Modi sulking over Pakistan internationalizing Kashmir Dispute

[Indian Patriot]

The ban is irrelevant since the Indian media and government itself reported Pakistani military responses to Indian violations of the ceasefire AFTER Modi and his coterie of BJP hatemongers went on their rants about "we shut Pakistan up". So obviously whatever the Indian BSF's shelling involved, it did nothing in terms of limiting the Pakistani military response.

The ban IS relevant because the Pakistanis were being hammered and they did not want you Pakistanis to know just how weak and ineffective your army is against India. Your government was lying to you as usual.

What rational reason exists for that to happen? Mod fanboy-ism aside, the fact remains that both Pakistan and India keep a very close eye on the troop, infrastructure and equipment levels deployed on the LoC/WB by the other. The recent exchanges were entirely composed of light artillery and small arms, something that Pakistan will have no problem in matching. Now, if the exchanges had involved air-power, then perhaps you might have been able to argue that "Pakistan was outgunned".

The UPA government did not give the Indian army a free hand, Modi did. The response from India was swift and unexpected for the Pakistanis. And Pakistan is no match for India irrespective of what your popular media and Zaid Hamid would like you to believe.

India can deploy three times the mortar, troops, machine guns than Pakistan. It is laughable when a country with a defence budget of 4 billion thinks it is on the same level as a country with a defence budget of close to 50 billion dollars.

Irrelevant to the exchanges along the LoC/IB - without escalation into a war (limited or full) these military exchanges will remain limited to small arms, light and perhaps heavy artillery, all of which is something Pakistan can match given the cost of the equipment involved.

Pakistan CANNOT match India in military strength. How many times will you keep lying that Pakistan can match India?

Indian army is 1.4 million. Pakistan is only 550,000. India has 4000+ artillery guns, Pakistan has only 2000+ guns. Indian paramilitary forces number a million soldiers. If Pakistan could have matched Indian military strength then they would not have lost Siachen so easily.

Pakistan played a very smart game diplomatically - on the ground Pakistan responded militarily to Indian violations of the ceasefire (and continues to do so) while diplomatically it raised the issue on every international stage it could, to make sure that Pakistan's position on the issue (that India started the ceasefire violations) was understood and also to snub the Modi government which is strongly opposed to Pakistan raising any India-Pakistan dispute on the international stage.

Smart and Pakistan does not go in the same sentence.

Your tall tales and lies about an imaginary Pakistani response notwithstanding your diplomatic influence in the world politics is laughable. A country which is regularly bombed by US, and leases its strategic territory to China can never be looked at with respect by other countries. What good has your ramblings done? The world sees Pakistan as the country that sheltered Osama Bin Laden and is sympathetic to Islamic terrorism. Look at western popular media perception of Pakistan, they portray Pakistan and Pakistanis like a terrorist heaven.

Indian economic and diplomatic clout is something Pakistan can only dream of. It speaks a lot when muslim Arab countries have deeper diplomatic and economic ties with India than they do with Pakistan. The world looks at Pakistan as the slave of US and China. Your international influence does not exist.

 

[Indian Patriot]

Not just India, every other country and the UN itself agree with India's interpretation.

Actually they do. That is why no country, not even China spoke a word in support of Pakistan during Kargil war. And no country, not even China has done anything to help Pakistan in its Kashmir cause.

You want your country to be taken seriously? Then become an economic and industrial superpower. Pakistan does not have any resources like oil and gas, does not have any industrial base, does not have a skilled labour population, does not manufacture anything worthy and does not have a good GDP. Why on earth would the world be interested in Pakistan?

Politics is guided by interest and interests are found in the economics of a growing market, labour reserve, natural resources and mutual benefit. What benefit can Pakistan offer anybody? The only reason US is sending Pakistan dollars is so that they can continue bombing your country and you actually feel happy about it.

 

[Abotani]

Another Indian PM,another dehati aurat wala rona dhona for the world

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

Modi is bad at foriegn relations as is proven from the pak-russian alliance in making for Afghanistan with china as a addition.

Modi instead of solving will in turn create more trouble in Indian occupied kashmir because of extreme hatred toward him which will increase more after his party win in IOK through rigging

either outcome suits us....if BJP wins (through crook, more than hook) in occupied Kashmir you can be sure that the hidden hatred and communalism will rise. Every Kashmiri i've spoken to are disgusted at the thought of having RSS-backed GOONS in repping their constituency

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

Actually they do. That is why no country, not even China spoke a word in support of Pakistan during Kargil war. And no country, not even China has done anything to help Pakistan in its Kashmir cause.

Why would China discuss it? It was a covert operation involving irregular fighters/mujahideen as well as regular forces such as the NLI. We dont go around on international panels discussing covert Chinese military activity, wherever it takes place.

and what matters in Kashmir is the sentiment and aspirations of the people, not what outsider people sitting in some building in Lower East Manhattan think

 

[Indian Patriot]

Why would China discuss it? It was a covert operation involving irregular fighters/mujahideen as well as regular forces such as the NLI. We dont go around on international panels discussing covert Chinese military activity, wherever it takes place.

and what matters in Kashmir is the sentiment and aspirations of the people, not what outsider people sitting in some building in Lower East Manhattan think

If it was a covert operation then why was your PM running to Washington begging Clinton for help? Not that Clinton helped you guys, he only rebuked your PM.

There was no mujahideen out there. I have no respect for the intelligence of Pakistani army officers but even they would not be so dumb to hand over artillery guns to jihadis. Jihadis don't find like conventional army by defending territory. They work in small groups, run hide and strike and hide again. They keep constantly moving around. That's how guerrillas the world over fight. And for the record your NLI was wiped out in Kargil. And what makes you think that the servant would dare to speak against his master? China is way more powerful than you, you are not even in their league.

Sentiment? What sentiment would that be? If you feel so strongly about Kashmir then come and take it. Kashmir will remain with India.

 

[Indian Patriot]

either outcome suits us....if BJP wins (through crook, more than hook) in occupied Kashmir you can be sure that the hidden hatred and communalism will rise. Every Kashmiri i've spoken to are disgusted at the thought of having RSS-backed GOONS in repping their constituency

Every baluchi and pashtun I met and spoken to are also disgusted with Pakistan goons attacking their region.

 

[airmarshal]

Pakistan did not do it for past 10 years in the hope India will come around and talk to resolve it. But India is a dishonest country. It will never talk. I say Pakistan must not only internationalize Kashmir, it should infiltrate it too.

 

[Viny]

. I say Pakistan must not only internationalize Kashmir, it should infiltrate it too.

Yeh hi mentality rahi to ghass bhi khane nahi milegi...
Grow up...think about empowering your country, you have been all the time busy in playing dirty games which lead you to nowhere other than shit hole. And still you morons dont understand that.

 

[third eye]

Yet Indian members keep telling us of 'what a great triumph in diplomacy' Modi's unprovoked ceasefire violations across the LoC/WB have been, and how Pakistan "internationalizing the Kashmir issue and the LoC violations by India" reflects "Pakistan's pain" - the pain over "internationalization" appears to be one suffered by Modi and Company, as can be seen from the following, in addition to previous statements by the Indian EA spokesperson and various BJP leaders.

.. and you doctored the title for this ?

The article quoted said ' May tell NS..)

In any case as per news received thus far Modi has chosen not to meet NS, so where is the ' sulking" ?

 

[SouthDesi]

Kathmandu: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had set a deadline for his Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif to clear stand on the critical issue of terrorism at the 18th South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Summit in Kathmandu.

According to the reports available with the India TV, Modi had given Pakistan time till Tuesday evening (4pm) to announce publically that no terror activities would be plotted or funded on its soil.

Besides this, Modi had also asked Sharif to announce that his government will act against 26/11 mastermind, Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) chief Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, and the two nations will sit together to find a solution to the contentious Kashmir issue without seeking any involvement of extremists and others.

The Indian Prime Minister waited till Tuesday evening for Sharif’s reply but Modi didn’t received any affirmative response from his Pakistani counterpart.

It was yesterday, the frostiness of ties between India and Pakistan was completely visible when the two shared the dais at the SAARC Summit in Nepal’s capital city.

India TV Exclusive: Modi had set deadline for Sharif to clear stand on terrorism at SAARC

 

[Indian Patriot]

Pakistan did not do it for past 10 years in the hope India will come around and talk to resolve it. But India is a dishonest country. It will never talk. I say Pakistan must not only internationalize Kashmir, it should infiltrate it too.

Why should India listen to a smaller, weaker country like Pakistan?

Pakistan tried infiltrating in Kashmir for last 20 years. Unfortunately for you now these same infiltrators are attacking Pakistan. What goes around comes around.

 

[kurup]

Pakistan did not do it for past 10 years in the hope India will come around and talk to resolve it. But India is a dishonest country. It will never talk. I say Pakistan must not only internationalize Kashmir, it should infiltrate it too.

As if you are not doing it ...... You are trying both and failing miserably as well .

 

[Agent Smith]

Yet Indian members keep telling us of 'what a great triumph in diplomacy' Modi's unprovoked ceasefire violations across the LoC/WB have been, and how Pakistan "internationalizing the Kashmir issue and the LoC violations by India" reflects "Pakistan's pain" - the pain over "internationalization" appears to be one suffered by Modi and Company, as can be seen from the following, in addition to previous statements by the Indian EA spokesperson and various BJP leaders.

the UN showed middle finger to pakistani diplomats trying to revive kashmir issue, yet its modi who lost diplomatic battle. gow up kid.

 

[idune]

Modi is that desperate that he called Pakistani PM to use the tragic event and show crocodile tears. That is india and Modi's double face.