What's new

Muslim woman asked to leave US store for wearing Niqab

This is not Roman time it's a time were people are educated and knows what's wrong and what's bad what store manager did was obviously wrong
Can't blame the store manager in these times ,it's a security threat,one can't even see the face.
 
.
.
Listen nigga, your chicks in the west need to adopt the garbage bag because they be looking fugly as ****. Instead of banning the niqab, the US should ban Indian grandmas wearing the saari with their fat bellies popped out inside of walmarts and other businesses.

You have earned a follower, truly savage lol.

When Pakistan starts thinkiing and liberal views.

When will India?

Can't blame the store manager in these times ,it's a security threat,one can't even see the face.

Then ask if they can see the face.
 
.
US should ban Indian grandmas wearing the saari with their fat bellies popped out
I have noticed that even in UK. The strange thing is the younger generation have taken to wearing Shalwar Kameez exactly as worn in Pakistan. Before even the Sikhs used to wear a standard Kameez but the Shalwar (or Jhalwar/Salvar as pronounced by them) was tight thing like tights with zero slack. Now all have began to wear the baggy Pakistani version.

However those over 50 plus still stick to their traditional dress as so vivedly described by yourself.
 
.
In our library, there is clear instruction to remove helmets, sunglasses or any other form of face veils before entering. They are being racists to Bikers who wants to SWAG.

who in his right mind wear sunglasses and helmets within four walls of a room? may be bharotis?
 
. .
This is not Roman time it's a time were people are educated and knows what's wrong and what's bad what store manager did was obviously wrong

Which part of what she did was wrong ?
 
.
Currently, what is the most assured ID method ? DNA, correct ? But DNA identification is not only active, it is INTRUSIVE. It is 'active' in the sense that we require the other party to give us a response, as in giving us access to their bodies, and intrusive in the sense that we must have a part, no matter how tiny, of their bodies.

Next is fingerprint. This is not as intrusive as DNA sampling, but it is still active and in the sense that we require access to the person's body.

Finally, throughout history, the face have always been the best compromise. Faces are on money, billboards, and official identifications. When we look at a person's face, the act is completely passive. If that person's face is not visible to us, for any reason, we categorize that person as 'anonymous'.
 
.
When India is going to start no Hijab campaign to save her brave people?


No they don't have next you see how she is going to be sacked for this nonsense.

I think stores are allowed to ban people who hide their face.

For instance there is no way a bank is going to allow anybody wearing a niqab service.
When I worked for a company that did money exchanges people had to remove their sunglasses during transactions so the cameras could have a clear picture of them.
 
. . . .
http://tribune.com.pk/story/1156796/muslim/

1156796-DBECCimagea_-1470459394-731-640x480.jpg


A Muslim woman in the American state of Indiana was asked to leave a grocery store for wearing a niqab.

Sara-Safi.jpg

Sarah Safi

Sarah Safi, 32, started recording the incident on her cell phone after she entered a Family Dollar store in Gary, Indiana and was almost immediately asked to leave. In the video, one can hear Safi ask the store’s manager, “You’re telling me I have to leave this store?”


The manager, who said her name was Jaime, is then heard replying, “Yes ma’am, if you can’t remove that from your face I need you to leave the store.” When Safi tried to reason with her, the manager threatened to “have police remove her.”

36DB313200000578-3722797-image-m-61_1470272567962.jpg

Jaime, the store manager, asked Sarah Safi to leave if she did not remove her veil.

“I’m the manager, and I’m telling you to leave my store,” she continued. Safi reminded her that it was a free country which not only believed in but upheld the principle of religious freedom. However, the woman was unmoved.

Safi later told ABC 7 News in an interview she was “really saddened” by the incident. “I was born here, raised here all my life and I’ve never been to an establishment and been treated like this,” she said. “I would like to sit with her and speak to her about what I believe in, because maybe if she heard and really listened to what I believe it I would open her heart,” the woman said.

She went in hunting trouble, didn't she? Cell phone camera on video mode and everything?
 
.
Same thing ruling covers both.

I don't see any ruling on nijab (hijab is fully reasonable) but since they are a known employee I can see that being allowed...versus total strangers coming off the street into someone's business (like a bank) wearing a niqab that is definitely not going to be allowed.

If one person was allowed everybody would have to be allowed.
 
.
I don't see any ruling on nijab (hijab is fully reasonable) but since they are a known employee I can see that being allowed...versus total strangers coming off the street into someone's business (like a bank) wearing a niqab that is definitely not going to be allowed.

If one person was allowed everybody would have to be allowed.
You are simply showing your bias towards Muslims like any other Hindu Bharti......Quote me source that store can refuse service to woman In Hijab or Niqab.
 
.
That full face veil is way over the top esp in Western countries . Hijab is ok but full face veil - - No way. America ain't Europe where people just take everything in as part of multiculturalism.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom