MilSpec
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2011
- Messages
- 12,931
- Reaction score
- 38
- Country
- Location
I am always amused with your lucknow rants, Just fyi following is the Lucknow Lok Sabha Const
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am always amused with your lucknow rants, Just fyi following is the Lucknow Lok Sabha Const
Pakistan do not need to interfer in this movement. muslims along with other minorties in india who are victims of hindutuva extremisam have enough potential to demand a separist homeland and to start a movement for this......
all we need to do is to rais this issue internationaly for the rights of indian minorties
What does it prove? That muslims in Lucknow are very well off? Not a single one of them seems muslim to me.I am always amused with your lucknow rants, Just fyi following is the Lucknow Lok Sabha Const
View attachment 267155
it represents the political mandate of Lucknow, since Independence.What does it prove? That muslims in Lucknow are very well off? Not a single one of them seems muslim to me.
For me it doesn't prove that we are well treated or anything. It proves that India has taken our basic rights from us. We are second class citizens:it represents the political mandate of Lucknow, since Independence.
Constitutional discrimination doesn't happen in India, unlike Pakistan, there are no class of citizens, The constitution of India treats everyone equally.For me it doesn't prove that we are well treated or anything. It proves that India has taken our basic rights from us. We are second class citizens:
What does it prove? That muslims in Lucknow are very well off? Not a single one of them seems muslim to me.
What for the case where the constitution is essentially INEFFECTIVE and not popularly proclaimed by the population?Constitutional discrimination doesn't happen in India, unlike Pakistan, there are no class of citizens, The constitution of India treats everyone equally.
Law and order is a challenge, which is an inherent for a country that houses 1/6th of the planet's population, but then again for a much smaller populace like Pakistan, (which btw constitutionally discriminates among it's citizenry) law and order is an even bigger problem....
HOW?Because India today is doing exactly that. .
What for the case where the constitution is essentially INEFFECTIVE and not popularly proclaimed by the population?
Because India today is doing exactly that. If the nation does not feel like its constitution reflects its character; then that constitutions is essentially no more than a piece of paper.
HOW?
Sir,Don't be a hypocrite. Look around.
Sir,
With utmost respect, I have been looking around for a while now, Babri Masjid demolitions happened when Congress was in power, - No one claimed failure of constitution, so much so,that the government in power did not take the guilty to task.
Congress till date houses the perpetrators of the Sikh riots, but that doesn't seems rattle anyone today as it is to be passed as breakdown of law and order.
Today what is happening is utterly despicable, but from what I am seeing these are not new developments, we have been seeing this time and again, so what is the fundamental change that has happened, to deem that constitutional rights of Indian citizenry is infringed upon today?
Instead of reforming the law and order machinery, it seems we are more busy at dealing accusations.
law and order is a state subject.
But that rule doesn't seem to apply when Mr. Modi is heading the central government.
Forgive me, but With Mr. Rao in the Centre, and well aware of Rath yatra and it's implication, was it not center's prerogative to diffuse the situation knowing that Kalyan Singhs Government was sympathetic to the entire issue.Don't talk rubbish. Kalyan Singh was the CM of the UP, and law and order is a state subject. Learn your subject first, please.
It rattles everybody who is committed to the rule of law. The Congress isn't, otherwise those swines wouldn't have reversed the Shah Bano case judgement with legislation.
No, it is not an old development. Earlier, it was a cynical manipulation of the law; this time, it is a sincere belief that what they are doing is the right way of doing things. Being a crook, and knowing that one is being a crook, is entirely different from being a straightforward upright man, and doing what a straightforward upright man should be doing. That is the difference between the Congress and the Sangh. One knows it is sinning; the other is not even aware of committing any fault.