Contrarian
ELITE MEMBER

- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 11,571
- Reaction score
- 4
As posted by Asim:
Now mate, i have a question(directed to all Moderators). Why will a discussion or debate (which may or may not lead to Modi's glorification - on account of his performance in Gujarat) not be allowed on this forum?
Any discussion on Gujarat automatically has to veer towards Modi as he has been the CM of Gujarat for more than 10 years now. Gujarat's performance vis-a-vis other Indian states will automatically will lead to praise as well as criticism on Modi.
As you can see for yourself, people debate on the pro's and con's of Modi on every thread related to him. He is a controversial figure in India as well. But the point is that there is discussion, not a blanket ban. That is the essence of democracy. He is an elected CM of Gujarat, and has also been (for now) not been indicted by the Courts.
And pardon me, but if Modi being the CM when the riots in Gujarat took place (which makes him accountable for everything that happens there - ie his complicity either explicit or implicit) then by that same token, then any thread on Pakistani army should also not be allowed as they were involved in the same kind of killings in Bangladesh?
When you protest against some countries who put up bans on freedom of expression and whatnot, should you not practice what you preach?
Lastly, this is a discussion forum - an international one at that. I see no reason to stifle debates and discussions. One must be open minded to hear what you donot like as well.
Regards
It has been categorically stated that Modi's glorification will not be allowed by any sensible website.
Shri Modi can go to hell.
Now mate, i have a question(directed to all Moderators). Why will a discussion or debate (which may or may not lead to Modi's glorification - on account of his performance in Gujarat) not be allowed on this forum?
Any discussion on Gujarat automatically has to veer towards Modi as he has been the CM of Gujarat for more than 10 years now. Gujarat's performance vis-a-vis other Indian states will automatically will lead to praise as well as criticism on Modi.
As you can see for yourself, people debate on the pro's and con's of Modi on every thread related to him. He is a controversial figure in India as well. But the point is that there is discussion, not a blanket ban. That is the essence of democracy. He is an elected CM of Gujarat, and has also been (for now) not been indicted by the Courts.
And pardon me, but if Modi being the CM when the riots in Gujarat took place (which makes him accountable for everything that happens there - ie his complicity either explicit or implicit) then by that same token, then any thread on Pakistani army should also not be allowed as they were involved in the same kind of killings in Bangladesh?
When you protest against some countries who put up bans on freedom of expression and whatnot, should you not practice what you preach?
Lastly, this is a discussion forum - an international one at that. I see no reason to stifle debates and discussions. One must be open minded to hear what you donot like as well.
Regards