What's new

Naswarville

Status
Not open for further replies.
The name of Islam’s Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) has become the most popular name in the world, a new report says.


Spanish daily ABC recently reported that some 150 million people across the world are named “Mohammad.”

The report said that in addition to the populated Muslim countries, the name Mohammed enjoys a high frequency in numerous non-Muslim countries as it is said to be the most popular name for babies in some regions in France.

The name also ranks sixth among the most popular names in Spain and the UK, the report noted.

Meanwhile, a recent study, conducted by Milan’s Chamber of Commerce and published on September 4, indicated that “Mohammed” has become the most popular name for small business owners in the Italian city of Milan.

MR/HJL
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/10/30/332087/mohammed-worlds-most-popular-name/
 
What do you think needs to be changed in India's Bangladesh policy?

India has to follow the Chinese policy in Bangladesh.Working with the government irrespective of the party in power.We know India supports Awami League and India has made it clear on multiple occasions.Problem is India views Hasina like Suu Kyi...but we have to remember Suu Kyi is supported by everyone because she is a leader against a military regime..where as Hasina is a democratic leader against another democratic leader.There's also a problem of being a federation dealing with a republic.India's policy takes way too long to come into effect compared to Bangladesh.India has to sort her internal problems out before they approach Bangladesh with any deal.Bangladesh directly deals with Delhi and not with Kolkata.So when the central gov comes to talk to us about LBA and Teesta they should mangae Kolkata and Assam and everyone they else.Most importantly India has to stop viewing Bangladesh as Nepal or Bhutan because they depend on India for everything where as Bangladesh has a lot more economic freedom and many parties with many interests are working here.Mozena went to Delhi and apparently sounded like a BNP standing committee member...The US clearly supports BNP in the next election...China although does not express it does like BNP because our ties get stronger during BNP era.If no decision is reached between BNP and AL the only option left will be military.And trust me we don't want and you don't want it.US will support anyone(even the military) to stabilize Bangladesh because they have business interest here...from garments companies to gas....Americans are the largest foreign investors in BD.
 
India has to follow the Chinese policy in Bangladesh.Working with the government irrespective of the party in power.We know India supports Awami League and India has made it clear on multiple occasions.Problem is India views Hasina like Suu Kyi...but we have to remember Suu Kyi is supported by everyone because she is a leader against a military regime..where as Hasina is a democratic leader against another democratic leader.There's also a problem of being a federation dealing with a republic.India's policy takes way too long to come into effect compared to Bangladesh.India has to sort her internal problems out before they approach Bangladesh with any deal.Bangladesh directly deals with Delhi and not with Kolkata.So when the central gov comes to talk to us about LBA and Teesta they should mangae Kolkata and Assam and everyone they else.Most importantly India has to stop viewing Bangladesh as Nepal or Bhutan because they depend on India for everything where as Bangladesh has a lot more economic freedom and many parties with many interests are working here.Mozena went to Delhi and apparently sounded like a BNP standing committee member...The US clearly supports BNP in the next election...China although does not express it does like BNP because our ties get stronger during BNP era.If no decision is reached between BNP and AL the only option left will be military.And trust me we don't want and you don't want it.US will support anyone(even the military) to stabilize Bangladesh because they have business interest here...from garments companies to gas....Americans are the largest foreign investors in BD.

So a more bipartisan view of things...

on the other hand what does Bangladesh need to change in its India policy?
 
So a more bipartisan view of things...

on the other hand what does Bangladesh need to change in its India policy?

Stop supporting insurgents....well that's the only hold BD has on India...for now!You have to allow Bangladeshi products in your market.Although there has been some advancement a major impediment has been Indian restriction Bangladeshi satellite channels.That will be a major step in commerce.

Bangladesh has not been much hostile towards Indian on anything.Do you have any complains about BD from the Indian perspective?
 
Stop supporting insurgents....well that's the only hold BD has on India...for now!You have to allow Bangladeshi products in your market.Although there has been some advancement a major impediment has been Indian restriction Bangladeshi satellite channels.That will be a major step in commerce.

Bangladesh has not been much hostile towards Indian on anything.Do you have any complains about BD from the Indian perspective?
Actually our major complaint with BD is neither insurgency nor transit. The insurgency in the NE is nearly dead, with 17 out of 20 groups declaring unilateral ceasefires and dropping their arms, even integrating into the political mainstream (including the single largest group, ULFA, where only a splinter faction of about a 100 fighters remains active), the rest are penny pushers in real terms. The real grouse we have is illegal immigration, which is treated as some sort of a myth by the BD members here, which has been talked about even in this year's UN report on the issue. Our north eastern denizens despise these immigrants, as in create a massacre level despise (the Assam student's union started a frigging sub-conventional conflict situation due to this issue and the Nellie massacre took 5000 lives when locals went apeshit about it). Other than that we do have concerns about fidayeen or mujaheddin being able to use BD's soil to operate but nothing more. It is the former issue which needs to be addressed urgently otherwise the Indian populace will probably start hankering for harsher moves on the border.
 
NaswarvillePage2043PakistanDefence_zps08c112b5.png

/\
/\

Like this?
Doctor sab ki haal aai :D
 
Actually our major complaint with BD is neither insurgency nor transit. The insurgency in the NE is nearly dead, with 17 out of 20 groups declaring unilateral ceasefires and dropping their arms, even integrating into the political mainstream (including the single largest group, ULFA, where only a splinter faction of about a 100 fighters remains active), the rest are penny pushers in real terms. The real grouse we have is illegal immigration, which is treated as some sort of a myth by the BD members here, which has been talked about even in this year's UN report on the issue. Our north eastern denizens despise these immigrants, as in create a massacre level despise (the Assam student's union started a frigging sub-conventional conflict situation due to this issue and the Nellie massacre took 5000 lives when locals went apeshit about it). Other than that we do have concerns about fidayeen or mujaheddin being able to use BD's soil to operate but nothing more. It is the former issue which needs to be addressed urgently otherwise the Indian populace will probably start hankering for harsher moves on the border.

Unfortunately we cannot control illegal immigration.It is impossible given our weak infrastructure and economy.Considering the long land border BD-India shares it is not possible for us to employ enough paramilitary forces.And about the Mujahideen...Bangladesh is as safe as the US if we go by international terrorism indices.The only terrorists that Indian intelligence mentions in relation to BD are Rohingyas who usually are at the Burma border and are not state sponsored(some of them were before 9/11 and Uncle Sam knew about it).There won't be any major Mujahideen camps in BD(unless Uncle Sam wants it).BUT terrorists can go in and out of the border and again we have limited control over it.
 
Unfortunately we cannot control illegal immigration.It is impossible given our weak infrastructure and economy.Considering the long land border BD-India shares it is not possible for us to employ enough paramilitary forces.And about the Mujahideen...Bangladesh is as safe as the US if we go by international terrorism indices.The only terrorists that Indian intelligence mentions in relation to BD are Rohingyas who usually are at the Burma border and are not state sponsored(some of them were before 9/11 and Uncle Sam knew about it).There won't be any major Mujahideen camps in BD(unless Uncle Sam wants it).BUT terrorists can go in and out of the border and again we have limited control over it.

That's exactly where the issue, FOR US, lies. It causes severe unrest in our north eastern states and that in turn causes a real headache for us given the environment we inhabit. The Indian people are changing, and changing drastically, looking outwards. Unfortunately for a large number of them all they see around them are enemies as per their perception.

On our part, at least the LBA should have been cleared and done with but you are right we need to ensure that our internal political jostling doesn't spill over to our foreign relations.
 
That's exactly where the issue, FOR US, lies. It causes severe unrest in our north eastern states and that in turn causes a real headache for us given the environment we inhabit. The India people are changing, and changing drastically, looking outwards. Unfortunately for a large number of them all they see around them are enemies as per their perception.

On our part, at least the LBA should have been cleared and done with but you are right we need to ensure that our internal political jostling doesn't spill over to our foreign relations.
The best thing you can do about illegal immigration is to not let them in...but not letting them in does not mean shooting them.Just grab them and deport them when they try to enter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom