What's new

Muslim woman asked to leave US store for wearing Niqab

Why do you keep mentioning Hijab??? It is perfectly ok to cover your hair. Why do you think that is banned??? It is also ok to wear glasses and a hat. You are intentionally misdirecting the focus of the article by making people think this is about Hijab wearing.


Because that is exactly what is wrong with most religions, idiots with no brains becoming religious and then using their twisted thought processes to malign something which is good and feeling aggrieved in the process, thereby attacking people for perceived 'insults' and thereby indulging in wordplay and acts to actually antagonise the other, who was previously amiable!!!!

Have you seen the posts so far by the member? One after another irrational and pure idiocy. A person who is unable to differentiate between hijab and niqab is feeling aggrieved and calling you 'biased' just because you are able to differentiate.

The problem with all religions. Happens when 90% of population is plain stupid and of remaining 90% is made stupid.

Would they serve Batman?

nope!

Superman will get served. LOL
 
Honestly what are the advantages of such a dress, all i see disadvantages.

And moreever if you have something to hide, then better hide yourself at home. No body is forcing to come out in public.
 
I am sorry but some muslims must learn to go with the flow , I mean what if I wear a Kurta pajama with a tilak placed in my forehead and walking around the market . Not only will I feel uncomfortable , so will the public . These kind of dresses were meant for 12th century ; leave it at that !
What flow do Hindu women go with when they roam around wearing Sarees in Western streets? I mean what if I wear Dhoti-Punjabi with a red dot on the Forehead and walk around the Church on Sunday? Not only I feel uncomfortable, so will the devout Christians, no? And what century was meant for Saree, Dhoti etc?
 
wow !
What flow do Hindu women go with when they roam around wearing Sarees in Western streets? I mean what if I wear Dhoti-Punjabi with a red dot on the Forehead and walk around the Church on Sunday? Not only I feel uncomfortable, so will the devout Christians, no? And what century was meant for Saree, Dhoti etc?
Why dont u ask her !

CoyqRPgW8AELo0N.jpg


Guess what?

You bhartis do that shit all the time in the US.
are u the one who do the cleaning afterwards !
 
Can't blame the store manager in these times ,it's a security threat,one can't even see the face.
Inside the dhoti and in Kurta's pocket, there are more spaces to carry life threatening staff than mere not showing face by veil, understand? BTW, can anything be pulled out of inside-veil without the usage of hand or anything that can catch? So,how can veil be levelled as security issue?
 
Last edited:
good that pious muslima was not asked to show her face by US Police other i would have been happy hunting ground visit for her !

Inside the dhoti and in Kurta's pocket, there are more space to carry life threatening staff than mere not showing face by veil, understand? BTW, can anything be pulled out of inside-veil without the usage of hands or anything that can catch? So,how can veil be levelled as security issue?
epic !!
 
wow !

Why dont u ask her !

CoyqRPgW8AELo0N.jpg
LOL re LOL! Is the above picture any different from Kevin Spacey having Lungi Dance with Indians?
https://www.google.com/search?q=pic...ch&q=kevin+spacey+dancing+with+indian+actress

And if Western lady wearing Saree a benchmark of acceptance than open the following link to see how many others are wearing Burqas, thanks...

https://www.google.com/search?q=pic...X&ved=0ahUKEwiEptKv0q7OAhWGph4KHYmvBrIQsAQIHg

thats true, it can be a male armed with weapons instead of female beneath those niqab
But to pull out gun by male would require the usage of his hand,no? And the same male if he is a Chauvinist-Hindu that carries gun inside his Kurta or Dhoti would need same hand to pull it out, no again? Then it is not the Veil or Kurta or Dhoti but the intention is the matter, comprende?
 
LOL re LOL! Is the above picture any different from Kevin Spacey having Lungi Dance with Indians?
https://www.google.com/search?q=pic...ch&q=kevin+spacey+dancing+with+indian+actress

And if Western lady wearing Saree a benchmark of acceptance than open the following link to see how many others are wearing Burqas, thanks...

https://www.google.com/search?q=pic...X&ved=0ahUKEwiEptKv0q7OAhWGph4KHYmvBrIQsAQIHg


But to pull out gun by male would require the usage of his hand,no? And the same male if he is a Chauvinist-Hindu that carries gun inside his Kurta or Dhoti would need same hand to pull it out, no again? Then it is not the Veil or Kurta or Dhoti but the intention is the matter, comprende?

one can suspects more from the ungodly veil of Niqab compared to the casual Hijab
 
If I were the manager,i would have done the same. You are a moron if you think the manager did that because he/she is religiously biased. She respectfully asked her to show her face which she was uncomfortable with. Heck,what was her problem,even the manager was a female.


The Americans aren't uncomfortable with someone wearing a saree or dhoti or a black dress . They seem uncomfortable when you hide your face. They are pretty much liberal as far as the dress is concerned.
'If you were', is the contrary to the fact conditional thus your intention to abuse power stands no value, after all no chauvinism has been accepted by the U.S's constitutional experts be it in 'Vegies Intense but moronic farting' or trolling form from Vedic School's teaching..

one can suspects more from the ungodly veil of Niqab compared to the casual Hijab
Suspect because of not seeing face, right? See if face is the issue here then why Hindu's supported candidate is openly spitting venom against all Muslims regardless of their face's showing or not? Then why in France, Islam is being branded as non-compliance with Western ideology? And how a mere piece of cloth that covers face has means to hide risky staff than what a Hijabi woman wears?
 
'If you were', is the contrary to the fact conditional thus your intention to abuse power stands no value, after all no chauvinism has been accepted by the U.S's constitutional experts be it in 'Vegies Intense but moronic farting' or trolling form from Vedic School's teaching..


Suspect because of not seeing face, right? See if face is the issue here then why Hindu's supported candidate is openly spitting venom against all Muslims regardless of their face's showing or not? Then why in France, Islam is being branded as non-compliance with Western ideology? And how a mere piece of cloth that covers face has means to hide risky staff than what a Hijabi woman wears?

Hindu what? i had lot of Hindu friends and they are fine with me as a Muslim, the problems is just you who actually come from Pakistan against the Hindu predominantly India. The rest of the Muslim world doesn't have much problems with India and their Hinduism

For the France, is their rules and as a foreigner i don't give a shit about that, is up to them. But it is you who failed to see what happened actually in France

As of April 2011, France has become the first country to enforce a ban against the niqab, or face veil. The French President Nicolas Sarkozy was quoted saying, “Burqas are not welcome in France. In our country, we cannot accept that women be prisoners behind a screen, cut off from all social life deprived of all identity.” Many Muslims, including those who do not wear or even approve of the face veil, lashed out against these words.

what's wrong with you guys, show me where is the hadist and ayat for the Muslim woman to cover her face?


what i found and i following is
24:30-31:

وَقُل لِّلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِنَّ وَيَحْفَظْنَ فُرُوجَهُنَّ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَى جُيُوبِهِنَّ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا لِبُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَائِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَاء بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَائِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَاء بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي أَخَوَاتِهِنَّ أَوْ نِسَائِهِنَّ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُنَّ أَوِ التَّابِعِينَ غَيْرِ أُوْلِي الْإِرْبَةِ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ أَوِ الطِّفْلِ الَّذِينَ لَمْ يَظْهَرُوا عَلَى عَوْرَاتِ النِّسَاء وَلَا يَضْرِبْنَ بِأَرْجُلِهِنَّ لِيُعْلَمَ مَا يُخْفِينَ مِن زِينَتِهِنَّ وَتُوبُوا إِلَى اللَّهِ جَمِيعًا أَيُّهَا الْمُؤْمِنُونَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُونَ ﴿٣١

The believing men are enjoined to lower their gaze and conceal their genitals and the believing women are enjoined to lower their gaze and conceal their genitals, draw their headdress to cover their cleavage, and not to display their beauty, except that which has to be revealed, except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers or their brothers’ sons, or their sisters’ sons, or their women, or their slaves, or eunuchs or children under age; and they should not strike their feet to draw attention to their hidden beauty. O believers, turn to God, that you may know bliss. (Qur’an 24:30-31)
 
Correct decision... Discourage veiled ppl in public place and specially at work place and schools..
 
Where was religious biasness in this whole matter, the store manager never said she would not allow muslim lady. She just said that she would not allow someone with covered face, so the lady was asked either to remove the face cover or to make an exit.

I am sure same store would have not allowed Indian HINDU NAGA Baba too for not covering his body.
People cook there stories to get fame on basis of religious grounds. Religion is for betterment of human life, but if it starts to hamper our day to day life then either we are in wrong society or our religion has not evolved, in both cases its more logical to change or adept.
 
In US every store has a notice. "The management reserves all rights to serve or not to any customer" as simple as that. Burqa or no burqa, its upto the discretion of manager. Remember they dont serve a white male too, if "No shirt or shoes". Why dont muslims leave some stone age customs, get liberal and behave according to changing times and societal norms ? Baffling.

I guess she went there hunting for trouble. All prepared with a camera. Lol
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom