Naya KPK | News & Updates on the development in KPK.

[karakoram]

yara bilkul da iltaf bhai paranka ye

haha rora kam ze nah ye ?

 

[Rasengan]

I thought that you will be a reasonable man and will understand what I say but you are a senseless human being. Kiddo I quoted you first and now I am saying that I don't want to argue with you anymore. You failed to prove your allegations and as far as I am concerned I proved everything what I want to. I have this entire thread as my source while you don't have any. You are a kiddo, kiddo Capital words were used for a capital idiot. My frustation? Mr. Kiddo if you have a look at our posts you started doing personal attacks first because you wasn't able to prove your incorrect allegations mr. jahil.

Your argument is coherently illogical, because an individual can never become a senseless human being, on the proclamation that he has a separate viewpoint on a particular subject. In your previous correspondence you proposed the idea that PTI have done exceptionally well in bringing $1 billion worth of investment to KPK. However, this hypothesis was erroneous in nature, since no company actually exists with that designated corporate name. This assumption can be validated on the basis of actually visiting the AIC website on Google. Furthermore, I have informed you quite clearly that this particular topic can be resolved by asking a Chinese member to settle the matter on whether such a company exists.

In your previous dispatch you ascribed to the notion that I failed to prove that China changed within one year of its open door policy. The historical evidence will tilt in my favor, because obviously China changed its economic system of socialism to capitalism and Maoist political philosophy became extinct within the CCP. Henceforth, the term open door policy was coined by Deng Xiaoping in 1978 and certain members of the party were eradicated for speaking against him. Then you utilized the analogy, that you cannot compare a province to a country. However, this dogma of your's was false because the open door policy was initiated in five separate economic zones based in five provinces. Each of these economic zones were autonomous in nature and were goaded by the central government of China, to compete with each other on the economic front. Guangzhou the capital of Guangdong is one such case, how things changed rapidly due to proactive local government policy in alluring investment from abroad. Your argument on this issue was non-existent, except for articulating on the idea that KPK has terrorism. However, your knowledge on China is very weak because its quite obvious that during the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution more than 30 million people died and Deng Xiaoping had to use force to come into power.

The only petulant child on this forum is you, because you can never accept the idea of someone actually criticizing PTI as a government. Capital locks in your previous message was applied by you, because the frustration of losing a debate was boiling inside. You had the audacity to insult my opinion, therefore I simply returned the gesture in which you failed to compete. There is no need for you to reply to this message, because I have said everything I wanted to say on the topic at hand.

 

[RescueRanger]

mufti Mehmood flyover
just near completion

Great job.

 

[s.k]

haha rora kam ze nah ye ?

za da pekhawar yam kho useygam pa karachi k

 

[BetterPakistan]

Your argument is coherently illogical, because an individual can never become a senseless human being, on the proclamation that he has a separate viewpoint on a particular subject. In your previous correspondence you proposed the idea that PTI have done exceptionally well in bringing $1 billion worth of investment to KPK. However, this hypothesis was erroneous in nature, since no company actually exists with that designated corporate name. This assumption can be validated on the basis of actually visiting the AIC website on Google. Furthermore, I have informed you quite clearly that this particular topic can be resolved by asking a Chinese member to settle the matter on whether such a company exists.

In your previous dispatch you ascribed to the notion that I failed to prove that China changed within one year of its open door policy. The historical evidence will tilt in my favor, because obviously China changed its economic system of socialism to capitalism and Maoist political philosophy became extinct within the CCP. Henceforth, the term open door policy was coined by Deng Xiaoping in 1978 and certain members of the party were eradicated for speaking against him. Then you utilized the analogy, that you cannot compare a province to a country. However, this dogma of your's was false because the open door policy was initiated in five separate economic zones based in five provinces. Each of these economic zones were autonomous in nature and were goaded by the central government of China, to compete with each other on the economic front. Guangzhou the capital of Guangdong is one such case, how things changed rapidly due to proactive local government policy in alluring investment from abroad. Your argument on this issue was non-existent, except for articulating on the idea that KPK has terrorism. However, your knowledge on China is very weak because its quite obvious that during the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution more than 30 million people died and Deng Xiaoping had to use force to come into power.

The only petulant child on this forum is you, because you can never accept the idea of someone actually criticizing PTI as a government. Capital locks in your previous message was applied by you, because the frustration of losing a debate was boiling inside. You had the audacity to insult my opinion, therefore I simply returned the gesture in which you failed to compete. There is no need for you to reply to this message, because I have said everything I wanted to say on the topic at hand.

At last what I can say you is that I give you a bunch of shit. You didn't proved anything nor you provided any source. No one will trust your crap, come up with source. You failed to give me answer for all the questions I asked and yet you are comparing a province with a country. I will suggest you to look at the rights of provincial govt in Pakistan and there's a big difference between Pakistan and China if you know anything. No one will trust you if you say that company doesn't exist because everyone will trust that News paper which is famous and reliable while you have no identification here. When IK will come in power at federal level, I will definitely have argument with you if you remain here till that time. Good Luck and enjoy standing in line of fuel stations to get 1 litre of petrol.

 

[nomi007]

 

[nomi007]

Work in progress on Mufti Mehmood Flyover

 

[Leader]

Pakistan's first police school of explosive handling

Pakistan's first police bomb handling school.

 

[Sulman Badshah]

NOWSHERA – In a latest counter-terrorism effort, Pakistan’s first training centre regarding explosive handling has been inaugurated in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa’s Nowshera city today (Monday)

The ceremony was attended by Chief Minister Pervaiz Khattak, IG Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Nasir Durrani, AIG Bomb Disposal Unit Shafqat Malik and other high officials.

At the Police School of Explosive Handling, law enforcement personnel will be given training of neutralizing different kinds of bombs and landmines. Police will also be trained regarding procedure of probe at the blast site.

Also, several courses will be offered to enhance capacity building of the law enforcement personnel.

Addressing the event, Chief Minister Pervaiz Khattak stated that police are being given every kind of training and facilities.

He said no one will be allowed to do corruption.

Bombs and IEDs have presented a challenge for security in the region, as they seem to be the weapon of choice for Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other foreign militant groups.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=413992695431211

 

[Leader]

Pakistan's first police school of explosive handling

 

[nomi007]

 

[Leader]

KP:Special incentives for pregnant women to extend across province

KP:Special incentives for pregnant women to extend across province

KP:Special incentives for pregnant women to extend across province

 

[nomi007]

 

[nomi007]

 

[waleed3601]

For female literacy: Govt to set up 1,000 community schools
By Asad Zia
Published: February 11, 2015

“The number of schools per village will be decided as per the requirements of the area and all facilities would be provided as we do not lack funds,” said Atif. PHOTO: AFP

PESHAWAR:
To boost female literacy rate in the province, the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa government has decided to establish 1,000 community schools for girls in all 25 districts.

For accessibility

In comparison to boys, very few girls in the province attend school, said Minister for Education Muhammad Atif Khan. “Girls do not go to schools due to various reasons, one of them being accessibility.”

According to Atif, parents in rural areas do not allow their daughters to go to distant areas for schooling and because of this reason the government has decided to establish community schools in villages to make education accessible for girls.

Atif said under this scheme, local communities will provide land for schools while the government will arrange teachers and equip the school buildings. “Work on the project will start from the new academic year,” said the minister.

He added the community school programme will first be initiated in Peshawar and then expanded to other districts. “The number of schools per village will be decided as per the requirements of the area and all facilities would be provided as we do not lack funds,” said Atif.

Expecting lasting benefits

Experts in the field of education have urged the government to ensure the scheme is a long-term one.

Talking to The Express Tribune, K-P Peace Education and Development Foundation Programme Manager Tariq Hayat Khan appreciated the initiative and said it will increase female literacy in underdeveloped districts. “The government should work on turning it into a long-term project as such schemes have been discontinued in the past due to lack of funds.”

According to Tariq, in 2004, the government launched a similar project to establish primary schools for girls in villages. Under the project funded by Unicef, hundreds of schools were set up in various districts, but the scheme was wrapped up later due to lack of funds.

“Such projects that are initiated by non-profit organisations last only for a few years and are soon shelved, putting children’s education at stake,” said Tariq.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 11th, 2015

----------------------------------

Where the PTI haters at?