What's new

Motivations behind selecting the name 'India' in 1947

Status
Not open for further replies.
Clearly the fact that indian contentions regarding our heritage, and our rejection of them, has hit a raw nerve, the fact that our indian friends are constantly trying to prove their non existent link to our civilization, has caused a few of our esteemed colleagues on to become highly agitated.

Not to worry, in the coming years and decades - there is sure to be discoveries made, regarding ancient india/bharat that will cause the many proud indians to swell out their chests, and beam from ear to ear with pride.

but until that time, they will continue to try to appropriate our history, which makes one sad - ancient bharat does seem somewhat barren of achievement. But with passionate and nationalistic people like Mr Shearer - they will be sure to rustle up some tit bits.

Good Luck and God Speed. :)
 
Last edited:
It being obvious that the modern state of india - has the heritage of bharat, which is the heritage of todays india.

You DO understand that the term 'bharat' in it's ancient context also encompasses ancient Pakistan into it's fold, don't you? ;)

Akhand Bharat FTW! :P
 
Why, thank you Joe, it is indeed marvellous to see what the Ancient Pakistanis - ie the people of the Indus - achieved, and the more than 5,000 years of continual civilization.

Of course it is.

And next year you may have more shiny new planes, and can be part of Ancient Egypt and Ancient China as well.

It is indeed marvellous to see what pictures on a plane's tail can prove to the simple of heart - and mind.

And we Pakistanis are sons of our soil, what we find very fascinating is our eastern neighbours attempt to co-opt our historical heritage. It being obvious that the modern state of india - has the heritage of bharat, which is the heritage of todays india.

2661491912_acfdec0eb8.jpg

I am sure that you will find more fascinating things as you set out on the tour that I have suggested to you. You will do well to concentrate on leaving an historical heritage of your own - any heritage at all - instead of being fascinated so fast at so many things, but then - there's always the consolation that you did so well the first 4, 940 years of your 5,000 year history. It's enough to make up for the rest.

pakistan_pnew2_v.jpg


Our forefathers have shown their greatness - and the uniqueness of the people and culture of the Indus Valley, from the rest of the so-called Sub-Continent - clearly show that in one form or another, Pakistan has been a de facto reality back to time immemorial.

My mean little professors completely forgot to teach me that you had invented printing - and currency notes at that - in the Indus Civilisation.

Good for you! Lovely notes, by the way. Would you like a contract printing all the Indian 1,000 rupee and 500 rupee notes? I know a bloke in Karachi who can help us with this one......
 
Of course it is.

And next year you may have more shiny new planes, and can be part of Ancient Egypt and Ancient China as well.

It is indeed marvellous to see what pictures on a plane's tail can prove to the simple of heart - and mind.



I am sure that you will find more fascinating things as you set out on the tour that I have suggested to you. You will do well to concentrate on leaving an historical heritage of your own - any heritage at all - instead of being fascinated so fast at so many things, but then - there's always the consolation that you did so well the first 4, 940 years of your 5,000 year history. It's enough to make up for the rest.



My mean little professors completely forgot to teach me that you had invented printing - and currency notes at that - in the Indus Civilisation.

Good for you! Lovely notes, by the way. Would you like a contract printing all the Indian 1,000 rupee and 500 rupee notes? I know a bloke in Karachi who can help us with this one......

Yes, they are lovely notes, regarding the contract for indian rupees, I think I might put in a bid - business is business after all. :azn:

It is indeed fascinating what justification cultural theft can inspire in our eastern neighbours.

And FYI we have done much better for the most part of the last 60 years - and once the WOT is over - we will go back to a high growth tragectory Inshallah. :pakistan:
 
Yes, they are lovely notes, regarding the contract for indian rupees, I think I might put in a bid - business is business after all. :azn:

Wouldn't do to have a monopoly, would it?

It is indeed fascinating what justification cultural theft can inspire in our eastern neighbours.

Have you parsed your sentence? What does it mean? Or are we to believe that your English skills match your historical knowledge?

And FYI we have done much better for the most part of the last 60 years - and once the WOT is over - we will go back to a high growth tragectory Inshallah. :pakistan:

Of course you will. Your printing industry and aircraft tail painting industries by themselves will take your economy soaring into the past.

A question in parting: did you understand even a little bit of what passed by under your nose in the last week or ten days? I know the answer from your last three posts, but just want to know how you will word it in your own words.

===========================================
Unfortunately, this is my last post on this subject. I have tried to explain the gross errors - and they have been gross, not fine - of history knowledge and of analysis that have been put forward, and believe that I have covered every point. Except for being told, after very careful and detailed explanations regarding the facts, the very same thing in the very next statement, there has not been much interaction. This leads me to believe that there is a lot of frantic mugging up and imperfect understanding of history that lies behind these sadly immature efforts.

When obvious amateurs and dunderheads start showing me painted planes' tails and printed currency notes in order to prove that they are responsible for some historical event or the other, it is time to leave. Even a retard would look at the Dravidian features of the pert little dancer on the plane tails, and come to his own conclusions himself. But this is beyond that point of infantilism. It does not seem to be an historical problem, it is a rhetorical, theological one. It is not history driving this debate on one side, my opposite side. It is some other motivation. Against such anti-historical motivation, my knowledge and learning, humble though these are, is of no consequence. I will not be able to participate in any further correspondence on this subject. Those with genuine questions or doubts can find me at

bonobashi@yahoo.co.in

What of the pack? They need to be dealt with by parallel fan-boys, and no doubt there will be a food fight on this thread. I lack the equipment for it.

A great pity, there were moments when I reached back to the very deepest parts of my discipline. But c'est la vie!
 
Wouldn't do to have a monopoly, would it?



Have you parsed your sentence? What does it mean? Or are we to believe that your English skills match your historical knowledge?



Of course you will. Your printing industry and aircraft tail painting industries by themselves will take your economy soaring into the past.

A question in parting: did you understand even a little bit of what passed by under your nose in the last week or ten days? I know the answer from your last three posts, but just want to know how you will word it in your own words.

===========================================
Unfortunately, this is my last post on this subject. I have tried to explain the gross errors - and they have been gross, not fine - of history knowledge and of analysis that have been put forward, and believe that I have covered every point. Except for being told, after very careful and detailed explanations regarding the facts, the very same thing in the very next statement, there has not been much interaction. This leads me to believe that there is a lot of frantic mugging up and imperfect understanding of history that lies behind these sadly immature efforts.

When obvious amateurs and dunderheads start showing me painted planes' tails and printed currency notes in order to prove that they are responsible for some historical event or the other, it is time to leave. Even a retard would look at the Dravidian features of the pert little dancer on the plane tails, and come to his own conclusions himself. But this is beyond that point of infantilism. It does not seem to be an historical problem, it is a rhetorical, theological one. It is not history driving this debate on one side, my opposite side. It is some other motivation. Against such anti-historical motivation, my knowledge and learning, humble though these are, is of no consequence. I will not be able to participate in any further correspondence on this subject. Those with genuine questions or doubts can find me at

bonobashi@yahoo.co.in

What of the pack? They need to be dealt with by parallel fan-boys, and no doubt there will be a food fight on this thread. I lack the equipment for it.

A great pity, there were moments when I reached back to the very deepest parts of my discipline. But c'est la vie!

Indeed your bitterness is etched into your post, I can actually visualise you hammering your keyboard in frustration.

History like beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and you behold something very strange indeed. Modern india's attempt to co-opt our history and culture into it's own, I find very sad this obsession, and am forced to think again, that surely bharat which is rightly part and parcel of modern india - will satisfy our indian friends urge for a link to the past.

If ancient india does not have awe inspiring artefacts, it is not therefore right to appropriate our cultural heritage.

And I repeat what I said earlier, with nationalistic and earnest indians such as Mr Shearer - ready to carry the tricolour onward and upward in the field of indian history and archaeology, I'm sure any day now they will be able to rustle up some very awe inspiring revelations.

Till than much luck and God Speed. :yahoo:
 
Last edited:
Regarding the pert little dancer, her ethnicity or cultural heritage are not clear, but you must have great powers of perception in deducing her Dravidian origins, how truly marvellous, indeed your powers of investigation show, that a career in Interpol or the FBI are in order.

In my opinion, the girl is a slave - and then there is the bust of the priest/patrician

Indus-02.jpg


Who's features are not Dravidian at all, it is quite clear that the people and their modern descendants are the erstwhile inheritors of probably one of the oldest urban civilizations in the known world.
 
Last edited:
LOL nice thread. Looks like Pakistanis are no longer content in being the "pure land" of Islam anymore. Apparently they have realized that their disgusting Hindoo ancestors had something of value.
 
Clearly the fact that indian contentions regarding our heritage, and our rejection of them, has hit a raw nerve, the fact that our indian friends are constantly trying to prove their non existent link to our civilization, has caused a few of our esteemed colleagues on to become highly agitated.

Not to worry, in the coming years and decades - there is sure to be discoveries made, regarding ancient india/bharat that will cause the many proud indians to swell out their chests, and beam from ear to ear with pride.

but until that time, they will continue to try to appropriate our history, which makes one sad - ancient bharat does seem somewhat barren of achievement. But with passionate and nationalistic people like Mr Shearer - they will be sure to rustle up some tit bits.

Pakistanis living in Sindh/Punjab are in majority REALLY sindhis/Punjabis(i.e descendants of people from Indus Valley civilization) or outsiders, first decide that because in many threads it is pakistanis who tend to prove that siginificant fraction of pakistani population may have their roots in armies of foreign invaders who came to sub-continent.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/genera...4292-we-pakistanis-indians-3.html#post1333639

I am afraid George Bush is American but not Mayan.
 
Obviously there's a lot of "foreign" mixing and matching over the centuries in Pak Punjab and Sindh but really that's besides the point. Most of these guys are stuck between trying their hardest to become Arabs but at the same time having to somehow dissociate their pre-Islamic history from India in order to keep the myth of their "separatness" going. Usually resorting to racial stuff "we are taller/fairer" :D or "we were not hindus but something else" or "we were always buddhists and you were always hindus" etc. etc.

Re: the name India, everybody who has studied history knows that it applied to the region east of the Indus river. Maybe in the very initial stage the Greeks used it for the regions which they had discovered. Big effing deal. What about the rest of 2000+ years? I don't know why this debate is still going. :disagree:
 
Re: the name India, everybody who has studied history knows that it applied to the region east of the Indus river.
Absolutely...YES and within the frontier of great desert!! As of Pre-historians their is no country beyond desert.
bunny.gif

I don't know why this debate is still going. :disagree:

That's What we asking to people like you and others.
cheesy.gif
I think some people make it an issue of their ego over nothing.
rofl.gif
 
^Dude are you daft? What about when the Greeks (and the rest of the world) discovered the REST OF INDIA? :lol:

I suppose you'll now say that the grain of sand which the first Greek explorer saw was called "India" and nothing more than that :D
 
Pliny: Position, Boundaries, and Physical Characteristics of India

BOOK VI. c. 17 (21). But where the chain of Hemodus rises the communities are settled, and the nations of India, which begin there, adjoin not only the eastern sea but also the southern, which we have already mentioned under the name of the Indian Ocean. That part which faces the east runs in a straight line to the bend where the Indian Ocean begins, and measures 1875 miles. Then from this bend to the south up to the river Indus, which forms the western boundary of India, the distance, as given by Eratosthenes, is 2475 miles. But many authors have represented the total length of its coast as being a sail of forty days and forty nights, and its length from north to south as being 2850 miles. Agrippa has estimated its length at 3300 miles, and its breadth at 2300. Poseidonios has measured it from north-east to south-east, placing it opposite to Gaul, which he was measuring from north-west to south-west, making the whole of India lie to west of Gaul. Hence he has shown by undoubted proofs that India being opposite to Gaul must be refreshed by the blowing of the west wind, and have in consequence a salubrious climate. Here the appearance of the heavens is entirely changed, and the stars rise differently; there are two summers in the year, and two harvests having winter between them, while the Etesian winds are prevalent; and during our winter the breezes there are light and the seas navigable. In this country the nations and cities are numberless should one attempt to reckon them all up. It was opened up to our knowledge not only by the arms of Alexander the Great and of the kings who succeeded him, Seleucus and Antiochus, as well as by their admiral Patrokles who sailed round even into the Hyrcanian and Caspian seas, but also by certain Greek authors, who resided with Indian kings, such as Megasthenes, and Dionysius who was sent by Philadelphus, and have thus informed us of the power and resources of the Indian nations. However, there is no room for a careful examination of their statements, they are so diverse and incredible. The companions of Alexander the Great have written that in that tract of India, which he subdued, there were 5000 towns, none less than Cos--that its nations were nine in number--that India was the third part of all the world, and that the multitude of its inhabitants was past reckoning. For this there was probably a good reason, since the Indians almost alone among the nations have never emigrated from their own borders. Their kings from Father Bacchus down to Alexander the Great are reckoned at 153 over a space of 6451 years and three months. The vast size of their rivers fills the mind with wonder. It is recorded that Alexander on no day had sailed on the Indus less than 600 stadia, and was unable to reach its mouth in less than five months and a few days, and yet it appears that it is smaller than the Ganges. Seneca, who was our fellow-citizen and composed a treatise on India, has given the number of its rivers at 60, and that of its nations at 118. It would be as great a difficulty should we attempt to enumerate its mountains. The chains of Imavos, Hemodus, Paropanisus, and Caucasus are mutually connected, and from their base the whole country sinks down into a plain of immense extent and bears a great resemblance to Egypt. But that our account of the geography of these regions may be better understood, we shall tread in the steps of Alexander the Great, whose marches were measured by Diognetes and Baeton.

BooK II. c. 73 (75). In the same way they inform us that in the town of Syene, which is 5000 stadia south of Alexandria, no shadow is cast at noon on the day of the solstice, and that a well dug for the purpose of the experiment was completely illuminated, from which it appears that the sun is vertical at that place, and Onesicritus writes that in India this is the case at that time at the river Hypasis. . . . In the country of the Oretes, a people of India, is the mountain Maleus, near which shadows in the summer are cast to the south and in winter to the north. The stars of the Great Bear are visible there for fifteen days only. In India also, at Patala, a celebrated port, the sun rises on the right hand and the shadows fall to the south. It was observed, while Alexander was staying there the seven stars of the Bear were seen only at the early part of the evening. Onesicritus, one of his generals, states that in those parts of India where there are no shadows the Bear is not seen; these places, he says, are called 'ascia,' and time there is not reckoned by hours.

C. 108 (112). One part of the earth . . . stretches out to the greatest extent from east to west, that is, from India to the Pillars of Hercules at Gades, being a distance of 8578 miles according to Artemidorus, but according to Isidorus 9818 miles.

Book VI. c. 16 (18). This nation (the Bactrian) lies at the back of Mount Paropanisus over against the sources of the river Indus.

From: McCrindle, J. W. Ancient India as Described in Classical Literature. Westminster: Archibald Constable, 1901, 107-110.

There we go. Some dude has already cleared up the confusion on Page 1. Looks like people don't want to see the obvious ;)
 
^Dude are you daft? What about when the Greeks (and the rest of the world) discovered the REST OF INDIA? :lol:

I suppose you'll now say that the grain of sand which the first Greek explorer saw was called "India" and nothing more than that :D

Keep going.
rofl.gif
rofl.gif
& serve your ego...
rofl.gif
rofl.gif
rofl.gif
 
Absolutely...YES and within the frontier of great desert!! As of Pre-historians their is no country beyond desert.
bunny.gif

This is what happens when we jump in without knowing the territory.The argument is about the use of the name 'India'. The name 'India' was historical, not pre-historical. So where is the question of pre-historians (presumably by that you mean the people who lived then) thinking that there is no country beyond the desert? Whether or not they did so didn't matter, because they also did not use the name 'India'; that came about only with the Greeks identifying diverse elements in the Achaemenid imperial army.


That's What we asking to people like you and others.
cheesy.gif
I think some people make it an issue of their ego over nothing.
rofl.gif

I am sure some of you Pakistanis think so. Nobody else does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom