Narendra Modi reminds to the Bangladeshi people that it was India who orchestrated the Break up of P

[Shahzaz ud din]

Narendra Modi reminds to the Bangladeshi people that it was India who orchestrated the Break up of Pakistan

 

[Trango Towers]

Reminder for Modi.

Bengal was the first state in India to vote for an independent Pakistan.

Hindutva broken

 

[Chakar The Great]

Without Bangladesh there would have been no Pakistan. Also what is he celebrating? Did Bangladesh joined india? Pakistan is happy for another Muslim country in the region. Cheers.

 

[Kuru]

I wonder how a Pakistani and a Bangladeshi behave when they meet each other in real. Of course there is no enmity, but is there a "moment of realisation" of what went wrong? Do they talk about 2 nation theory ? Or about Jinnah ?
Or about "Hindu India" ?
Would love to know some real life experiences.

Bengal was the first state in India to vote for an independent Pakistan

I guess this makes them the real succesors of Pakistan that Jinnah created in 1947. Moreover, their population was also more than the west wing.

I think Bangladesh should be called Pakistan (because that's where this who thing was started). And as for Pakistan , not sure , may be Punjabistan ? If sindhis don't mind?

Bangladesh joined india?

That was never the part of the plan. May be India just wanted to prove that 2 nation theory is flawed.

Pakistan is happy for another Muslim country in the region

No it isn't. Pak Army fought hard "to avoid another muslim country in the region". How can you take that honor away from them ? Just because they lost?

 

[Shahzaz ud din]

"Hindu India"

ONLY

 

[Trango Towers]

I wonder how a Pakistani and a Bangladeshi behave when they meet each other in real. Of course there is no enmity, but is there a "moment of realisation" of what went wrong? Do they talk about 2 nation theory ? Or about Jinnah ?
Or about "Hindu India" ?
Would love to know some real life experiences.


I guess this makes them the real succesors of Pakistan that Jinnah created in 1947. Moreover, their population was also more than the west wing.

I think Bangladesh should be called Pakistan (because that's where this who thing was started). And as for Pakistan , not sure , may be Punjabistan ? If sindhis don't mind?


That was never the part of the plan. May be India just wanted to prove that 2 nation theory is flawed.


No it isn't. Pak Army fought hard "to avoid another muslim country in the region". How can you take that honor away from them ? Just because they lost?

I am Pakistani. My best friend is Bengali. I have been to Bangladesh many time. Stayed in dhanmandi outside the BDR HQ for 3 months. Travelled all over. I had zero trouble. Infect people were kind and most people acknowledge that mujibur Rahman and Bhutto were both traitors and look how they died. One killed by his own troops and the other hung. I have spoken about the war and what a nasty time it was for all. How one young Pakistani officer in a main roundabout in Dhaka shot himself rather the surrender. How atrocities took place. How even in the darkest hour there was kindness. But you won't get that from bums on the net. You have to get out and meet people.
I have also travelled in India from Delhi westerds to Jaipur. I met amazing Indians and not one of them reflects people on PDF.

 

[Shahzaz ud din]

just say whatever comes to his head

 

[xyxmt]

I wonder how a Pakistani and a Bangladeshi behave when they meet each other in real. Of course there is no enmity, but is there a "moment of realisation" of what went wrong? Do they talk about 2 nation theory ? Or about Jinnah ?
Or about "Hindu India" ?
Would love to know some real life experiences.


I guess this makes them the real succesors of Pakistan that Jinnah created in 1947. Moreover, their population was also more than the west wing.

I think Bangladesh should be called Pakistan (because that's where this who thing was started). And as for Pakistan , not sure , may be Punjabistan ? If sindhis don't mind?


That was never the part of the plan. May be India just wanted to prove that 2 nation theory is flawed.


No it isn't. Pak Army fought hard "to avoid another muslim country in the region". How can you take that honor away from them ? Just because they lost?

we had a quite a few Bangali students in our University and there was no animosity, most educated Bangalis know what happened and now continue with their lives. Living with Bangalis in Karachi during my childhood there always was a barrier between Bangalis and non Bangalis and I dont think anyone was surprised.

 

[doorstar]

these "commentators" in this thread are talking about different crap instead of listening to the speech and then commenting on it and its contradictions etc

it's pdf after all, what can you expect?

 

[Shahzaz ud din]

People Of BanglaDesh Still Love Pakistan | A crying and touching truth

 

[TMA]

I wonder how a Pakistani and a Bangladeshi behave when they meet each other in real. Of course there is no enmity, but is there a "moment of realisation" of what went wrong? Do they talk about 2 nation theory ? Or about Jinnah ?
Or about "Hindu India" ?
Would love to know some real life experiences.


I guess this makes them the real succesors of Pakistan that Jinnah created in 1947. Moreover, their population was also more than the west wing.

I think Bangladesh should be called Pakistan (because that's where this who thing was started). And as for Pakistan , not sure , may be Punjabistan ? If sindhis don't mind?


That was never the part of the plan. May be India just wanted to prove that 2 nation theory is flawed.


No it isn't. Pak Army fought hard "to avoid another muslim country in the region". How can you take that honor away from them ? Just because they lost?

Bangladesh cannot be called P A K (I) S TAN, perhaps Bengalistan....?
Punjab
Afghania (Another name for KPK)
Kashmir
Sindh
Balochistan

There is and was no Bangla in P A K (I) S TAN.

The I was added in the Roman for correct pronunciation.
In the Abjad it is پ ا ک س تان (no I equivalent as it is not needed for correct pronunciation).

 

[Trango Towers]

Bangladesh cannot be called P A K (I) S TAN, perhaps Bengalistan....?
Punjab
Afghania (Another name for KPK)
Kashmir
Sindh
Balochistan

There is and was no Bangla in P A K (I) S TAN.

The I was added in the Roman for correct pronunciation.
In the Abjad it is پ ا ک س تان (no I equivalent as it is not needed for correct pronunciation).

How about India as chutia

 

[aman_rai0007]

Pakistan is happy for another Muslim country in the region. Cheers.

Really...??
Then let Balochistan be another independent Muslim Country...

 

[doorstar]

why is no one talking about modi speech in op?

 

[ziaulislam]

I wonder how a Pakistani and a Bangladeshi behave when they meet each other in real. Of course there is no enmity, but is there a "moment of realisation" of what went wrong? Do they talk about 2 nation theory ? Or about Jinnah ?
Or about "Hindu India" ?
Would love to know some real life experiences.


I guess this makes them the real succesors of Pakistan that Jinnah created in 1947. Moreover, their population was also more than the west wing.

I think Bangladesh should be called Pakistan (because that's where this who thing was started). And as for Pakistan , not sure , may be Punjabistan ? If sindhis don't mind?


That was never the part of the plan. May be India just wanted to prove that 2 nation theory is flawed.


No it isn't. Pak Army fought hard "to avoid another muslim country in the region". How can you take that honor away from them ? Just because they lost?

Please read cabinet mission 1946, Pakistan resolution 1940
There is no mention of single state drill 1946 Delhi conventi6muslim league wanted two countries...its only 1946 when Bengal first governor asked for single country given growing animosity with india...

After wards the inflexible attitude of mujeeb led to Bangladesh

Summary which is never taught to Indians but can be easily verified by some Google search
1. 1940 resolution was after India repeatedly ignored ores 1/3 seats in center for muslims to avoid constitutional changes unilaterally
2. Pakistan accepted 1946 cabinet mission calling for United India, it was Congress who rejected it calling it too loose federation
3. Original plan was two countries east and west only in 1946 Bengal leaders asked for single entity
4. India played a vital role in breaking Pakistan through unilateral military aggression though it mention refugees as a ploy but do you see Pakistan axing Afghanistan due to refugees?
Pakistan learned a lesson.
And thus this ended any hope for peace fully settlement for next 100 years ..sindh water agreement proves that Pakistan can make unilateral concessions but now we will see two nuclear states as Pakistan knew had it had nuclear weapons in 1971 India would not have attacked us
5. India frequently mentions baluchistan movement when India has nothing to do with it in anyway. You never see Pakistan talking about nagaland or manipur
Kashmir is disputed territory and both sides talk about each occupied areas which is okay but why baluchistan??? Clearly shows India obsession
6. Terroism has effected both countries Pakistani died in Samjohta Express and Indians in Bombay but still India forgets about its side

why is no one talking about modi speech in op?

Because it's an old news..every PM has talked same shit since last 20 years