What's new

N-League shift towards centre left

Kabira

BANNED
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
-20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
I have noticed in last 4 years N-league is slowly shifting towards centre left from being right wing pseudo religious party. Likes of Chaudhry Nisar now are shunned and people who think logically like Ahsan Iqbal are replacing them. Rana Sanaullah days also look numbered. Meanwhile PTI who started as centre left quickly turned towards right wing politics and its losing appeal to secular people in Pakistan who don't want religion to dictate politics.

PTI now have these pseudo religious fanboys like Abbasi who spit on Pakistani passport over freaking rohigas.

"It all started amidst an intense discussion Abbasi was having with PML-N’s Jan Achakzai regarding Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, during which he implied that a Pakistani passport isn't really the most valuable piece of paper to have."
https://images.dawn.com/news/1178382
 
.
I have noticed in last 4 years N-league is slowly shifting towards centre left from being right wing pseudo religious party. Likes of Chaudhry Nisar now are shunned and people who think logically like Ahsan Iqbal are replacing them. Rana Sanaullah days also look numbered. Meanwhile PTI who started as centre left quickly turned towards right wing politics and its losing appeal to secular people in Pakistan who don't want religion to dictate politics.

PTI now have these pseudo religious fanboys like Abbasi who spit on Pakistani passport over freaking rohigas.

"It all started amidst an intense discussion Abbasi was having with PML-N’s Jan Achakzai regarding Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, during which he implied that a Pakistani passport isn't really the most valuable piece of paper to have."
https://images.dawn.com/news/1178382
Lagta hy tesky ko check mil gaya :D
@PakSword
Abdul Manan jaisey bhand key hotey hoye ye aisi batein kar raha hy
 
.
left and right wing spheres aren't really a good way to gauge politics in pakistan.
you'd find that many so called leftists in pakistan have more on common with the western center-right (or even the far right for that matter)

PTI has been considered the new face of the left in Pakistan:
http://petroimperialism.blogspot.ca/2016/06/imran-khans-pti-new-face-of-liberalism.html

Remember the group 'code pink' that marched alongside PTI years ago. it was a far left group, PPP considers itself the vanguard of the Pakistani left yet no leftist group outside of pakistan ever voiced their support for them.
 
.
left and right wing spheres aren't really a good way to gauge politics in pakistan.
you'd find that many so called leftists in pakistan have more on common with the western center-right (or even the far right for that matter)

PTI has been considered the new face of the left in Pakistan:
http://petroimperialism.blogspot.ca/2016/06/imran-khans-pti-new-face-of-liberalism.html

Remember the group 'code pink' that marched alongside PTI years ago. it was a far left group, PPP considers itself the vanguard of the Pakistani left yet no leftist group outside of pakistan ever voiced their support for them.

Im not comparing them with world standard but our own. Democrats will be right wing in UK and so on.

PTI is two faced, in KP they are against women rights bill while their workers in punjab pretend to be “liberal” to counter N-league narrative. Now N it self is shifting towards centre left and people know what PTI is doing in KP.
 
.
Actually PML-N has always maintained the same stance over their political history. And that stance is corruption, corruption is 'holier than thau' and every member of the party will engage in massive corruption. Every member from a worker, MNA, MPA, Minister, Senator and PM will all engage in corruption and that is the only motto of the party.
 
.
Behnain kiya kar rahien thien dialogue yaad hy?
 
.
You will see in NA-120 that PTI have become irrelevant in punjab. They were expected to be PPP replacement with leftish politics. Now that N-league it self is changing for good, I don't see much hope for PTI.
 
. . .
Islami Jhamorian never vote for mulla tolla, all parties have few mulla in their parties kuch ke munh pe aur kuch ke pait mein dhadhi. Capt Safdar Rana Sanaullah Ch Nisar still PMLN main characters to harvest zombies.
 
.
Islami Jhamorian never vote for mulla tolla, all parties have few mulla in their parties kuch ke munh pe aur kuch ke pait mein dhadhi. Capt Safdar Rana Sanaullah Ch Nisar still PMLN main characters to harvest zombies.

Rana, Nisar and Safdar don't have much importance in N league anymore. They are stupid and jahil like PTI MNAs, especially Rana and Safdar. As I said N league is changing for good.

Ahsan Iqbal, Ismael Mistah, Jan Achakzai, Haqan Abbasi, etc look like competent team which can lead Pakistan.
 
.
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Pakistanis with their inferiority-complex and misplaced infatuation with Western terms sometimes fascinate me.

Without googling--can anybody here tell me that precise reason why right and left rose in Western Europe? What's the FUNDAMENTAL difference between "conservatives" and "liberals" in Western world? Here's a trick question: Classical liberals of 18, 19th centuries in Europe had what kind of views? ;)

Here's the thing my goodhearted but unfortunate fellows: The notion of "liberal" and "secular" vs "right-wing" and "conservative" does not apply to countries outside of Western sphere...ESPECIALLY Islamic world (which Pakistan is a part of).

These notions and grand concepts rose out of Europe because of particular European history, political struggles, and culture. Westerners use these symbols/terms to make sense of the outside world and that's okay. A people will use their indigenous lenses to look at the foreign lands and cultures.

However, when a peoples use foreign concept and tools to understand themselves and their own locale---then it becomes completely embarrassing and downright offensive to intelligent mind.

I grew up (like most kids here who went to high school and then college here in US as American citizens) learning about Europe's history, political basis, philosophical foundations and their application to our modern times. Take my word for it---you guys have NO idea about any of the above and you come across utter loony toons when discussing Pakistan as if it is a wealthy, post-religious society of Western Hemisphere.

PPP is significantly MORE 'conservative' than the actual conservatives in US (let alone Europe, which is far less conservative than here)---and you think PML-N is "center left" now given that PML-N is more conservative than PPP itself

As I said, these labels and titles do not apply to countries like Pakistan.

@Zibago @Kabira @war&peace

Islami Jhamorian never vote for mulla tolla, all parties have few mulla in their parties kuch ke munh pe aur kuch ke pait mein dhadhi. Capt Safdar Rana Sanaullah Ch Nisar still PMLN main characters to harvest zombies.

Lol, the precise reason why so called "Islamic parties" don't win in Pakistan is a very solid proof that Pakistan IS an Islamic state and has Islamic culture and heritage.

I know it's hard for you to comprehend. Here's a food for thought.

US claims to be the most free nation on planet Earth. We have several "freedom parties" here...they NEVER win ANYTHING.

Is it because US is not a free country and people never vote for "freedom"? Or is it because US is indeed a very free country and since the need has already been met (with all its short comings just like in Pakistan)--people don't see the necessity of so called "freedom parties"

Now take the same approach and apply to Pakistan and so called "Islamic" parties ;)

The state itself is Islamic. Culture, identity, and heritage is very much Islamic (again with all its imperfections and shortcomings)---and hence "Islamic" parties are not considered to be worth voting for. Not because people don't like what they are offering...BUT because Pakistan and Pakistanis have ALREADY ESTABLISHED what these so called "Islamic" parties sell in their message :)

I know, your world probably just cam crashing down bc nobody had ever given u this perspective in ur little cute bubble of your own that you and your fellow wanna be liberal/seculars live in..
 
.
^^
Read post number 4, I already explained why its pointless to compare european left with Pakistani left. But we are writing in western language and western terms are used.

There is nothing Islamic about Pakistan. If there was then afghans will not have to go back and Pakistan would take all of Rohingas. In Islam concept of nation state doesn't exist and everyone is equal. We just should use Islam for advancing our relations with muslim world.
 
.
^^
Read post number 4, I already explained why its pointless to compare european left with Pakistani left. But we are writing in western language and western terms are used.

There is nothing Islamic about Pakistan. If there was then afghans will not have to go back and Pakistan would take all of Rohingas. In Islam concept of nation state doesn't exist and everyone is equal. We just should use Islam for advancing our relations with muslim world.

:rofl::rofl:

And there it is folks...the level of argumentation from "educated and enlightened secularists of Pakistan"

No wonder you guys are not taken seriously by anyone

Here's another one

US is not a free and capitalist society becaus we have social security :D
 
.
Without googling--can anybody here tell me that precise reason why right and left rose in Western Europe? What's the FUNDAMENTAL difference between "conservatives" and "liberals" in Western world? Here's a trick question: Classical liberals of 18, 19th centuries in Europe had what kind of views? ;)


Hey,

if my memory does not betray me, I remember from my history class is that the Left and Right started in the French parliament. The conservatives/religious people who wanted the things to remain unchanged used to sit on the right side while the people who wanted change used to sit on the left, while people who were moderates used to be in the centre and we called centrist. That's what I remember. For more info one can read online.

BTW in Pakistan, it is difficult to categories the major political parties in any of the aforementioned. Most of them are not doing politics of principles. In ZAB's time PPP was a socialist party and it stuck to it until the illegal murder of the founder and the leader. After that PPP changed its ideology and became like others. PMLn never had any ideology, it was created on "nazriya zaroorat" by Gen. Jeelani and Zia (lanatullahi alaihum) by gathering all opportunists and malleable crooks. NS used the Punjabi (jag punjabi jag ...) and religious cards to fool the nation and stay in power especially in Punjab that asymmetrically holds the most of the power in the centre.

Actually PML-N has always maintained the same stance over their political history. And that stance is corruption, corruption is 'holier than thau' and every member of the party will engage in massive corruption. Every member from a worker, MNA, MPA, Minister, Senator and PM will all engage in corruption and that is the only motto of the party.

Not just corruption, hooliganism, rascal-ism, vandalism, barbarism, sexism, racism, provincialism, religion etc... all are feathers in their caps. They use whatever suits them according to the situation. So they are all over the place...not just left, right or centre.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom