MOSSAD floats Islamist Political Party in Bangladesh - RAW aggrieved

[Goodperson]

If I had just put up the news item it would not have made any sense. With the commentary at the beginning and a new title everyone can interpret the news item with its true or hidden meaning.

The news item by itself merely suggests an Islamist group have launched a party with the aid of westerners. My commentary brings out the deeper significance of this development.

In a forum you could have posted news article then share and discuss. Then spices like RAW MOSSAD could be added in later posts with some support of neutral links.

 

[BanglaBhoot]

Which title would have caught the readers attention? The one in the news item or my one? Which title was more accurate and revealing of the content?

 

[Goodperson]

What exactly does that have to do with the subject of the thread?

You are just embarrassing yourself and your country with your ignorance and stupidity.

Wow !!! What is the subject ?

MOSSAD and RAW are part of subject put just to draw readers attention they provide no meaning.

How does "Osama bin Laden floats Islamist Political Party in Bangladesh - India aggrieved" sound.

Osama will draw more readers attention I feel.

 

[BanglaBhoot]

Your title would have no basis in the actual text of the news item and would therefore be irrelevant.

 

[Goodperson]

Your title would have no basis in the actual text of the news item and would therefore be irrelevant.

Aren't we discussing about the subject ? feel irritating right ?

Then why do decide to change the actual text when the source of the text from the media do not think so.

Anyway you could have added RAW and MOSSAD spice in posts afterward to cause more irritation.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Watch the language please. Comments denigrating entire peoples and nations will not be tolerated.

Its not that hard sticking to the subject and refuting arguments, without resorting to low blows.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Lets move beyond the title issue - The thread starter chose a title that better reflected the conclusions he wanted to draw form the article posted. He then continued to expand upon those conclusions in subsequent posts.

I see nothing wrong here.

 

[BanglaBhoot]

Aren't we discussing about the subject ? feel irritating right ?

Then why do decide to change the actual text when the source of the text from the media do not think so.

Anyway you could have added RAW and MOSSAD spice in posts afterward to cause more irritation.

I have already mentioned that the news item comes from a RAW source. To rely on its title would have been meaningless and dishonest. It has a purpose to serve and that is to hide information. My commentary provided the necessary background to understanding the news item in its actual context.

You may debate this as many ways as you want but all you are doing is attracting more and more attention to this thread.

I guess you are doing me a favour. LOL.

 

[Goodperson]

Lets move beyond the title issue - The thread starter chose a title that better reflected the conclusions he wanted to draw form the article posted. He then continued to expand upon those conclusions in subsequent posts.

I see nothing wrong here.

AM, Adding your own imagination to news article just to add readers attention is not advisable. Motive is quite evident.

Questioning the same is logical.

And over that the thread starter himself is insisting on discussing about the subject.

 

[BanglaBhoot]

No actually I have finished on that issue. Thanks.

 

[Goodperson]

I have already mentioned that the news item comes from a RAW source. To rely on its title would have been meaningless and dishonest. It has a purpose to serve and that is to hide information. My commentary provided the necessary background to understanding the news item in its actual context.

You may debate this as many ways as you want but all you are doing is attracting more and more attention to this thread.

I guess you are doing me a favour. LOL.

Dailystar is not RAW source its just imagination just to get Indians irritated.
Your are hiding the facts by adding MOSSAD and RAW to title.

How does Title "RAW and MOSSAD agent AbdurRahim Azad got caught with his hand in the cookie jar !" sound ?

The fact is Huji leaders float party with govt nod. They want to enforce Sharia law now you want to blame that on RAW.

Its not the content of the post but ones intentions which are reflected by the title of the thread.

 

[BanglaBhoot]

Yea just keep the nonsense coming......

 

[Goodperson]

Yea just keep the nonsense coming......

I know the subject is irritating and I am also amused by zeal to stick with the same.

Yeah the sensible things are coming from Google, It gives access to lots of information about the news, facts and the persons.

 

[BanglaBhoot]

Give an idiot a computer and he thinks he's God. So what if Google has opinions and comments. Any fool can make a remark on the internet and Google will have it.

What has any of this to do with the thread?

 

[Goodperson]

Give an idiot a computer and he thinks he's God. So what if Google has opinions and comments. Any fool can make a remark on the internet and Google will have it.

What has any of this to do with the thread?

Stick to the subject no Idiots or fools please. Google is the fav search engine for all.

I got info about IDP Huji from Google and found RAW and MOSSAD have nothing to do with the same.

I searched about your articles but found interesting information.