Generally Khan

I was actually pointing to the same thing

Same I do respect ones religion, even though im a hindu I dont follow much of what people do around. I have many muslim friends and think all is not bad between us...

You are going on a tangent, where did I say Riwat is not what you said? You mean to say that all the Pakistanis which were part of ancient India were Muslims, I dont think that is what you said. and what are you arguing on is something I cannot understand now, I though you were denying the fact that modern Pakistan was not the birth place of Hindusim, if you did not argue on that point, I did waste yours and mine...

The links
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India#Ancient_India
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan#Early_and_medieval_age

Read from bottom to top..

Actually if you search in wiki you will find this about the history of your land "Some of the earliest ancient human civilisations in South Asia originated from areas encompassing present-day Pakistan. The earliest known inhabitants in the region were the Soanians, who settled in the Soan Valley of Punjab. The Indus region, which covers most of Pakistan, was the site of several successive ancient cultures including the Neolithic Mehrgarh and the Bronze Age Indus Valley Civilisation (2800–1800 BCE) at Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro.

The Vedic Civilization (1500–500 BCE), characterized by Indo-Aryan culture, laid the foundations of Hinduism, which would become well established in the region."

So, according to you Pakistan should be Hindus claim, that is the reason I said your argument is flawed.

"During the period 2000–500 BCE, in terms of culture, many regions of the subcontinent transitioned from the Chalcolithic to the Iron Age. The Vedas, the oldest scriptures of Hinduism, were composed during this period,and historians have analysed these to posit a Vedic culture in the Punjab region and the upper Indo-Gangetic Plain." which is the present Pakistan. Also, "In the late Vedic period, around the 5th century BCE, the small chiefdoms of the Ganges Plain and the north-western regions had consolidated into 16 major oligarchies and monarchies that were known as the mahajanapadas. The emerging urbanisation and the orthodoxies of this age also created the religious reform movements of Buddhism and Jainism, both of which became independent religions"

All im saying is we all were and are part of this sub-continent and have the same history untill the time of division... there was no history of Pakistan, just the people of our sub-continent where Hinduism, dravidians was the most prevalent form of religion before the arabs arrived and , i quote from wiki

dude, im not saying pakistani land is ours, where did u get the idea from? but when you say that pakistani region spawned the present indian sub-continent were you not the part of that sub-continent?

Your logic seems flawed, how can a pre-historic civilization can be claimed of Pakistani origin when that name itself was know broadly as bharat and riwat is now in Pakistan, did you know in 47 that riwat existed? You are a part of Indian sub-continent which was divided into countries. but we remain part of that sub-continent only..

Salam bro ..If u dun mind can u plz tell me wht u do in Xian?i am from Xi gong da

Salam brother...how are you??good to see another one from Xian here...