What's new

No evidences of terrorists group operating from Pakistan: US State Department

What I wanna know is why do Indians take US words as the ultimate truth when they say something against Pak and the moment they say something in Pak's favor all of a sudden US becomes a liar?

If US is a hypocrite as u say and they only pivot back and forth based on their interests than why treat their words against Pak as the ultimate truth? Why not be doubtful of those statements just as much? Personally I would be wary of someone who is willing to twist facts based on personal interests.

When their words match the reality we take their words, when they are bluffing as in this case we call them hypocrites.
 
.
When their words match the reality we take their words, when they are bluffing as in this case we call them hypocrites.
But how do u know their words match the "reality"? U probably r not some high official privy to classified info nor have any means to find things out. U r probably an average person like me and u get ur picture of "reality of Pak" from what the Indian government tells u. India portrays Pak as a terror state and when the US issues a statement that agrees, all Indians go "Aha! I knew it". But when US says that Pak isn't behind terrorism instead of questioning whether ur government is lying or not u guys just straight up say that US is lying.

Have u considered that just like US gov, ur gov may also be twisting facts based on interests?
 
.
When their words match the reality we take their words, when they are bluffing as in this case we call them hypocrites.

Interesting. So if someone agrees with you then they are truthful. Otherwise they are liars. Sounds like we are dealing with 10 year olda here. Bharatis seem completely void of logic, rationality and objective thinking. If you agree with me then you are truthful otherwise you are a liar. LOL
 
.
No evidences of terrorists group operating from Pakistan: US State Department
Posted By: News Deskon: December 01, 2016
Mark-TOner.jpg


The United States has welcomed the appointment of General Qamar Javed Bajwa as new Pakistan Army chief.

US State Department advice for Pakistani political parties

Addressing media briefing in Washington, State Department spokesman Mark Toner said the United States is working quite closely with Pakistan in the field of counterterrorism.

He said Pakistan has suffered a lot from the menace of terrorism, and it is in the interest of Pakistan also to crackdown on terrorist groups.

Pakistani mission raided in US: Foreign Office clarifies news

To a question that terrorist get training in Pakistan and then hit US interests across the world, the US spokesman said these are mere allegations as the law enforcement agencies have not been able to confirm these allegations.

https://timesofislamabad.com/no-evi...ting-pakistan-us-state-department/2016/12/01/



Of course they were. Even those that are not friends of Pakistan admit this. A lie is always ultimate exposed. We got far more important and pressing matters to attend to than spreading terrorism. It's not Pakistan's fault if certain groups or individuals have problems with their own governments and decide to engage in violent activities. It's not Pakistan's fault if certain nations are incompetent and blame Pakistan when we don't feed them. It's not Pakistan's fault if the americans decide to destroy other nations and peoples. These are just as rational as is blaming Pakistan for WW1 & WW2.
 
. .
Didn't I say it has to be some Randi Ka Bacha india


must be really funny if clown start clapping


Slow claps and laughs after !

Some fantastic comedy from US these days !

0mKXcg1.gif

certainly no certificates for declared terrorist

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...i-into-US-visa-denied/articleshow/1055543.cms

Proud because there is no need to give certificates on a sovereign country by another country !
 
.
USA is continuously sending positive vibes to Pakistan since the elections :) :) Allah Khair :lol::lol:

Glad you noticed. Hopefully your establishment will utilize this gate pass from purgatory better this time and not continue to be paranoid.
 
. . .
And how r u so sure about it? Do u have any evidence? I mean if the US is saying that those allegations cannot be backed up by evidence, I'm interested in knowing ur sources.

.
its not about sources, its about trends and deductions. WHo is naive here that Pakistan was not and is still not training militants?I dunno the variety or missions of all of them, ut at least we know some were and are trainined for Kashmir jihad". no? where were the militants who attacked Uri, Pananthakot etc trained? Offcourse in Pakistan. US knows Pakistan trains militants too, so dont be naive. US knows where Pakistans nukes are why wont they know which militants are trained in Pakistan and where? If you feel Pakistan is not training militants, then you are just in denial. Its an easy deduction that Pakistan govt trains militants. You think afghan taliban dont train in pakistan and Pakistan govt turns a blind eye? sorry, am not naive.
 
.
its not about sources, its about trends and deductions. WHo is naive here that Pakistan was not and is still not training militants?I dunno the variety or missions of all of them, ut at least we know some were and are trainined for Kashmir jihad". no? where were the militants who attacked Uri, Pananthakot etc trained? Offcourse in Pakistan. US knows Pakistan trains militants too, so dont be naive. US knows where Pakistans nukes are why wont they know which militants are trained in Pakistan and where? If you feel Pakistan is not training militants, then you are just in denial. Its an easy deduction that Pakistan govt trains militants. You think afghan taliban dont train in pakistan and Pakistan govt turns a blind eye? sorry, am not naive.

Please tell me how did u deduce this conclusion then?

I'll show u some for an example

1) Terrorists attack in India, India says that surely they got weapons and training from somewhere and Pakistan being the enemy could be a likely culprit.
Let's assume that Pakistan is behind it being enemy and all

Then how do u explain terrorist attacks in Pak?
Is India behind it? Where r the ones attacking Pak getting weapons/training/funding?

India's position is that it's Pakistan's policies that backfired. So tell me r we training/funding these terrorists so they can attack us and then spending some more money to fight them and destroy our economy? Does that make much sense to u?

Following the line of thought provided above, it's more likely that both enemies r having proxy wars and supporting terrorists in each other's countries.

In that case Indians should stop acting angelic as if they can do no wrong and it's Pakistan's fault in everything.

2) Another scenario could be that India isn't supporting those terrorists attacking Pakistan(their money/weapons appear out of thin air somehow) and they r disgruntled/angry citizens that have taken arms against the gov of Pak.

In that case it could also apply to India. What if those behind Uri/Pathankot/etc. attacks are just dissatisfied/angry Indians?

But according to India that can never be

According to Indian logic:
- Terrorist attack in India --> Pakistan's fault
- Terrorist attack in Pak --> Pakistan's fault

- US issues a statement agreeing with India --> Must be true
- US issues a statement in favor of Pak --> US is hypocrite
 
Last edited:
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom