What's new

Nehru and Savarkar

It's more from the unconfirmed sources who were with him in Kalapani at that time.
read it somewhere, will try to search for it.

To all, read the wonderful book written by Savarkar which got him jailed to understand why it got him jailed.

https://jambudveep.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/veer-savarkar-1857.pdf

British were so terrified of Savarkar that they gave him 50 years jail term.

Contrast that to the incredible love they had for chacha & Bapu.
Who was the real revolutionary that terrified the British? Was it Chacha & Bapu or was it Savarkar?

ASK your common sense.

Read the below excerpt........


Savarkar's ideological self always had two axes: along one he worshipped modern scientific rationality and Machiavellianism, along the other he used European romanticism to empower his ideas of nationalism and revolution. His ethics probably came from the latter. The Cellular jail crippled the romanticism, so that it now survived mainly as a rhetoric that allowed him to give fuller play to his amoral, reason-driven, Machiavellian self as a technology of survival. Contrary to the impression he gives in his autobiographical writings, within a year of his arrival at Andamans he began to write abject appeals to the authorities, seeking clemency and promising loyalty, obedience and good behaviour.

Savarkar's admirers claim that the mercy petitions and the undertakings he signed so readily were strategic; he wanted to be released to participate in the freedom movement. It is true that the British never fully trusted his petitions and his relationship with the colonial regime did not automatically become cosy immediately afterwards, as some of his detractors insinuate. It is also true that some degree of manipulative cunning was part of Savarkar's repertoire. Filing of such petitions by political prisoners, too, was not rare. But it is also true that the authorities trusted him enough to appoint him a foreman in the jail and Savarkar never again played any significant or insignificant part in the anti-imperialist struggle.

Savarkar's petitions paid dividends nonetheless; the colonial authorities probably had a more rounded understanding of his personality than his Indian admirers and detractors. He was considered harmless and released in 1921 at the age of 38. But the authorities did not take any chance either. After his return from Andaman in 1921, he was kept in Ratnagiri jail for three years. The ghosts of Andamans still haunted him and this new sentence was probably the last straw. The colonial system was more efficient than it itself thought; Savarkar had returned from Andamans a shadow of his old self and the three additional years in jail, too, had done their job. When released in 1924, “at forty one he looked sixty and resembled a lean and hungry hawk, with bitter mouth and eyes that looked hooded.”


Oh ya, I forgot about his 3 years in Ratnagiri.

That makes it a total of almost 14 years in jail for a man who was never convicted of any crime.

Reminds me of Col. Purohit who had to spend 9 years in Jail.

Clearly, nothing much has changed in Indian judicial system.
 
.
Oh ya, I forgot about his 3 years in Ratnagiri.

That makes it a total of almost 14 years in jail for a man who was never convicted of any crime.

Reminds me of Col. Purohit who had to spend 9 years in Jail.

Clearly, nothing much has changed in Indian judicial system.

Even after the struggles Savarkar went through, the inhumane treatment he suffered for India, the secular granny's take pleasure putting down the great patriot.

What a shame that we Indians have a day celebrating STD Nehru but degrade Savarkar at drop of the hat.
 
.
Even after the struggles Savarkar went through, the inhumane treatment he suffered for India, the secular granny's take pleasure putting down the great patriot.

What a shame that we Indians have a day celebrating STD Nehru but degrade Savarkar at drop of the hat.

You know what was Veer Savarkars REAL CRIME ?

It was writing a BOOK :cheesy:

A book about the First war of Independence and a book on Hindu swaraj called "Hindu Pad Padshai".

A book that was captured from the possession of Bhagat singh when he was arrested.

So in essence he was arrested and tortured for writing History books :cheesy:

Now you know why the marxist historians hate him.
 
.
You know what was Veer Savarkars REAL CRIME ?

It was writing a BOOK :cheesy:

A book about the First war of Independence and a book on Hindu swaraj called "Hindu Pad Padshai".

A book that was captured from the possession of Bhagat singh when he was arrested.

So in essence he was arrested and tortured for writing History books :cheesy:

Now you know why the marxist historians hate him.

No wonder the secular Granny's are so triggered by him.

If you get a chance read his book on 1857. Wonderful book. He was rightly feared by British.

It's such a sad fact to see everyone contrasting Savarkar with Bhagat Singh while completely forgetting the former was latter's hero..
 
.
You want to know bad prison conditions.

Ask the great anti-Hindi fighters Thalamuthu and Natarajan who died in prison in 1939, jailed by Congress government of Madras Province.

Ask Tamil patriot Shanmugam. His dead body was mysteriously found in his prison cell.

Ask Tamilarsan who was murdered in an encounter shooting.

Ask Rajaraman. Murdered on his way from prison to court.

WE KNOW HOW OUR LEADERS are murdered by Hi-ndians

@Nilgiri @SOUTHie @manlion @Hindustani78
 
.
You want to know bad prison conditions.

Ask the great anti-Hindi fighters Thalamuthu and Natarajan who died in prison in 1939, jailed by Congress government of Madras Province.

Ask Tamil patriot Shanmugam. His dead body was mysteriously found in his prison cell.

Ask Tamilarsan who was murdered in an encounter shooting.

Ask Rajaraman. Murdered on his way from prison to court.

WE KNOW HOW OUR LEADERS are murdered by Hi-ndians

@Nilgiri @SOUTHie @manlion @Hindustani78

lol. Founder of the BJP i.e Jan sangh was Murdered by non other than Nehru in Jail.

110.jpg


And you know why ?

Because he protested against the need for "Permits" for Indians to enter Kashmir AFTER it became a part of India. :lol:

Shayama Prasad protested this by entering Kashmir without a Permit, hold peaceful protest and hunger strike.

So Nehru told kashmir govt. to allow him to enter but to ensure that he never returns.

Kashmir govt. promptly arrested him.

Thereafter, he was put in a dilapidated house for one and half months. There Shyama Prasad who suffered from dry pleurisy and coronary troubles had an mild attack. He was taken to the hospital and was administered penicillin despite having informed the doctor-in-charge of his allergy to penicillin. He promptly died.


Of course, more than 500 RSS workers have been murdered in India so far in the last 70 years. from highest post to the lowest worker.

I do not think even one person was arrested and convicted for killing them all. :lol:
 
.
WE KNOW HOW OUR LEADERS are murdered by Hi-ndians

Are you saying Chacha & bapu killed your leaders? :D

I do not think even one person was arrested and convicted for killing them all.

Heh, for that matter, I don't remember even a case being registered on genocide of Kashmiri Pandits.

After all, they are not "secular", so, who cares eh...
 
.
Are you saying Chacha & bapu killed your leaders? :D

Heh, for that matter, I don't remember even a case being registered on genocide of Kashmiri Pandits.

After all, they are not "secular", so, who cares eh...

The Irony is that the Supreme court had the time to get involved in the illegal Rohingya refugees but dismissed the petition by the Hindu pandit refugees of Kashmir. :lol:
 
.
The Irony is that the Supreme court had the time to get involved in the illegal Rohingya refugees but dismissed the petition by the Hindu pandit refugees of Kashmir. :lol:

lets all sing 'Agenda uncha rahe hamara'...

In a nation where frauds like Nehru and Gandhi are celebrated as freedom fighters, nothing surprises me.

Just one family destroyed our nation..
 
.
Even after the struggles Savarkar went through, the inhumane treatment he suffered for India, the secular granny's take pleasure putting down the great patriot.

What a shame that we Indians have a day celebrating STD Nehru but degrade Savarkar at drop of the hat.
Hii bhakths...
We are not uneducated... We know the exact history of Savarkar and How he begged before British for freedom... If you read his mercy petitions, you will be ashamed... Our hero is thousands died for our independence like Bhaghat Singh, not the one who begged before British...

One of his mercy petitions...

CELLULAR JAIL, PORT BLAIR,

The 30th March 1920.

To

The CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF ANDAMANS

In view of the recent statement of the Hon'ble Member for the Home Department to the Government of India, to the effect that "the Government was willing to consider the papers of any individual, and give them their best consideration if they were brought before them"; and that "as soon as it appeared to the Government that an individual could be released without danger to the State, the Government would extend the Royal clemency to that person," the undersigned most humbly begs that he should be given a last chance to submit his case, before it is too late. You, Sir, at any rate, would not grudge me this last favour of forwarding this petition to His Excellency the Viceroy of India, especially and if only to give me the satisfaction of being heard, whatever the Government decisions may be.

I. The Royal proclamation most magnanimously states that Royal clemency should be extended to all those who were found guilty of breaking the law "Through their eagerness for Political progress." The cases of me and my brother are pre-eminently of this type. Neither I nor any of my family members had anything to complain against the Government for any personal wrong due to us nor for any personal favour denied. I had a brilliant career open to me and nothing to gain and everything to loose individually by treading such dangerous paths. Suffice it to say, that no less a personage than one of the Hon'ble Members for the Home Department had said, in 1913, to me personally, "... ... Such education so much reading,... ... .. you could have held the highest posts under our Government." If in spite of this testimony any doubts as to my motive does lurk in any one, then to him I beg to point out, that there had been no prosecution against any member of my family till this year 1909; while almost all of my activity which constituted the basis for the case, have been in the years preceding that. The prosecution, the Judges and the Rowlatt Report have all admitted that since the year 1899 to the year 1909 had been written the life of Mazzini and other books, as well organised the various societies and even the parcel of arms had been sent before the arrest of any of my brothers or before I had any personal grievance to complain of (videRowlatt Report, pages 6 etc.). But does anyone else take the same view of our cases? Well, the monster petition that the Indian public had sent to His Majesty and that had been signed by no less than 5,000 signatures, had made a special mention of me in it. I had been denied a jury in the trial: now the jury of a whole nation has opined that only the eagerness for political progress had been the motive of all my actions and that led me to the regrettable breaking of the laws.

II. Nor can this second case of abetting murder throw me beyond the reach of the Royal clemency. For (a) the Proclamation does not make any distinction of the nature of the offence or of a section or of the Court of Justice, beyond the motive of the offence. It concerns entirely with the Motive and requires that it should be political and not personal. (b) Secondly, the Government too has already interpreted it in the same spirit and has released Barin and Hesu and others. These men had confessed that one of the objects of their conspiracy was "the murders of prominent Government officials" and on their own confessions, had been guilty of sending the boys to murder magistrates, etc. This magistrate had among others prosecuted Barin's brother Arabinda in the first "Bande Mataram" newspaper case. And yet Barin was not looked upon, and rightly so, as a non-political murderer. In my respect the objection is immensely weaker. For it was justly admitted by the prosecution that I was in England, had no knowledge of the particular plot or idea of murdering Mr. Jackson and had sent the parcels of arms before the arrest of my brother and so could not have the slightest personal grudge against any particular individual officer. But Hem had actually prepared the very bomb that killed the Kennedys and with a full knowledge of its destination. (Rowlatt Report, page 33). Yet Hem had not been thrown out of the scope of the clemency on that ground. If Barin and others were not separately charged for specific abetting, it was only because they had already been sentenced to capital punishment in the Conspiracy case; and I was specifically charged because I was not, and again for the international facilities to have me extradited in case France got me back. Therefore I humbly submit that the Government be pleased to extend the clemency to me as they had done it to Barin and Hem whose complicity in abetting the murders of officers, etc., was confessed and much deeper. For surely a section does not matter more than the crime it contemplates. In the case of my brother this question does not arise as his case has nothing to do with any murders, etc.

III. Thus interpreting the proclamation as the Government had already done in the cases of Barin, Hem, etc. I and my brother are fully entitled to the Royal clemency "in the fullest measure." But is it compatible with public safety? I submit it is entirely so. For (a) I most emphatically declare that we are not amongst "the microlestes of anarchism" referred to by the Home Secretary. So far from believing in the militant school of the type that I do not contribute even to the peaceful and philosophical anarchism of a Kuropatkin or a Tolstoy. And as to my revolutionary tendencies in the past:- it is not only now for the object of sharing the clemency but years before this have I informed of and written to the Government in my petitions (1918, 1914) about my firm intention to abide by the constitution and stand by it as soon as a beginning was made to frame it by Mr. Montagu. Since that the Reforms and then the Proclamation have only confirmed me in my views and recently I have publicly avowed my faith in and readiness to stand by the side of orderly and constitutional development. The danger that is threatening our country from the north at the hands of the fanatic hordes of Asia who had been the curse of India in the past when they came as foes, and who are more likely to be so in the future now that they want to come as friends, makes me convinced that every intelligent lover of India would heartily and loyally co-operate with the British people in the interests of India herself. That is why I offered myself as a volunteer in 1914 to Government when the war broke out and a German-Turko-Afghan invasion of India became imminent. Whether you believe it or not, I am sincere in expressing my earnest intention of treading the constitutional path and trying my humble best to render the hands of the British dominion a bond of love and respect and of mutual help. Such an Empire as is foreshadowed in the Proclamation, wins my hearty adherence. For verily I hate no race or creed or people simply because they are not Indians!

(b) But if the Government wants a further security from me then I and my brother are perfectly willing to give a pledge of not participating in politics for a definite and reasonable period that the Government would indicate. For even without such a pledge my failing health and the sweet blessings of home that have been denied to me by myself make me so desirous of leading a quiet and retired life for years to come that nothing would induce me to dabble in active politics now.

(c) This or any pledge, e.g., of remaining in a particular province or reporting our movements to the police for a definite period after our release - any such reasonable conditions meant genuinely to ensure the safety of the State would be gladly accepted by me and my brother. Ultimately, I submit, that the overwhelming majority of the very people who constitute the State which is to be kept safe from us have from Mr. Surendranath, the venerable and veteran moderate leader, to the man in the street, the press and the platform, the Hindus and the Muhammadans - from the Punjab to Madras - been clearly persistently asking for our immediate and complete release, declaring it was compatible with their safety. Nay more, declaring it was a factor in removing the very `sense of bitterness' which the Proclamation aims to allay.

IV. Therefore the very object of the Proclamation would not be fulfilled and the sense of bitterness removed, I warn the public mind, until we two and those who yet remain have been made to share the magnanimous clemency.

V. Moreover, all the objects of a sentence have been satisfied in our case. For (a) we have put in 10 to 11 years in jail, while Mr. Sanyal, who too was a lifer, was released in 4 years and the riot case lifers within a year; (b) we have done hard work, mills, oil mills and everything else that was given to us in India and here; (c) our prison behaviour is in no way more objectionable than of those already released; they had, even in Port Blair, been suspected of a serious plot and locked up in jail again. We two, on the contrary, have to this day been under extra rigorous discipline and restrain and yet during the last six years or so there is not a single case even on ordinary disciplinary grounds against us.

VI. In the end, I beg to express my gratefulness for the release of hundreds of political prisoners including those who have been released from the Andamans, and for thus partially granting my petitions of 1914 and 1918. It is not therefore too much to hope that His Excellency would release the remaining prisoners too, as they are placed on the same footing, including me and my brother. Especially so as the political situation in Maharastra has singularly been free from any outrageous disturbances for so many years in the past. Here, however, I beg to submit that our release should not be made conditional on the behaviour of those released or of anybody else; for it would be preposterous to deny us the clemency and punish us for the fault of someone else.

VII. On all these grounds, I believe that the Government, hearing my readiness to enter into any sensible pledge and the fact that the Reforms, present and promised, joined to common danger from the north of Turko-Afghan fanatics have made me a sincere advocate of loyal co-operation in the interests of both our nations, would release me and win my personal gratitude. The brilliant prospects of my early life all but too soon blighted, have constituted so painful a source of regret to me that a release would be a new birth and would touch my heart, sensitive and submissive, to kindness so deeply as to render me personally attached and politically useful in future. For often magnanimity wins even where might fails.

Hoping that the Chief Commissioner, remembering the personal regard I ever had shown to him throughout his term and how often I had to face keen disappointment throughout that time, will not grudge me this last favour of allowing this most harmless vent to my despair and will be pleased to forward this petition - may I hope with his own recommendations? - to His Excellency the Viceroy of India.

I beg to remain,

SIR,

Your most obedient servant,

(Sd.) V.D. Savarkar,
Convict no. 32778.
 
.
Hii bhakths...
We are not uneducated... We know the exact history of Savarkar and How he begged before British for freedom... If you read his mercy petitions, you will be ashamed... Our hero is thousands died for our independence like Bhaghat Singh, not the one who begged before British...

One of his mercy petitions...

CELLULAR JAIL, PORT BLAIR,

The 30th March 1920.

To

The CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF ANDAMANS

In view of the recent statement of the Hon'ble Member for the Home Department to the Government of India, to the effect that "the Government was willing to consider the papers of any individual, and give them their best consideration if they were brought before them"; and that "as soon as it appeared to the Government that an individual could be released without danger to the State, the Government would extend the Royal clemency to that person," the undersigned most humbly begs that he should be given a last chance to submit his case, before it is too late. You, Sir, at any rate, would not grudge me this last favour of forwarding this petition to His Excellency the Viceroy of India, especially and if only to give me the satisfaction of being heard, whatever the Government decisions may be.

I. The Royal proclamation most magnanimously states that Royal clemency should be extended to all those who were found guilty of breaking the law "Through their eagerness for Political progress." The cases of me and my brother are pre-eminently of this type. Neither I nor any of my family members had anything to complain against the Government for any personal wrong due to us nor for any personal favour denied. I had a brilliant career open to me and nothing to gain and everything to loose individually by treading such dangerous paths. Suffice it to say, that no less a personage than one of the Hon'ble Members for the Home Department had said, in 1913, to me personally, "... ... Such education so much reading,... ... .. you could have held the highest posts under our Government." If in spite of this testimony any doubts as to my motive does lurk in any one, then to him I beg to point out, that there had been no prosecution against any member of my family till this year 1909; while almost all of my activity which constituted the basis for the case, have been in the years preceding that. The prosecution, the Judges and the Rowlatt Report have all admitted that since the year 1899 to the year 1909 had been written the life of Mazzini and other books, as well organised the various societies and even the parcel of arms had been sent before the arrest of any of my brothers or before I had any personal grievance to complain of (videRowlatt Report, pages 6 etc.). But does anyone else take the same view of our cases? Well, the monster petition that the Indian public had sent to His Majesty and that had been signed by no less than 5,000 signatures, had made a special mention of me in it. I had been denied a jury in the trial: now the jury of a whole nation has opined that only the eagerness for political progress had been the motive of all my actions and that led me to the regrettable breaking of the laws.

II. Nor can this second case of abetting murder throw me beyond the reach of the Royal clemency. For (a) the Proclamation does not make any distinction of the nature of the offence or of a section or of the Court of Justice, beyond the motive of the offence. It concerns entirely with the Motive and requires that it should be political and not personal. (b) Secondly, the Government too has already interpreted it in the same spirit and has released Barin and Hesu and others. These men had confessed that one of the objects of their conspiracy was "the murders of prominent Government officials" and on their own confessions, had been guilty of sending the boys to murder magistrates, etc. This magistrate had among others prosecuted Barin's brother Arabinda in the first "Bande Mataram" newspaper case. And yet Barin was not looked upon, and rightly so, as a non-political murderer. In my respect the objection is immensely weaker. For it was justly admitted by the prosecution that I was in England, had no knowledge of the particular plot or idea of murdering Mr. Jackson and had sent the parcels of arms before the arrest of my brother and so could not have the slightest personal grudge against any particular individual officer. But Hem had actually prepared the very bomb that killed the Kennedys and with a full knowledge of its destination. (Rowlatt Report, page 33). Yet Hem had not been thrown out of the scope of the clemency on that ground. If Barin and others were not separately charged for specific abetting, it was only because they had already been sentenced to capital punishment in the Conspiracy case; and I was specifically charged because I was not, and again for the international facilities to have me extradited in case France got me back. Therefore I humbly submit that the Government be pleased to extend the clemency to me as they had done it to Barin and Hem whose complicity in abetting the murders of officers, etc., was confessed and much deeper. For surely a section does not matter more than the crime it contemplates. In the case of my brother this question does not arise as his case has nothing to do with any murders, etc.

III. Thus interpreting the proclamation as the Government had already done in the cases of Barin, Hem, etc. I and my brother are fully entitled to the Royal clemency "in the fullest measure." But is it compatible with public safety? I submit it is entirely so. For (a) I most emphatically declare that we are not amongst "the microlestes of anarchism" referred to by the Home Secretary. So far from believing in the militant school of the type that I do not contribute even to the peaceful and philosophical anarchism of a Kuropatkin or a Tolstoy. And as to my revolutionary tendencies in the past:- it is not only now for the object of sharing the clemency but years before this have I informed of and written to the Government in my petitions (1918, 1914) about my firm intention to abide by the constitution and stand by it as soon as a beginning was made to frame it by Mr. Montagu. Since that the Reforms and then the Proclamation have only confirmed me in my views and recently I have publicly avowed my faith in and readiness to stand by the side of orderly and constitutional development. The danger that is threatening our country from the north at the hands of the fanatic hordes of Asia who had been the curse of India in the past when they came as foes, and who are more likely to be so in the future now that they want to come as friends, makes me convinced that every intelligent lover of India would heartily and loyally co-operate with the British people in the interests of India herself. That is why I offered myself as a volunteer in 1914 to Government when the war broke out and a German-Turko-Afghan invasion of India became imminent. Whether you believe it or not, I am sincere in expressing my earnest intention of treading the constitutional path and trying my humble best to render the hands of the British dominion a bond of love and respect and of mutual help. Such an Empire as is foreshadowed in the Proclamation, wins my hearty adherence. For verily I hate no race or creed or people simply because they are not Indians!

(b) But if the Government wants a further security from me then I and my brother are perfectly willing to give a pledge of not participating in politics for a definite and reasonable period that the Government would indicate. For even without such a pledge my failing health and the sweet blessings of home that have been denied to me by myself make me so desirous of leading a quiet and retired life for years to come that nothing would induce me to dabble in active politics now.

(c) This or any pledge, e.g., of remaining in a particular province or reporting our movements to the police for a definite period after our release - any such reasonable conditions meant genuinely to ensure the safety of the State would be gladly accepted by me and my brother. Ultimately, I submit, that the overwhelming majority of the very people who constitute the State which is to be kept safe from us have from Mr. Surendranath, the venerable and veteran moderate leader, to the man in the street, the press and the platform, the Hindus and the Muhammadans - from the Punjab to Madras - been clearly persistently asking for our immediate and complete release, declaring it was compatible with their safety. Nay more, declaring it was a factor in removing the very `sense of bitterness' which the Proclamation aims to allay.

IV. Therefore the very object of the Proclamation would not be fulfilled and the sense of bitterness removed, I warn the public mind, until we two and those who yet remain have been made to share the magnanimous clemency.

V. Moreover, all the objects of a sentence have been satisfied in our case. For (a) we have put in 10 to 11 years in jail, while Mr. Sanyal, who too was a lifer, was released in 4 years and the riot case lifers within a year; (b) we have done hard work, mills, oil mills and everything else that was given to us in India and here; (c) our prison behaviour is in no way more objectionable than of those already released; they had, even in Port Blair, been suspected of a serious plot and locked up in jail again. We two, on the contrary, have to this day been under extra rigorous discipline and restrain and yet during the last six years or so there is not a single case even on ordinary disciplinary grounds against us.

VI. In the end, I beg to express my gratefulness for the release of hundreds of political prisoners including those who have been released from the Andamans, and for thus partially granting my petitions of 1914 and 1918. It is not therefore too much to hope that His Excellency would release the remaining prisoners too, as they are placed on the same footing, including me and my brother. Especially so as the political situation in Maharastra has singularly been free from any outrageous disturbances for so many years in the past. Here, however, I beg to submit that our release should not be made conditional on the behaviour of those released or of anybody else; for it would be preposterous to deny us the clemency and punish us for the fault of someone else.

VII. On all these grounds, I believe that the Government, hearing my readiness to enter into any sensible pledge and the fact that the Reforms, present and promised, joined to common danger from the north of Turko-Afghan fanatics have made me a sincere advocate of loyal co-operation in the interests of both our nations, would release me and win my personal gratitude. The brilliant prospects of my early life all but too soon blighted, have constituted so painful a source of regret to me that a release would be a new birth and would touch my heart, sensitive and submissive, to kindness so deeply as to render me personally attached and politically useful in future. For often magnanimity wins even where might fails.

Hoping that the Chief Commissioner, remembering the personal regard I ever had shown to him throughout his term and how often I had to face keen disappointment throughout that time, will not grudge me this last favour of allowing this most harmless vent to my despair and will be pleased to forward this petition - may I hope with his own recommendations? - to His Excellency the Viceroy of India.

I beg to remain,

SIR,

Your most obedient servant,

(Sd.) V.D. Savarkar,
Convict no. 32778.

So, you put a freedom fighter in kalapani for 11 years and then deny his right to get out.

Similarly, I am surprised that you are NOT ASKING THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION...

Why was Gandhi or Nehru, the great Indian patriots put in Kalapani or any "real" jail EVER?

Can you answer that important question to us stupid Indians please?
 
.
Hii bhakths...
We are not uneducated... We know the exact history of Savarkar and How he begged before British for freedom... If you read his mercy petitions, you will be ashamed... Our hero is thousands died for our independence like Bhaghat Singh, not the one who begged before British...

Hello Chrislamist,

Funny how Bhagat singh considered Sarvarkar his Hero :lol:

BTW do you know How many "Mercy petition" did Bhagat singh file with the British courts ?

How many "appeals" his lawyers made to the British courts ?

The difference is Bhagat singh and Bhukteshwar threw two Bomb in the assembly house full of unarmed men, Sarvarkar wrote a Book that inspired millions.
 
.
So, you put a freedom fighter in kalapani for 11 years and then deny his right to get out.

Similarly, I am surprised that you are NOT ASKING THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION...

Why was Gandhi or Nehru, the great Indian patriots put in Kalapani or any "real" jail EVER?

Can you answer that important question to us stupid Indians please?
I am also an Indian... Because British really feared the public support of Gandhi... British everytime bend before Gandhi's satyagraha, only because of this public support only... They knew if Gandhi is hurt, the fight will get out of control...
Nehru was not considered as a great freedom fighter... He was a good administrator in Congress party...
 
.
So, you put a freedom fighter in kalapani for 11 years and then deny his right to get out.

Similarly, I am surprised that you are NOT ASKING THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION...

Why was Gandhi or Nehru, the great Indian patriots put in Kalapani or any "real" jail EVER?

Can you answer that important question to us stupid Indians please?

These chrislamist truly make my skin crawl. :sick:

Not only do they take joy in the torture and denial of rights for an Indian freedom fighter.

They are shameless enough to malign his name for their narrow bigotry and political agenda. :sick:

There truly should be no place in India for their likes. We are far too tolerant for our own good. :tdown:
 
.
Hello Chrislamist,

Funny how Bhagat singh considered Sarvarkar his Hero :lol:

BTW do you know How many "Mercy petition" did Bhagat singh file with the British courts ?

How many "appeals" his lawyers made to the British courts ?

The difference is Bhagat singh and Bhukteshwar threw two Bomb in the assembly house full of unarmed men, Sarvarkar wrote a Book that inspired millions.

Lets all sing "Secular Agenda Uncha rahe hamara"...:D
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom