What's new

Missiles, missiles everywhere

I smell burnt curry in this thread.


If Indians didn't act like show offs, I might consider giving them respect. But that will never happen.




And Indians your agni can't do anything to Pakistan.


Pakistan changed the game with Nasr, those things are like nuclear bullets. :P

Keep your respect for your own country....

When China and Pakistan buys missile then now issue...When India test Agni 5 you guys unable to digest...and farting here and there

I believe your Rajahastan desert would be turned to glass along with your mechanized divisions, if you bhartis ever made the mistake.

We can also convert Pakistan in Rajasthan desert ...so dont talk like that
 
. . . .
The writer is right about all but one thing:

Korea cannot create an ICBM. If it could, it would be able to launch commercial rockets. But it can't. Korea has a 100% failure rate in commercial rocket launching, both North and South. That means that Korea is unable to create ICBMs which have far higher requirements. That is because Korea mostly imports foreign machinery.
 
.
expected something like that from chinese friends....(actually expected something like toilet or malnutrition) anyway,i can live with that. :lol: :lol: :lol:

by the way Chinatoday,how did you find these articles???
 
. . .
The writer is right about all but one thing:

Korea cannot create an ICBM. If it could, it would be able to launch commercial rockets. But it can't. Korea has a 100% failure rate in commercial rocket launching, both North and South. That means that Korea is unable to create ICBMs which have far higher requirements. That is because Korea mostly imports foreign machinery.

I dont know about NK but SK will have ICBM ......made in India :D
 
.
Why can't we in India be more business-like? When we tested nuclear weapons in 1998, the government, the media, and the Indian public were spectacularly undignified. A lot of vulgar and foolish things happened in the ensuing months - intemperate statements by our leaders, media coverage that was adulatory and clownish, and public behaviour that was childish (handing out sweets in the streets).

Predictably, the Pakistanis punctured our bubble. They tested immediately and then attacked in Kargil to show that nuclear weapons did not scare them. Pakistan's public reactions were as juvenile as ours, if not more so, which shows that South Asians are cut from the same cloth.

With India's Agni V missile test two weeks ago and Pakistan's Hatf IV Shaheen-1A test, we have had a replay of 1998. Missiles are not as big a deal as nuclear weapons, so our leaders were more restrained this time round. The media, though, was pretty much as bad as before, thinking it appropriate to talk a lot of nonsense about India's ability to project power (to Europe, amongst other destinations). Unlike 1998, the public did not rush out into the streets to party, which was a relief; instead, the blogosphere, the new public square, lit up with commentary, most of which would shame a nine-year-old.

When the Agni V has been properly tested, it will certainly strengthen India's deterrent with respect to China. Having said this, the Integrated Guided Missile Development Programme (IGMDP) goes back to the 1980s. That it managed to produce a missile which can carry a nuclear warhead 5,000 km is noteworthy but hardly the stuff of national celebration. After all, it took nearly 30 years to produce a missile of that range.

Any one of a dozen countries today could do it - and in short order. These include Japan and both the Koreas, just in Asia, and surely it would not take Australia very long. Pakistan's latest Shaheen already has a range of 3,000 km, so it is not technologically beyond our next-door neighbour's capabi-lity either. And Iranian missile technology is catching up fast.

The point is that missiles, as much as nuclear weapons, are old technology. Hopping up and down about them is silly. India's scientists have not particularly distinguished themselves (nor have Indian social scientists). If we look at the number of scientific papers published in leading journals, patents filed, and inventions credited to Indians, our scientists do not rank high. China ranks well ahead, as do Japan and South Korea. Britain, with 60 million people, has had 76 Nobel laureates in science and technology.

India has had only one that worked in India (C V Raman, who worked in British and not independent India) and three that worked outside India (Har Gobind Khorana, Subramanyan Chandrashekhar and Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, all in the US). There are probably only two Indian technologies that have international name-recognition - the Jaipur leg prosthetic device and the Nano mini car - which are home-grown.

Why are we so undignified over things like the missile test? The answer most likely is that we have so little to celebrate, with human development indicators lower in key areas than our South Asian neighbours and sub-Saharan Africa. Indians are eating less in calories terms than a decade ago. We have millions of more males than females in our population: the social consequences of this male surplus will be massive. Our education system is in a shambles. Our infrastructure is scarily bad. The only town in India with clean drinking water is Jamshedpur. We have a fiscal crisis looming, stuttering growth, rising prices, stagnating agriculture, caste and religious discrimination, partisan politics to the maximum, and policy paralysis. Governance, particularly at the state-level, where one absurd chief minister replaces another, is so awful that you run out of adjectives.

If India wants to be respected and secure in the long run, it should celebrate clean renewable energy and the eradication of polio far more than the launching of a new missile. That would be worth many sweets in the streets.

Missiles, missiles everywhere - The Times of India

this girl has poor General Knowledge .. poor understanding of security situations India faces... in general... a poor attempt to write an article on the issue this sensitive ...
 
. .
I guess chinese don't believe TOI right....

yes,but they believe when TOI printed some bu11sh!t about india.. :lol: :lol:

but how they find this type of article???i'm a toi subscriber for many years,very few times i saw this kind of article..but these chinese guys find it instantly...how???? :undecided:
 
.
this girl has poor General Knowledge .. poor understanding of security situations India faces... in general... a poor attempt to write an article on the issue this sensitive ...

Typical Indian response.


Kanti Bajpai


It's a HE, genius! And Kanti is a very well respected analyst. He is a contributor to Stephen Cohen's new book. From the looks of it you have never even read a book.

What a clown.
 
. .
agni v is not an icbm, its an irbm.

indians dont have the technical knowledge to make icbm's yet.
they will in the future, but they are not there yet.

the fact that india considers agni v to be a breakthrough shows how backward india truly is.

whats more funny is indians thinking that any border war between china and india will be settled by nukes. :lol:
every single war will be a conventional war, launching nukes is suicide, the whole world will be against any country that launches nukes first.

i think india forgot just how many nuclear warheds and delivery capabilities china has, most of them are undisclosed, china has thousands of nuclear warheads but only reports a few hundred to keep the 'china threat' from the west to a minimal.

if india ever launches a nuclear warhead at china, it will be the end of the indian civilization.
chinese hardliners are cold, brutal and absolutely ruthless, they will not care if chinese cities are nuked as long as india is completely wiped off the map forever. the chinese retaliation will be constant and incredibly ruthless.

for all the indian boasting about launching nukes at china, they very well know what the consequences of that will be.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom