What's new

Modi's rise to power will not affect India-Pakistan trade relations: Zubair Ahmed Malik

Modi has good relation with sindhi business people. After coming to power, he might go to pakistan in a bus. :-)

LOL. No chance of that. Modi would treat pakistan as a terrorist nation and take all measure to hunt down and kill terrorists in India.

Once that is done, paksitan will have no more leverage to blackmail India. Modi would then ignore pakistan and focus on China and will try to isolate pakistan. That is the best case scenario.
 
Abey pagle, acquiring a territory and administering it even for a small time is not a straightforawd thing. It's damn difficult. Your BJP gives all kinds of simplistic explanations- "IF shastri did this we would have done that' and all. Khud ki aukaat nahi to come to any position of public authority. they sit and BS all day long.
jab baat ka jawab sahi sahi nahi de saka to aa gaya apni aukat me aur to tarak aur gali galoch kerne laga he he he he well agar dhyan se dekho ki is desh ke 66 sal ke itihas me sirf 6 saal BJP/NDA ne shasan kiya hai aur NDA ke time me jitni roads aur infra structure banayee gayee thee utne UPA1 & UPA2 ke combined tenure me nahi banayee gayee he he he

ek baat batao agar NDA Govt corrupt thi jaisa ki congressi mante hain to fir 8 saal baad bhi kyon nahi ek bhi former NDA leader ko convict ker paayi aapki sarkar = wo isliye kyonki NDA raj me corruption / courtie aur sifarshi culture tha hi nahi aur congeress aur uski paid media ke lakho prayaso ke baad bhi koi court of law kissi bhi BJP neta ko aaj tak convict nahi ker paya hai aur lakh gale pharne ke aur repeated SITs/ACPs aur na jane kya kya hathkande apneane ke baad bhi congressi sarkar wek bhi mamle me aaj tako NaMo ko convict nahi ker pati hai he he he he aur tum Bs aur "simplistick explanation" ki baat kerte ho :rofl:
 
'Goodbye from your dad'
jab baat ka jawab sahi sahi nahi de saka to aa gaya apni aukat me aur to tarak aur gali galoch kerne laga he he he he well agar dhyan se dekho ki is desh ke 66 sal ke itihas me sirf 6 saal BJP/NDA ne shasan kiya hai aur NDA ke time me jitni roads aur infra structure banayee gayee thee utne UPA1 & UPA2 ke combined tenure me nahi banayee gayee he he he

ek baat batao agar NDA Govt corrupt thi jaisa ki congressi mante hain to fir 8 saal baad bhi kyon nahi ek bhi former NDA leader ko convict ker paayi aapki sarkar = wo isliye kyonki NDA raj me corruption / courtie aur sifarshi culture tha hi nahi aur congeress aur uski paid media ke lakho prayaso ke baad bhi koi court of law kissi bhi BJP neta ko aaj tak convict nahi ker paya hai aur lakh gale pharne ke aur repeated SITs/ACPs aur na jane kya kya hathkande apneane ke baad bhi congressi sarkar wek bhi mamle me aaj tako NaMo ko convict nahi ker pati hai he he he he aur tum Bs aur "simplistick explanation" ki baat kerte ho :rofl:

a) DOn't give 66 saal type justifications. BJP hasn't done any great shakes either.
b) In general a political party will rarely put political leaders of other parties in jail. Neither will Advani put Sonia in Jail, nor will Sonia do a thing to senior BJP leadership. THis is the unwritten law of politics in India. In places where it is violated (TN) the results have been unbearably disastrous
c) BJP is also major supporter of corruption and scams. The work that leading lights of BJP (Gadkare, AMit SHah, BSY etc.) is open for all to see.
 
'Goodbye from your dad'


a) DOn't give 66 saal type justifications. BJP hasn't done any great shakes either.
b) In general a political party will rarely put political leaders of other parties in jail. Neither will Advani put Sonia in Jail, nor will Sonia do a thing to senior BJP leadership. THis is the unwritten law of politics in India. In places where it is violated (TN) the results have been unbearably disastrous
c) BJP is also major supporter of corruption and scams. The work that leading lights of BJP (Gadkare, AMit SHah, BSY etc.) is open for all to see.
he he he he kya baathai ok tell me why is lallo in jail / why is chautala in jail / why is raja in jail / why count congress convict a single BJP leader on corruption chareges if you think BJP is as corrupt as congress

he he he well congressies cant do anything cause they are corrupt to bone just look at rapes / forcible confienment / extortion cases that keep on surfecing about congressi leaders in power recent example rajasthan and you talk of morality tell me a single case against amit shah / or modi or ghatkari but any one can give you neumrous links about congeressi netas and there colourfull history but i dont want to get to your level ..you aint worth it cause when you dont have answer you like doggy raja spew fillthh as you dont have any conviction or ideology your onli ideology is make money at expense of indian population and congress has just done that in last 66 years
 
'Goodbye from your dad'


a) DOn't give 66 saal type justifications. BJP hasn't done any great shakes either.
b) In general a political party will rarely put political leaders of other parties in jail. Neither will Advani put Sonia in Jail, nor will Sonia do a thing to senior BJP leadership. THis is the unwritten law of politics in India. In places where it is violated (TN) the results have been unbearably disastrous
c) BJP is also major supporter of corruption and scams. The work that leading lights of BJP (Gadkare, AMit SHah, BSY etc.) is open for all to see.
Did You have any courts decision to sustain Your claim here Your Just one of peoples who are good in making political propaganda Is there any high court, supreme court Judgement that Prove them Guilty If there is Post it To Sustain Your Claim or Shut up
 
tell me why is lallo in jail / why is chautala in jail / why is raja in jail / why count congress convict a single BJP leader on corruption chareges if you think BJP is as corrupt as congress
he he he well congressies cant do anything cause they are corrupt to bone just look at rapes / forcible confienment / extortion cases that keep on surfecing about congressi leaders in power recent example rajasthan and you talk of morality tell me a single case against amit shah / or modi or ghatkari but any one can give yo
he he he he kya baathai ok tell me why is lallo in jail / why is chautala in jail / why is raja in jail / why count congress convict a single BJP leader on corruption chareges if you think BJP is as corrupt as congress

he he he well congressies cant do anything cause they are corrupt to bone just look at rapes / forcible confienment / extortion cases that keep on surfecing about congressi leaders in power recent example rajasthan and you talk of morality tell me a single case against amit shah / or modi or ghatkari but any one can give you neumrous links about congeressi netas and there colourfull history but i dont want to get to your level ..you aint worth it cause when you dont have answer you like doggy raja spew fillthh as you dont have any conviction or ideology your onli ideology is make money at expense of indian population and congress has just done that in last 66 years

I never talked about morality at all. And if you see that in order to keep Laloo out of Jail scumbag congresssis even try to bring in an ordinance. Anyway, point is...BJP is just as bad if not worse. You talk about extortion- let me tell you priya modiji has been repeatedly doing murder. Not only rioted and involved in Haren Pandya's murder, not he's stalking women he wants. So BJP is no moral great shakes. If you're defending them, that's coz you are on pot. 
Did You have any courts decision to sustain Your claim here Your Just one of peoples who are good in making political propaganda Is there any high court, supreme court Judgement that Prove them Guilty If there is Post it To Sustain Your Claim or Shut up

shooo.....
 
I never talked about morality at all. And if you see that in order to keep Laloo out of Jail scumbag congresssis even try to bring in an ordinance. Anyway, point is...BJP is just as bad if not worse. You talk about extortion- let me tell you priya modiji has been repeatedly doing murder. Not only rioted and involved in Haren Pandya's murder, not he's stalking women he wants. So BJP is no moral great shakes. If you're defending them, that's coz you are on pot. 


shooo.....
well the women he was stalking or ordered to stalk was the partner of an congressi stooge IAS officer who was convicted anhd is in jail for a land scam and this womenis the one who chose to become "sarkari gawah" so in order not to be double crossed by her gujrat police was keepin an eye on him and her owm father requested for the same lolzzz things dint stop here that corrupts/congressi stooge IAS officers IPS brother was the one who came up so called "fake encounter case of sohrabbudinn" and was later himself found guilty and now is leagel advizer of sonia ji in 10 Janpath

now tell me where is modi / amit shah wrong in it when they ordered spying of a corrupt and double crosser women which was actualli requested by her own father for her safety from congressi goons and her dads stetment is on record go and read it

what about haren pandya do you have any solid evidence if yes provide it if not STFU

and about pot well onli pot i know is on which i go every morning to releave myself :rofl:
 

Even BJP hasn;t claimed that. Only yesterday they tried to put come post facto color to the whole thing claiming oh even 'woman' asked for it. Everything in the tapes other hand shows snooping was covert.
 
One thing i noticed here on pdf, that congress supporters some of them will join even with enemies of india as long as it helps them stay in power, look at their guys, and their posts only one guy thanks cos no one supports their rhetoric, but they thank pakistani guys in posts against modi or who spew venom against modi or BJP or hindus, they always thank those posts.
Have you ever seen Normal folks here do that? no they won't no matter what for us country comes first, we might bash congress leaders but we don't thank pakistanis bashing our leaders.
Ghar ki ladayi between brothers alag hai, hum ladte jhagadte hain , lekin jab bahaar waala jab hamare ghar ke ladayi mein enter hota hai toh hamaare poore ladayi band kardete hain,aur bahar waale ko pehli laat padti hai.:agree:These congress supporters are a whole new breed they will go to any extent as long as any country villifies modi or bjp.
The congress ministers writing to OBAMA not to grant visa to MODI, or their congress stooges trying to scuttle his speech in usa,we never did that to any congress politician out of India, infact, we praised them its on record.we can't stoop to that level of sleeping with the enemy to be in power.
Now i start to believe that those allegations of ISI links in UPA seem to be true looking at their partymen.:disagree:
 
Last edited:
True a sikh licking balls of Yuvraj whose family massacred Sikhs. Great going sardara.. 


We have seen your Nehru in 62 war..We have seen Nehru in 48..Kashmir issue is still lingering because of that fucktard. 


You should also remember RSS for saving thousand of Sikhs when congressis were butchering Sikhs.


Yes, a 'Sikh' licking balls of 'Yuvraj' is better than licking blood loathed balls of a 'Tea Sellers' and 'Feku Ecnomist', who butchred more than 4000 of my fellow innocent countrymen. Why 'Yuvraj' is made responsible for any bad deeds of their fathers or fore-fathers? If we follow your theory then BJP/RSS (Read 'Jan Sangh', Change of name does not change your ethics, similar example LeT/JuD) is a traitor party of India, whose founder was licking white balls to get pardon from their white god fathers.

I am proud of Nehru's contribution to build my country, he made this country secular not relgio-fascist as desired by f****ng morons like you. I have no shame in accepting that JL Nehru made a no. of mistakes and one is loss to China in '62, 2nd is his recognition of an extremist & fundamentalist group like RSS after '62 war.

That's where the the fundamental difference lies, RSS saved thousands of Sikhs not Indian citizen, because similar to Fascist your ideology consider them Sikhs but not Indians equal to you. But RSS or you can be right by calling them Sikhs as you might be a Hindu fanatic not an Indian.
 
Yes, a 'Sikh' licking balls of 'Yuvraj' is better than licking blood loathed balls of a 'Tea Sellers' and 'Feku Ecnomist', who butchred more than 4000 of my fellow innocent countrymen. Why 'Yuvraj' is made responsible for any bad deeds of their fathers or fore-fathers?
Ughh! Golden Temple ,Ughhh! 84,Ughh!,Ughhh!

You can support any party but you should not build you argument on rant.
 
Ughh! Golden Temple ,Ughhh! 84,Ughh!,Ughhh!

You can support any party but you should not build you argument on rant.


What is the role of 'Yuvraj' in all the above said incidents???
 
"Yuvraj" ??? Are you talking about Amrinder Singh ???


I am talking about the person, whom 'tea seller'/'feku economist' is calling as 'Yuvraj'!!!! "Rahul Gandhi"

You should read the previous posts to understand everything and I am not saying that congress is innocent of '84 riots and darbar sahib attack. I am saying 'Rahul Gandi' had no role in these mis-deeds of her fathers or fore-fathers.

images
in uttarkhand 

well that was not even mosque there man thats why Allahabad court
ctober 1990 by the BB Lal- led Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) team claimed to have found the pillar-bases of what may have been a temple at the site which must have belonged to a larger building than the Babri Mosque.

The team of archaeologists of the ASI, led by former Director-General ASI (1968-1972), B.B. Lal in 1975-76, worked on a project titled "Archaeology of Ramayana Sites", which excavated five Ramayana-related sites of Ayodhya, Bharadwaj Ashram, Nandigram, Chitrakoot and Shringaverapura.[2] At Ayodhya, the team found rows of pillar-bases which must have belonged to a larger building than the Babri Mosque. In 2003 statement to the Allahabad High Court, Lal stated that after he submitted a seven-page preliminary report to the Archaeological Survey of India, mentioning the discovery of "pillar bases", immediately south of the Babri mosque structure in Ayodhya. Subsequently, all technical facilities were withdrawn, and despite repeated requests, the project wasn't revived for another 10-12 years, despite his repeated request. Thus the final report was never submitted, the preliminary report was only published in 1989, and in Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) volume on historicity of Ramayana and Mahabharat.[2] Subsequently, in his 2008 book,Rama: His Historicity Mandir and Setu, he wrote, "Attached to the piers of the Babri Masjid, there were twelve stone pillars, which carried not only typical Hindu motifs and mouldings, but also figures of Hindu deities. It was self-evident that these pillars were not an integral part of the Masjid, but were foreign to it."[1] 
In July 1992, eight eminent archaeologists (among them former ASI directors, Dr. Y.D. Sharma and Dr. K.M. Srivastava) went to the Ramkot hill to evaluate and examine the findings. These findings included religious sculptures and a statue of Vishnu. They said that the inner boundary of the disputed structure rests, at least on one side, on an earlier existing structure, which “may have belonged to an earlier temple”. (Indian Express, 4 July 1992.) The objects examined by them also included terracotta Hindu images of theKushan period (100-300 AD) and carved buff sandstone objects that showed images of Vaishnav deities and of Shiva-Parvati. They concluded that these fragments belonged to a temple of the Nagara style (900-1200 AD).

Prof. S.P. Gupta commented on the discoveries:

"The team found that the objects were datable to the period ranging from the 10th through the 12th century AD, i.e., the period of the late Pratiharas and earlyGahadvals. (....) These objects included a number of amakalas, i.e., the cogged-wheel type architectural element which crown the bhumi shikharas or spires of subsidiary shrines, as well as the top of the spire or the main shikhara ... This is a characteristic feature of all north Indian temples of the early medieval period (...) There was other evidence — of cornices, pillar capitals, mouldings, door jambs with floral patterns and others — leaving little doubt regarding the existence of a 10th-12th century temple complex at the site of Ayodhya."[6] 
man have ayodhya is holy place of millions of hindus have ever thought of constructing temple in mecca


Where did I say "Ayodhya is not a holy place for Hindus" or where did I reject findings of ASI, I am say that there are other legal or friendly means to do it.
 
Last edited:
I am talking about the person, whom 'tea seller'/'feku economist' is calling as 'Yuvraj'!!!!
Oh! But he if going to to harp on to the good deeds of his previous generations,then he has to own up to the other half too.This is the culture of this place.

Anyway lets leave it to the people,who they want ?
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom