What's new

No proof Nawaz ever owned London flats: Zia

Champion_Usmani

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
4,022
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
JIT head also says no evidence found showing ex-PM benefitted from Gulf Steel sale proceeds

no-proof-nawaz-ever-owned-london-flats-zia-1522275295-3721.jpg


ISLAMABAD - The key prosecution witness Wednesday admitted before the accountability court that there is no documentary evidence to prove that Nawaz Sharif himself owns London flats or he has any link to the offshore companies holding the flats.

Wajid Zia, the head of the joint investigating team that probed Sharif family’s business dealings abroad in Panama papers case, appeared before the court to record his testimony and was cross-examined by defence counsel Khawaja Haris.

“Is any document available which can prove Nawaz Sharif the owner of the Avenfield properties?” Haris asked. The reply from Zia was in negative.

“Has Nawaz Sharif ever remained the owner of these properties?” the lawyer asked. JIT chief’s reply was “no”.

Zia also replied in negative when asked if any institution ever correspond with the JIT to declared Nawaz the owner of London properties.

The star NAB witness said that he had not seen any document establishing ownership of Avenfield apartments with the former prime minister.

Also, Sharif could not be established as the beneficial owner of Nielson and Nescoll, the offshore companies holding these apartments, he added.

Moreover, there was no document or bank transaction that showed that the ex-PM had paid the rent or utility bills of the properties in question, Zia admitted.

JIT head also said that the letter by Mossack Fonseca – the legal firm at the centre of the Panama Papers scandal – regarding Nielson and Nescoll did not prove Sharif was the beneficial owner of the two offshore companies.

To a query of defence counsel Wajid Zia said that as Mossack Fonseca was a private law firm they had not engaged in direct correspondence with it and all the correspondence was done with British Virgin Island Attorney General Office.

He said that he was not in knowledge on whose direction FIA correspondence with British Virgin Island was made in 2012. At that time Pakistan Peoples Party was in power and FIA was under the command of the then interior minister Rehman Malik.

JIT chief said that at the time of Avienfield properties’ purchase no transaction was made from any account belonging to Nawaz Sharif while there was also no evidence that he ever remained the beneficial owner of these properties.

He further informed that Avenfield apartments were purchased by Nielson and Nescoll companies during 1993 to 1995 but there was not documentary evidence of Nawaz Sharif’s linkage to it.

Steel Mills

The court was told that Al-Azizia Steel was established by Mian Muhammad Sharif late and was transferred to Hussain Nawaz, Rabia Sharif and Abbas Sharif (late). JIT could not find any evidence that late Abbas Sharif and Rabia Sharif ever participated in the business or received any profits from Al-Azizia Steel and that JIT never issued any notices to Rabia Sharif or heirs of Abbas Sharif.

Regarding transfer of money from the sales proceeds of Gulf Steel, Wajid Zia said that there is no evidence that the money benefitted Mian Nawaz Sharif and that even the letters from Al-Thani Family do not mention that Nawaz Sharif benefitted from the money they returned.


https://nation.com.pk/29-Mar-2018/no-proof-nawaz-ever-owned-london-flats-zia
 
. .
It is the property of Maryam Nawaz.. She is the beneficial owner of those flats
 
.
That the problem with the justice system U cant prove anything
Remember surrey mehal? No body could prove who owned it.

And aftet the case closed zardari claimed it and sold it. And no one can do anything about it......
 
.
ISLAMABAD - The key prosecution witness Wednesday admitted before the accountability court that there is no documentary evidence to prove that Nawaz Sharif himself owns London flats or he has any link to the offshore companies holding the flats.

Desperation.

When did this question of NS's owning these flats arise? Khuwaja Haris knows what will be the answer to his questions..

The whole case has been built on ownership of companies with NS's children..

And those children were not nationals of UK at that time..

And those children were on students in UK at that time.

So as per the NAB law (which NS calls a Kala Qanoon), it is the responsibility of a public office holder to explain the sources of unexplained wealth with his dependents.

Had Khuwaja asked me this question, I would have replied the same.. :lol:

That the problem with the justice system U cant prove anything
Remember surrey mehal? No body could prove who owned it.

And aftet the case closed zardari claimed it and sold it. And no one can do anything about it......

Don't be fooled by noothiya propaganda..

The ownership of companies has been proven already.. It is and was with Maryam Nawaz..

What Khuwaja is doing right now, is to save NS from the conviction that he didn't send the money to his children to buy these flats.. Then from where these flats were bought? This has to be explained by either children, or if they aren't able to explain the source, it will be Nawaz who will have to explain how his children got so much money?
 
. .
JIT head also says no evidence found showing ex-PM benefitted from Gulf Steel sale proceeds

View attachment 462304

ISLAMABAD - The key prosecution witness Wednesday admitted before the accountability court that there is no documentary evidence to prove that Nawaz Sharif himself owns London flats or he has any link to the offshore companies holding the flats.

Wajid Zia, the head of the joint investigating team that probed Sharif family’s business dealings abroad in Panama papers case, appeared before the court to record his testimony and was cross-examined by defence counsel Khawaja Haris.

“Is any document available which can prove Nawaz Sharif the owner of the Avenfield properties?” Haris asked. The reply from Zia was in negative.

“Has Nawaz Sharif ever remained the owner of these properties?” the lawyer asked. JIT chief’s reply was “no”.

Zia also replied in negative when asked if any institution ever correspond with the JIT to declared Nawaz the owner of London properties.

The star NAB witness said that he had not seen any document establishing ownership of Avenfield apartments with the former prime minister.

Also, Sharif could not be established as the beneficial owner of Nielson and Nescoll, the offshore companies holding these apartments, he added.

Moreover, there was no document or bank transaction that showed that the ex-PM had paid the rent or utility bills of the properties in question, Zia admitted.

JIT head also said that the letter by Mossack Fonseca – the legal firm at the centre of the Panama Papers scandal – regarding Nielson and Nescoll did not prove Sharif was the beneficial owner of the two offshore companies.

To a query of defence counsel Wajid Zia said that as Mossack Fonseca was a private law firm they had not engaged in direct correspondence with it and all the correspondence was done with British Virgin Island Attorney General Office.

He said that he was not in knowledge on whose direction FIA correspondence with British Virgin Island was made in 2012. At that time Pakistan Peoples Party was in power and FIA was under the command of the then interior minister Rehman Malik.

JIT chief said that at the time of Avienfield properties’ purchase no transaction was made from any account belonging to Nawaz Sharif while there was also no evidence that he ever remained the beneficial owner of these properties.

He further informed that Avenfield apartments were purchased by Nielson and Nescoll companies during 1993 to 1995 but there was not documentary evidence of Nawaz Sharif’s linkage to it.

Steel Mills

The court was told that Al-Azizia Steel was established by Mian Muhammad Sharif late and was transferred to Hussain Nawaz, Rabia Sharif and Abbas Sharif (late). JIT could not find any evidence that late Abbas Sharif and Rabia Sharif ever participated in the business or received any profits from Al-Azizia Steel and that JIT never issued any notices to Rabia Sharif or heirs of Abbas Sharif.

Regarding transfer of money from the sales proceeds of Gulf Steel, Wajid Zia said that there is no evidence that the money benefitted Mian Nawaz Sharif and that even the letters from Al-Thani Family do not mention that Nawaz Sharif benefitted from the money they returned.


https://nation.com.pk/29-Mar-2018/no-proof-nawaz-ever-owned-london-flats-zia

These kind of articles were being published in Dawn/ The News/ Nation/ and Express before the disqualification of NS as well.

And then suddenly.... ............................... lightening struck on noothiya band on 28th of July.. :lol:

Yeh bhi parh le meri jan aur phir apni hasraton pe aansu baha ke soja..
1105160962-1.gif
 
.
Yes and she paid for them with her blood sweat and tears working hard
OMG... My imagination runs wild as to how she paid for them for apparently having no job, no talent, except her "assets", her poor father who pays 5000 per year in taxes used to get money from his son.

Desperation.

When did this question of NS's owning these flats arise? Khuwaja Haris knows what will be the answer to his questions..

The whole case has been built on ownership of companies with NS's children..
To mislead the people especially who are fools and thus you see newspaper lead....the paid newspaper and shitwaries sharing it all over.

Don't be fooled by noothiya propaganda..
He himself is a chronic patwari so what do you expect from these goons.
 
. . . . .

Bachon ne yeh bata kar buhat bari ghalti ki hai ke flats dada se nahi Qatri se aaye.. loll.
Aur Qatri se bhi title 2005 main transfer hua -- doosri ghalti
Aur Qatri ne yeh flats aik investment ke badlay (jo kay 1980 ki dihai main ki gaee thi) transfer kiey - Teesri ghalti


Aur sab se bari ghalti --- Qatri zinda hai.. lollll


Why explaining if Mr. Wajid Zia has failed in the court? :lol:


Maryam ko paigham pohncha dena ke Dada 1919 main paida huay thay.. aur 1930 main buhat baray karobari ban gaey thay.. aur 50 ki dihai main kiey factories ke maalik thay?? tou yeh tou British India ka case banta hai seedha seedha.. Did he pay taxes from 1930 to 1947?
 
. .
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom