Bin Laden Death Script & the Needed Trigger for Next Step-Pakistan
By Sibel Edmonds
Time to Talk about Why & Why Now
May 20, 2011 "Information Clearing House" -- It has been over two weeks since the orchestrated ever-changing Bin Laden Death. The question of what happened remains the same except it doesnt seem to matter any longer. The US media is done after making their initial splash, and the majority is left with one conclusion: the SOB is dead, and who gives a da how it happened. Whether Osama held an AK-47 while using some damsel in distress as a shield, whether there was a real fight or not, whether it was really Osamas body in an organic edible shell we fed to the endangered sharks, whether the full credit goes to the CIA or the White House or the Pentagon no longer seems to matter. Dizzy-fying confusion induced by dozens and dozens of lies and discrepancies and denials has given way to post-adrenaline-rush exhaustion. The question of what happened has been classified as moot and irrelevant. Right or wrong Ill leave that question behind, at least for now, and instead, go back to focus on the more important question- the question of why and why now.
As I stated during the first few days of covering the Bin Laden Death Script, when it comes to DC dirty politics, when it comes to the new world order machine, and when it comes to US presidents, timing is everything and there are no such things as coincidences:
Considering the mainstream medias sensationalism and propaganda tactics and their cemented role as an extension of the establishment, one must step back and take in the entire landscape, the context, connections, and of course the timing. Only after that, after putting the pieces together instead of dumbly staring at the images spread before us by the media, we have a chance to get a grasp of the reality-facts; or at least a chance to come up with real questions.
In the past two weeks, after talking with many experts and sources, both nationally and internationally, Pakistan has been surfacing as the common thread holding the most rational explanation of why and why now. Interestingly, I came across the following statement by Rep. Ron Paul during his interview on MSNBCs Morning Joe:
The helicopters that landed in Abbottabad wont be the last to put American troops on the ground in Pakistan, I see the whole thing as a mess, and I think that we are going to be in Pakistan. I think thats the next occupation and I fear it. I think its ridiculous, and I think our foreign policy is such that we dont need to be doing this.
I was planning to write a comprehensive piece based on information and analyses I have gathered from my solid intelligence and Pentagon sources. However, after watching the interview with Ron Paul (And he has his credible sources), I decided to go ahead and write a fairly quick commentary on why the question of why and why now keeps pointing to Pakistan as the next probable occupation target for our never-dying neocon objective-makers. Actually the following is more of significant developments and a timeline than a subjective interpretation or commentary. I am going to put them together and have us look at the pattern and where these points point to, and thats exactly what I meant by one must step back and take in the entire landscape, the context, connections, and of course the timing.
Lets start with Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which was launched in 1997 and became known for leading the public campaign to oust Saddam Hussein both before and after the September 11 attacks. As many of my highly aware readers know, those neocons, their objectives and activities, never go away. They may change names or change a few front faces, but like a leech they always hold on to the system; the system they help put in place in the first place:
The blandly-named Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) the brainchild of Weekly Standard editor William Kristol, neo-conservative foreign policy guru Robert Kagan, and former Bush administration official Dan Senor has thus far kept a low profile; its only activity to this point has been to sponsor a conference pushing for a U.S. surge in Afghanistan.But some see FPI as a likely successor to Kristols and Kagans previous organisation, the now-defunct Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which they launched in 1997 and which became best known for leading the public campaign to oust former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein both before and after the Sep. 11 attacks.
So whats their mission statement, and what have these neocons been cooking up with the new face, their new president, Obama? The following is from an article by Jim Lobe in 2009:
The mission statement opens by listing a familiar litany of threats to the U.S., including rogue states, failed states, autocracies and terrorism, but gives pride of place to the challenges posed by rising and resurgent powers, of which only China and Russia are named.
FPI intends to make confrontation with China and Russia the centrepiece of its foreign policy stance. If this is the case, it would mark a return to the early days of the Bush administration, before 9/11, when Kristols Weekly Standard took the lead in attacking Washington for its alleged appeasement of Beijing FPI has chosen to push for escalating the U.S. military effort in Afghanistan. The organisations first event, to be held here Mar. 31, will be a conference entitled Afghanistan: Planning for Success.
For now, this is what I want you to take from the above on Obamas Neoconistic objectives: fiercely counter China-Russia when it comes to establishing US hegemony, especially in Central and South Asia, with emphasis on Afghanistan. Next, lets look at the strategic importance of the same region for China [All emphasis mine]:
In order for China to sustain its status as the emerging economic superpower, it must take all the necessary steps required in order to have sufficient energy resources for the near future. According to Pakistani think tank, BrassTacks, Chinese interests in the Indian Ocean became visible in 2002, when they invested heavily and began work on the Gwadar Port, located in Baluchestan, a province of Pakistan.
The Gwadar Port has its benefits for both Pakistan and China. According to Abdus Sattar Ghazali, executive editor for American Muslim Perspective, The cost benefits to China of using Gwadar as the port for western Chinas imports and exports are as evident as the long-term economic benefits to Pakistan of Gwadar becoming a port for Chinese goods. Not only does Gwadar enable China to fulfill its energy needs, but it will also provide a strategic military footprint in the Arabian Sea, which has the United States worried.
Okay, now you have Obamas Neoconistic objectives with China as its main target and competitor, and you have China competing for the same strategic area, Pakistan, to fulfill its energy needs and establish a strategic footprint in the Arabian Sea, and in the middle of it, the point where US-China strategic objectives intersect: Pakistan.
In order to halt this, the globalists need to block Chinas access to the Arabian Sea by way of Gwadar. According to BrassTacks, to do this, there needs to be a new Pakistan as indicated in Operation Enduring Turmoil. Operation Enduring Turmoil is PNACs plan to disassemble Pakistan into three parts. According to a game plan drawn out by Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, in a 2006 article of the Armed Forces Journal, Pakistans Northwest Frontier tribes would be reunited with their Afghan brethren [and] would also lose its Baluch territory to Free Baluchistan. The remaining natural Pakistan would lie entirely east of the Indus, except for a westward spur near Karachi. With this done, what was once the NWFP, a province of Pakistan, is now part of Afghanistan, and what was once Baluchistan, a province of Pakistan, is now its own state, Free Baluchistan. This would force China to impossibly go through Afghanistan and Free Baluchistan in order to reach the Arabian Sea. Such an arrangement would cut Chinas route to the Arabian Sea.
Now, please focus on our three main actors- China, US and in the middle, the strategically important Pakistan. Lets use our common sense minus logic-clouding details, and consider what happens when the strategically crucial actor in the middle starts straying away from one main actor and moving toward the other.
This is from November, 2009:
China has sent out an interesting signal ahead of US president Barack Obamas scheduled visit to Beijing by offering a set of advanced fighter jets to Pakistan. It has agreed to sell $1.4 billion worth of jets to Islamabad days ahead of the planned visit of the US president Barack Obama to Shanghai and Beijing on November 15-18.
The move is expected to jolt the US administration as it works on notes and talking points for Obamas meetings with Chinese leaders. He is expected to discuss Beijings relationship with India and its role in internal conflicts in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Beijing is keen to reduce US influence on Pakistan, which will make it easier for it to deal with India, sources said. Washingtons recent decision to extend massive financial assistance to Islamabad is seen in some quarters as a policy setback for China.
A year later, in October 2010, the following interesting perspective on how things were heating up between the US and Pakistan is published by Margolis:
The neoconservative far right in Washington and its media allies again claim Pakistan is a grave threat to US interests and to Israel. Pakistan must be declawed and dismembered, insist the neocons. Pakistans nuclear arsenal is reportedly being targeted for seizure or elimination by US Special Forces. There is also talk in Washington of dividing Afghanistan into Pashtun, Tajik and Uzbek mini-states, as the US has done in Iraq, and perhaps Pakistan, as well. Little states are easier to rule or intimidate than big ones. Many Pakistanis believe the United States is bent on dismembering their nation. Some polls show Pakistanis now regard the United States as a greater enemy than India.
It is important to remember how Obama passed AIPAC neocons test on Pakistan during his presidential campaign in 2007. Obama said if elected in November 2008 he would be willing to attack inside Pakistan with or without approval from the Pakistani government,If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf wont act, we will, Obama said.
Now, lets fast-forward to early April 2011:
Pakistans ambassador to China used a recent celebration of his countrys Republic Day to give a rhetoric-filled talk about Beijing-Islamabad relations. If March 23, 1940, was the day the Muslim League decided to establish Pakistan, then the anniversary would be a time to declare that relations with China will define the way forward. We shall take our bilateral relations to new heights, Masood Khan proclaimed. [...] Pakistan has been moving into Chinas sphere of influence for decades and the countries routinely refer to each other as all-weather partners.
This year will mark the 60th anniversary of diplomatic relations. Even when I was there in 1981, 82, I could see Chinese military factories going up, says Stephen Cohen, a Pakistan expert at the Brookings Institution. Now, Pakistan represents a major market for Chinas nuclear and military technology. According to SIPRI, a Swedish think tank, over 40 per cent of Chinese arms exports go to Pakistanthe largest share of any country China sells to.
Obviously Obamas day in day out bombing of Pakistan, his lets drone the hell out of them policy, had backfired, producing the opposite effect for his Neoconistic global hegemony objectives. Now, things begin to really heat up; this is from April 17, 2011:
President Obamas rhetoric in Delhi had no substance except to rile the Pakistanis. The Delhi card didnt quite work. The Chinese Premier visited Islamabad and pledged $20 billion in investment in Pakistan during the next five years. How about them apples? The Pakistani retort is what it has always been we need Friends Not Masters.
Britain as a colonial power practiced Divide and rule pitting religious and ethnic differences in the Middle East to rule continents. Bhutto famously theorized that the post-colonial powers were working on a unite and rule strategy forcing Pakistan to work with India against China.
The idea of becoming subservient to India is abhorrent and that of cooperation with India, with the object of promoting tension with China, equally repugnant. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.
Most Pakistanis dont want closer relations with Washingtonthey want to build closer relations with Beijing, and work on creating the Muslim Union (similar to the European Union) in Central Asia. Links with Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Iran and Turkey are key to the future of Pakistan.
Islamabad is moving ever closer to China, both militarily and economically and thats a fact Jack.
By mid April things start going downhill; very fast.
The transactional relationship between Washington and Islamabad is coming to an end. While US-Pakistani transactional relations are fraying at both ends, the opposite is true of Sino-Pakistani relations.
Pakistan supported China when she was recognized only by Albania, and built the bridge to the USA. This fact cannot be forgotten by the Chinese who mention it in every summit and mentioned it in this summit also
There is renewed energy to pace up the development of Gwadar Port to provide China a shorter route and easy excess to world markets to dispatch its goods to Europe and America.
The Gwadar port project will transform Pakistans Navy into a force that can rival regional navies. The government of Pakistan has designated the port area as a sensitive defense zone. The Gwadar port will rank among the worlds largest deep-sea ports. The port provides China a strategic foothold in the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean.
Located at the entrance of the Persian Gulf and about 460 kms from Karachi, Gwadar has had immense Geostrategic significance on many accounts. The continued unstable regional environment in the Persian Gulf in particular as a result of the Iran/Iraq war, the Gulf war and the emergence of the new Central Asian States has added to this importance. Considering the Geo-economic imperative of the regional changes, the ADBs Ports Master Plan studies considered an alternate to the Persian Gulf Ports to capture the transit trade of the Central Asian Republic (CAR) as well as the trans-shipment trade of the region.
And finally, on April 27, according to my sources, the following catalyst prompts the Obama team to execute the Kill Osama Bin Laden Script. This is the pivotal point in the Bin Laden Death Operation Script as a catalyst for the soon to come Pakistan Occupation:
Pakistan is lobbying Afghan President Hamid Karzai against building a long-term strategic partnership with the United States, and urging him instead to look to Pakistan and its ally, China, for help in striking a peace deal with the Taliban and rebuilding the economy, according to Afghan officials.
Washingtons relations with Pakistan have reached their lowest point in years following a series of missteps on both sides, and Pakistani officials say that they no longer have an incentive to follow the American lead in their own backyard, the report added.
Pakistan is sole guarantor of its own interest, said a senior Pakistani official, adding: Were not looking for anyone else to protect us, especially the US. If theyre leaving, theyre leaving and they should go.
The next day, on April 28, , a senior Pakistani government official said that the Export-Import Bank of China will loan Pakistan $1.7 billion to develop a city-wide train system in the eastern city of Lahore.
Since the holes-filled and never-explained kill or capture operation, the presidential PR machine, the US media and their extension guised under alternative have been beating the war drums. After all, as with any wars of ours, public opinion must be shaped, and public backing must be garnered. This is one of the latest reflecting just that:
After the killing of Usama bin Laden in Pakistan, few American voters believe that country is an ally of the United States in the war against terrorism. Moreover, most doubt Pakistan is worthy of continued U.S. foreign aid.
Thats according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday.
Nearly three out of four voters 73 percent say the United States should stop sending foreign aid until Pakistan demonstrates a deeper commitment to the war against terrorism. Some 19 percent would continue to provide funding.
With the discovery that bin Laden apparently had been living in Pakistan for years, the consensus is Pakistan is not a friend (74 percent). A small 16 percent minority of voters views Pakistan as a strong U.S. ally in the war against terrorism.
You must be thinking: Pakistan must have tons in their own dossier to expose US government duplicities, lies, and nefarious activities. So why have they been relatively silent in all this? Why dont they open the flood gate on facts surrounding Bin Laden, his supposed role in 9/11, his supposed journey since 9/11, and his supposed death recently? And I have an answer for that: neither party has played all their cards yet. Just take a look at how Gates has been playing both sides carefully while measuring the outcome of various factors in play:
Gates reiterated the accusation that elements within the Pakistani government knew about the location of Osama bin Laden and were keeping that information from the United States. Bin Laden was killed in a US raid earlier this month.
At the same time, Gates echoed comments by other officials, conceding that the US has absolutely no evidence to that effect and that it is pure supposition on our part. The repeated accusations, despite being based on pure supposition have done major damage to US-Pakistan ties, and have spawned calls from Congress to suspend all aid to Pakistan to punish them.
Gates, who attended the conference with Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Michael Mullen, also said that the US raid that killed bin Laden had humiliated the Pakistani government, and that they had paid a price for bin Ladens presence. Mullen added that the US ability to attack Pakistan with impunity was a humbling experience for the Pakistani military.
The White House neocons are in the midst of age-old diplomatic games, bluffing, and hedging their bets. They have the foreign & military aid card. They have the ISI dirt files card. They have the ultimate China leaning card. And of course, they have the mighty power of preemptive occupation war card which is always blessed and supported by NATO and overlooked by their butlers in the UN.
China has its own set of cards; whether it is their biggest market for dumping goods, or carrying the US debt, or who knows what else. For now they are using the talk card with no real strings attached:
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao assured his Pakistani counterpart Yusuf Raza Gilani of Chinas all-weather friendship on Wednesday, during a visit that sharply contrasted with anger between Washington and Islamabad.
I wish to stress here that no matter what changes might take place in the international landscape, China and Pakistan will remain forever good neighbours, good friends, good partners and good brothers, Wen told Gilani at the start of a meeting in central Beijings Great Hall of the People.
Suffice it to say that not all cards have been placed on the table. As the famous Kenny Rogers Gambler lyrics go:
You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em,
Know when to walk away and know when to run.
You never count your money when youre sittin at the table.
Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
As for us the people, well be sitting and waiting for the three parties to conclude this stage of their global hegemony game. Well be reading and watching and listening to their PR machine in the media give us one concocted fantasy after another. As in all other wars of ours we will have zero to say, zilch to gain, and plenty to lose. They have the cards, and we are the piled up tokens on the table.
Sibel Edmonds is the founder and president of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC), a nonprofit organization dedicated to aiding national security whistleblowers. She has appeared on national radio and TV as a commentator on matters related to whistleblowers, national security, and excessive secrecy & classification, and has been featured on CBS 60 Minutes, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, and in the New York Times, Washington Post, Vanity Fair, The American Conservative, and others. Ms. Edmonds has a MA in Public Policy and International Commerce from George Mason University, a BA in Criminal Justice and Psychology from George Washington University, and AA degree in Science from NVCC. She is certified as a Court Appointed Special Advocate and as an instructor for the Womens Domestic Violence Program. She is fluent in Turkish, Farsi and Azerbaijani. She can be contacted through her blog at BoilingFrogsPost.com.
By Sibel Edmonds
Time to Talk about Why & Why Now
May 20, 2011 "Information Clearing House" -- It has been over two weeks since the orchestrated ever-changing Bin Laden Death. The question of what happened remains the same except it doesnt seem to matter any longer. The US media is done after making their initial splash, and the majority is left with one conclusion: the SOB is dead, and who gives a da how it happened. Whether Osama held an AK-47 while using some damsel in distress as a shield, whether there was a real fight or not, whether it was really Osamas body in an organic edible shell we fed to the endangered sharks, whether the full credit goes to the CIA or the White House or the Pentagon no longer seems to matter. Dizzy-fying confusion induced by dozens and dozens of lies and discrepancies and denials has given way to post-adrenaline-rush exhaustion. The question of what happened has been classified as moot and irrelevant. Right or wrong Ill leave that question behind, at least for now, and instead, go back to focus on the more important question- the question of why and why now.
As I stated during the first few days of covering the Bin Laden Death Script, when it comes to DC dirty politics, when it comes to the new world order machine, and when it comes to US presidents, timing is everything and there are no such things as coincidences:
Considering the mainstream medias sensationalism and propaganda tactics and their cemented role as an extension of the establishment, one must step back and take in the entire landscape, the context, connections, and of course the timing. Only after that, after putting the pieces together instead of dumbly staring at the images spread before us by the media, we have a chance to get a grasp of the reality-facts; or at least a chance to come up with real questions.
In the past two weeks, after talking with many experts and sources, both nationally and internationally, Pakistan has been surfacing as the common thread holding the most rational explanation of why and why now. Interestingly, I came across the following statement by Rep. Ron Paul during his interview on MSNBCs Morning Joe:
The helicopters that landed in Abbottabad wont be the last to put American troops on the ground in Pakistan, I see the whole thing as a mess, and I think that we are going to be in Pakistan. I think thats the next occupation and I fear it. I think its ridiculous, and I think our foreign policy is such that we dont need to be doing this.
I was planning to write a comprehensive piece based on information and analyses I have gathered from my solid intelligence and Pentagon sources. However, after watching the interview with Ron Paul (And he has his credible sources), I decided to go ahead and write a fairly quick commentary on why the question of why and why now keeps pointing to Pakistan as the next probable occupation target for our never-dying neocon objective-makers. Actually the following is more of significant developments and a timeline than a subjective interpretation or commentary. I am going to put them together and have us look at the pattern and where these points point to, and thats exactly what I meant by one must step back and take in the entire landscape, the context, connections, and of course the timing.
Lets start with Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which was launched in 1997 and became known for leading the public campaign to oust Saddam Hussein both before and after the September 11 attacks. As many of my highly aware readers know, those neocons, their objectives and activities, never go away. They may change names or change a few front faces, but like a leech they always hold on to the system; the system they help put in place in the first place:
The blandly-named Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) the brainchild of Weekly Standard editor William Kristol, neo-conservative foreign policy guru Robert Kagan, and former Bush administration official Dan Senor has thus far kept a low profile; its only activity to this point has been to sponsor a conference pushing for a U.S. surge in Afghanistan.But some see FPI as a likely successor to Kristols and Kagans previous organisation, the now-defunct Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which they launched in 1997 and which became best known for leading the public campaign to oust former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein both before and after the Sep. 11 attacks.
So whats their mission statement, and what have these neocons been cooking up with the new face, their new president, Obama? The following is from an article by Jim Lobe in 2009:
The mission statement opens by listing a familiar litany of threats to the U.S., including rogue states, failed states, autocracies and terrorism, but gives pride of place to the challenges posed by rising and resurgent powers, of which only China and Russia are named.
FPI intends to make confrontation with China and Russia the centrepiece of its foreign policy stance. If this is the case, it would mark a return to the early days of the Bush administration, before 9/11, when Kristols Weekly Standard took the lead in attacking Washington for its alleged appeasement of Beijing FPI has chosen to push for escalating the U.S. military effort in Afghanistan. The organisations first event, to be held here Mar. 31, will be a conference entitled Afghanistan: Planning for Success.
For now, this is what I want you to take from the above on Obamas Neoconistic objectives: fiercely counter China-Russia when it comes to establishing US hegemony, especially in Central and South Asia, with emphasis on Afghanistan. Next, lets look at the strategic importance of the same region for China [All emphasis mine]:
In order for China to sustain its status as the emerging economic superpower, it must take all the necessary steps required in order to have sufficient energy resources for the near future. According to Pakistani think tank, BrassTacks, Chinese interests in the Indian Ocean became visible in 2002, when they invested heavily and began work on the Gwadar Port, located in Baluchestan, a province of Pakistan.
The Gwadar Port has its benefits for both Pakistan and China. According to Abdus Sattar Ghazali, executive editor for American Muslim Perspective, The cost benefits to China of using Gwadar as the port for western Chinas imports and exports are as evident as the long-term economic benefits to Pakistan of Gwadar becoming a port for Chinese goods. Not only does Gwadar enable China to fulfill its energy needs, but it will also provide a strategic military footprint in the Arabian Sea, which has the United States worried.
Okay, now you have Obamas Neoconistic objectives with China as its main target and competitor, and you have China competing for the same strategic area, Pakistan, to fulfill its energy needs and establish a strategic footprint in the Arabian Sea, and in the middle of it, the point where US-China strategic objectives intersect: Pakistan.
In order to halt this, the globalists need to block Chinas access to the Arabian Sea by way of Gwadar. According to BrassTacks, to do this, there needs to be a new Pakistan as indicated in Operation Enduring Turmoil. Operation Enduring Turmoil is PNACs plan to disassemble Pakistan into three parts. According to a game plan drawn out by Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, in a 2006 article of the Armed Forces Journal, Pakistans Northwest Frontier tribes would be reunited with their Afghan brethren [and] would also lose its Baluch territory to Free Baluchistan. The remaining natural Pakistan would lie entirely east of the Indus, except for a westward spur near Karachi. With this done, what was once the NWFP, a province of Pakistan, is now part of Afghanistan, and what was once Baluchistan, a province of Pakistan, is now its own state, Free Baluchistan. This would force China to impossibly go through Afghanistan and Free Baluchistan in order to reach the Arabian Sea. Such an arrangement would cut Chinas route to the Arabian Sea.
Now, please focus on our three main actors- China, US and in the middle, the strategically important Pakistan. Lets use our common sense minus logic-clouding details, and consider what happens when the strategically crucial actor in the middle starts straying away from one main actor and moving toward the other.
This is from November, 2009:
China has sent out an interesting signal ahead of US president Barack Obamas scheduled visit to Beijing by offering a set of advanced fighter jets to Pakistan. It has agreed to sell $1.4 billion worth of jets to Islamabad days ahead of the planned visit of the US president Barack Obama to Shanghai and Beijing on November 15-18.
The move is expected to jolt the US administration as it works on notes and talking points for Obamas meetings with Chinese leaders. He is expected to discuss Beijings relationship with India and its role in internal conflicts in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Beijing is keen to reduce US influence on Pakistan, which will make it easier for it to deal with India, sources said. Washingtons recent decision to extend massive financial assistance to Islamabad is seen in some quarters as a policy setback for China.
A year later, in October 2010, the following interesting perspective on how things were heating up between the US and Pakistan is published by Margolis:
The neoconservative far right in Washington and its media allies again claim Pakistan is a grave threat to US interests and to Israel. Pakistan must be declawed and dismembered, insist the neocons. Pakistans nuclear arsenal is reportedly being targeted for seizure or elimination by US Special Forces. There is also talk in Washington of dividing Afghanistan into Pashtun, Tajik and Uzbek mini-states, as the US has done in Iraq, and perhaps Pakistan, as well. Little states are easier to rule or intimidate than big ones. Many Pakistanis believe the United States is bent on dismembering their nation. Some polls show Pakistanis now regard the United States as a greater enemy than India.
It is important to remember how Obama passed AIPAC neocons test on Pakistan during his presidential campaign in 2007. Obama said if elected in November 2008 he would be willing to attack inside Pakistan with or without approval from the Pakistani government,If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf wont act, we will, Obama said.
Now, lets fast-forward to early April 2011:
Pakistans ambassador to China used a recent celebration of his countrys Republic Day to give a rhetoric-filled talk about Beijing-Islamabad relations. If March 23, 1940, was the day the Muslim League decided to establish Pakistan, then the anniversary would be a time to declare that relations with China will define the way forward. We shall take our bilateral relations to new heights, Masood Khan proclaimed. [...] Pakistan has been moving into Chinas sphere of influence for decades and the countries routinely refer to each other as all-weather partners.
This year will mark the 60th anniversary of diplomatic relations. Even when I was there in 1981, 82, I could see Chinese military factories going up, says Stephen Cohen, a Pakistan expert at the Brookings Institution. Now, Pakistan represents a major market for Chinas nuclear and military technology. According to SIPRI, a Swedish think tank, over 40 per cent of Chinese arms exports go to Pakistanthe largest share of any country China sells to.
Obviously Obamas day in day out bombing of Pakistan, his lets drone the hell out of them policy, had backfired, producing the opposite effect for his Neoconistic global hegemony objectives. Now, things begin to really heat up; this is from April 17, 2011:
President Obamas rhetoric in Delhi had no substance except to rile the Pakistanis. The Delhi card didnt quite work. The Chinese Premier visited Islamabad and pledged $20 billion in investment in Pakistan during the next five years. How about them apples? The Pakistani retort is what it has always been we need Friends Not Masters.
Britain as a colonial power practiced Divide and rule pitting religious and ethnic differences in the Middle East to rule continents. Bhutto famously theorized that the post-colonial powers were working on a unite and rule strategy forcing Pakistan to work with India against China.
The idea of becoming subservient to India is abhorrent and that of cooperation with India, with the object of promoting tension with China, equally repugnant. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.
Most Pakistanis dont want closer relations with Washingtonthey want to build closer relations with Beijing, and work on creating the Muslim Union (similar to the European Union) in Central Asia. Links with Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Iran and Turkey are key to the future of Pakistan.
Islamabad is moving ever closer to China, both militarily and economically and thats a fact Jack.
By mid April things start going downhill; very fast.
The transactional relationship between Washington and Islamabad is coming to an end. While US-Pakistani transactional relations are fraying at both ends, the opposite is true of Sino-Pakistani relations.
Pakistan supported China when she was recognized only by Albania, and built the bridge to the USA. This fact cannot be forgotten by the Chinese who mention it in every summit and mentioned it in this summit also
There is renewed energy to pace up the development of Gwadar Port to provide China a shorter route and easy excess to world markets to dispatch its goods to Europe and America.
The Gwadar port project will transform Pakistans Navy into a force that can rival regional navies. The government of Pakistan has designated the port area as a sensitive defense zone. The Gwadar port will rank among the worlds largest deep-sea ports. The port provides China a strategic foothold in the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean.
Located at the entrance of the Persian Gulf and about 460 kms from Karachi, Gwadar has had immense Geostrategic significance on many accounts. The continued unstable regional environment in the Persian Gulf in particular as a result of the Iran/Iraq war, the Gulf war and the emergence of the new Central Asian States has added to this importance. Considering the Geo-economic imperative of the regional changes, the ADBs Ports Master Plan studies considered an alternate to the Persian Gulf Ports to capture the transit trade of the Central Asian Republic (CAR) as well as the trans-shipment trade of the region.
And finally, on April 27, according to my sources, the following catalyst prompts the Obama team to execute the Kill Osama Bin Laden Script. This is the pivotal point in the Bin Laden Death Operation Script as a catalyst for the soon to come Pakistan Occupation:
Pakistan is lobbying Afghan President Hamid Karzai against building a long-term strategic partnership with the United States, and urging him instead to look to Pakistan and its ally, China, for help in striking a peace deal with the Taliban and rebuilding the economy, according to Afghan officials.
Washingtons relations with Pakistan have reached their lowest point in years following a series of missteps on both sides, and Pakistani officials say that they no longer have an incentive to follow the American lead in their own backyard, the report added.
Pakistan is sole guarantor of its own interest, said a senior Pakistani official, adding: Were not looking for anyone else to protect us, especially the US. If theyre leaving, theyre leaving and they should go.
The next day, on April 28, , a senior Pakistani government official said that the Export-Import Bank of China will loan Pakistan $1.7 billion to develop a city-wide train system in the eastern city of Lahore.
Since the holes-filled and never-explained kill or capture operation, the presidential PR machine, the US media and their extension guised under alternative have been beating the war drums. After all, as with any wars of ours, public opinion must be shaped, and public backing must be garnered. This is one of the latest reflecting just that:
After the killing of Usama bin Laden in Pakistan, few American voters believe that country is an ally of the United States in the war against terrorism. Moreover, most doubt Pakistan is worthy of continued U.S. foreign aid.
Thats according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday.
Nearly three out of four voters 73 percent say the United States should stop sending foreign aid until Pakistan demonstrates a deeper commitment to the war against terrorism. Some 19 percent would continue to provide funding.
With the discovery that bin Laden apparently had been living in Pakistan for years, the consensus is Pakistan is not a friend (74 percent). A small 16 percent minority of voters views Pakistan as a strong U.S. ally in the war against terrorism.
You must be thinking: Pakistan must have tons in their own dossier to expose US government duplicities, lies, and nefarious activities. So why have they been relatively silent in all this? Why dont they open the flood gate on facts surrounding Bin Laden, his supposed role in 9/11, his supposed journey since 9/11, and his supposed death recently? And I have an answer for that: neither party has played all their cards yet. Just take a look at how Gates has been playing both sides carefully while measuring the outcome of various factors in play:
Gates reiterated the accusation that elements within the Pakistani government knew about the location of Osama bin Laden and were keeping that information from the United States. Bin Laden was killed in a US raid earlier this month.
At the same time, Gates echoed comments by other officials, conceding that the US has absolutely no evidence to that effect and that it is pure supposition on our part. The repeated accusations, despite being based on pure supposition have done major damage to US-Pakistan ties, and have spawned calls from Congress to suspend all aid to Pakistan to punish them.
Gates, who attended the conference with Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Michael Mullen, also said that the US raid that killed bin Laden had humiliated the Pakistani government, and that they had paid a price for bin Ladens presence. Mullen added that the US ability to attack Pakistan with impunity was a humbling experience for the Pakistani military.
The White House neocons are in the midst of age-old diplomatic games, bluffing, and hedging their bets. They have the foreign & military aid card. They have the ISI dirt files card. They have the ultimate China leaning card. And of course, they have the mighty power of preemptive occupation war card which is always blessed and supported by NATO and overlooked by their butlers in the UN.
China has its own set of cards; whether it is their biggest market for dumping goods, or carrying the US debt, or who knows what else. For now they are using the talk card with no real strings attached:
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao assured his Pakistani counterpart Yusuf Raza Gilani of Chinas all-weather friendship on Wednesday, during a visit that sharply contrasted with anger between Washington and Islamabad.
I wish to stress here that no matter what changes might take place in the international landscape, China and Pakistan will remain forever good neighbours, good friends, good partners and good brothers, Wen told Gilani at the start of a meeting in central Beijings Great Hall of the People.
Suffice it to say that not all cards have been placed on the table. As the famous Kenny Rogers Gambler lyrics go:
You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em,
Know when to walk away and know when to run.
You never count your money when youre sittin at the table.
Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
As for us the people, well be sitting and waiting for the three parties to conclude this stage of their global hegemony game. Well be reading and watching and listening to their PR machine in the media give us one concocted fantasy after another. As in all other wars of ours we will have zero to say, zilch to gain, and plenty to lose. They have the cards, and we are the piled up tokens on the table.
Sibel Edmonds is the founder and president of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC), a nonprofit organization dedicated to aiding national security whistleblowers. She has appeared on national radio and TV as a commentator on matters related to whistleblowers, national security, and excessive secrecy & classification, and has been featured on CBS 60 Minutes, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, and in the New York Times, Washington Post, Vanity Fair, The American Conservative, and others. Ms. Edmonds has a MA in Public Policy and International Commerce from George Mason University, a BA in Criminal Justice and Psychology from George Washington University, and AA degree in Science from NVCC. She is certified as a Court Appointed Special Advocate and as an instructor for the Womens Domestic Violence Program. She is fluent in Turkish, Farsi and Azerbaijani. She can be contacted through her blog at BoilingFrogsPost.com.