Modi sulking over Pakistan internationalizing Kashmir Dispute

[Avik274]

Modi is bad at foriegn relations as is proven from the pak-russian alliance in making for Afghanistan with china as a addition.

Modi instead of solving will in turn create more trouble in Indian occupied kashmir because of extreme hatred toward him which will increase more after his party win in IOK through rigging

He is standing for Indians who dont want to get bullied anymore..Russians turns out to be a money sucking leech.Allies change..Its not inborn..

 

[sathya]

He is standing for Indians who dont want to get bullied anymore..Russians turns out to be a money sucking leech.Allies change..Its not inborn..

Nope
Russia ran out of quality weapons it can export to India ..
Russia couldn't afford to sell exclusively to India ..

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Two words:

Simla Agreement.

Which contains explicit language reiterating the commitment of both India and Pakistan to the UN Charter, and therefore to the UNSC Resolutions on Kashmir, as well as explicit language allowing for the involvement of third parties in India-Pakistan disputes.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

By the term sulking what is the actual interpretation or thought behind it?

The interpretation is as I explained in the OP.

 

[Judge]

Which contains explicit language reiterating the commitment of both India and Pakistan to the UN Charter, and therefore to the UNSC Resolutions on Kashmir, as well as explicit language allowing for the involvement of third parties in India-Pakistan disputes.

It says explicitly that unless India consents no third party can be brought in by Pakistan.

This means no UN, US, etc till India agrees...and India does not agree. So it remains a bilateral affair.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

But what results will it bring ?? just internationalize , not internationally mobilize

That is a question for Modi and his government - if, as it appears from the comments of Indians and their sympathizers on this thread, the Indian government does not care about Pakistani attempts to internationalize the Kashmir dispute, then why is his EA spokesperson and various BJP leaders routinely issuing statements against Pakistan "internationalizing the Kashmir Dispute"?

Why is the Indian media carrying report after report of "Modi demanding/tough talking/chest puffing that Pakistan stop internationalizing the Kashmir Dispute"?

There is a disconnect between the views expressed on this thread by Indians/Indian sympathizers and the statements of Modi/BJP and the Indian government.

 

[VCheng]

It says explicitly that unless India consents no third party can be brought in by Pakistan.

This means no UN, US, etc till India agrees...and India does not agree. So it remains a bilateral affair.

Further both countries are bound by this clause: "(ii) That the two countries are resolved to settle their differences by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations or by any other peaceful means mutually agreed upon between them".

Pretty clear.

 

[SpArK]

The interpretation is as I explained in the OP.

No mate . Not at all.

I will put it in a simpler way.

In order to say some person is sulking over "something", there has to be some action or words associated with it which will relate him to that "something".
Has he or his ministers, diplomats or anything from government machinery done "something" or anything to prove they are sulking?

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

That is wonderful news! So perhaps now the Indian media and government can stop whining about "Pakistan's internationalization of the Kashmir dispute"?

We rather use these International adventures by Pakistan. Every time Pakistan goes out to the world you guys go against the very Shimla agreement that you signed in 1971..giving India all mo more reasons to stop talking to you... I wonder ...does Pakistan even want to resolve the K issue or its just wants to use it to play victim.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

It says explicitly that unless India consents no third party can be brought in by Pakistan.

Correct, but it does not rule out third party mediation, as India would like us to believe.

This means no UN, US, etc till India agrees...and India does not agree. So it remains a bilateral affair.

The UNSC Resolutions were passed long before the Simla Agreement, as was the Indus Water Treaty. The first part of the SA explicitly reiterates the commitment of both nations to the UN Charter, which by extension means the UN Resolutions on Kashmir.

There is nothing in the Simla Agreement that invalidates prior agreements/commitments that India and Pakistan entered into prior to entering into the SA. The UNSC Resolutions on Kashmir constitute a prior commitment under the UN Charter by India and Pakistan, and the IWT was also a "prior commitment" entered into by India and Pakistan, brokered by a third party mediator. If the Indian government does not contest the validity of the IWT under the Simla Agreement, then on what grounds can it contest the validity of the UNSC Resolutions?

 

[Dash]

That is a question for Modi and his government - if, as it appears from the comments of Indians and their sympathizers on this thread, the Indian government does not care about Pakistani attempts to internationalize the Kashmir dispute, then why is his EA spokesperson and various BJP leaders routinely issuing statements against Pakistan "internationalizing the Kashmir Dispute"?

Why is the Indian media carrying report after report of "Modi demanding/tough talking/chest puffing that Pakistan stop internationalizing the Kashmir Dispute"?

There is a disconnect between the views expressed on this thread by Indians/Indian sympathizers and the statements of Modi/BJP and the Indian government.

Well that's the catch, you need to think harder.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

No mate . Not at all.

Has he or his ministers, diplomats or anything from government machinery done "something" or anything to prove they are sulking?

Yes - the EA statements and statements by BJP leadership asking/demanding/ranting that Pakistan stop internationalizing the Kashmir dispute.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Well that's the catch, you need to think harder.

No, that is for Modi (or his apologists) to explain.

 

[Dash]

No, that is for Modi (or his apologists) to explain.

We don't want to explain. The very reason for your dilemma.

 

[SpArK]

Yes - the EA statements and statements by BJP leadership asking/demanding/ranting that Pakistan stop internationalizing the Kashmir dispute.

So PMNL leaders asking/ranting/demanding can be called Nawaz sulking, right?

EA statement.... really? towards Pakistan or towards the rest of the world?