I didn't say it should be the only way, these things can be debated upon. Few people raised issue about how cremation adds to pollution but that didn't get any attention.
I guess then those, who lynch people for consuming beef don't fall in that "plenty" category..............
.Sure if the Indian Muslims, who are allegedly the second largest representation of Islam in any country are willing to debate then it's their choice. My point was to illustrate the significance of religious practices, which aren't just confined to Islam and drawing analogies in that retrospect to denounce some, is absolutely irrelevant.
Throw bodies in deep sea/ no cremation no pollution.
Nah its highly unlikely that Muslims arguably the most religious community in the world would comprise on their beliefs for your convenience. There was a report from Indian news recently about how Ganga is the most shitiest and polluted river in South Asia due to lumps of dead Hindus floating in the water.
And people are talking about polluted Ganga and floating dead bodies and how to clean it up, all I am saying is there can be a discussion about it.
Lets put religious ways aside, cremation is counter productive for ecosystem. You must listen to
I guess then those, who lynch people for consuming beef don't fall in that "plenty" category..............
