What's new

No Indian troops in Afghanistan because of Pakistan considerations: US

Show me where Doval called for sending troops there. If he ever talked about pakistan,its by using proxies.

You got the words and not the logic though, in the end of your post, you have solved such mystery.

India dont have any territorial ambitions in A-stan so no point of sending troops there. Pakistan will continue to face music with or widout indian presence there.

Speaking of music, we use to see who dances wildly. Read, peace talks with Afghan Taliban including Pakistan, China and Afghanistan.
 
.
No Indian troops in Afghanistan because India doesnt have stomach for it
 
.
You got the words and not the logic though, in the end of your post, you have solved such mystery.



Speaking of music, we use to see who dances wildly. Read, peace talks with Afghan Taliban including Pakistan, China and Afghanistan.

1)Isn't pakistan using proxies inside A-stan ?
2) and will end with result of every peace talks happened till now.
 
.
LOL when will we see pakistani boots in Afghanistan?
Mulla fajlluhah killer of your APS is sitting right across the border .
Bring indian boots there and you will see the magic.
 
.
1)Isn't pakistan using proxies inside A-stan ?

Well, on record, it is Doval acknowledging openly and I am sure, he is not Pakistani or am I missing something here.


2) and will end with result of every peace talks happened till now.

Enlighten yourself with reading Ashraf Ghani in late July, 2017 inviting Taliban openly for talks yet, this process never ended except if a party wanted to close the eyes pretending the moment is gone. Denying Indian Troops presence in Afghanistan is one of the major development of peace process that US acknowledged openly, which wouldn't be possible due to Indian presence.
 
.
That's a good excuse, but the real reason is that Indian troops simply can't survive in a region like Afghanistan.
 
.
USA should go home and Indians should take their place in Afghanistan :devil:
 
.
. However, Doval and his proxies knew it, it is going to be expansion of graveyard and nothing else. However, I appreciate the usual sensing of India for dropping such plan.
lol, graveyard will extend to pakistan if afghanistan is not fixed. pakistan's past immature decisions from will haunt them forever. ghosts from graveyard they are not going away , are they?
 
.
lol, graveyard will extend to pakistan if afghanistan is not fixed. pakistan's past immature decisions from will haunt them forever. ghosts from graveyard they are not going away , are they?

This time, seems like much space wouldn't be needed as such. Pakistan, after all, learnt how to contain though, I am worried about newbie in this situation. India realized it or sees what's coming hence, air out of balloon situation arised but cleverly sought US help to make an excuse. The same was proven long ago when such bluff was done by India so Karzai may not feel left alone.
 
.
During Zardari time.. Indian troops were present in Afghanistan, and they had given free hand by Pakistan's democratic regime, just to undermine army.
TTP training and arming was done by Indian troops, who also took part in invasion of NWFP.

lol, graveyard will extend to pakistan
Than it will lead to Khalistan and from there on to Bharat.
 
.
Mattis-5-300x188.jpg

  • Mattis says Pakistan-India open-border trade to bring regional stability
  • India has achieved a degree of affection from the Afghan people
WASHINGTON: US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis has said that India’s decision not to send its troops to Afghanistan was in view of Pakistan’s opposition, as this would bring in new complexities in the region.

Mattis praised India’s contributions to the war-torn country before lawmakers at House Armed Services Committee, saying New Delhi has adopted a holistic approach in its assistance towards Afghanistan.

“It is really a very holistic approach that India is taking. You’ll notice I left off (Indian) boots (soldiers) on the ground because of the complexity that would bring to Pakistan,” Mattis said in response to a question from Congressman Doug Lamborn during the Congressional hearing on South Asia.

“We’re trying to make this an inclusive strategy and we don’t want them to get a sense that they’re vulnerable to any Indian Army people from their western flank, that’s not necessary,” Mattis said.

The defence secretary insisted that an open-border trade between Pakistan and India would help in bringing regional stability.

“If there’s any way for Pakistan and India to open their border to trade at a great economic advantage to both of the countries, it would be a big help across the region,” he said.

Stability can follow economics as much as stability enables economics, he added. He hoped that they will eventually see that happen.

“I believe India wants that to happen, but it’s very hard to do that if your concern is that you open the border to one thing, and you get something else,” Mattis said.

Responding to a series of questions on the Indian role in Afghanistan, Mattis said, “India has achieved a degree of affection from the Afghan people as a result of economic support”.

India, he said, is willing to rehabilitate the Soviet-era equipment until they are replaced with the American. That will take years, he noted.

Mattis said there are many areas where India and the US are natural partners for each other. The two countries, he said, are deepening and broadening the military-to-military relationship.

“But it is not an exclusive strategy, exclusive of anyone. Any nation that wants to be part of the counter-terror effort and this stability effort in South Asia, can sign up,” he said seeking to allay Pakistan’s concern of being excluded.

Referring to his talks with the Indian leadership, Mattis said the US does not need to convince Indians that it doesn’t have nefarious designs on the Indo-Pacific area.

https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/20...of-pakistans-opposition-says-us-defence-secy/
 
. . .
US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis has said that India’s decision not to send its troops to Afghanistan was in view of Pakistan’s opposition, as this would bring in new complexities in the region.
Is RAW operating there with Pakistan's consent as they worth our decision that much ?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom