can you just elaborate on your statement, because it seems more like rant, a usul one liner is not excepted
muslims in india are backward beccause of the muslim laws?
They are. Laws that govern Hindus
( called Hindu law but largely secular) have been changed completely in the last 60 years to bring them up to date. Muslim laws are archaic, worse than even Muslim majority countries & reform is almost non-existent because mainstream politicians don't want to touch this issue with a barge pole. Had Hindu law been left to Hindu religious leaders, we would have still been in the dark ages. Muslim women end up bearing the brunt of being subjected to antiquated religious laws while the rest of the population continues to make strides.
dont you think that muslims are not in the main stream of india, and the hindus of india are trying to sideline them, dont you think that the majority which constitues india has the duty to uplift any minority community india has by incentives and all that
Many reasons, Hindus sidelining them is not a real issue.
( Point out examples if you will) It is important to offer incentives as you rightly say to bring them up but a separation from the rest of the country based on following silly religious/cultural laws does not necessarily foster integration & support.
or is it more about the traditions of indian society intolerance for minorities with different sets of cultures and beliefs? they are not so easily 'acceptable', sideline them, and dont make ways for their progress easy
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. The other minorities generally are at a higher economic/social level than the majority. Granted Muslims have different issues and there are complicated reasons behind their backwardness but your analogy is clearly flawed.
thats what i think of shudras too by the way
"Shudras" are not discriminated now, as a matter of fact they constitute the majority. They have both influence as well as being the holders of most land. They also benefit by being included in the OBC list, entitling them to reservation & the like. You are probably confusing "Dalits" with Shudras. Even Dalits have the most sustained backing of the governments for their upliftment and are now a key political block in some areas.
we all know how the 'chinese looking minority' of northern eastern states are sidelined as compared to mainstream india, the asian indians are even attacked racially
The only people who have attacked North Easterners in the recent past are Muslims, the people of the NE are hardly discriminated
(regardless of any racial comments) and the proof of that could be seen in any major city that they have migrated to. Education has helped them and they are far more integrated into the national mainstream than ever before.
What happens when the mullah-judge proclaims that the woman is guilty of adultery and the only acceptable penalty is that she be killed?
The
"judge" gets booted to the nearest jail..............
Do both the litigants have to agree to go to shariah court or only one's consent is needed !
What about higher courts ?
Consent of both parties is mandatory. Higher court optional will always remain.