Slight defect -- before you annexed them they were not internal India
Further my point was -- what is good for India might possibly be good for Pakistan?
And who wrote the rule book ? I want to meet that guy..
Well the answer is in your statement -- so far ... so if tomorrow it was a success it would OK?
The future is always in motion: said Yoda?
So India was a failure in the 1950s -- maybe Pakistan will succeed in 2050?
success is only transient -- Indians were snake charmers in the 1950 (according to your Union Minister) now they are leaders in the computing revolution
The history of Pakistan does not start with 1947 nor does it end with the recognition of the Taliban government.
Nations fall, nations stand, nations fall again, they stand again
Change is the law of nature, change is inevitable, but we cannot always predict the future. One just needs to ensure he is on the right side of history, which is again, written by the survivors.
My points were specific to your questions raised in relation to Goa or Sikkim or Hyderabad.
Morality is very important to me -- may not be to you
A powerless can always take refuge in morality, because he is incapable of doing anything. If that same person becomes powerful, he will also do things which will be considered immoral by the third powerless guy. With all your books in the library, you still could not figure out this very basic human nature ?
And for that matter you cannot even take refuge in that. Your country's history begins with an attempt of forceful annexation of then an independent state. October 1947 it was, when Pakistan attacked Kashmir ?Probably the new map of Pakistan was not even out of the printing-presses then and you are doing military adventurism from that time.
So, sorry, we don't want a Pakistani or for that matter anybody what we should do with Goa or Sikkim, and that, without even going into the history the then circumstances of each of these individual cases.