Musharraf answers to the threat of Surgical strikes by India

[Awesome]

Of course they would be lame to you.

But the point remains that your ally is able to do anything in your territory and Pak doesn't have the balls to stop em. And this same ally is then abused by quite a few members on this very forum and a lot of intellectuals in Pak about colluding with RAW in arming TTP? Don't you find all this strange? Why the double standards?

Now you want to take this conversation into a US-Pakistan relationship issue? Stick to topic.

 

[Gazzi]

Try it and find out. We Pakistanis have been daring Indians to just try it out. There has been no backing out of a fight from our end. The Indians cowered away from a fight after amassing 1 million troops in 2002.

Retaliation would be massive.

Exactly, Solomon seems to think that Pakistan will be OK with an Indian strike in territories where Pakistan is conducting Operations.......WTF, do you think Pakistan is a Palestine, where Israeli tanks are going to burst through and park outside yasser Arafats headquarters.......Pakistan may have a reply for any adventurism over its LOC..........but....theres only one way to find out.......balls in Indias court....Like Asim has said,, bring it on

 

[Barrett]

Of course they would be lame to you.

But the point remains that your ally is able to do anything in your territory and Pak doesn't have the balls to stop em. And this same ally is then abused by quite a few members on this very forum and a lot of intellectuals in Pak about colluding with RAW in arming TTP? Don't you find all this strange? Why the double standards?

They are doing it because they can and you dont because you cant..... as simple as that.

Cheers

 

[Solomon2]

Solomon seems to think that Pakistan will be OK with an Indian strike in territories where Pakistan is conducting Operations -

Slow down, I'm pretty sure this interview dates from December 2008 or January 2009, that's when other similar interviews with Musharraf took place, and that was long before the P.A. commenced operations in the territories.

Regardless of that, your argument isn't with me, but with President Musharraf. I don't believe he was speaking carelessly, nor do I believe that he is a stupid man. Do you disagree, Gazzi?

 

[Always Neutral]

Yes, but then that's at the behest of Pakistanis against a common enemy in collaboration with an ally. India IS the enemy.

So you disagree with the majority of your countrymen ? Lets take the debate further since ur a fan of Gen M!

This is what he said

" I told US if you don't want to give us the drone tech fine atleast paint the PAF flag on the drone"

Ok for argument sake lets say you control the drones? the next time innocent civillians die can the Chief of ISI take the blame for wrong INTEL ?

Regards

 

[blain2]

Hey Blain,

Do the drone strikes come under surgical strikes ? Ask Gen M that.

Regards

His candid answer would be that India is not the United States

 

[Gazzi]

Slow down, I'm pretty sure this interview dates from December 2008 or January 2009, that's when other similar interviews with Musharraf took place, and that was long before the P.A. commenced operations in the territories.

Regardless of that, your argument isn't with me, but with President Musharraf. I don't believe he was speaking carelessly, nor do I believe that he is a stupid man. Do you disagree, Gazzi?

Solomon, sorry dude......I was jumping the gun and going into laser mode......didn;t understand the post properly

 

[qsaark]

1. He will play a major role in future.

He doesn't dare coming back home; role he will play.... Wet dreams.

 

[blain2]

He doesn't dare coming back home; role he will play.... Wet dreams.

Personal biases and preferences aside, more bizarre things have happened in the world of Pakistani politics than the dreams you refer to.

 

[qsaark]

Personal biases and preferences aside, more bizarre things have happened in the world of Pakistani politics than the dreams you refer to.

This I cant deny. In Pakistan, anything can happen.

 

[forcetrip]

I wait for the day he comes back and I get to reply to all his topics. Judiciary .. Another bunch of thugs ..

 

[Barrett]

Personal biases and preferences aside, more bizarre things have happened in the world of Pakistani politics than the dreams you refer to.

Second you on that,
Did anyone in the wildest dreams thought of Zardari becoming the President of Pakistan 3 years ago.?

 

[SandsofTime]

Good. Now we need to issue similar warnings in case of water blockage by our tiresome neighbors

 

[Awesome]

So you disagree with the majority of your countrymen ? Lets take the debate further since ur a fan of Gen M!

This is what he said

" I told US if you don't want to give us the drone tech fine atleast paint the PAF flag on the drone"

Ok for argument sake lets say you control the drones? the next time innocent civillians die can the Chief of ISI take the blame for wrong INTEL ?

Regards

You asked me a question comparing the two, this thread is not for veering into drone attacks, but what we'll do to Indian attacks. It will be a cold day in hell before we allow Indians to attack Pakistani soil. Even a shot onto our icy glaciers would be met with Indian Army fatalities. The government has the full mandate to launch massive strikes upon India - even nuclear, if it goes into any misadventure with Pakistan.

The intensity of that response would be of our choosing, not India's.

 

[Creder]

Its like they say

Don't start a fight, but if you get in one make sure you finish it. As far as US is concerned, two things having 300 MKI's doesnt make you US, so stop asking stupid questions we aren't at war with the US and US knows well enough not to push its luck past the drone strikes, which might i add are coordinated between CIA and the ISI.