IceCold
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- May 1, 2007
- Messages
- 19,236
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
The thing is that whether or not you open a thread about what Bilawal or Nawaz or anyone else has to say about PM Khan's performance is a moot point because Pakistan as a country was ruled by Military for better half of its existence and the people you are quoting as opposition were mostly made by none than military.OK Sir , I understood your point.
But I have a doubt and can I ask?
If I will open a thread by quoting
bilawal bhutto, zardari or Sharif family about imran khan's performce then will it be fine?
Because I believed that opposition leaders talk always BS about present government and quoting to them are completely useless.
So better to quote more realible sources compare to opposition leaders.
For e.g ZA bhutto was a no one until Yahya Khan brought him to main stream, similarly Nawaz was a nobody until Zia brought him as a counter weight to PPP at the time.
India on the other hand never faced this problem and while to some extent this is correct that opposition has to remain in business but there is a difference between oppositions of both countries. For e.g In India both opposition and government have a unilateral stance towards Pakistan, there is no change irrespective of who is in power but in Pakistan people like Nawaz were doing personal business with India at the expense of Pakistan's core interests while at the same time being a PM of Pakistan. Do you see the conflict of interest here?
So while our opposition which is not really an opposition but rather a band of corrupts joining hands to avoid justice, Indian opposition is different. Neither are your opposition flying to other countries seeking asylum like ours case in point Nawaz Sharif again in London nor were they ever dismissed on corruption charges.
So what you opposition says and what our says, there is a hell of a difference.