What's new

Narendra Modi’s second partition of India

graphican

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
12,433
Reaction score
48
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
AfXEmfzjejE7O8RiGWIk.jpg


This article originally appeared on Project Syndicate and is republished with permission.


At a time when India’s major national priority ought to be cratering economic growth, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has instead plunged the country into a new political crisis of its own making.

With its penchant for shock-and-awe tactics, the government pushed through parliament a controversial Citizenship Amendment Bill that fast-tracks citizenship for people fleeing persecution in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh – provided they are not Muslim. By excluding members of just one community, the bill, which was quickly signed into law by President Ram Nath Kovind, is fundamentally antithetical to India’s secular and pluralist traditions. As I argued in parliament, it is an affront to the fundamental tenets of equality and religious non-discrimination enshrined in our Constitution and an all-out assault on the very idea of India for which our forefathers gave their lives.

As India’s freedom struggle neared its goal, Indian nationalists split over the question of whether religion should be the determinant of nationhood. Those who believed that it should, led by Mohammed Ali Jinnah and his followers, advocated the idea of Pakistan as a separate country for Muslims. The rest, led by Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, argued passionately that religion had nothing to do with nationhood. Their idea of India led to a free country for people of all religions, regions, castes, and languages.

The implications – constitutional, political, social, and moral – of the Modi government’s betrayal of this core idea are profound. Under the approved bill, Muslim immigrants may be declared illegal. Coupled with the government’s plan to create an even more problematic National Register of Citizens, the authorities will be able to disenfranchise any Indian Muslim who is unable to prove his or her provenance in India. Many Indians, especially the poor, lack documentary evidence of when and where they were born; even birth certificates have become widespread only in recent decades. While non-Muslims would, thanks to the approved bill, get a free pass, similarly undocumented Muslims would suddenly bear the onus of proving that they are Indian.

This marks a breathtaking departure from seven decades of practice in managing an astonishing degree of cultural diversity. Foreigners – including President George W. Bush – admired the fact that India had produced hardly any Islamic State or al-Qaeda members, despite being home to 180 million Muslims. Indians proudly pointed out that this was because Indian democracy gave Muslims an equal stake in the country’s wellbeing. We can no longer say that.

Democratic India has never had a religious test for citizenship. Muslims have served as presidents, generals, chief ministers and governors of states, ambassadors, Supreme Court chief justices, and captains of national sports teams.

The religious bigotry that led to partition and the establishment of Pakistan has now been mirrored in pluralist India. As I told my fellow parliamentarians, that was a partition of India’s soil; this has become a partition of India’s soul.

Inevitably, mass protests have erupted, particularly in the North-Eastern states bordering Bangladesh, where locals fear being swamped by Bangladeshi Hindu migrants with fast-track citizenship; in West Bengal and Delhi, where Muslims fear that they will be subject to a worsening climate of suspicion; and among Muslims and secularists nationwide. Though the protests have been mostly peaceful, the authorities have responded with force. Four demonstrators have been shot dead in Assam (and two more killed in the chaos), curfews have been imposed, police have invaded universities, and Internet and telephone services have been suspended in some areas. Over 100 people have been injured. This self-inflicted wound will take a long time to heal.

In his first term in office, Modi attempted to create a more unabashedly Hindu India, but one that was still attractive to global investors. Six months into his second term, he seems to have given up on the latter goal. As foreigners recoil with horror at the blatant Islamophobia on display from the highest echelons of Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party, he has focused on criminalising the triple-talaq form of Islamic divorce, pushing for a Hindu temple on a site where a 470-year-old mosque was demolished in 1992 by Hindu protesters, and changing the constitutional status of Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir and detaining its political leaders. The new citizenship law is just one more brick in an edifice of official bigotry.

It is an edifice that is leaving India increasingly isolated. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe promptly canceled a visit to India following the citizenship bill’s enactment, as have two Bangladeshi ministers. Foreign investors have already been withdrawing, thanks to Modi’s mismanagement of the economy, which has never recovered from the disastrous blows of an irresponsible demonetisation exercise and the botched implementation of a nationwide Goods and Services Tax. Banks are weighed down by bad debt, the public sector is hemorrhaging money, automobile factories are closing, unemployment is at a 46-year high, and farmers are committing suicide in record numbers.

Now, the Modi government has compounded its economic fecklessness with political recklessness, plunging India into turmoil. The combination of ineptitude and bigotry that has laid the country low has left long-time admirers of the Indian model speechless in disbelief. With the government on the warpath against the fundamental assumptions of the Indian republic, the unspoken fear among the country’s democrats is that the worst is yet to come.

Shashi Tharoor, a former UN under-secretary-general and former Indian Minister of State for External Affairs and Minister of State for Human Resource Development, is an MP for the Indian National Congress.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2019.
www.project-syndicate.org

Reference: https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/12/25/958852/narendra-modis-second-partition-of-india
 
all of you people can dream. you should take care of your second partition.
 
I HAVE BEEN INFORMED BY MY CONTACTS IN DELHI, JUST AN OVER AN HOUR AGO
THAT AGENT MODI IS DOING a GOOD JOB. MAY ISI GIVE HIM A PLACE IN ARMY INTEL HISTORY.
Money is the real agent. Whoever has money on his side wins. That's why we have been winning for 70 years.

- PRTP GWD
 
you are right that's why 1 billion hungry indians.
We collect/prise money from the poor to bribe the enemy. How else we had the last laugh in:
1. 1965 war
2. 1971 war
3. 1984 Siachen conflict
4. 1990s Kashmir insurgency
5. 1999 Kargil conflict

- PRTP GWD
 
We collect/prise money from the poor to bribe the enemy. How else we had the last laugh in:
1. 1965 war
2. 1971 war
3. 1984 Siachen conflict
4. 1990s Kashmir insurgency
5. 1999 Kargil conflict

- PRTP GWD

the tea is fantastic. 1 billion Indians vs 200 million paks the result is not good for a big country like India. it should be an easy win for India instead soldiers are hungry and failed pilots drinking tea from pak. quantity vs quality.
 
the tea is fantastic. 1 billion Indians vs 200 million paks the result is not good for a big country like India. it should be an easy win for India instead soldiers are hungry and failed pilots drinking tea from pak. quantity vs quality.
Tum meri baat nahi samajh raha hai. Quality achchha ho ya bura, Akhir mein jeet kiski hui hain?

Example: Pakistan was winning in Kargil. Why then it had to withdraw? Money talks, bullshit walks. Don't mention the Abhinandan episode. It was an insignificant one day skirmish.

- PRTP GWD
 
We collect/prise money from the poor to bribe the enemy. How else we had the last laugh in:
1. 1965 war
2. 1971 war
3. 1984 Siachen conflict
4. 1990s Kashmir insurgency
5. 1999 Kargil conflict

- PRTP GWD

Thanks for listing why an implosion of India would be a win for peace and prosperity of South Asia.

Don’t forget to add the 1962 Indian victory over China. It fits right into this list.
 

Back
Top Bottom