Modi's rise to power will not affect India-Pakistan trade relations: Zubair Ahmed Malik

[GURU DUTT]

As expected your replies are full of desperation while 3 reasons i have given are all happened in reality. Cool down and have a deep breadth.

In kargil coffins meant for army men martyred NDA made money in that 



i have told you the blunders committed by the BJP govt who claims to have all the iron men in it, what congress would have or wouldn't have done is all useless and hypothetical now

well a congressi is talking about blunders lolzz

1.had congressi L B shastri not gone to tashkent and carried on with the attack in 1965 lahore and many parts of pakistan would have been india

2.had indra not let Z A Bhutto take 93000 pakistani POWs on an empty assurance whole kashmir would have been owrs

3. had nehru never trusted chinese 1962 humiliation would not have happeneed

4.had nehru not taken kashmir to UNSC pakistan would have been helpless

but congress made many mistakes and that too so its leaders could get "noble peace prize" at expense of india of whose instalments we are still giving

 

[[Bregs]]

well a congressi is talking about blunders lolzz

1.had congressi L B shastri not gone to tashkent and carried on with the attack in 1965 lahore and many parts of pakistan would have been india

2.had indra not let Z A Bhutto take 93000 pakistani POWs on an empty assurance whole kashmir would have been owrs

3. had nehru never trusted chinese 1962 humiliation would not have happeneed

4.had nehru not taken kashmir to UNSC pakistan would have been helpless

but congress made many mistakes and that too so its leaders could get "noble peace prize" at expense of india of whose instalments we are still giving

All your RSS obsessed lies have nothing to do with the current situation and this thread, remaining on thread i replied those 3 points why relations with pak are expected to improve if bjp comes to power

what all your queries have go to do with this thread ? make a separate thread the pain in a33 of RSS is understandable as they have ruled for 5 yrs out of 66 years and can only point out short comings in others

 

[GURU DUTT]

All your RSS obsessed lies have nothing to do with the current situation and this thread, remaining on thread i replied those 3 points why relations with pak are expected to improve if bjp comes to power

what all your queries have go to do with this thread ? make a separate thread the pain in a33 of RSS is understandable as they have ruled for 5 yrs out of 66 years and can only point out short comings in others

well now your talking about pain in a33.....

 

[[Bregs]]

well now your talking about pain in a33.....

lol because your going into past history is derailing this thread, while my reply was in context with the thread why the relations might improve under all iron men bjp

 

[Guynextdoor2]

well a congressi is talking about blunders lolzz

1.had congressi L B shastri not gone to tashkent and carried on with the attack in 1965 lahore and many parts of pakistan would have been india

2.had indra not let Z A Bhutto take 93000 pakistani POWs on an empty assurance whole kashmir would have been owrs

3. had nehru never trusted chinese 1962 humiliation would not have happeneed

4.had nehru not taken kashmir to UNSC pakistan would have been helpless

but congress made many mistakes and that too so its leaders could get "noble peace prize" at expense of india of whose instalments we are still giving

You would have taken Lahore and did what with it? Achaar bana ke khata kya Paranthe ke saath? It's like saying if Nehru wasn't PM we could have got Washington or Hong Kong.

 

[GURU DUTT]

lol because your going into past history is derailing this thread, while my reply was in context with the thread why the relations might improve under all iron men bjp

well it was you who started asking questions about the past of NDA which i gave you the results and benfits we gained from it but you count come about anything concreate about the blunders of congressies foriegn policy

and now your accusing me of trolling and making fun or BJP/NDA and so called "iron man"

 

[[Bregs]]

Past i discussed related to this thread, what shastri and indo-china war has to do with thread ? i never accused you of trolling, because BJP Iron man was home minister Mr advani during that rule

 

[GURU DUTT]

You would have taken Lahore and did what with it? Achaar bana ke khata kya Paranthe ke saath? It's like saying if Nehru wasn't PM we could have got Washington or Hong Kong.

well well well and you call yourself senior member

had shastri taken over lahore pakistan would have vacated Azad Kashmir and surrendered all its claims on sir creek and kashmir but shastri went to tashkent and got killed there in process who killed him nad why and who was the biggest beneficiarry apart from pakistan is a different stori

then again in 1971 when we were holding pakistani establishemnet by there balls indira dont know why let all of the pakistani POWs go scot free even after pakistan was reluctant to give kashmir to us and knowing there crimes agaisnt humanity in there direct involvemnt in geonocide in bangladesh

now i know congressies never want to answer these questions but make no mistake they will have to among others are the geonocide of sikhs in 1984 and why they supported bhinderwala in the first place

hope you got the ppoint sir 

Past i discussed related to this thread, what shastri and indo-china war has to do with thread ? i never accused you of trolling, because BJP Iron man was home minister Mr advani during that rule

what has kandhar hijak drama to do with this thread ?

what has 2002 stand off got to do with thread ?

what has lahore bus yatra and kargill muisadvanture got to do with this thread ?

l;olzz you started it and when i came for it your accusing me of derailing this thread what do you think you are and whome your talking too if you give a stupid answer to a genuine question i will ask ten stupid questions from you im not the kind you could bully with your so called "intellectual debates"

Got It

 

[[Bregs]]

well well well and you call yourself senior member

had shastri taken over lahore pakistan would have vacated Azad Kashmir and surrendered all its claims on sir creek and kashmir but shastri went to tashkent and got killed there in process who killed him nad why and who was the biggest beneficiarry apart from pakistan is a different stori

then again in 1971 when we were holding pakistani establishemnet by there balls indira dont know why let all of the pakistani POWs go scot free even after pakistan was reluctant to give kashmir to us and knowing there crimes agaisnt humanity in there direct involvemnt in geonocide in bangladesh

now i know congressies never want to answer these questions but make no mistake they will have to among others are the geonocide of sikhs in 1984 and why they supported bhinderwala in the first place

hope you got the ppoint sir 

what has kandhar hijak drama to do with this thread ?

what has 2002 stand off got to do with thread ?

what has lahore bus yatra and kargill muisadvanture got to do with this thread ?

l;olzz you started it and when i came for it your accusing me of derailing this thread what do you think you are and whome your talking too if you give a stupid answer to a genuine question i will ask ten stupid questions from you im not the kind you could bully with your so called "intellectual debates"

Got It

For answer to all your queries read the title of thread

 

[GURU DUTT]

For answer to all your queries read the title of thread

lolzzz are you running away with your tail between the legs or are you trying to be nice .....lolzzz whats your point

 

[[Bregs]]

lolzzz are you running away with your tail between the legs or are you trying to be nice .....lolzzz whats your point

i am not running but you are not trying to be too innocent why i quoted those replies in context with this thread. if you can't convince few members here factually how would your party get 200 seats for that you need to convince general public

 

[GURU DUTT]

i am not running but you are not trying to be too innocent why i quoted those replies in context with this thread. if you can't convince few members here factually how would your party get 200 seats for that you need to convince general public

he he he he so now its about either BJP is getting majority or not well dont worry about that and i dont need to convince anybody wheather BJP will get majority or not and niether do i care all im worried is that this chor UPA and idiot pappu dosent becomes power vielders again post 2014 elections ...njow have to go just got a massage from my home ministry will take you on some other day till then have fun

 

[[Bregs]]

he he he he so now its about either BJP is getting majority or not well dont worry about that and i dont need to convince anybody wheather BJP will get majority or not and niether do i care all im worried is that this chor UPA and idiot pappu dosent becomes power vielders again post 2014 elections ...njow have to go just got a massage from my home ministry will take you on some other day till then have fun

Very fine then stop derailing this thread

 

[Guynextdoor2]

well well well and you call yourself senior member

had shastri taken over lahore pakistan would have vacated Azad Kashmir and surrendered all its claims on sir creek and kashmir but shastri went to tashkent and got killed there in process who killed him nad why and who was the biggest beneficiarry apart from pakistan is a different stori

then again in 1971 when we were holding pakistani establishemnet by there balls indira dont know why let all of the pakistani POWs go scot free even after pakistan was reluctant to give kashmir to us and knowing there crimes agaisnt humanity in there direct involvemnt in geonocide in bangladesh

now i know congressies never want to answer these questions but make no mistake they will have to among others are the geonocide of sikhs in 1984 and why they supported bhinderwala in the first place

hope you got the ppoint sir 

what has kandhar hijak drama to do with this thread ?

what has 2002 stand off got to do with thread ?

what has lahore bus yatra and kargill muisadvanture got to do with this thread ?

l;olzz you started it and when i came for it your accusing me of derailing this thread what do you think you are and whome your talking too if you give a stupid answer to a genuine question i will ask ten stupid questions from you im not the kind you could bully with your so called "intellectual debates"

Got It

Abey pagle, acquiring a territory and administering it even for a small time is not a straightforawd thing. It's damn difficult. Your BJP gives all kinds of simplistic explanations- "IF shastri did this we would have done that' and all. Khud ki aukaat nahi to come to any position of public authority. they sit and BS all day long.

 

[Android]

You would have taken Lahore and did what with it? Achaar bana ke khata kya Paranthe ke saath? It's like saying if Nehru wasn't PM we could have got Washington or Hong Kong.

You have no idea of how much importance the city of Lahore is for Sikhs for cultural, historic and religious reasons plus although i respect Shastri he made a big blunder after Nehru of letting it fall into the hands of Muslims which we had defended from Muslim invaders for centuries plus don't you think those 93000 POW would have been really good bargaining chip in exchange for Pakistan administered Kashmir and we could have solved another Nehrus blunder of taking the matters to UN before entire kingdom of Kashmir was liberated not only would we have been able to get rid of the mess which continues to bleed us till date but through North Western region of Kashmir would have given us land border with Afghanistan thereby direct access to Central Asia