MIT: Syrian Government is not responsible for Ghouta Chemical Attack

[Syrian Lion]

New MIT Study Finds Syrian Government not Responsible for Ghouta Chemical Attacks
​

The U.S. conclusion that a chemical attack near Damascus in August was carried out by the government has been challenged by a team of highly respected experts. Washington immediately blamed President Assad, but a new report from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which arguably has the world's best engineering school, found that the rocket couldn't have been fired from government-controlled areas.

PDF of MIT study for download showing maps and GRAD missile information and etc: http://tinyurl.com/pdaxvvu

PDF of MIT study for download: http://tinyurl.com/pdaxvvu
PDF of MIT study for download: http://tinyurl.com/pdaxvvu

 

[Hack-Hook]

who needed such studies to understand that the attack was not government work but the result of the same thoughts that faked those torture pictures just before Geneva conference .

 

[forcetrip]

When will they sanction MIT and arrest it for being traitors to the US cause? This report will put the American troops in danger and will aid Americas enemies the world over.

 

[500]

Degeneracy on several levels.

1) Rockets in question where ADMITTED by Syrian regime itself. There is no any question that these rockets belong to regime. Why there is need in idiotic research when to find out whos rockets are these when we KNOW that these rockets belong to regime?
2) They use baseless assumptions that rockets are propelled by Grad.
3) They claim that the range from the edge of regime controlled area to Zamalka is 5.5-6 km. That is blatant and silly lie.The range from regime controlled al Maamounie to center of Zamalka is 1.5 km.

Conclusion: those who made this so called report are either degenerates, or they are payed liars.

 

[elis]

Again JEW USA liars

They were about striking Syria to help their zionist Al Qaeda dogs, thanks to Russia for blocking the JEW NATO terrorists

 

[500]

Again JEW USA liars

They were about striking Syria to help their zionist Al Qaeda dogs, thanks to Russia for blocking the JEW NATO terrorists

USA installed Shia government in Iraq. Are u against it Sun Piwa?

 

[elis]

USA installed Shia government in Iraq. Are u against it Sun Piwa?

JEW USA installed zionist Al Qaeda in Iraq, and arm their enemies so arabs kill each other

Iraq was invaded from wahabit Jordania, Kuwait, Saudi, NATO Turkey not from Iran

The real dogs of JEW USA have USA bases and live well. Their enemies have zionist Al Qaeda and are under embargo or attacked by Israel

 

[al-Hasani]

@elis



@500 Well put.

 

[Yzd Khalifa]

That Elis he really needs someone to take care of him.

 

[airmarshal]

The way it was blamed on Syria immediately, clearly conveyed the ulterior motive.

Knowing how America and its allies lie about something to pursue a geopolitical objective, I was not surprised.

 

[Star Wars]

Of course not..i was the first person to prove that in the forum just 1 days after the attack

 

[Yzd Khalifa]

who needed such studies to understand that the attack was not government work but the result of the same thoughts that faked those torture pictures just before Geneva conference .

The very same conference you cried a blood out for not being allowed to get into

 

[Syrian Lion]

Degeneracy on several levels.

1) Rockets in question where ADMITTED by Syrian regime itself. There is no any question that these rockets belong to regime. Why there is need in idiotic research when to find out whos rockets are these when we KNOW that these rockets belong to regime?
2) They use baseless assumptions that rockets are propelled by Grad.
3) They claim that the range from the edge of regime controlled area to Zamalka is 5.5-6 km. That is blatant and silly lie.The range from regime controlled al Maamounie to center of Zamalka is 1.5 km.

Conclusion: those who made this so called report are either degenerates, or they are payed liars.

oh so now MIT is Alasad Institution .... Rockets could have been from Libya or stolen from bases, your beloved friend blackeagle keeps posting pictures and videos of stolen arms and rocket, heck even you, and now you are trying to deny that those rockets could not be stolen? why would the regime use rockets like that for this attack?

and now you know the location of Syria very well?? last time you claimed Homs was not the largest province in Syria enough jokes, no go support your beloved terrorists and fight with them, maybe the SAA will take care of you.

 

[500]

oh so now MIT is Alasad Institution .... Rockets could have been from Libya or stolen from bases, your beloved friend blackeagle keeps posting pictures and videos of stolen arms and rocket, heck even you, and now you are trying to deny that those rockets could not be stolen? why would the regime use rockets like that for this attack?

Rockets in question exist only in Syria. They are made by your regime. They are dubbed "Al Bourkan". Here videos made by Regime itself.

Syrian National Defence Force Launching UMLACAs Near The Tameco Complex - YouTube

Before there were videos made by opposition and leaks.

and now you know the location of Syria very well?? last time you claimed Homs was not the largest province in Syria enough jokes

Largest province by population is Aleppo. Homs has large territory, but 90% of it is desert.

no go support your beloved terrorists and fight with them, maybe the SAA will take care of you.

I prefer Assad to win.

 

[500]

By the way, here is another proof that those who made this reports are idiots. They made calculations based on fact that Burkan rocket has Grad engine. But its obvious it is not:

Here is Grad launch:

0:38 - rocket produces no smoke almost.

Here is Burkan launches:

Massive smoke trail. So engine is NOT from Grad.