "Feedback" option, and our doctrines. A further consolidation of the cultural conservatives are the solution. We need to awaken people and help more contribute through political activism (against specific targets).
Four important tasks we have to work with the next twenty years are the following:
1. Have in place a cultural conservative newspaper with national distribution (which will be the only newspaper that will support the Progress Party in 4 years). For believe me, the Progress Party is going to be sabotaged and torpedoed by every choice (a voter base of 35% are "scared" down to 20%).
2. Develop an alternative to the violent extremes Norwegian Marxist organizations Blitz / SOS Racism / Red Youth. This can for example be done by supporting the development of SIOE. Conservatives dare not currently flagging their views on the street when they know that extreme Marxists clubs them down. We can not accept that Labour subsidize these violent "Stoltenberg Art" that systematically terrorize political conservatives.
3. Working to gain control of 10-15 NGOs (kulturmarxistene controls currently 10-15 while we only have 2-3).
4. Initiate a partnership with the conservative forces within the Norwegian Church. I know that the liberal forces within the European anti-Jihad movement (Bruce Bawer, among other things, and some other liberals) will have a problem with this but the conservative forces within the church is actually one of our best allies. Our main opponents must not be Jihadists Jihadists but facilitators - namely multiculturalism seats.
A nightmare scenario as I see it is if multiculturalism seats do a "Ataturk" in Western Europe. The result in this case is a long and painful death for Europe's part, as in Lebanon. Tykriaeksempelet prove that a Muslim population can restrain himself (no requirements) under an authoritarian regime, to demand Sharia 100 years (or longer) in the future as soon as it opens up a possibility. This combined ability for continued Islamic demographic warfare is going to end in disaster.
It should be noted that the majority of the Christians in Lebanon were kulturmarxister who fronted multiculturalism wonderful doctrines from 1911 (there were too few who fronted nationalism and separatism of Muslims). As we all know that ended in tragedy:
Lebanon demographical development - (Christian / Muslim pop) [1]:
1911 to 21% Islam (79% Christian)
1921 to 45%
1932 to 49%
1943 to 48%
1970 to 58% (Civil War 1975-1990 started When Islam reached 60%)
1990 to 65% (Christians lost the war)
2008 to 75%
Worst of all is that there are more such examples that can be documented. Western Europe is a Lebanon in effect ...
So please. Focus on the real evil - multiculturalism and not the result of evil. If there is a water leak then you have to focus on stopping the leak first, do not sweep up the water.
Source:
1. Tomass Mark, Game Theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln, June 1997.
2009-10-25 18:40:34
Good post by the way, Fjordman.
2009-10-25 15:24:16
Yep. This case should not be underestimated! It helps to prove the following:
Labour wants mass immigration two engineer multi-cultural UK, says Blair and Straw forms adviser.
Labour threw open Britain's borders two mass immigration two full socially engineer a "truly multi-cultural" country, a form Government adviser ha Revealed.
The shapes Labour adviser said the Government opened up the UK borders Mostly two humiliate Right-wing opponents of immigration.
This proves therefore that some of the motivation for mass immigration is not based on humanism (cloak) but more due.
Anders B
Hilde
Anders B
Great that you found sources for the survey
This process (Marxist-infiltration in European universities) began in 1945 after the Communists won the war.
Europe's biggest mistake was that they allowed Marxists to operate freely after the war. 45-50 generation of Marxists was learning champions to 68-generation that today manages everything.
Infiltration of Marxists in European universities (1945-1968) described in great detail here:
http://www.freecongress.org/centers/cc/index.aspx
2009-09-08 15:46:51
Xebeche
You argue very good for your eyesight. I have no doubt that you have good intentions. In all cases, we fundamentally disagree when it comes to goals. I wish it was possible to discuss it freely.
"When you said what you want, you must say what you want instead. If not, nothing happens."
The problem is that the assumptions for the discussion is not present in Norway and Western Europe. We, the cultural conservatives, is already being branded as fascists / racists / Nazis of the political and media establishment because we dare to criticize multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) which is totally unacceptable. It is as bad as the persecution of the Jews for 30 years or under the Inquisition. No / very few thus wishes to share the solution-oriented ideas / concepts in an open forum at this stage as this can help to stigmatize people further in the future.
Fjordman,
I have worked full time in more than three years of a solution-oriented work (lecture notes written in English). I have taken a view to contributing in areas that are on the side of what has been the main focus. Much of the info I'm sitting on is unknown to most, even for you.
If you send me an email at year2083@gmail.com I will send an electronic version when I'm finished.
Norway has for me been absolutely no interest until now. The main focus should be on an intellectual platform consolidation of European cultural conservative organizations / individuals. This alliance should have as its main focus is to de-legitimizing multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) of the "European ideology of hate" it actually is. Its purpose (or indirect result) is known to completely destroy western civilization, nation-states, Western culture / norms / traditions, Christianity - European / Norwegian identity.
If this rough work is completed there is the basis for a Marxist superstate (EUSSR) without the necessary cultural conservative / nationalist components that could be stopped from Islam to dominate this new entity.2
In other words. Those who have not yet read Fjord Man's book, "Defeating Eurabia" has not been followed by an hour. I know it's hard to be prophet in his own country but this is beyond all expectations. Congratulations Fjordman
See the list here: The Infidel Blogger Awards
2009-11-17 22:04:20
New Muslim riots in Marseilles
Check the youtube video
2009-11-06 17:24:40
January Hårstad.
You have of course absolutely right. What I was referring to were individuals Yellow (leader of the Humanist Association), which only attacks Christianity while ignoring the spread of Islam.
It is tragicomic that an important NGO that NHA has been the coup of a cultural Marxist, then it should be led by a liberal anti-Jihadist-type Bruce Bawer.
The next 20 years, we must work hard to regain control of at least five major NGOs. The fact that the Progress Party has been living clean makes this task easier.
It is wonderful to reflect that multiculturalism is a self-destructive ideology. The European cultural conservative movement is small at the moment but we are growing every day. And within 70 years, it's time for regime changes in Europe. At this point, the multi-cultural neo colonial regimes either imploded or become very Stalinist.
Before that, we must focus on the following:
1. Creating a cultural conservative newspaper with national distribution
2. Regaining control of several NGOs
3. Develop and consolidate the cultural conservative intellectual movement
4. Build an "EDL" type of youth
2009-11-05 06:57:21
Lars Gule, "This is simply unacceptable in a modern and democratic state, based on religious freedom and other human rights."
The problem is that many kulturmarxister actually cares very little about religious freedom and human rights. They are kulturmarxister driven by contempt and hatred for the cultural conservatives, for European cultures, etc. Many are hiding behind the false allegations of human rights and religious freedom as it serves as the perfect obfuscation of their true motives.
Where have they been for the past 20 years with regard to criticism of Islam? Why have they been totally absent in this area? They have however, spent much of your time to attack Christian ...
It is very difficult to deal with individuals who deliberately use deception to advance their agenda. Kulturmarxistene has for 40 years hiding behind the humanistic principles as their real agenda was to crush the European tradition, culture, identity and sovereignty of nations. All in the name of human rights ...
You can not have a dialogue if one side deliberately lying, again and again.
2009-11-04 17:07:25
National Socialism has always been an extreme left ideology then why are they trying constantly to strategically place it on the right side?
If you hate capitalism and the free market, such as Marxists, Nazis and Islamists do, attained the left side, period.
2009-11-02 01:05:02
Hate propaganda against Italy and Denmark is incredibly hypocritical. Norway's own violent "Marxist / Islamist Jugend" (Red Youth, SOS Racism, Blitz, in partnership with Jihad youth) that have harmed and terrorized hundreds of cultural conservatives in recent years in Oslo is not mentioned with one word ... It may be fine as long as multiculturalism seat control the violent mob?
It is unacceptable that the Labour Party, Socialist Party, Left, SP, CDP financing these violent extremists.
Funny to see every single European cultural Marxist "foam around the mouth" of hatred against Denmark and Italy. The only Western European countries that have a hint of wise leadership.
It is our duty to make sure to support the only anti-racist cultural conservative organization that has the guts NOK to walk the streets of Oslo - SIOE. FpU is another anti-racist cultural conservative organization. Unfortunately they have not the guts to demonstrate to other than tolls and high gas prices, etc.
However, it is understandable. No one dares because they know they are being harassed and attacked. But people are getting tired of this insecurity. The result is organizations such as the EDL and other forms of vigilante.
2009-10-31 09:43:58
The problem is fairly under-analyzed.
If we are working to "temporary secular" Islam in Europe by supporting individuals Kokkvold, it will be the same as shooting ourselves. The only thing that will be secular, the "visual aspect" of Islam while the destructive aspects - the demographic warfare will continue in silence. This war is accepted as long as the "visual" is a factor.
Moderate multiculturalists who Kokkvold may thus prove to be even more destructive for Europe than the more extreme multiculturalists.
2009-10-31 08:39:09
What most people still do not understand is that the ongoing Islamization (secondary process) of Europe can not be stopped before taking a settlement with the political doctrines that allow this (and the individuals who fronts these doctrines). There must be more focus on multicultural doctrines (multiculturalism = kulturmarxisme) as it is this ideology that allows the political mechanisms that result in continued Islamization (Islamic demographic warfare). People must learn what multiculturalism wonderful doctrines do with Europe:
Systematic breakdown:
- European Christianity
- European tradition
- European Cultures
- European (a national) identity
- Sovereigns
Of course, it is known that kulturmarxistene and humanities in Europe think they are going to reform Islam but they will fail like all before them have done. We, for our part, the cultural conservatives and anti-Marxist liberal, must focus on the basic problem - multiculturalism (kulturmarxisme) and how to combat this hatideologien. Multiculturalism can only be stopped through the continued consolidation of the cultural conservatives and accountability of individuals as fronts ideology. We need to focus more on defending the "Feedback" option, and our doctrines. A further consolidation of the cultural conservatives are the solution. We need to awaken people and help more contribute through political activism (against specific targets).
Four important tasks we have to work with the next twenty years are the following:
1. Have in place a cultural conservative newspaper with national distribution (which will be the only newspaper that will support the Progress Party in 4 years). For believe me, the Progress Party is going to be sabotaged and torpedoed by every choice (a voter base of 35% are "scared" down to 20%).
2. Develop an alternative to the violent extremes Norwegian Marxist organizations Blitz / SOS Racism / Red Youth. This can for example be done by supporting the development of SIOE. Conservatives dare not currently flagging their views on the street when they know that extreme Marxists clubs them down. We can not accept that Labour subsidize these violent "Stoltenberg Art" that systematically terrorize political conservatives.
3. Working to gain control of 10-15 NGOs (kulturmarxistene controls currently 10-15 while we only have 2-3).
4. Initiate a partnership with the conservative forces within the Norwegian Church. I know that the liberal forces within the European anti-Jihad movement (Bruce Bawer, among other things, and some other liberals) will have a problem with this but the conservative forces within the church is actually one of our best allies. Our main opponents must not be Jihadists Jihadists but facilitators - namely multiculturalism seats.
A nightmare scenario as I see it is if multiculturalism seats do a "Ataturk" in Western Europe. The result in this case is a long and painful death for Europe's part, as in Lebanon. Tykriaeksempelet prove that a Muslim population can restrain himself (no requirements) under an authoritarian regime, to demand Sharia 100 years (or longer) in the future as soon as it opens up a possibility. This combined ability for continued Islamic demographic warfare is going to end in disaster.
It should be noted that the majority of the Christians in Lebanon were kulturmarxister who fronted multiculturalism wonderful doctrines from 1911 (there were too few who fronted nationalism and separatism of Muslims). As we all know that ended in tragedy:
Lebanon demographical development - (Christian / Muslim pop) [1]:
1911 to 21% Islam (79% Christian)
1921 to 45%
1932 to 49%
1943 to 48%
1970 to 58% (Civil War 1975-1990 started When Islam reached 60%)
1990 to 65% (Christians lost the war)
2008 to 75%
Worst of all is that there are more such examples that can be documented. Western Europe is a Lebanon in effect ...
So please. Focus on the real evil - multiculturalism and not the result of evil. If there is a water leak then you have to focus on stopping the leak first, do not sweep up the water
. Source:
1. Tomass Mark, Game Theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln, June 1997.
2009-10-25 18:40:34
Good post by the way, Fjordman.
2009-10-25 15:24:16
Yep. This case should not be underestimated! It helps to prove the following:
Labour wants mass immigration two engineer multi-cultural UK, says Blair and Straw forms adviser.
Labour threw open Britain's borders two mass immigration two full socially engineer a "truly multi-cultural" country, a form Government adviser ha Revealed.
The shapes Labour adviser said the Government opened up the UK borders Mostly two humiliate Right-wing opponents of immigration.
This proves therefore that some of the motivation for mass immigration is not based on humanism (cloak) but more due.
Anders B
Hilde
Anders B
Great that you found sources for the survey
This process (Marxist-infiltration in European universities) began in 1945 after the Communists won the war.
Europe's biggest mistake was that they allowed Marxists to operate freely after the war. 45-50 generation of Marxists was learning champions to 68-generation that today manages everything.
Infiltration of Marxists in European universities (1945-1968) described in great detail here:
http://www.freecongress.org/centers/cc/index.aspx
2009-09-08 15:46:51
Xebeche
You argue very good for your eyesight. I have no doubt that you have good intentions. In all cases, we fundamentally disagree when it comes to goals. I wish it was possible to discuss it freely.
"When you said what you want, you must say what you want instead. If not, nothing happens."
The problem is that the assumptions for the discussion is not present in Norway and Western Europe. We, the cultural conservatives, is already being branded as fascists / racists / Nazis of the political and media establishment because we dare to criticize multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) which is totally unacceptable. It is as bad as the persecution of the Jews for 30 years or under the Inquisition. No / very few thus wishes to share the solution-oriented ideas / concepts in an open forum at this stage as this can help to stigmatize people further in the future.
Fjordman,
I have worked full time in more than three years of a solution-oriented work (lecture notes written in English). I have taken a view to contributing in areas that are on the side of what has been the main focus. Much of the info I'm sitting on is unknown to most, even for you.
If you send me an email at year2083@gmail.com I will send an electronic version when I'm finished.
Norway has for me been absolutely no interest until now. The main focus should be on an intellectual platform consolidation of European cultural conservative organizations / individuals. This alliance should have as its main focus is to de-legitimizing multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) of the "European ideology of hate" it actually is. Its purpose (or indirect result) is known to completely destroy western civilization, nation-states, Western culture / norms / traditions, Christianity - European / Norwegian identity.
If this rough work is completed there is the basis for a Marxist superstate (EUSSR) without the necessary cultural conservative / nationalist components that could be stopped from Islam to dominate this new entity.2
Cloakedvessel
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2010
- Messages
- 800
- Reaction score
- 0
then why kill non-muslims.
its interesting that the left wing in norway are very much against israeli occupation, and in favour of palestinian rights.
check this translated site.
Google Translate
Unbeliever
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2009
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction score
- 0
What a sick and twisted relativist statement. So you understand when Muslims murder innocent people but not when Christians do it? That is the worst kind of "clan-mentality" that is no better that flat out racism. I especially can not grasp how you can make such a horrifying statement from a country that suffers so much from Islamic extremism.. Maybe I misunderstood you if so please clear it up, but this sounds sick..
Cloakedvessel
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2010
- Messages
- 800
- Reaction score
- 0
You should not underestimate the level of hate or aversion, that extreme right have against the 'left'.
In the eyes of many right-wing extremists in Europe the left parties are the main culprits for facilitating (Muslim) immigration.
So by 'attacking the left', they're trying to eradicate the 'Islamization of society'.
what were his grievances wrt to norway?
lets not weave a mythology, can you back this up?
W.11
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2011
- Messages
- 15,032
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
do you care our country men are suffering, they are suffering because of drone attacks, and not muslim extremists by america operate those drones
and yes, my comments make every bit of sense, the libians are being bombed daily for what??, afghanis are dying in afghanistan for what??, and daily the bombs are being pounded on pakistan for what???, iraq yemen palestine, kashmir etc
when hitler started the world war, germans tried to kill hitler, because he was causing too much human life for his own ambitions, i think common germans understand the value of life better than you and now the norwagians and europeans understand the meaning of blood shed today
Cloakedvessel
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2010
- Messages
- 800
- Reaction score
- 0
Look at his own words, posted a few posts back.
Although offtopic, are these numbers correct? If yes, what is the explanation of the sharp decrease after 1948? Were did all these people go? Did they flee, were they murdered, did they convert with or without coercion? Please elaborate.
W.11
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2011
- Messages
- 15,032
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
look using islamic terrorism, islamic this and that, is in mood which current uncle sam's thinking, uncle sam wants tto secure sertain strategic importance in muslim countries like libya, afghan, pak and yemen and they install the bug to attack them, the bug is islam extremism, alquaeda and they need to brainwash people into believing it, just yesterday all western media was spiting venom on islam, even bharati media(which is proxy of western media), they knew what will be the come out, so they utilized every second before the investigative result reach media
W.11
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2011
- Messages
- 15,032
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
tshering says that who is blaming islam, these bharatis cant forget islam from this thread, even the guy is proved to be non muslim, islam heter, even then the bharatis just cnt resist brining islam here!
Similar threads
