Gin ka Pakistan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2009
- Messages
- 2,949
- Reaction score
- 0
^^^ I wish him good luck
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Before this day where was his leadership for the common Pakistanis? Where was his leadership for Pakistanis when his men were extra-judicially abducting and selling Pakistanis to their enemies? Where was his leadership for Pakistanis when his men were dragging the honorable Justices out of their chambers and imprisoning them in their residences along with their family members? Were those Justices not Pakistanis? or were those Justices RAW agents? Where was his leadership for Pakistanis when people were committing suicides for not being able to feed their families and kids? Where was his leadership for Pakistanis when he and his PM Aziz bagged millions of dollars worth of officials presents/gifts instead of selling those and distributed the money among Pakistanis?because he always maintained that he is the leader of common Pakistanis and he will face everything and anything for the sake of Pakistan.
Since when the ousted Dictators started getting official protocols? Indeed he did a lot for his masters but now he is only a 'chala howa kartoos', why should US give him any protocol reserved for the Statesmen only?Today he proved that there is no US or CIA behind him otherwise he would have got the same treatment as Zardari or Nawaz Sharif.
Musharraf Ki Yaad AAyi Us Kay Janay Kay Baad jab bijli na aai aur yaad aaya Musharaf ne kuch nahin kia 8 saal mien.
Musharraf government paid IPPs regularly and on time , The current government and IPPs have payment issues or % issues.
Who the hell wants IPPs to produce Electricity in the first place? The per unit cost is high. We need the damn Dams. We need the Coal power generation units and we need Nuclear Power
Oh Man , PPP government brought IPPs into Pakistan in the first place (in 90s) and now they want their previous agreed % (over due) from them and in that fight of two elephants common people are suffering.
They are indeed answerable to the Supreme Judicial Counsel. The "petition" that was used to "kick out" the CJP was based on mala fide intentions, violated constitutional method of referencing to the SJC, violated legal precedents as the reference wasn't sent to the SJC first and when the CJP was restored everybody had the right to file a proper reference through legal procedures. The President could then have sent the reference and initiated proceedings. A new reference never came, hence no proceedings could ever be started.
Legislation, especially civil litigation, is a very complex field. I do not expect anybody, except top jurists to understand the complexities.
The complete judgment makes clear each and every step of the procedure that should have been followed and mentions that any references cannot by blocked by any person as well. In the case of a reference against the CJP or any other member of the SJC, the said member is sidelined for the inquiry and the SJC presents its binding recommendations to the President for approval.
Judgment :- http://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/web/user_files/File/ConstitutionPetitionNo21OF2007.pdf
Musharraf Ki Yaad AAyi Us Kay Janay Kay Baad jab bijli na aai aur yaad aaya Musharaf ne kuch nahin kia 8 saal mien.