What's new

Muslims may become majority in Germany by 2046

ALL Abrahmic Faith practices rule by force.

What force?

You are lacking evidence

The Christians are in a better position because they have seperated religious fanaticism and govt in most countries.

Bush himself is an extremist evangelist; The people in the senate who make policies are right wing neo-cons. What are you talking about ?

Adux is right house cleaning is required.

Exactly; lets make US 100% secular like Turkey. Of course the master of freedom and democracy should be the first one to embrace 100% secularity
 
What force?

You are lacking evidence
well yea christians, jews, islam didnt spread invaded countries and just spread! :rofl: :rofl:

Bush himself is an extremist evangelist; The people in the senate who make policies are right wing neo-cons. What are you talking about ?
lot of people hates him, his policies are wrong in someway.idc if hes alien.

Exactly; lets make US 100% secular like Turkey. Of course the master of freedom and democracy should be the first one to embrace 100% secularity
yep make middle east same too, and i want to practice many religion on saudi too without getting deported, and maybe zoroastriasm in iran.

and you know its a problem everywhere which isnt so easy to address.
and also you should know turkey is not islamic country, islam and secularism doesnt go side by side so what are you referring to is wrong.

if you want to give example of nice country thats japan , west-indies :P

so you see Thing about Saudi is it doesnt makes hilly billy $hit out of declaring itself secular and justifies its actions, west is making a wrong by justifying secularism but still they are way tolerant than saudi, so one shouldnt expect 100% secularism, frankly i wont expect freedom anywhere as i have in india.period.

plus there are social customs involved too which goes against the norms of a society and shouldnt be done normally, like what if you go to Pakistan and start drinking in public or go in bjp house and start taking beef or go to west wearing a dress of nazi..........this is not about govt policy but adoptation of society.

plu what Middle east isnt getting is it is a culprit of series of aftermath that followed after ww2, even many many christian nations were culprits of that too.they can only themselves make progress.
just look at your country as an example middle east can follow [without the border claims ::P ], progressing good inspite thousands of riots in past century.
 
alamgir > you no nothing about germany.

Germany is among one of the country that breeds terror unlike any other european countries, Muslims in french are much better.

Lemme tell you a small insight, Any time german govt broadcasts a terror story say 9/11 or so peoples converts to Islam.

There are a strong strong underground of neo nazis in germany and they are extremely extremely anti-west, they cannot express their views through nazism so to opt for anti-west they opts for Islam to misuse it not to practise it.

a nice site http://www.aryan-nations.org/

I have a peer who works in max planc institute in germany and i my mam is married there.
Muslim in germany and other eu states are victoms of neo nazis movements,saveral time these orgnization attack on islamic centers, muslim,s businesses, and persons belong to islamic faith.I not know where you got the idea that neo nazis are converting in islam.
 
[QUOTE said:
joey;45125]Well we do have them, but it necessarily doesnt reflects the ideology, they came to existence to keep bay the influence of abrahmic faiths atleast they were the invaders.

ALL Abrahmic Faith practices rule by force.
Have you ever read the history of vedic,s how hinduism spread in india, they also are invader and they imposse their faith on local populations
 
Muslim in germany and other eu states are victoms of neo nazis movements,saveral time these orgnization attack on islamic centers, muslim,s businesses, and persons belong to islamic faith.I not know where you got the idea that neo nazis are converting in islam.

other Eu states diff, French people normally hates all others they have good islamic population and they share high post too.

In germany its diff, they are not victim of nazism in todays world, but its mainly more nazis converting specifically for germany as both islamists extremists and nazis share similar agenda , anti-israel/anti-west. just go to the site and see yourself the new ideology which is so fake :lol: they still thinks if your white you can join us if not you cannot stuffs.

Have you ever read the history of vedic,s how hinduism spread in india, they also are invader and they imposse their faith on local populations

About hinduism, you need to learn something first without reading articles written for propaganda.
Vedic was Sindhs own culture and invasion DIDNT happened and IT IS proven.

People migrated from Central Asia to china to Europe not other way around which was tuff for colonial rulers to accept.

Its as simple as this- conversion thing is modern thing in hinduism in true sense it doesnt exist.
conversion doesnt exists in hinduism but dikhsha exists[spiritualism].

The non-indo gagentic peoples were tribals of Asia and they still exists, they lives in forests and preaches Sun god.

but if your referring to atrocities committed by rulers - well it happened quickest comes to mind is kalinga war by ashoka.it was for the sake of ruling and not for some to establish certain religion.
 
Muslims have ruled over india for more then a thousand years. If islam was spread by the sword then why is it that there are so many non-muslims in india.
 
Kuffir, aka non-muslims. :) I see nothing disrespect in that. That's like calling indians indians and pakistanis pakistanis. :rolleyes:



Islam is the fastest growing religon in the world. That is a fact. Either these people can accept it, or will cry and whine about how it is being spread by the sword. Yet the sword is nowhere to be found :wall:

Context which is said, needs a lot to be desired.the way it is used now implies people who dont follow islam are sub-human
 
Muslims have ruled over india for more then a thousand years. If islam was spread by the sword then why is it that there are so many non-muslims in india.

We were good at reproduction, Muslims ruled for less than a thousand years and not all over the present India.
 
So it justifies your forced convertions.

Islam has no concept of forced conversion

Context which is said, needs a lot to be desired.the way it is used now implies people who dont follow islam are sub-human

Well thats what "you" think; neither you have read and understood Quran nor you are a credited theologian.

In the end its your own anti Islamic feelings that are clouding the judgment
 
other Eu states diff, French people normally hates all others they have good islamic population and they share high post too.

In germany its diff, they are not victim of nazism in todays world, but its mainly more nazis converting specifically for germany as both islamists extremists and nazis share similar agenda , anti-israel/anti-west. just go to the site and see yourself the new ideology which is so fake :lol: they still thinks if your white you can join us if not you cannot stuffs.



About hinduism, you need to learn something first without reading articles written for propaganda.
Vedic was Sindhs own culture and invasion DIDNT happened and IT IS proven.

People migrated from Central Asia to china to Europe not other way around which was tuff for colonial rulers to accept.

Its as simple as this- conversion thing is modern thing in hinduism in true sense it doesnt exist.
conversion doesnt exists in hinduism but dikhsha exists[spiritualism].

The non-indo gagentic peoples were tribals of Asia and they still exists, they lives in forests and preaches Sun god.

but if your referring to atrocities committed by rulers - well it happened quickest comes to mind is kalinga war by ashoka.it was for the sake of ruling and not for some to establish certain religion.


Why don't you tell us about Hindusim? Wasn't Hindusim called something else?

when the Muslim arrived from such places as Afghanistan and Persia, they called the Sindhu River (Sindh/Indus River) the Hindu River. Thereafter, the name “Hindu” was used to describe the inhabitants from that tract of land in the northwestern provinces (now call Sindh) of India where the Sindhu River (Sindh/Indus River) is located, and the region itself was called “Hindustan.” (People of Sindhu river or Sindhu area) Because the Sanskrit sound of “S” converts to “H” in the Farsi language, the Muslims pronounced the Sindhu as “hindu,” even though at the time the people of the area did not use the name “hindu” themselves. This word was used by the Muslim foreigners to identify the people and the religion of those who lived in that area


Question for Hindus, should they call themselves Hindu?
 
Back
Top Bottom