NATIONAL RANKINGS BY MILITARY STRENGTH

[Deactivated]

I 've never seen crap like that before... Even our standard troll guests at the Turkish section don't spread bullhiyet like that... I pissed my pants laughing... Algeria? N.K.? Vietnam? -

 

[Thorough Pro]

This is bullcrap.

At number 4 is India and strength is air superiority. Really?

Previous Ranking 2018-2020
A ranking of the world’s foremost military powers taking into account a wide variety of factors and using a precise formula to rate countries by their warfighing capabilities. Over 50 different factors are considered in determining each country’s position. Quantities of armaments, while important, are hardly the only factors determining a country’s military capabilities or its ranking. Training, combat readiness, overseas military bases, defensive infrastructure and fortifications are some of the many other assets considered which can and often do prove decisive in the outcome of a war. Outstanding strengths of each particular country, if any, are noted to give an indication as to the assets each party will be most likely to rely on to achieve victory.

Strategic and tactical nuclear capabilities, due to the extreme caution with which they must be deployed and states’ general refrain from using such weapons, are considered a limited asset rather than the decisive game changer they would be if employed freely. Nuclear powers are marked accordingly in the right hand column. Due to their highly secretive nature, biological warfare capabilities are not taken into consideration.

As well as ranking states numerically, military powers are also divided into six tiers based on the league in which their military capabilities lie. Those countries in the same tier can be considered near peer adversaries, while countries in lower tiers would struggle to wage war on those in higher ones unsupported.

Links to further information for each country’s aerial, naval and ground warfare capabilities are given below their names.
https://militarywatchmagazine.com/f...noVPI7n3EjI9fu8ChPmrZIX9Od_89dq0xTxB29lYK3W_8

 

[Muhammed45]

Mate they dont even have subs just bunch of underwater bogies which are steered mechanically. Also their missile tech is highly questionable considering even after decades of development their SRBM and IRBM fail miserably during practice launches. Remember the fiasco with our Ghauri series missile which had severe shortfalls after we imported few from NKorea. It took another 6 years just to get it working with several modifications including propulsion and navigation.

Are you kidding Mate?

Or this, look at the size of warhead man

This list is realistic. Because it gives a high value to the nuclear capability of countries.

France and the UK beneath North Korea, two top tier industrial nations that make their own weapons and have advanced research and development, whilst North Korea operates a stone age military, just lots of it.
Japan tier 2, hasn't fired a shot in anger since the Second World War.

Dear sir, Japan has strong navy not to mention their industrial advances. They are not allowed to develop ICBMs and you know why. But they have chosen the path of Space rockets which means they are completely capable of making ICBMs.

About NK, they are countering American military lonely, given the fact that China wouldn't pick a fight against USA because of NK, we can conclude that Koreans have managed to counter American military well and beyond imagination.

The list is realistic.

 

[waz]

Dear sir, Japan has strong navy not to mention their industrial advances. They are not allowed to develop ICBMs and you know why. But they have chosen the path of Space rockets which means they are completely capable of making ICBMs.

About NK, they are countering American military lonely, given the fact that China wouldn't pick a fight against USA because of NK, we can conclude that Koreans have managed to counter American military well and beyond imagination.

The list is realistic.

Ok brother, so let me get this right, when the Japanese find themselves in a war they will start converting and building then? That doesn't work.
Who is going to fight this war then, the oldest population on the planet? Also going back to the original point, how much combat experience do they have, you know learning through real-time encounters. They have none.
I'm sorry Japan can't fight a war now or in the future.

The Americans don't feel it's worth taking out North Korea, for crying out loud the nation was starving a few years back. Yes they can keep people at bay with their wacky nature, but that doesn't take away the fact that as a nation they should be no where near the top 15.

 

[Hassan Guy]

Ok brother, so let me get this right, when the Japanese find themselves in a war they will start converting and building then? That doesn't work.
Who is going to fight this war then, the oldest population on the planet? Also going back to the original point, how much combat experience do they have, you know learning through real-time encounters. They have none.
I'm sorry Japan can't fight a war now or in the future.

The Americans don't feel it's worth taking out North Korea, for crying out loud the nation was starving a few years back. Yes they can keep people at bay with their wacky nature, but that doesn't take away the fact that as a nation they should be no where near the top 15.

Maybe bro, but look at their SLBM capability @mohammad45 pointed out.
We don't have anything like that.

 

[waz]

Maybe bro, but look at their SLBM capability @mohammad45 pointed out.
We don't have anything like that.

Yes true bro, but not enough to fight a war.

 

[Ceylal]

O.k.

This is bullcrap.

At number 4 is India and strength is air superiority. Really?

What make you think that their air force is bull crap?

 

[Dexon]

i kinda understand the logic behind this list.for example number 6 NK can nuke both nu 16 Ty and nu 14 egypt .what they can do jack sh@t?...

 

[Thorough Pro]

HISTORY

O.k.

What make you think that their air force is bull crap?

 

[Nike]

Have a look at the following map:-

Geographical distance between Turkey and Vietnam = 7500+ KM

I ask you again - HOW can Turkey bring war to Vietnam and hope to win?

Problem # 1: YOU need to establish military bases near Vietnam such as in Thailand but they will not allow you.

Problem # 2: YOU do not have aircraft carriers to park near Vietnamese borders either.

Problem # 3: YOUR limited fleet of aerial refueling tankers (7 in total) cannot enable Turkish Air Force to move all the way from Turkey to Vietnam, and subject Vietnamese terrain to bombardment. Too much distance to cover (7500+ KM), and one aerial refueling tanker can refuel 2 fighter jets at maximum.

7 aerial refueling tankers can support 14 fighter jets in total; using 196 fighter jets is out of question.

All that talk of Turkish industrial capability is of little consequence in this scenario.

UNDERSTAND THIS: Turkey cannot bring much of its FIREPOWER to bear against Vietnam to accomplish anything meaningful in a hypothetical conflict between the two.

While Vietnam does not have a NATO standard military force, they do have a functioning Air Force equipped with multiple Su-27 and Su-30 variants for aerial engagements and Su-22 for SEAD missions, and a functioning Navy equipped with submarines, frigates, corvettes and patrol boats. Their military assets are spread across multiple military bases (cannot be taken out in one go), and they will definitely plan for a potential war coming at their borders. Whatever limited number of assets YOU will manage to bring to Vietnam, these will be defeated.

I hope Turkish military planners do not share your mindset.

Vietnam can even bring the conclussion of Vietnam war into their own advantage, when their enemies is USA and her other major Ally. Don't understand about Turkish strong hurr durr here

 

[MMM-E]

i kinda understand the logic behind this list.for example number 6 NK can nuke both nu 16 Ty and nu 14 egypt .what they can do jack sh@t?...

Do you know what about NATO Nuclear Weapon sharing policy ?

Turkiye hosts B-61 Nuclear Bombs against N.Korea,Iran,India even Russia
N.Korea can not start a nuclear war and without nuclear weapon N.Korea is full of sh@t


btw what can Iran do jack sh@t?

Vietnam can even bring the conclussion of Vietnam war into their own advantage, when their enemies is USA and her other major Ally. Don't understand about Turkish strong hurr durr here

Military super power USSR (Russians) also failed in weak poor unarmed Afghanistan

Nobody can conquer Vietnam but as of 2020's military technologies ( Airforce ) can burn big cities in Vietnam to hurt economy

and Vietnam doesn't have large scale operation capability to respond Air strikes

 

[vishwambhar]

I think we could make a better list if we all put our collective mind to it.

Here is a rough one, just a non serious one:

1. USA
2. China
3. Russia
4. France
5. India
6. Turkey
7. UK
8. Pakistan
9. South Korea
10. Brazil
11. Germany
12. Australia

UK too should be above India.... with Trident armed Astute class submarines they have capability to hit India by sitting in English channel without worrying about India's retaliation on British land as there is no missile in India comparable to Trident range..... that's the power.....

 

[Ceylal]

HISTORY

Maybe..things change

 

[vishwambhar]

No need to invade Vietnam
Turkish Airforce and Navy can destroy every military and strategic targets in Vietnam
also Turkish Airforce and Navy can turn cities into dark age in Vietnam .... and bye bye Vietnam's economy ( hundreds of billions of dollars )

Turkish Airforce and Navy can do it also against Egypt ......


and both Vietnam and Egypt dont have large scale operation capability to attack Turkiye

also Algeria is full of joke ... and backward Countries are ahead of Turkiye .... what a crap list

Dear friend MMM-E, Turkey can certainly cripple Vietnam in long stretch war but only if both are sharing borders with each other..... not with the current geographical distance....

Only USA can do it but in 1960s even they failed.... can't say they will fail now.....

Also Turkish airforce though very Hi-tech can't bomb Vietnam day and night and make it surrender..... for such things you need heavy bombers in the class of B2 or Russian TUs..... only fighter jets won't be able to achieve this.... even if you have a military base in neighboring country of Vietnam then also you won't be able to deploy your entire military strength as you need significant force for the mainland Turkey defense too.....

Vietnam is a reasonably big country with dense forests, long coast lines..... not to mention they have decent air defense systems....it's very tough to make such country surrender just by using advanced F16s without bombers....

 

[Dexon]

Do you know what about NATO Nuclear Weapon sharing policy ?

Turkiye hosts B-61 Nuclear Bombs against N.Korea,Iran,India even Russia
N.Korea can not start a nuclear war and without nuclear weapon N.Korea is full of sh@t


btw what can Iran do jack sh@t?

stand on your foot not NATO!.this list does not account daddy US to support your country!

and our solid engine ICBM are almost ready with all it glory