Mostly Pakistani nationals fighting for ISIS in Afghanistan: Taliban

[Pak47]

Once you join isis you're no longer a Pakistani or national of any country.. You're just an idiot.

 

[I.R.A]

Actually this is very true -- Indians have a free buffer state in Pakistan

Unfortunately yes and these ungrateful ignorant will go on to say anything just to make a point and prove their hatred for Pakistan. They think they know ISIS and TTP more than us, but they know nothing they have not witnessed yet, how it feels when a truck load of munitions goes kaboom in a peaceful settled area, or how it feels to pick maimed mutilated bodies after a suicide attack.

Though they have one thing in common with ISIS.

 

[rezangahir]

 

[hkdas]

however you my dear can huff and puff all you want, you cannot deny that your country (India) has been meddling in the affairs of sovereign states

indian is not middling in any affairs of sovereign states. what you are saying is your army propaganda.

annexing them

we didn't annexed any one after 1947.

(which Pakistan has not done thus far).

you better learn how Pakistan got Baluchistan. why they still resist pakistan occupation of Baluchistan.

 

[Samandri]

This news may be true -- however some points to consider:

1. Labelling anybody a Pakistani in Afghanistan denies them legitimacy -- for example the Taliban seethe at being labelled Pakistani henchmen
2. Further the people who label the Taliban Pakistani henchmen -- the erstwhile Mujahideen -- were once called Pakistani henchmen (I would encourage you to watch Najibullah's speeches)
3. So whether this is true or not -- it is a clever tactic by the Taliban to essentially play tag and call ISIS "it" -- not ISIS is the Pakistani slave
4. Afghan government officials and politicians have been at this game for a while -- insinuating that the ISIS is actually "ISI + S"
5. It is highly unlikely that Pakistanis could be operating in Afghanistan without an Afghan core -- they do not know the land and would be easy prey for other belligerents
6. Note Turkey is similarly accused by the Kurds, Syrians, Iraqis of secretly supporting ISIS

These are the ex-Taliban members of TTP from Khyber , Orakzai and Mohmand who are now operating under the name of ISIS. These Pakistani nationals of tribal agencies can easily operate in adjacent border provinces of Afghanistan.

 

[pakistani342]

indian is not middling in any affairs of sovereign states. what you are saying is your army propaganda.

So please forgive but can you confirm that:
1. India did not meddle in SriLanka
2. India did not meddle in Paksitan by supporting the Mukti Bhani
3. India does not control the foreign policy of Bhutan

Are the above 3 propaganda by the Pak Army.

we didn't annexed any one after 1947.

And your point is? So say if Pakistan annexes someone in 2016 -- it will be ok in 2026?

you better learn how Pakistan got Baluchistan. why they still resist pakistan occupation of Baluchistan.

Well if we have independent proof that the accession was under duress -- I'm not saying it was not -- but I have not seen anything, independent to support such a claim.

These are the ex-Taliban members of TTP from Khyber , Orakzai and Mohmand who are now operating under the name of ISIS. These Pakistani nationals of tribal agencies can easily operate in adjacent border provinces of Afghanistan.

Yes, close to the border yes -- deep in Afghanistan -- I am skeptical -- very skeptical.

For example ISIS's battlefield success in Iraq is essentially because it, in large part consists of Saddam's old army. Foreign fighters do compliment the fighting force but the core is always local.

 

[Optimos Prime IA]

Their so called 'insecurity' and lack of confidence in themselves have resulted in Pakistan being perpetually in a state of war with its ighbors.

To be frank Pakistan should be happy to hsve india as its neighbou

 

[Samandri]

So please forgive but can you confirm that:
1. India did not meddle in SriLanka
2. India did not meddle in Paksitan by supporting the Mukti Bhani
3. India does not control the foreign policy of Bhutan

Are the above 3 propaganda by the Pak Army.



And your point is? So say if Pakistan annexes someone in 2016 -- it will be ok in 2026?



Well if we have independent proof that the accession was under duress -- I'm not saying it was not -- but I have not seen anything, independent to support such a claim.



Yes, close to the border yes -- deep in Afghanistan -- I am skeptical -- very skeptical.

For example ISIS's battlefield success in Iraq is essentially because it is in large part consists of Saddam's old army. Foreign fighters to compliments the fighting force but the core is always local.

Nangarhar is not deep in Afghanistan though, it is adjacent to Pakistan. So far ISIS's activities are confined to Nangarhar. Lets see where it goes.

 

[pakistani342]

Nangarhar is not deep in Afghanistan though, it is adjacent to Pakistan. So far ISIS's activities are confined to Nangarhar. Lets see where it goes.

Agreed, the question is where will it go from here.

 

[GURU DUTT]

well with pashtun majority afghan taliban blaming pakistani nationals in supporting ISIS is afghanistan maybe its right time for us to make a entryand use afghani pashtoons , hazaras , tajiks and uzbegs and iran to forge a pro india alliance

 

[Dragon4]

You should fcking understand there is only one power standing between you infidels and these ISIS who would enjoy more to behead an infidel than me, and that someone is Pakistan.

Now keep on ranting, and spare me your ignorant lectures. You are taught to hate Pakistan and that is the best you do, tomorrow ISIS would say people fighting them are Pakistanis and I am sure you would believe ISIS.

but you do believe wen your ISI says RAW is behind all ills happening in your country

 

[ravi kiran]

Unfortunately yes and these ungrateful ignorant will go on to say anything just to make a point and prove their hatred for Pakistan. They think they know ISIS and TTP more than us, but they know nothing they have not witnessed yet, how it feels when a truck load of munitions goes kaboom in a peaceful settled area, or how it feels to pick maimed mutilated bodies after a suicide attack.

Though they have one thing in common with ISIS.

yes i agree we have two buffer states between us and ISIS Iran and Pakistan. whats so big deal? you will fight isis for your own interest not to protect us.
its sad you peoples suffered a lot in terrorism. but who did harbor these terrorists in first place? it was you who first supported these terrorists to use them against us. you can not expect snake will not bite you back.

and care to explain what is common between us and ISIS??

 

[Bilal.]

And they wonder why Afghanistan hates pakistan to the core . Will u ever let your neighbourhood in peace at all .

These "Pakistani nationals" are TTP who pledged allegiance to IS. NDS was very keen to accommodate them, now they can enjoy the shit that they invited.

 

[hkdas]

So please forgive but can you confirm that:
1. India did not meddle in SriLanka
2. India did not meddle in Paksitan by supporting the Mukti Bhani
3. India does not control the foreign policy of Bhutan

Are the above 3 propaganda by the Pak Army.

1. india supports LTTE due to the brutal way of suppression of tamil people by Sinhalese people. india help those amil people to resiste or rathar save their life from Sinhalese people. when sri lankan Tamils formed terrorists group and start terrorist attacks in the country india help the srilankan forces. india's help to tamil people is mostly on humanitarian way.
2. when 10million people of east pakistan take refuge in india and it become un controlable for india to feed all those who are comming to india. and those people ask india's help to support them. so india helped them. every country praise india's support to the people of east pakistan, including UN.
3 we don'r control foreign policy of Bhutan.


you had said that pakistan didn't ever interfere in anyone's affairs. let me teach you..
pakistan terror sponsorship in india, and afghanistan. pakistan send PAF to conflicts in middle east. helped CIA to overthrow afghan gov.

And your point is? So say if Pakistan annexes someone in 2016 -- it will be ok in 2026?

1947 is the year india got independence. we didn't force any country to join india. just asked them and they willingly annexed to india. the goa was occupied by portuguese .. just like british occupied indian main land. india force portuguese to vacate the land. just like we did with the british. but unlike india, Baluchistan and P.O.K were occupied by Pakistan by force.

Well if we have independent proof that the accession was under duress -- I'm not saying it was not -- but I have not seen anything, independent to support such a claim.

reason for the creation of BLA is to resist the pakistani occupying force. learn the history man. balugistan was not a part of british india. when pakistan got independence, they send army to capture balugistan by force.

 

[pakistani342]

1. india supports LTTE due to the brutal way of suppression of tamil people by Sinhalese people. india help those amil people to resiste or rathar save their life from Sinhalese people. when sri lankan Tamils formed terrorists group and start terrorist attacks in the country india help the srilankan forces. india's help to tamil people is mostly on humanitarian way.

>>> So interference -- that was my point

2. when 10million people of east pakistan take refuge in india and it become un controlable for india to feed all those who are comming to india. and those people ask india's help to support them. so india helped them. every country praise india's support to the people of east pakistan, including UN.

>>> Again interference

3 we don'r control foreign policy of Bhutan.

>>> Yes you do, yes you do -- seriously you do not know this?

you had said that pakistan didn't ever interfere in anyone's affairs. let me teach you..

>>> Quite to the contrary I never said that
>>> I have said that if something is good for India -- can it be bad for Pakistan -- that is all

pakistan terror sponsorship in india, and afghanistan.

>>> As India supported Terror in Pakistan, Sri Lanka
>>> Oh I forgot the annexing of Sikkim?

pakistan send PAF to conflicts in middle east. helped CIA to overthrow afghan gov.

>>> As India based forces in Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Annexed Haydarabad, Goa, Sikkim

1947 is the year india got independence. we didn't force any country to join india. just asked them and they willingly annexed to india. the goa was occupied by portuguese .. just like british occupied indian main land. india force portuguese to vacate the land. just like we did with the british. but unlike india, Baluchistan and P.O.K were occupied by Pakistan by force.

Really??
Police action in Haydarabad?
Yes but there is no legal basis for the annexation of Goa under International Law -- we are talking International Law here

reason for the creation of BLA is to resist the pakistani occupying force. learn the history man. balugistan was not a part of british india. when pakistan got independence, they send army to capture balugistan by force.

My dear I have read history -- and I assure (sadly) far more than you -- The Khan of Kalat Acceded Baluchistan to Pakistan -- the charge is that he did so under duress -- however he never claimed such later in his life nor do we have a supporting witness who has stated so or other evidence. Please do read history.

That there are Blauch who want independence is besides the point as there are Kashmiris who want Independence from India.

At least do your homework and be intellectually honest.