No comparison with Indian economy!

[Bang Galore]

And Since last decade we are in a state of war and we are still going through it. On the other hand India enjoyed comparatively peace full time which allowed Indian economy to thrive.

That too is a choice we make.......first fight other people's war, then fight your own in other countries, finally fight in your own.....choices my friend....choices.

 

[ghauri05]

None of the above excuses are going to help India or Pakistan. South Korea was in ruins in the Korean war, but yet today is far head of India and Pakistan.

I am not presenting any excuse just stating the fact that Pak and India did not start together in economy and also in political culture. India had a well established democratic system on the contrary Pakistan was a new born state which has yet to decide about its political system.
And also we are in a state of war still last decade and that is the biggest hurdle to our economic progress

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

I will leave no escape route for u.

Just take the example of fruits and vegetable production or milk production's yield we are way ahead.

In India we got more yield per acre in agriculture. So the 8 times larger makes no sense.

lol

Where did you get per acre data? lol

 

[Pabbi]

They did not start from the same baseline. Why you people have to lie always.

You people live on a different planet.

 

[Vinod2070]

I think we should stop these meaningless comparisons.

We have a long way to go and the only issue for us is to provide a better life to our poor people.

We wish the others well while we try and improve ourselves.

 

[my2cents]

No, in 1947 India still had an infrastructure of industry and agriculture. On the other hand Pakistan had nothing. Only one luxury was made in Pakistan and that was railway(for the purpose of serving Goraand nothing else) .

In 1947 because of partition most of the canals head works remained in India. In order to allay your concerns India compensated you guys in financing one of the best canal systems in the world.

Yet you are complaining that you had nothing after Independence.

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

In 1947 because of partition most of the canals head works remained in India. In order to allay your concerns India compensated you guys in financing one of the best canal systems in the world.

Yet you are complaining that you had nothing after Independence.

90% of industries British build remained in India, rest 10% divided between Bangladesh & Pakistan. British didn't build anything in muslim majority areas, its a fact. Pakistan basically started from 0 and ended up with less poverty then India.

"In terms of economic resources, India did much better than Pakistan out of partition. It inherited 90% of the subcontinent's industry and the thriving cities of Delhi, Bombay (now Mumbai) and Calcutta."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/629/629/6922293.stm

 

[ghauri05]

In 1947 because of partition most of the canals head works remained in India. In order to allay your concerns India compensated you guys in financing one of the best canal systems in the world.

Yet you are complaining that you had nothing after Independence.

India did no favour, it was decided by both parties among other rules of division and India had to comply with it.

 

[my2cents]

India did no favour, it was decided by both parties among other rules of division and India had to comply with it.

What did we ever get in return from Pakistan?? Nothing but heartburn. It is still the same Pakistan for past 7 decades. Nothing has changed in your outlook with respect to India.

At least China is more pragmatic and restrained...in order to promote peace in our subcontinent.

 

[ghauri05]

What did we ever get in return from Pakistan?? Nothing but heartburn. It is still the same Pakistan for past 7 decades. Nothing has changed in your outlook with respect to India.

At least China is more pragmatic and restrained...in order to promote peace in our subcontinent.

Pakistan had nothing to give to India, it was Pakistan which was created as a new state in 1947 not India , India was always there and as "Rules of Disengagement" India had to give Pakistan its share legally(not reverse).

And if India had accepted these rules particularly on Kashmir,then you wont be complaining about those Heartburns.

Today's Pakistan is far less India centric then ever before(if you meet the common Pakistani you would know that).
Hope I could say same for India.

 

[ghauri05]

What did we ever get in return from Pakistan?? Nothing but heartburn. It is still the same Pakistan for past 7 decades. Nothing has changed in your outlook with respect to India.

At least China is more pragmatic and restrained...in order to promote peace in our subcontinent.

Pakistan had nothing to give to India, it was Pakistan which was created as a new state in 1947 not India , India was always there and as "Rules of Disengagement" India had to give Pakistan its share legally(not reverse).

And if India had accepted these rules particularly on Kashmir,then you wont be complaining about those Heartburns.

Today's Pakistan is far less India centric then ever before(if you meet the common Pakistani you would know that).
Hope I could say same for India.

And also as you said China is more pragmatic in promoting peace because China is bigger than India and realizes its responsibility, the same way India should realize it in Pak-India relations instead of promoting hate against Pakistan and blaming every thing on Pakistan

 

[vicky sen]

we should not brag. pakistan should not be an yardstick while comparing economis growth. it should be countries like china.

 

[vicky sen]

Pakistan had nothing to give to India, it was Pakistan which was created as a new state in 1947 not India , India was always there and as "Rules of Disengagement" India had to give Pakistan its share legally(not reverse).

And if India had accepted these rules particularly on Kashmir,then you wont be complaining about those Heartburns.

Today's Pakistan is far less India centric then ever before(if you meet the common Pakistani you would know that).
Hope I could say same for India.

And also as you said China is more pragmatic in promoting peace because China is bigger than India and realizes its responsibility, the same way India should realize it in Pak-India relations instead of promoting hate against Pakistan and blaming every thing on Pakistan

do you realize the main thing dat is harming talks and full diplomatic relations is terrorism and pak's actions on the borders. inspite of des our PMs are holding talks. Y is hafiz saeed still free to run LeT?? Y is indian army fighting 30 infiltrators in kashmir??? Are infiltrators and terrorists going to solve kashmir??? never. and dats where we are stuck.

 

[ghauri05]

do you realize the main thing dat is harming talks and full diplomatic relations is terrorism and pak's actions on the borders. inspite of des our PMs are holding talks. Y is hafiz saeed still free to run LeT?? Y is indian army fighting 30 infiltrators in kashmir??? Are infiltrators and terrorists going to solve kashmir??? never. and dats where we are stuck.

Do you seriously realize why those Infiltrators are there in the first place? If India had solved Kashmir issue then there would have been no infiltrators.
As far as hafiz saeed is concerned , boy your country needs to respect other country's judiciary. Just like Indian court declared Ajmal ksaab culprit and Pakistan accepted the decision.
just like your court wrote in the final verdict of 2001 attacks that Afzal Guru is found innocent but just to satisfy public sentiment he was hanged and PAKISTAN RESPECTED YOUR COURT'S DECISION
The same way a case was filed against hafiz saeed and continued for 6 months and our court found him innocent and India seriously needs to respect our JUDICIARY's VERDICT .

 

[Glorino]

Pakistan had early start with special relationship with the United States-CENTO.Look at South Korea and Taiwan today-how developed are these two countries-economic power houses.Pakistan could have an economy of these countries with high technological capabilities.Pakistan could have become an engine of growth with high capability in South Asia.Pakistan's regressive policies of sharpening its sword rather creating wealth brought its own destruction.AFTER 65 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE _WHAT HAS BEEN ACHIEVED-no world class multi national Bank, no world class multi national Companies.WASTED YEARS-Becoming a terror super power does no good for the world