It is amazing to note that no one is commenting on authenticity of video presented here but just using other tactics to flush the topic into drain.
Hey! If you want to comment on this topic, then use arguments other than usual brain farts.
Ok lets start.
Is that video fake?
Was that thing, in the video, an airliner?
The video is morphed.
Notice movement of the surroundings with respect to the camera (relativistically speaking) and then compare the speed of that movement with the velocity of the missile.
And that hazy camera was so good it tracked the continuous movement of the missile within 50 yards?
I am a fool when it comes to defence equipments (missiles, fighters, tanks etc.), but even a fool can easily tell that the
velocity of the missile in this video is nowhere higher than 100 miles an hour. Is that the speed a missile is supposed to be at while hitting the target?
Secondly, on one hand many proponents say the 7ft by 8ft hole was created by the missile - into the wall. If so, then the missile did not carry any warhead, leave alone any liquid fuel. But in the undeniably genuine official video you see a fireball going 100 ft high - that kind of fireball can only be created with large amount of liquid fuel. No missile will just make a hole, and then go on to create a huge dark red (tells you about the fuel that is burning) fireball that big.
Bombs or Warheads or Missiles create shockwaves, not fireballs.
Then the tail piece part - It is not necessary that in each and every disaster, that includes a plane crash, will you find a tail piece. Remember it was Pentagon, one of the most important and well protected buildings of the US, it was quickly cordoned off and they did not deem it fit to show off the evidences for those who may want to deny everything they see for unrealistic reasons.
Finally, think of the last plane that crashed in Pennsylvania. If it were an inside job, why would the conspirators just crash down another plane for no reason? Are you going to say that all the phone calls made from that plane and released by the relatives were fake too?
If it were not to crash in a public area and a lot of videos did not go around, many would be saying this was another missile that missed its target.
And about those "reliable" pilots and spooky Boeing engineers saying the debris would have fallen miles apart in Pentagon crash - How far did the debris of planes (crashing in twin towers) fall away? When a plane hits a building, even a very small one, its debris does not get far, and they say the debris of even a small fighter jet would go for miles.
Here's a fact from my personal experience - A fighter plane crashed in a residential area of Najafgarh, New Delhi. I was right there waiting for my school bus. We all ran to look for those in need of help. A lot of fire was there, not much debris. The most distant debris, that was later collected by the Air Force officials, had fallen 2 blocks away - a distance of 25 yards.
These conspiracy theorists are simply passing away a possibility for 100% probability. It does not happen like that.
