What's new

Miltary activities carried out by Japanese Self Defense Forces

Oh good, so then back on topic for the time being.



-------------------------------------
2016 Fuji Combined Arms Live Fire Demonstration on August 28th of that year. First half and second half.

As long as China and Japan have good collaboration, I don't care how Japan develop it's military. I even support Japan will have a powerful independent defent military. American soldiers have made about 210, 000 cases of crimes or delicts to Japanese citizens. We don't think America has any necessary to stay in Japan when China and Japan have good relationship.
 
.
The Senkaku islands belong to Japan. Taiwan is not part of CCP China. And the 9 dash line is unacceptable. Those are obviously the key interests points of Japanese foreign policy.
Senkaku belong to Japan of course meet Japanese interests. "Taiwan is not part of CCP China" and "9 dash one is unacceptable", if Japan working for this goal obviously break Japanese interests. The 2 things are American interests, not Japanese interests.
 
.
Senkaku belong to Japan of course meet Japanese interests. "Taiwan is not part of CCP China" and "9 dash one is unacceptable", if Japan working for this goal obviously break Japanese interests. The 2 things are American interests, not Japanese interests.

So for the South China Sea, Japanese leaders started the concept of an Indo-Pacific sometime around 2007:

...
The Pacific and the Indian Oceans are now bringing about a dynamic coupling as seas of freedom and of prosperity. A "broader Asia" that broke away geographical boundaries is now beginning to take on a distinct form. Our two countries have the ability -- and the responsibility -- to ensure that it broadens yet further and to nurture and enrich these seas to become seas of clearest transparence.
...

https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/pmv0708/speech-2.html


It's later further extended to "Free and open Indo-Pacific" which comes along with Japan's call for not changing the status que of things which does not recognize the 9 dash line. The following is Abe's speech in 2012:

...
Peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the Pacific Ocean are inseparable from peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the Indian Ocean. Developments affecting each are more closely connected than ever. Japan, as one of the oldest sea-faring democracies in Asia, should play a greater role in preserving the common good in both regions.

Yet, increasingly, the South China Sea seems set to become a "Lake Beijing", which analysts say will be to China what the Sea of Okhotsk was to Soviet Russia: a sea deep enough for the People's Liberation Army's navy to base their nuclear-powered attack submarines,capable of launching missiles with nuclear warheads. Soon, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy's newly built aircraft carrier will be a common sight—more than sufficient to scare China's neighbours.

That is why Japan must not yield to the Chinese government's daily exercises in coercion around the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea. True, only Chinese law-enforcement vessels with light weaponry, not PLA Navy ships, have entered Japan's contiguous and territorial waters. But this "gentler" touch should fool no one. By making these boats' presence appear ordinary, China seeks to establish its jurisdiction in the waters surrounding the islands as a fait accompli.

If Japan were to yield, the South China Sea would become even more fortified. Freedom of navigation, vital for trading countries such as Japan and South Korea, would be seriously hindered. The naval assets of the US, in addition to those of Japan, would find it difficult to enter the entire area, though the majority of the two China seas is international water.

...
https://gamp.ameblo.jp/firebird-1090/entry-12577747464.html

The deepening of a strategic relation between the Philippines and Japan in 2015.
https://www.mofa.go.jp/s_sa/sea2/ph/page4e_000280.html

Japan strongly backed the UN tribunal decision in July 2016 in the South China Sea, caling it legally binding:

As the Tribunal’s award is final and legally binding on the parties to the dispute under the provisions of UNCLOS, the parties to this case are required to comply with the award. Japan strongly expects that the parties’ compliance with this award will eventually lead to the peaceful settlement of disputes in the South China Sea.
https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press4e_001204.html

So then Japan starts putting some muscle into the South China Sea such as with JS Izumo's dispatch to the Indo-Pacific for training. With the context now laid out from the earlier political moves in the above portions of this post, JS Izumo's dispatch was welcomed by the Philippines president Duterte:

President Duterte boarded “Izumo,” the largest escort vessel of the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force, during its port call in Subic on June 4. He was the first foreign head of state to do so.

We are very thankful that the President took time off from his busy schedule to tour the vessel, and are pleased that he found “Izumo” to be “very impressive” and “state of the art” while praising its HA/DR capability.

As maritime states, both the Philippines and Japan have a shared interest in ensuring maritime security. By boosting our defense cooperation, we can further deepen overall bilateral ties.
https://www.ph.emb-japan.go.jp/itpr_en/00_000330.html
 
.
So for the South China Sea, Japanese leaders started the concept of an Indo-Pacific sometime around 2007:

...
The Pacific and the Indian Oceans are now bringing about a dynamic coupling as seas of freedom and of prosperity. A "broader Asia" that broke away geographical boundaries is now beginning to take on a distinct form. Our two countries have the ability -- and the responsibility -- to ensure that it broadens yet further and to nurture and enrich these seas to become seas of clearest transparence.
...

https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/pmv0708/speech-2.html


It's later further extended to "Free and open Indo-Pacific" which comes along with Japan's call for not changing the status que of things which does not recognize the 9 dash line. The following is Abe's speech in 2012:

...
Peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the Pacific Ocean are inseparable from peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the Indian Ocean. Developments affecting each are more closely connected than ever. Japan, as one of the oldest sea-faring democracies in Asia, should play a greater role in preserving the common good in both regions.

Yet, increasingly, the South China Sea seems set to become a "Lake Beijing", which analysts say will be to China what the Sea of Okhotsk was to Soviet Russia: a sea deep enough for the People's Liberation Army's navy to base their nuclear-powered attack submarines,capable of launching missiles with nuclear warheads. Soon, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy's newly built aircraft carrier will be a common sight—more than sufficient to scare China's neighbours.

That is why Japan must not yield to the Chinese government's daily exercises in coercion around the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea. True, only Chinese law-enforcement vessels with light weaponry, not PLA Navy ships, have entered Japan's contiguous and territorial waters. But this "gentler" touch should fool no one. By making these boats' presence appear ordinary, China seeks to establish its jurisdiction in the waters surrounding the islands as a fait accompli.

If Japan were to yield, the South China Sea would become even more fortified. Freedom of navigation, vital for trading countries such as Japan and South Korea, would be seriously hindered. The naval assets of the US, in addition to those of Japan, would find it difficult to enter the entire area, though the majority of the two China seas is international water.

...
https://gamp.ameblo.jp/firebird-1090/entry-12577747464.html

The deepening of a strategic relation between the Philippines and Japan in 2015.
https://www.mofa.go.jp/s_sa/sea2/ph/page4e_000280.html

Japan strongly backed the UN tribunal decision in July 2016 in the South China Sea, caling it legally binding:

As the Tribunal’s award is final and legally binding on the parties to the dispute under the provisions of UNCLOS, the parties to this case are required to comply with the award. Japan strongly expects that the parties’ compliance with this award will eventually lead to the peaceful settlement of disputes in the South China Sea.
https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press4e_001204.html

So then Japan starts putting some muscle into the South China Sea such as with JS Izumo's dispatch to the Indo-Pacific for training. With the context now laid out from the earlier political moves in the above portions of this post, JS Izumo's dispatch was welcomed by the Philippines president Duterte:

President Duterte boarded “Izumo,” the largest escort vessel of the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force, during its port call in Subic on June 4. He was the first foreign head of state to do so.

We are very thankful that the President took time off from his busy schedule to tour the vessel, and are pleased that he found “Izumo” to be “very impressive” and “state of the art” while praising its HA/DR capability.

As maritime states, both the Philippines and Japan have a shared interest in ensuring maritime security. By boosting our defense cooperation, we can further deepen overall bilateral ties.
https://www.ph.emb-japan.go.jp/itpr_en/00_000330.html
“The Pacific and the Indian Oceans are now bringing about a dynamic coupling as seas of freedom and of prosperity. ”
"Peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the Pacific Ocean are inseparable from peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the Indian Ocean. "
Because China control and manage the South China Sea, so it is still a peace, stability and freedom of navigation area.
Besides Korea, or Japan, actually there are most numbers of Chinese civilian vessels on the route. Compare trading scale, you would understand it.

"If Japan were to yield, the South China Sea would become even more fortified. Freedom of navigation, vital for trading countries such as Japan and South Korea, would be seriously hindered. The naval assets of the US, in addition to those of Japan, would find it difficult to enter the entire area, though the majority of the two China seas is international water."
Japan should yield, or try to collaborate with China to gurantee the peace and stability of two China sea. In long term, China will further fortify and protect two seas peace and stability, Japan fight with China will break the peace and stability, Which will break China, Japan and Korea commercial interests. A non-Japnese pro-Japan guy should advise Japan to collaborate with China.


"As maritime states, both the Philippines and Japan have a shared interest in ensuring maritime security."
Phillipines navy competence can't ensure the maritime security, they even can't cope with its internal pirates. Japan should collaborate with the most powerful navy in the regions to ensure the maritime security.

As a non-Japan pro-Japan guy, you still need to know how to increase Japanese real interests. Avoiding all unnecessary conflicts with China is Japanese real interests. We know some Japanese politicians have some impulsion of leading the two China seas security, you should warn them it's not right. Conflicting against China is increasing their insecurity and break interests finally.
Change your thinking mode, dear, and advise you pro-Japan make efforts on right way. My two cents.
 
.
“The Pacific and the Indian Oceans are now bringing about a dynamic coupling as seas of freedom and of prosperity. ”
"Peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the Pacific Ocean are inseparable from peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the Indian Ocean. "
Because China control and manage the South China Sea, so it is still a peace, stability and freedom of navigation area.
Besides Korea, or Japan, actually there are most numbers of Chinese civilian vessels on the route. Compare trading scale, you would understand it.

"If Japan were to yield, the South China Sea would become even more fortified. Freedom of navigation, vital for trading countries such as Japan and South Korea, would be seriously hindered. The naval assets of the US, in addition to those of Japan, would find it difficult to enter the entire area, though the majority of the two China seas is international water."
Japan should yield, or try to collaborate with China to gurantee the peace and stability of two China sea. In long term, China will further fortify and protect two seas peace and stability, Japan fight with China will break the peace and stability, Which will break China, Japan and Korea commercial interests. A non-Japnese pro-Japan guy should advise Japan to collaborate with China.


"As maritime states, both the Philippines and Japan have a shared interest in ensuring maritime security."
Phillipines navy competence can't ensure the maritime security, they even can't cope with its internal pirates. Japan should collaborate with the most powerful navy in the regions to ensure the maritime security.

As a non-Japan pro-Japan guy, you still need to know how to increase Japanese real interests. Avoiding all unnecessary conflicts with China is Japanese real interests. We know some Japanese politicians have some impulsion of leading the two China seas security, you should warn them it's not right. Conflicting against China is increasing their insecurity and break interests finally.
Change your thinking mode, dear, and advise you pro-Japan make efforts on right way. My two cents.

The post you responded to was entirely 100% observation based and 0% of my personal opinion even if my on view is similar to it. So trying to frame the content's of that post as just my own opinion which than you sum it up as not in Japan's intetest just is another little troll trick. *yaaaawwnnn*
 
.
Deleting the the crap



The fire bombing of USA on Japan will be nothing compared to the hellstorm that will engulf Japan from China .

In the first 10++ minutes, all the bases in Japan will be cratered and hit by the DongFangs with conventional warheads ensuring their planes cannot take off.


1609419562372.png




1609418768829.png



Missile Strikes on U.S. Bases in Asia: Is This China's Real Threat to America?

Shugart and Gonzalez also point out that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has carried out drills simulating preemptive attacks against America’s regional military assets. In one such instance, the PLA Rocket Forces “appears to have been practicing on several ship targets of a similar size to U.S. Arleigh Burke –class destroyers moored in a mock port that is a near-mirror image of the actual inner harbor at the U.S. naval base in Yokosuka.” This is illuminating, the authors note, because the only way the Chinese military could catch three U.S. ships in port is if they conducted a complete surprise attack.
After reviewing Chinese capabilities and doctrines, the authors try to simulate such an attack to judge its effectiveness. Interestingly, while they believe China would strike U.S. bases in Japan and even some Japanese forces, they assume Beijing would avoid attacks on Korea “in order to prevent a distracting second front on the Korean Peninsula while pursuing its primary military goals elsewhere.” In their simulation, they also assume that Beijing would not initially target America’s base at Guam since it is U.S. territory and China would want to prevent an escalation that could result in America bombing mainland China.
Shugart and Gonzales run two different models of a simulated preemptive attack, keeping in mind what they know about U.S. and allied missile defense systems in the region. In both models, “enough ballistic missiles seemed likely to leak through to cause highly significant damage to U.S. bases and forces in the region.” Some of the results of the attacks include:
• “Almost every major fixed headquarters and logistical facility struck, with key headquarters struck within the first few minutes of the conflict.”
• “Almost every U.S. ship in port in Japan struck pierside by ballistic missiles.”
• “In most cases, cratering by ballistic missiles of every runway and runway-length taxiway at all major U.S. air bases in Japan.”
• “As a result of runway cratering, headquarters destruction, and air defense degradation, more than 200 trapped U.S. aircraft destroyed on the ground in the first hours of the conflict.”
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Then Chinese cruise missiles will fly in their thousands to take out what not taken out military assets in that first 20++ minutes.

Chinese AShMs will burn and incinerate Japanese Naval assets.

During that time, Japanese command centers will blown up killing all those inside.

See the photos of test sites in Western China of dummy airfields and plane shelters of air and naval bases in Japan being hit so accurately by DFs.

First Strike: China's Missile Threat to U.S. Bases in Asia

By your own Western military experts. Even if they underestimated the numbers of DFs and Cruise Missiles of China in their reports.


It would have been so simple that Japan return Diaoyudao to China with grace.
China will then forgive Japan. And perhaps Okinawa and Ryukuku be allowed to remain with Japan.

But you want to do it the hard hard way.
And scrapping at bottom of barrel and below the bottom of barrel

Japan so frightened that Japan scraping below the bottom of barrel and trying to form alliance with Taiwan, the Philippines, Palau, Vietnam, Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia and to a further extent Australia and India.


The funny thing is that Suika not joking at all. :omghaha: :omghaha::omghaha:

Japan hoping to con them to fight for Japan and die for Japan when Japan start the war with China and save the Japan Emperor from having to be custodian and cleaner of public toilet build on the very site of the Yakasuni Shrin


Suika might do better with getting Japan AV girls to fight in the war.


1609418586274.png



Or even armed Japanese school girls with spears and they will do better than Filipinos or Indians or Aussies or Palaunese in the fight.



So instead of those from India and Aussies or Philipine, Suika better use Japanese AV girls or Japanese school girls who will fight better than them. And remember , Murica is impotent

1609382501705.png






1609382566791.png





Extract just a wee bit from https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/chinese-missiles-news-discussions.84215/page-164

Happy new year with first aerial view of DF-17

49eca83dgy1gm79ix2basj20u01gitgw.jpg



1.gif

2.gif



PLA Rocket Force ‘Cruise Missile 1st Brigade’ CJ-10A Cruise Missile Training Scene



The CJ-10A is a land-attack cruise missiles (LACM) with range of more than 1,500 km

Japan depending on Aegis & Patriot & Thaad systems to protect them?


Patriot? Thaad?? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :D :D :D


:enjoy:


1602377212761.png



1602377146518.png



4a5fa3802642.jpg




Despite overlapping coverage. And those missiles were sub sonic slow poke missiles.
USA did not know then that the missiles were there and coming.
USA to date with records of radar traces got no clue where the missiles came from or going to.
Until those missiles hit their intended targets with big BANGS. If not , USA and KSA got no clues that the missiles were even there.

And USA charging billions for stuff which was all bluff and smoke and mirrors when the crunch came.

Your best and only defence is for Shinzo Abe to go on bended knees and hands to Beijing and kowtow 3 times and return all land stolen from China and live in peace.

And if not, then your Emperor got to go on bended knees and hands to Beijing and kowtow 3 times and return all land stolen from China and live in peace.


Choice for Japan to make.
China will do the rest.

I be happy to go Yum Seng and dance on table tops and streets with many other very happy Chinese.:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:
giphy.gif





:cheers::cheers::cheers:
:enjoy::enjoy::enjoy:




As to why Japanese Emperor will be the custodian and cleaner of a public toilet build exactly where Yasukuni Shrine located.
And why Diaoyudao and Okinawa and Ryukuku chain be no longer Japanese
 
Last edited:
.
The post you responded to was entirely 100% observation based and 0% of my personal opinion even if my on view is similar to it. So trying to frame the content's of that post as just my own opinion which than you sum it up as not in Japan's intetest just is another little troll trick. *yaaaawwnnn*
We can know from your posts that your opinion is putting Japan on the position of conflicting with China. And you think comflicting with China can bring Japan interests. Do you admit this?
You pro-Japan means you like Japan, or at least you wish Japan best. This is why I advise you to change the thinking mode. My opinion is China-Japan collaboration can maximize Japanese interests. You can see Chinese economic and military scale in the region. Make some contribution to your liked Japan.
You yawn always and seem tired because you feel your opinion is based on wrong anticipation. You troll Japan conflicting with China can't be continuous. Take a rest, You are too tired of doing the worthless efforts.
 
.
We can know from your posts that your opinion is putting Japan on the position of conflicting with China. And you think comflicting with China can bring Japan interests. Do you admit this?
You pro-Japan means you like Japan, or at least you wish Japan best. This is why I advise you to change the thinking mode. My opinion is China-Japan collaboration can maximize Japanese interests. You can see Chinese economic and military scale in the region. Make some contribution to your liked Japan.
You yawn always and seem tired because you feel your opinion is based on wrong anticipation. You troll Japan conflicting with China can't be continuous. Take a rest, You are too tired of doing the worthless efforts.

The following JSDF videos have sections about international cooperation but note an absence of cooperation with PLA forces. Reason being is due to the foreign policy adopted by the government.



In this 70th year anniversary promo, there's a section that starts at 2:53 listing many of JSDF joint-training with many countries such as with the US, Australia, India, and the Philippines. It infers the obvious about Japan's Free and Open Indo-Pacific policy.

Additional official documents about Japan's Free and Open Indo-Pacific policy.
https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000430632.pdf
https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/100056243.pdf

And of course Japan's white defense paper that includes this bit:
jwdp.jpg

https://www.mod.go.jp/e/publ/w_paper/wp2020/DOJ2020_EN_Full.pdf

That evolved from Japan's efforts in trying to establish some trust with a China that it viewed as unilateral and non-transparent back in 2013 as identified in this Japan National Defense paper.
jdltoutline.jpg

https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/agenda/guideline/pdf/security_strategy_e.pdf

 There's also this page in the MoD's Defense Planning Outline which puts concerns about increased military activities in the region by PRC aircraft and carrier.

jdoutline.jpg

https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/agenda/guideline//2019/pdf/20190801.pdf



This earlier post about Japanese foreign policy, not of my specific conclusions, and really should hvae been enough:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/milt...nese-self-defense-forces.676197/post-12884415
You're insistence to sidetrack from reality and to take things into marginalizing posts about it as some sort of fake content created by an individual and not by the government and then proceed to discredit the post as you insistently press to frame it as all just individually created fake content goes to show that responding to you is no longer necessary in this thread except with just a link to this post.
 
.


The fire bombing of USA on Japan will be nothing compared to the hellstorm that will engulf Japan from China .

In the first 10++ minutes, all the bases in Japan will be cratered and hit by the DongFangs with conventional warheads ensuring their planes cannot take off.


1609419562372.png




1609418768829.png



Missile Strikes on U.S. Bases in Asia: Is This China's Real Threat to America?


Then Chinese cruise missiles will fly in their thousands to take out what not taken out military assets in that first 20++ minutes.

Chinese AShMs will burn and incinerate Japanese Naval assets.

During that time, Japanese command centers will blown up killing all those inside.

See the photos of test sites in Western China of dummy airfields and plane shelters of air and naval bases in Japan being hit so accurately by DFs.

First Strike: China's Missile Threat to U.S. Bases in Asia

By your own Western military experts. Even if they underestimated the numbers of DFs and Cruise Missiles of China in their reports.


It would have been so simple that Japan return Diaoyudao to China with grace.
China will then forgive Japan. And perhaps Okinawa and Ryukuku be allowed to remain with Japan.

But you want to do it the hard hard way.
And scrapping at bottom of barrel and below the bottom of barrel

Japan so frightened that Japan scraping below the bottom of barrel and trying to form alliance with Taiwan, the Philippines, Palau, Vietnam, Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia and to a further extent Australia and India.


The funny thing is that Suika not joking at all. :omghaha: :omghaha::omghaha:

Japan hoping to con them to fight for Japan and die for Japan when Japan start the war with China and save the Japan Emperor from having to be custodian and cleaner of public toilet build on the very site of the Yakasuni Shrin


Suika might do better with getting Japan AV girls to fight in the war.


1609418586274.png



Or even armed Japanese school girls with spears and they will do better than Filipinos or Indians or Aussies or Palaunese in the fight.



So instead of those from India and Aussies or Philipine, Suika better use Japanese AV girls or Japanese school girls who will fight better than them. And remember , Murica is impotent

1609382501705.png






1609382566791.png





Extract just a wee bit from https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/chinese-missiles-news-discussions.84215/page-164

Happy new year with first aerial view of DF-17

49eca83dgy1gm79ix2basj20u01gitgw.jpg



1.gif

2.gif



PLA Rocket Force ‘Cruise Missile 1st Brigade’ CJ-10A Cruise Missile Training Scene



The CJ-10A is a land-attack cruise missiles (LACM) with range of more than 1,500 km

Japan depending on Aegis & Patriot & Thaad systems to protect them?


Patriot? Thaad?? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :D :D :D


:enjoy:


1602377212761.png



1602377146518.png



4a5fa3802642.jpg




Despite overlapping coverage. And those missiles were sub sonic slow poke missiles.
USA did not know then that the missiles were there and coming.
USA to date with records of radar traces got no clue where the missiles came from or going to.
Until those missiles hit their intended targets with big BANGS. If not , USA and KSA got no clues that the missiles were even there.

And USA charging billions for stuff which was all bluff and smoke and mirrors when the crunch came.

Your best and only defence is for Shinzo Abe to go on bended knees and hands to Beijing and kowtow 3 times and return all land stolen from China and live in peace.

And if not, then your Emperor got to go on bended knees and hands to Beijing and kowtow 3 times and return all land stolen from China and live in peace.


Choice for Japan to make.
China will do the rest.

I be happy to go Yum Seng and dance on table tops and streets with many other very happy Chinese.:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:
giphy.gif





:cheers::cheers::cheers:
:enjoy::enjoy::enjoy:




As to why Japanese Emperor will be the custodian and cleaner of a public toilet build exactly where Yasukuni Shrine located.
And why Diaoyudao and Okinawa and Ryukuku chain be no longer Japanese

There's no doubt that the PRC has become militarily much more powerful. But things are multi-faceted. Those end results you post would have to be proceeded by PRC's forceful unification with Taiwan first. That hasn't happened yet so keep waiting.
 
.
The following JSDF videos have sections about international cooperation but note an absence of cooperation with PLA forces. Reason being is due to the foreign policy adopted by the government.



In this 70th year anniversary promo, there's a section that starts at 2:53 listing many of JSDF joint-training with many countries such as with the US, Australia, India, and the Philippines. It infers the obvious about Japan's Free and Open Indo-Pacific policy.

Additional official documents about Japan's Free and Open Indo-Pacific policy.
https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000430632.pdf
https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/100056243.pdf

And of course Japan's white defense paper that includes this bit:
jwdp.jpg

https://www.mod.go.jp/e/publ/w_paper/wp2020/DOJ2020_EN_Full.pdf

That evolved from Japan's efforts in trying to establish some trust with a China that it viewed as unilateral and non-transparent back in 2013 as identified in this Japan National Defense paper.
jdltoutline.jpg

https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/agenda/guideline/pdf/security_strategy_e.pdf

 There's also this page in the MoD's Defense Planning Outline which puts concerns about increased military activities in the region by PRC aircraft and carrier.

jdoutline.jpg

https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/agenda/guideline//2019/pdf/20190801.pdf



This earlier post about Japanese foreign policy, not of my specific conclusions, and really should hvae been enough:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/milt...nese-self-defense-forces.676197/post-12884415
You're insistence to sidetrack from reality and to take things into marginalizing posts about it as some sort of fake content created by an individual and not by the government and then proceed to discredit the post as you insistently press to frame it as all just individually created fake content goes to show that responding to you is no longer necessary in this thread except with just a link to this post.
This is a conversation forum, dear, not propaganda medias. I am not interested in spending a lot of time collecting videos or reports. We just share opinions here on the forum / thread, right? You are the only Japan-related poster here, We can only share opinions with you. If there is another real Japanese poster, I am not interested in chating with a non-Japnese pro-Japan guy, you can't be honestly think and speak for Japanese interests. Period.
 
.
There's no doubt that the PRC has become militarily much more powerful. But things are multi-faceted. Those end results you post would have to be proceeded by PRC's forceful unification with Taiwan first. That hasn't happened yet so keep waiting.



You are not cute.
You are an incredible bore.
So the place for you is into the ignore bin with used toilet papers and
discarded condoms and discarded used sanitary pads with cockroaches and flora fauna
feasting on used toilet papers and discarded condoms and discarded used sanitary pads
I do hope you represent most Japanese.

Which meant they be so engrossed in thinking how strong and mighty their military power is, allied with Taiwan, Palau, Philipines and India and Australia that Japan be tempted to keep Diaoyudao and refused to return what was not theirs to start with.

AND JAPAN WILL PROVOKE AND CAUSE A WAR WITH CHINA

Choice for Japan to make.
China will do the rest.

I be happy to go Yum Seng and dance on table tops and streets with many other very happy Chinese.:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:
giphy.gif






:cheers::cheers::cheers:
:enjoy::enjoy::enjoy:


AND WE WILL SEE JAPANESE EMPORER BECOMING CUSTODIAN AND CLEANER OF PUBLIC TOILET BUILD WHERE YAKUSUNI SHRINE USED TO BE




The fire bombing of USA on Japan will be nothing compared to the hellstorm that will engulf Japan from China .

In the first 10++ minutes, all the bases in Japan will be cratered and hit by the DongFangs with conventional warheads ensuring their planes cannot take off.



1609419562372.png






1609418768829.png




Missile Strikes on U.S. Bases in Asia: Is This China's Real Threat to America?

Shugart and Gonzalez also point out that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has carried out drills simulating preemptive attacks against America’s regional military assets. In one such instance, the PLA Rocket Forces “appears to have been practicing on several ship targets of a similar size to U.S. Arleigh Burke –class destroyers moored in a mock port that is a near-mirror image of the actual inner harbor at the U.S. naval base in Yokosuka.” This is illuminating, the authors note, because the only way the Chinese military could catch three U.S. ships in port is if they conducted a complete surprise attack.
After reviewing Chinese capabilities and doctrines, the authors try to simulate such an attack to judge its effectiveness. Interestingly, while they believe China would strike U.S. bases in Japan and even some Japanese forces, they assume Beijing would avoid attacks on Korea “in order to prevent a distracting second front on the Korean Peninsula while pursuing its primary military goals elsewhere.” In their simulation, they also assume that Beijing would not initially target America’s base at Guam since it is U.S. territory and China would want to prevent an escalation that could result in America bombing mainland China.
Shugart and Gonzales run two different models of a simulated preemptive attack, keeping in mind what they know about U.S. and allied missile defense systems in the region. In both models, “enough ballistic missiles seemed likely to leak through to cause highly significant damage to U.S. bases and forces in the region.” Some of the results of the attacks include:
• “Almost every major fixed headquarters and logistical facility struck, with key headquarters struck within the first few minutes of the conflict.”
• “Almost every U.S. ship in port in Japan struck pierside by ballistic missiles.”
• “In most cases, cratering by ballistic missiles of every runway and runway-length taxiway at all major U.S. air bases in Japan.”
• “As a result of runway cratering, headquarters destruction, and air defense degradation, more than 200 trapped U.S. aircraft destroyed on the ground in the first hours of the conflict.”
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Then Chinese cruise missiles will fly in their thousands to take out what not taken out military assets in that first 20++ minutes.

Chinese AShMs will burn and incinerate Japanese Naval assets.

During that time, Japanese command centers will blown up killing all those inside.

See the photos of test sites in Western China of dummy airfields and plane shelters of air and naval bases in Japan being hit so accurately by DFs.

First Strike: China's Missile Threat to U.S. Bases in Asia

By your own Western military experts. Even if they underestimated the numbers of DFs and Cruise Missiles of China in their reports.


It would have been so simple that Japan return Diaoyudao to China with grace.
China will then forgive Japan. And perhaps Okinawa and Ryukuku be allowed to remain with Japan.

But you want to do it the hard hard way.
And scrapping at bottom of barrel and below the bottom of barrel

Japan so frightened that Japan scraping below the bottom of barrel and trying to form alliance with Taiwan, the Philippines, Palau, Vietnam, Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia and to a further extent Australia and India.


The funny thing is that Suika not joking at all. :omghaha: :omghaha::omghaha:

Japan hoping to con them to fight for Japan and die for Japan when Japan start the war with China and save the Japan Emperor from having to be custodian and cleaner of public toilet build on the very site of the Yakasuni Shrin


Suika might do better with getting Japan AV girls to fight in the war.



1609418586274.png




Or even armed Japanese school girls with spears and they will do better than Filipinos or Indians or Aussies or Palaunese in the fight.



So instead of those from India and Aussies or Philipine, Suika better use Japanese AV girls or Japanese school girls who will fight better than them. And remember , Murica is impotent

1609382501705.png







1609382566791.png






Extract just a wee bit from https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/chinese-missiles-news-discussions.84215/page-164

Happy new year with first aerial view of DF-17


49eca83dgy1gm79ix2basj20u01gitgw.jpg




1.gif


2.gif




PLA Rocket Force ‘Cruise Missile 1st Brigade’ CJ-10A Cruise Missile Training Scene




The CJ-10A is a land-attack cruise missiles (LACM) with range of more than 1,500 km

Japan depending on Aegis & Patriot & Thaad systems to protect them?


Patriot? Thaad?? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :D :D :D


:enjoy:



1602377212761.png





1602377146518.png





4a5fa3802642.jpg





Despite overlapping coverage. And those missiles were sub sonic slow poke missiles.
USA did not know then that the missiles were there and coming.
USA to date with records of radar traces got no clue where the missiles came from or going to.
Until those missiles hit their intended targets with big BANGS. If not , USA and KSA got no clues that the missiles were even there.

And USA charging billions for stuff which was all bluff and smoke and mirrors when the crunch came.

Your best and only defence is for Shinzo Abe to go on bended knees and hands to Beijing and kowtow 3 times and return all land stolen from China and live in peace.

And if not, then your Emperor got to go on bended knees and hands to Beijing and kowtow 3 times and return all land stolen from China and live in peace.


Choice for Japan to make.
China will do the rest.

I be happy to go Yum Seng and dance on table tops and streets with many other very happy Chinese.:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:
giphy.gif






:cheers::cheers::cheers:
:enjoy::enjoy::enjoy:




As to why Japanese Emperor will be the custodian and cleaner of a public toilet build exactly where Yasukuni Shrine located.
And why Diaoyudao and Okinawa and Ryukuku chain be no longer Japanese
 
.
A video (with cheesy music) about the 24th Deployment Surface Force for Counter-Piracy Enforcement to the Gulf of Aden. The dispatch was made up of JS Yudachi and JS Yugiri and went from March to September in 2016.
 
.
Can Japan defeat China now as it did in WW2? A question set in Quora

888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
Extract from Quora

There are two parts to this question.

Which I covered in two answers I made earlier.

Part 1 Did Japan defeat China in WW2?

Wuming Chan's answer to If the Nationalists and Communists didn't fight each other, would a united China have beaten the Japanese?

extracted in full below

Did the Japanese win in CHina?
Could the Japs win in China?
I thought they were stuck in a quagmire and sucked deeper and deeper in China and being killed and injured by the millions in the Sino Japanese war despite the Chinese having pathetically little arms.
I think the German Army stuck and surrounded in Stalingrad got more arms and supplies send to them than what was send in all entirety to the Chinese in China during the Sino Japanese war.
Japan got sucked into quicksand in China despite overwhelming military advantage and 4 to 5 times as many Japanese died at the hands of Chinese than they did in the islands of Pacific at the arms of the USA Marines and Army and Navy.
That the Japanese soldiers were very well trained can be seen in their earlier victories against British and USA.
The Japanese could fight very very well.
As to how Japs could fight, do recall 36,000 Japanese invaded Malaya , forced and fought their way down and utterly defeated 86,000++ British troops capturing Singapore. So do not think Japs could not fight.
About 130,000 Indian, Australian and British troops became prisoners of war when Singapore was surrended to General Yamashita. The 130,000 Brits and Allied forces with artillery and tanks and planes and guns and lots of ammo surrended to 36,000 Japs who rode down on fucking bicycles fighting with guns and hardly any arty .
Neither could the Americans hold off the Japanese at the beginning because the Japanese fought extremely well against USA as seen in Corregidor.
The defensive arsenal on Corregidor was formidable with 45 coastal guns and mortars organized into 23 batteries, some seventy-two anti-aircraft weapons assigned to thirteen batteries and a minefield of approximately 35 groups of controlled mines.
The two 12-inch (305 mm) guns of Batteries Smith and Hearn, with a horizontal range of 29,000 yd (27,000 m) and all-around traverse were the longest range of all the island's artillery.
Caballo Island, with Fort Hughes—just south of Corregidor—was the next largest in area. At about 160 acres (65 ha), the island rose abruptly from the bay to a height of 380 ft (120 m) on its western side. Commander Francis J. Bridget was in charge of its beach defenses with a total of 800 men, of whom 93 were Marines and 443 belonged to the Navy, by the end of April 1942. Coastal artillery numbered some 13 assorted pieces, with its anti-aircraft defenses tied in with those of Corregidor.
Fort Drum—which lay about 4 mi (6.4 km) south of Fort Hughes—was the most unusual of the harbor defenses. Military engineers had cut away the entire top of El Fraile Island down to the water-line and used the island as a foundation to build a reinforced concrete "battleship", 350 ft (110 m) long and 144 ft (44 m) wide, with exterior walls of concrete and steel 25–36 ft (7.6–11.0 m) thick. The top deck of this concrete battleship was 40 ft (12 m) above the low-water mark and had 20 ft (6.1 m) thick walls. Equipped with four 14-inch (356 mm) guns in armored turrets facing seaward, a secondary battery of four casemated 6-inch (152 mm) gunsguns, and two antiaircraft guns, the fort with its 200-man garrison was considered impregnable to attack.
And the 13,000++ USA and Filipino soldiers left on Corregidor with all those hardware and lots of military goodies were ran over and surrendered to 2,400++ Japs in three landings made by the Japs on the island.
And that Gen McArthur ran away from his troops in Corregidor for which he was awarded MOH for his glorious act of running away.
As for China at the time of the Sino Japanese war, China was defenseless.
China had little industry in China being raped and pillaged by Western powers all set to divide and dismembered her and selling opium to China prior to the Sino Japanese war from July 7, 1937, to September 2, 1945
And for that purpose, the Western Powers were not going to let China have the means to produce armaments which could be used to stop the West from enjoying what they could from China.
Second Sino-Japanese War - Wikipedia
Japanese had a very strong military and armaments , from the steel USA happily sold to her for that purpose, together with the oil . Going on until almost before Japan decided to attack Pearl harbour because the Japanese were very unhappy USA not selling to Japan as much steel and oil as they want to beat and loot China in the way the Japanese want to.
China ports were all taken by Japanese so nothing could get through and for that matter, USA was not going to do that as USA had this great friendship going on with Japan.
Until Japan attacked Pearl Harbour that USA decided perhaps USA needed to supply arms to China except USA main focus was to supply arms to Europe as China was a bastard child. China did not even get 1% of the armaments supplied to UK, Russia and other Allied forces in other theatres of war.
The much ballyhooed military lift over the Hump was a fucking joke as that primarily was to try to get fuel and bombs over to bases for USA planes to bomb Japan and not arms for China. And at that, the fuel required to fly over the hump, and to fly back meant only a pittance could be brought over.
Chinese had to take on 80% of the Japanese Armed strength in China itself and 20% of the Japanese in the Pacific fighting the Americans
From Jamie Wong answer to How powerful is the Chinese military?
As a matter of fact, a lot of PLA soldiers didn’t even have a rifle. For major battles, each soldier got 1 rifle, 100~200 bullets, and 2~3 grenades. As for the guerrillas who was fighting in the Japanese occupied ares, half of them didn’t even have a rifle or pistol. Each battle, 5 rounds were the standard equipment. Others had to use blades and spears.
[
1609563529612.png

↑ This picture shows the common situation of PLA guerrillas.
]
1609563551978.png

]↑ And this was already a major division, but in the tough area.[
]
1609563572739.png

↑ This is how the 8th route army looked like. It was the major division of PLA. Still no armored vehicle.[
]
1609563589557.png

1609563605849.png

1609563618066.png
[
E]This was how Chinese went into battle in 1941
Those Chinese lucky enough to have rifles would have five rounds for each rifle. The rest using swords and spears against Japanese machine guns, tanks and artillery.
Yet they fought and killed Japanese invaders.
Even though the Chinese had no experience with fighting, and Japanese very well armed and with enormous experience in war and killing, Chinese took them on. (so those that always harp and crow that Chinese got no experience, please remember this and take note)
And Chinese killed over 1.5 million Japanese soldiers. Chinese did it by strapping explosives to their bodies to rush at tanks and machine guns and Japanese concentration of troops in suicidal charges.
Except the chinese being chinese, never ever will call their charges as banzai charges.
This not only killed Japanese, this terrified them as to how Chinese with so few arms could take on the Japanese. This was when the Japanese copied the Chinese in Japanese Pacific war against USA.
Why should the Japanese use Banzai attacks on Chinese in China? Japanese got machine guns and artillery and tanks and planes to kill the Chinese without having to go Banzaiiing!
Japanese learned Kamikazi and Banzai attacks from Chinese.
From the Chinese who had little arms and no other choices to their killing of Japanese in China.
Chinese paid with 14 ++ million of their Chinese soldiers dying . And another 14++ million Chinese civilians slaughtered and murdered by the Japanese soldiers in attempts to terrorised and intimidate China into surrendering.
For the Americans it was very different in their later fight with Japanese.
USA did not have to strap explosives to their bodies like the Chinese soldiers to rush the Japanese.
USA had battleships with 16″ guns and planes and bombs and Ma Deuces and artillery , tanks flame throwers and unlimited ammo and kitchen sink to help them take on the remaining 20% of the Japanese on islands like Iwo Jima, Guadalcanal, Guam, Okinawa maybe taking out 200,000 Japanese troops in the entire Pacific islands campaigns.[
E]
main-qimg-72db35907af4861e21003e5f7997873f

main-qimg-d16f5bbb8f93ebe93bf1ebacb6b2711f

main-qimg-73cb524b52c50467ad7606d0770cf68c
[
]Now we look at how the Chinese fought when they had adequate arms.
Battle of Yenangyaung - Wikipedia
And in Burma, at the battle of Yenangyaung, almost 7,000 British soldiers, and 500 prisoners and civilians were encircled by an equal number of Japanese soldiers from the IJA 33rd Division at Yenangyaung and its oil field. The 33rd Division had cut the Magwe road between Slim's two divisions, who were now about 50 miles (80 km) apart.
General Sun instead led his 113th Regiment with only 1,121 men, of which only 800 were combat personnel, in the rescue mission.
British veteran expresses thanks to descendants of China Expeditionary Force
And those 800 chinese saved the Brits. And those 800 Chinks pulled the chestnuts of the 7,000 valiant brits out of the fucking fire and slaughtered the IJA 33rd Division.
In China, Chinese with kungfu and spears and swords and hardly any guns hold the Japs and fought the Japs killing 1.77 million of the Japs and wounding 1.9 million Japs with suicidal charges strapping explosives to take out Jap tanks and machine guns and artillery.
But Chinese when given adequate arms could fight far better than the Japs.
Imagine now if Chinese had been given sufficient arms in China to fight the fucking Japanese there in China!
There might not even be a fucking TORA TORA TORA at Pearl Harbour. And no Japanese in Pacific at all for USA Army and Marines to fight as Japs will all be in China and being fucked and killed by Chinese in China.[
And now for Part 2.

Can Japan defeat China now?

I wrote answer a short while ago in Wuming Chan's answer to Why would Japan's military beat China?

extracted in full below

Japan military beat China?

ROTFFLMFAO!

Chinese in China and all over the world hope the day come soon when Japan military attack China. Be it an all out assault or a sneaky Pearl Harbour kind of Tora Tora Tora that Japan is known for.

Please do have war with China.

Go play games of chicken with China around DiaoYuDao which is Chinese stolen by Japan or trying to be bully boy at first Island chain for USA.

Young men and women of both countries and all countries should smell roses, make love and drink and dine and laugh and go enjoy sunrises and sunsets and play with their kids and children.

Please do have war with China.

China will not attack Japan first. But China will end any fight that Japan chose to start.

On the first day and night after that Japan military attack on China, nothing will happen.

Chinese in China and chinese all over the world will be too busy and happy buying dinner and drinks for each other and total strangers and shouting yum seng! after yum seng! and kan pei! to bottoms up with one and all. They be drinking and dancing on the table tops, under the table tops , and streets in celebrations .

That with this Japan attempt on a Pearl Harbour kind of sneak attack on China that China will be able to finally take revenge. And China will make it nightmarish on the Japan for their failures to apologise for Nanjing Massacre and Unit 731 and other atrocities Japan inflicted on China.

The fire bombing of USA on Japan will be nothing compared to the hellstorm that will engulf Japan from China from the second day onwards.

On that 2nd day, in the first 20++ minutes, all the bases in Japan will be cratered and hit by the DongFangs with conventional warheads ensuring their planes cannot take off.

Missile Strikes on U.S. Bases in Asia: Is This China's Real Threat to America?

Shugart and Gonzalez also point out that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has carried out drills simulating preemptive attacks against America’s regional military assets. In one such instance, the PLA Rocket Forces “appears to have been practicing on several ship targets of a similar size to U.S. Arleigh Burke –class destroyers moored in a mock port that is a near-mirror image of the actual inner harbor at the U.S. naval base in Yokosuka.” This is illuminating, the authors note, because the only way the Chinese military could catch three U.S. ships in port is if they conducted a complete surprise attack.
After reviewing Chinese capabilities and doctrines, the authors try to simulate such an attack to judge its effectiveness. Interestingly, while they believe China would strike U.S. bases in Japan and even some Japanese forces, they assume Beijing would avoid attacks on Korea “in order to prevent a distracting second front on the Korean Peninsula while pursuing its primary military goals elsewhere.” In their simulation, they also assume that Beijing would not initially target America’s base at Guam since it is U.S. territory and China would want to prevent an escalation that could result in America bombing mainland China.
Shugart and Gonzales run two different models of a simulated preemptive attack, keeping in mind what they know about U.S. and allied missile defense systems in the region. In both models, “enough ballistic missiles seemed likely to leak through to cause highly significant damage to U.S. bases and forces in the region.” Some of the results of the attacks include:
• “Almost every major fixed headquarters and logistical facility struck, with key headquarters struck within the first few minutes of the conflict.”
• “Almost every U.S. ship in port in Japan struck pierside by ballistic missiles.”
• “In most cases, cratering by ballistic missiles of every runway and runway-length taxiway at all major U.S. air bases in Japan.”
• “As a result of runway cratering, headquarters destruction, and air defense degradation, more than 200 trapped U.S. aircraft destroyed on the ground in the first hours of the conflict.”
Then Chinese cruise missiles will fly in their thousands to take out what not taken out military assets in that first 20++ minutes.

Chinese AShMs will burn and incinerate Japanese Naval assets.

During that time, Japanese command centers will blown up killing all those inside.

See the photos of test sites in Western China of dummy airfields and plane shelters of air and naval bases in Japan being hit so accurately by DFs.

First Strike: China's Missile Threat to U.S. Bases in Asia

By your own Western military experts. Even if they underestimated the numbers of DFs and Cruise Missiles of China in their reports.

The same way they thought China has only 260 nukes.

The same way Mc Arthur thought no Chinese at all in Korea until Chinese appeared in the hundreds of thousands right within USA and UN troops!

First Strike: China's Missile Threat to U.S. Bases in Asia

And in short time, DiaoYuDao will be back with China together with Okinawa and Ryuku islands.



Yasukuni Shrine will be razed and turned into a park as memorial to victims of Nanjing Massacre and Unit 731 and comfort women used by Japanese Army in WW2.

main-qimg-71a50dbba44c78128b221b7df7bb51f1.webp

http://www.thecover.cn/news/179072

main-qimg-77d798e8e8589f823fa5545f1e1046bf

On December 13, 2016, the National Public Sacrifice Ceremony of the Nanjing Massacre Killers was held in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province.

main-qimg-16a45035a45e7e5fbb80d7d2b71a9d9f

main-qimg-e8a91462e1510409fba865a69f775934

main-qimg-e28ec39dd60746fc083bba5a54a9cd04

main-qimg-4c46192fc415fd9898bd203c546ff25d

main-qimg-da56153e09570e9674457662e8022153

main-qimg-95787a1809e1efeda832ebae447893f1

main-qimg-f09a6c60a57500f86fcf3c5678fcbf6c

Please do have war with China.

Go play games of chicken with China around DiaoYuDao which is Chinese stolen by Japan or trying to be bully boy at first Island chain for USA.

Young men and women of both countries and all countries should smell roses, make love and drink and dine and laugh and go enjoy sunrises and sunsets and play with their kids and children.
 
Last edited:
.
.
Food for thought for those who want China as their enemy and preparing for war with China



1.JPG



2.JPG



3.JPG



4.JPG


11.gif


22.gif


21.gif
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom