What's new

Military UAV Designs

Turkey has obtained a second export customer for its new Anka UAV. Saudi Arabia will buy a dozen or more Ankas (contract details are still being negotiated). The first order for Anka came from the Turkish Air Force which ordered 30 aircraft (ten systems). Each Anka system consists of three UAVs plus ground control equipment and all necessary maintenance and ground operations gear.

Looking very similar to the American Predator, the Anka is a 1.6 ton aircraft propelled by a rear facing propeller. Payload is 200 kg (440 pounds) and endurance is 24 hours, and Anka can operate up to 200 kilometers from its controller. Max altitude is 7,900 meters (26,000 feet). A UAV like this would sell for over $2 million each. The Turkish military is to receive its first Anka by the end of the year. In late 2012 Turkey found its first export customer for Anka, with Egypt ordering ten. First deliveries will be in two years. Turkey is already working on a larger (four ton) version of Anka that can carry missiles or a lot more reconnaissance equipment.

Turkey is developing a significant UAV industry. Another Turkish firm made its first export sale (to Qatar) of its Bayraktar Tactical UAV a year ago. This is a 500 kg (1,100 pound) aircraft with a 40 kg (88 pound) payload and an endurance of 14 hours. It enters service in Turkey this year. The price for ten Bayraktars Tactical UAVs sold to Qatar was reported to be $25 million.
There is also a Bayraktar Mini UAV which is a 4.6 kg (9.9 pound) aircraft that is battery powered and hand launched. Endurance is 60 minutes and the Bayraktar can operate up to 15 kilometers from the operator. The Turkish Army has been using the Bayraktar Mini for the last six years.

Turkey's economy has been booming during the last decade, as a new government made good on its pledge to crack down on the corruption that had long crippled the economy. As the economy grew the government sought to make Turkey more self-sufficient in military equipment, and UAVs are considered part of this program.

uav-turkey-anka.jpg

Pakistan Aeronautical Complex Kamra delivers first batch of drone parts for Turkey


ISLAMABAD, May 13 (APP): The Pakistan Aeronautical Complex, Kamra has handed over the first batch of Turkish UAV (ANKA) parts to Turkish Aerospace Industry (TAI) in an impressive ceremony held during International Defence Exhibition and Fair (IDEF) at Istanbul, Turkey.

After the signing ceremony, Muharrem DORTKASLI, President and CEO of TAI expressed his satisfaction on the skill and knowledge possessed by PAC, Kamra for undertaking such assignments, said a press release issued by PAF here on Monday.

He expressed that many more collaborations would be undertaken in the future as well.

Talking to media persons, Air Marshal Sohail Gul Khan, Chairman PAC, Kamra paid his gratitude to TAI for paving PAC’s way to enter into a new domain of commercialization.

He further said that it was the first step towards building up close cooperation in the field of aviation which will open the doors of further collaboration between the aviation industries of Turkey and Pakistan.

The ceremony was attended by Lt General (Retd) Shahid Iqbal, Secretary Defence Production Division and high ranking officials from Turkey.

The PAC Kamra has been exploring the different venues in aviation industry and affiliated production facilities and stands shoulder to shoulder with other advanced aviation industries of the world.
 
Aerial Target

Conceived late in 1916, this was a radio-controlled, pilotless aeroplane intended both for defence against Zeppelins and as a flying bomb. In the former role it was planned that it would be controlled from the ground, but in the latter role control from an accompanying manned aeroplane was also considered. To disguise its intended purpose it was always referred to as the Aerial Target.
Its wireless apparatus was designed by Capt Archibald M Low of the RFC's wireless unit at Feltham, whose idea it was. His attempt to build the aeroplane himself, largely from spare parts, had met with no success, and the assistance of the Royal Aircraft Factory had therefore been requested. The project was undertaken by Henry Folland, although much of the detail work was drawn by his assistant, H E Preston. The Farnborough design was a small shoulder-wing monoplane powered by a two-cylinder ABC Gnat of 35hp, with numerous radio aerials running vertically down the fuselage sides and chordwise across the wings. In the interests of simplicity, lateral control was by wing warping, and generous dihedral ensured lateral stability.
Six examples, A8957-A8962, were constructed, the first being delivered to RFC Northolt, where the trials were to take place, on 5 June 1917. The intention was that the machine should be trimmed to take off and climb away to a reasonable height before radio control was attempted. Extensive windtunnel tests on models had indicated what the necessary tailplane incidence should be, but the first flight, on 6 July, consisted of an almost vertical climb away from the launching rail, followed by the inevitable stall and consequent crash, before the radio control system could take effect. It was clear that the still imperfectly understood aerodynamic differences between scale models and full-sized aeroplanes had resulted in insufficient tailplane incidence.
A second example was tested on 25 July but failed to take off, merely running along the ground until its undercarriage finally collapsed, the tailplane adjustment having been somewhat overcorrected. A third attempt, with the tailplane finally set at the correct angle, was made three days later, but unfortunately resulted in yet another crash when the engine failed just after take-off. Although damage was confined to a broken propeller and some easily repaired undercarriage components, official interest in the project appears to have diminished and no further trials are recorded as having taken place, although the project was resurrected briefly in the early 1920s.
One example was later converted to a manned aeroplane by No 3 (Western) Aircraft Depot at Bristol, and was fitted with a wheeled undercarriage and ailerons. As a rebuilt aircraft it was allotted a serial number from a batch allocated for that purpose. It received the number B8962, with numerals similar to those of its original, uncertain identity, and this has caused much ill-founded conjecture among latter-day historians.
By 1934 it had been disposed of, and was owned by Mr Ron Shelley of Billericay, but it was broken up without appearing on the civil register.

Dimensions:
span 22ft 0in; length 20ft 4in; height 5ft 10 1/2in;
chord 5ft 2in; incidence 6°; dihedral 5°.
Weight 500lb.


zlPZ5IG.jpg


RAF Aerial Target / AT

The Predator's Ancestors - UAVs in The Great War
Recently, drones, or UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) like the Predator, Reaper, Global Hawk and Grey Eagles, have been making front page news; from bombing terrorist leaders out of existence, and surveillance of the nation’s borders, to more mundane tasks such as tracking wildfires, or analyzing traffic flow on many streets, roads, and highways across the country. Whether you agree or disagree with their usage, UAVs have a history that dates back over one hundred fifty years.
The first military use of an unmanned aerial vehicle actually occurred on August 22, 1849, when, after months of secret trial and error, the Austrians launched explosive-laden unmanned balloons over the Italian city of Venice. The Austrian military had instructed that “in favorable winds, the balloons will be launched and directed as near to Venice as possible, and on their being brought to vertical positions over the town; they will be fired by electro magnetism by means of a long isolated copper wire with a large galvanic battery placed on the shore. The bomb falls perpendicularly and explodes on reaching the ground.' Many of the balloons were launched from the Austrian ship Vulcano, but the erratic winds caused a number of the balloons to drift back over the Austrians, preventing their use, and the operation was not considered a success.
Although balloons do not generally meet today's definition of a UAV, the concept was strong enough that once winged aircraft had been invented, the effort to fly them unmanned for military purposes was not far behind. And so the story picks up again in 1916 at the height of World War One.
Serbian-American inventor and engineer Nikola Tesla had described a fleet of unmanned aerial combat vehicles in 1915 and the idea came to fruition in Great Britain with the “Aerial Target” (as seen in the photo at the very top.) This radio-controlled, pilotless aeroplane was intended both for defense against Zeppelins and as a flying bomb. In its role as a Zeppelin-killer, it was planned to be controlled from the ground, but as a flying bomb, the control was to be from an accompanying manned aeroplane.

The wireless apparatus was the brainchild of Capt. Archibald M. Low of the Royal Flying Corp. As a civilian, Low had written a brief based on his research to remotely control an aircraft to use as a guided missile. When the war broke out, Low joined the military and went through officer training. In just a few months he was promoted to Captain and sent to the Royal Flying Corp. With two other officers assisting him, Low set to work to see if it was possible. This project was called the "Aerial Target" or AT, a deliberate misidentification meant to fool German spies into thinking the British were building a drone aircraft to test anti-aircraft capabilities. Capt. Low attempted to build the aeroplane himself from spare parts but met with no success, and the assistance of the Royal Aircraft Factory was subsequently requested. The project was undertaken by Mr. Henry Folland, (although a considerable amount of the detail work was done by his assistant, H. E. Preston.) After a prototype was constructed, the Royal Flying Corps Experimental Works was created to build the first proper "Aerial Target" complete with an explosive warhead. Low was promoted to head up the Experimental Works and acquired about 30 picked men, including jewelers, carpenters and aircraftsmen in order to get the pilotless plane built as quickly as possible. Construction commenced at the Ruston Proctor Works where they were already building aircraft designed by the Sopwith firm.

The Ruston Proctor Works where early ATs and Sopwith aircraft were built

The aircraft design was a small shoulder-wing monoplane powered by a two-cylinder ABC Gnat engine of 35hp, with numerous radio aerials running vertically down the fuselage sides and chord-wise across the wings. In the interests of simplicity, lateral control was by wing warping and generous dihedral ensured lateral stability. Radio guidance equipment was developed and installed on the design. The first trial was held on March 21, 1917 near the Salisbury Plain in southern Britain and was attended by about forty Allied Generals. The AT was launched from the back of a lorry using compressed air and successfully demonstrated the ability to be remotely controlled before an engine failure led to a crash landing.



x9tx1uQ.jpg


Contemporary artwork of what the Aerial Target looked like

Six examples, numbers A.8957 to A.8962, were constructed, the first being delivered on June 5, 1917 to the RFC base at Northolt. The intention was that the machine should be trimmed to take off and climb away to a reasonable height before radio control was attempted. Wind-tunnel testing on models had indicated what the necessary tailplane incidence should be, but the first flight on July 6th consisted of an almost vertical climb away from the launching rail, followed by the inevitable stall and crash, due to insufficient tailplane incidence and long before the radio control system could take effect.


RWD1cqI.jpg

Awaiting testing of one of the Aerial Targets in 1917


A second example was tested on July 25th but failed to even get off the ground, merely running along the ground until its undercarriage finally collapsed. This time it was determined that the tailplane adjustment had been vastly overcorrected. Three days later, a third attempt was made, with the tailplane finally set at the correct angle. Unfortunately, it resulted in yet another crash when the engine seized just after take-off. Although damage was confined to a broken propeller and some easily repaired undercarriage components, official interest in the project vanished and no further trials are recorded as having taken place. At a later date an electrically driven gyro was added to the plane, but ultimately the "Aerial Target" project was not followed up because short-sighted military leaders thought it had limited military potential.



42QGRYK.jpg

Three-view drawing by the Royal Aircraft Factory of the Aerial Target

In the U.S., the Hewitt-Sperry Automatic Airplane, called the "flying bomb" made its first flight on September 12, 1917, demonstrating the concept of an unmanned aircraft. They were intended for use as "aerial torpedoes", an early version of a cruise missile. (Germany had actually already developed a type of cruise missile; the Siemens Schuckert glider bomb or torpedo glider.) Control was achieved using gyroscopes developed by the Sperry Gyroscope Company. In November, the Automatic Airplane was flown for representatives of the U.S. Army. This led the army to commission a project that eventually resulted in the Kettering Bug which first flew in 1918. While the Bug's revolutionary technology was successful, it could not be fully developed and deployed before the war ended.

the Kettering Bug
mt1CEQn.jpg


Warnepieces: The Predator's Ancestors - UAVs in The Great War

Remote Piloted Aerial Vehicles : The 'Aerial Target' and 'Aerial Torpedo' in Britain
The 'Aerial Target' and 'Aerial Torpedo' in Britain

Aerial Torpedo.
http://www.geocities.com/jjnevins/pulpsa.html

The Aerial Torpedo was introduced in the 1909 film The Airship Destroyer. An unknown country arms their zeppelins with bombs and launches an air raid on England. After a bombing raid British aircraft engage the zeppelins but are shot down. The bombing raid continues until finally a patriotic British inventor creates an "aerial torpedo," controlled by "wireless electricity," which he uses to bring down the enemy air fleet.



Airship Destroyer, The (Silent, England, 1909)
http://spot.colorado.edu/~dziadeck/airship/htmls/films.htm
A quickie about a zeppelin raid. The model work was very obvious. To quote from a movie list:"Inspired by Wells, this is one of the first real science fiction films to be made in England. The story concerns an attack on London by a fleet of airships from an unknown country. Through the extensive use of models, buildings were wrecked, prototype tanks destroyed, and railroads blown up. However, the films young hero, an inventor, launches radio controlled aerial torpedoes at the airships, and saves the day." The film was a great success, and was directed by Walter Booth, produced by Charles Urban.

There were 2 sequels to this film "The Pirates of 1920" (1911) and "The Aerial Anarchists (1911).

Entry in the Internet Movie Database

Airship Destroyer, The (1909) Directed by Walter R. Booth Genre: Short, Also Known As: Aerial Torpedo, The (1909) (UK) Battle of the Clouds, The (1909) (UK) Country: UK Black and White Silent


The Flying Torpedo
Silent Era : PSFL : The Flying Torpedo (1916)

(1916) American
B&W : Five reels
Directed by John B. O'Brien + [William Christy Cabanne]

Cast: John Emerson, Spottiswoode Aitken, William E. Lawrence (W.E. Lawrence), Fred J. Butler, Raymond Wells, Lucille Younge, Erich von Stroheim, Peggy Pearce (Viola Barry), Bessie Love, Ralph Lewis, Juanita Horton

Fine Arts Film Company production; distributed by Triangle Film Corporation. / Scenario by Robert M. Baker and John Emerson Production supervised by D.W. Griffith. Music score arranged by J.A. Raynes. / © January 31, 1916 by Triangle Film Corporation [LP8297]. Released March 12, 1916. / Standard 35mm spherical 1.37:1 format. / Working title: The Scarlet Band. Project began shooting in July 1915. Cabanne directed the battle sequences.

Drama: Science fiction.

Synopsis: US West Coast is invaded in 1921 by Asians and fought off by torpedoes controlled by wireless transmitters.




July 28, 1914
Dispatch Archive
On July 28, 1914, the first aerial torpedo was launched from a Royal Navy Short seaplane by Lt. A. M. Longmore. The U. S. Navy first experimented with aerial torpedoes in late 1917, when a 400-pound dummy torpedo was dropped from a seaplane and ricocheted back into the air, almost hitting the plane.

Since the aircraft of the day could lift only about 600 pounds of bombs or other ordnance, and the normal shipboard or submarine torpedo weighed 1,500 pounds or more, the torpedo bomber was not yet a reality.

Professor A.M. Low and the 'Aerial Target'
http://naarcee.bizland.com/feedback.htm

Prior to World War One there was one man in England who was working on a brand new concept, radar. It also seems that somebody at the War Office felt that too many of England's best and brightest pilots were being killed by the Fokker Mono Plane (Eindecker) Scourge. The man who was to head up this new research project was a Professor A.M. Low.




Sopwith AT

At the start of W.W.I Professor Low was actually working on the very first electronic range finder, based on the principles of radar, for the Artillery Corps but the RFC (Royal Flying Corps) had other things in mind for the good Professor. The RFC wanted Prof. Low to put his knowledge of radar to use in designing and developing remotely controlled pilot-less aircraft.
The concept was to develop a small, very simple aircraft. Pack it with explosives and then guide it into a designated target. Thus the RFC Experimental Works were born and the newly commissioned Second Lieutenant Low began his secret work in a Chiswick garage. As it turns out the aircraft design was the least of the challenges; it was the radio gear that needed to be developed first.

As Low made progress with the radio gear there was a need to relocate the operation to a more aeronautical site and Brooklands was chosen. It was here that it was discovered that the uncowled 50 hp Gnome rotary engine caused so much radio noise as to make the operation of the gear unreliable (sound familiar). In spite of the engine noise and unreliability of the aircraft it was shipped off to the Central Flying School at Upavon. It was subsequently never flown.

The key here is that the radio gear did operate as planned when the power plant was not running. As a matter of fact this remotely piloted vehicle (RPV) concept caught the interest of the great Sopwith Co. as well as Ruston Proctor & Co. Ltd who began immediate, parallel development to Low's own at the RFC. Granville Bradshaw of A.B.C. Motors Ltd. who gained fame by designing the well proven 45 hp Gnat engine subsequently designed a throwaway engine specifically for use in the RPV.

The 35 hp was a horizontally-opposed twin cylinder engine with a run life of 2 hours. It was this lightweight inexpensive engine that propelled RPV research and development into the next phase. In the mean time Sopwith had developed the 14ft wingspan "Sopwith AT" (AT = air target) which was fitted with the 35 hp ABC engine driving an ordinary wooden propeller. The radio box was further back towards the tail behind the fuel, batteries and of course the explosives.

The sensitive radio equipment was fitted into a wooden box with a glass lid, suspended on rubber supports. The box itself measured about 2ft 3in by 9in. This box contained all of the relays, receiver and the Key system which was an interference filter. An interesting note here, a shaft which was driven by the engine triggered a mechanical relay so that each contact made in the control box caused the engine power to operate the control services. The date was 1916 and the Sopwith AT was completed with full servo control. It never flew because it was subsequently damaged while in hangar and abandoned (sound familiar?).

The ironic end result was the creation of the Sopwith Sparrow which was a small, single seat aircraft which did in fact have a pilot after all. Naturally this is not the end of our story, enter Geoffrey de Havilland. De Havilland built a little mono plane around the lightweight ABC expendable engine. It is believed that it was the de Havilland monoplane which flew on a March 21st, 1917 test flight at Upavon. The rumor is that high ranking officials were invited to attend and were quickly dispersed in a rather comical fashion when the initial test flight went awry as they so often do. No more is known.

Later that year H.P. Folland the designer of the S.E.5 fighter embarked on task to build an aircraft using Low's radio equipment. By July of 1917 he had 5 aircraft ready for flight and on July 6, 1917 the first flight was conducted. The aircraft rolled smoothly along on a 150 ft launch track and became airborne mid way. The craft rose steeply, stalled and plummeted to the ground (sound familiar?). Two more tests were conducted on July 25 and 28 but the aircraft were under controlled and the entire "R/C" program slowed to a trickle until the end of the war.

Late in the War there was some research and development in the U.S. but it was relegated to gyroscopically controlled flying bombs and as such do not merit discussion here. It wouldn't be until September 3rd, 1924 when we would see the very first successful radio control flight of a lighter than air craft. From the decks of H.M.S. Stronghold a 23 ft wings span craft designated the RAE Target made a fully controlled 12 minute flight. The only reason why the flight ended was because the engine stopped (sound familiar ?). Success at last!

Subsequent flights off of the Stronghold were proving the viability of the notion of Radio Controlled flight. In fact the duration of the 10th flight was 39 minutes long. The flight was so successful that the RAE recorded a record 43 separate commands. Once the news of this reached the powers that be the RAE was given the go ahead to do what comes naturally...build it bigger and better with a larger pay load.

Thus the LARYNX was born. This mid- winged mono plane was designed to hold 250lbs of high powered explosives and travel a distance of over 300 miles. The Armstrong Siddeley Lynx - 200 hp engines was enclosed in a low drag cowling at the front end of a light weight tubular fuselage and attained the impressive speed of over 190 mph in the year - 1927.

This aircraft was years ahead of its kind and was even faster than its contemporary, manned, fighter planes. When it came time to actually replace the empty payload section with the intended explosives and field test the "flying bombs" they decided to forgo the R/C and install gyroscopes. They sent these aircraft to Iran where all of them failed miserably except one. This aircraft sailed off into the distance never to be seen or heard from again (sound familiar?). Whether the payload exploded or not, no one will ever know.


The Queen Bee

De Havilland Tiger Moth, Two seater bi plane trainer of the Royal Air Force, Maximum speed 109 mph, Ceiling 14,000 feet, and can remain airborne for three hours. The Royal Air Force last Bi Plane, which served as a trainer from 1932 to 1947.




Remote piloting a Queen Bee

Its design remained nearly the same throughout its history, and was well constructed and able to do aerobatics. A total of 8800 Tiger Moths were built which included 420 Radio Controlled Pilotless Target aircraft. (The Queen Bee) for the Royal Air Force. It was also used for a short period during the first months of world war two for coastal reconnaissance.

Kálmán Tihanyi

In the beginning of 1930, Kálmán Tihanyi moved to London at the invitation of the British Air Ministry to build a prototype of his aerial torpedo, whose plans he had completed in Berlin. Later that same year, he learned of RCA's interest in his television patents. While working on the aerial torpedo and negotiating with RCA, he conducted negotiations regarding various other inventions as well: wide-screen and stereo film, a reflector for submarines, etc.

At the end of 1931, Tihanyi was invited by the Italian Navy to develop his torpedo for marine use. During the next three years, he divided his time between the laboratories of the Air Ministry in London and the laboratories of the Italian Navy off the harbor of Genoa, on Isola Castagna.

also...

In an article, entitled, "Etwas uber das Fernsehen," ("About television,") written by Kálmán Tihanyi and published in the journal: Funk und Fernseh Technik, Berlin, (undated, but judging form reference to the invitation by the British Air Ministry to London, probably in early 1930) Tihanyi describes his Aerial Torpedo as a device which also possesses "eyes" with the help of which it "sees" and locks onto moving targets deploying one of various weapons it carries for the target's destruction. It should be noted that the patent [K. Tihanyi: Br. Pat. 352,035/December 21, 1929 application, (conv. date December 16, 1929, Hungary), issued June 22, 1931.] describes television guidance through specially constructed light and heat sensitive photocells for other types of weaponry, such as tanks, bombs, etc. as well.

http://www.scitech.mtesz.hu
 
Last edited:
Sperry Aerial Torpedo and Kettering Bug (USA, 1916-18)
Brothers Elmer and Lawrence Sperry were very prominent pioneers in the field of aeronautics, notably stabilizers, gyroscopes, and the like. Elmer Sperry had 350 patents to his name, and Lawrence Sperry invented an automatic gyroscope that enabled aircraft to fly level without the need for human intervention. In 1916, they incorporated a 'steering gyroscope' with the automatic gyro to create one of the first 'automatic pilot' systems in the world. That same year, Lawrence Sperry filed a patent for an aerial torpedo (unmanned aircraft) which featured:
0801SperryATorpedo1918_500.jpg

  • A gyro-stabilizer to keep the aircraft level
  • An automatic steering gyroscope to keep the aircraft on a specified heading
  • A barometer, indicating cruising altitude in order for the aircraft to level off
  • An engine-revolution counter to determine the point at which the aircraft should cut power and begin descent to its target.
The gyro motors and servo-motors would be powered by a wind-driven generator. (NOVA)
The US Navy awarded the Sperry Gyroscope Company $200,000 to construct this aircraft. The brothers began working with Curtis to develop it, and in 1917 Curtis delivered the first purpose-built torpedo airframe, powered by a two-cylinder engine. On March 6th, 1918, a guided missile flew for the first recorded time, successfully. Further tests of the Curtis torpedo did not go well, and Sperry engineers reverted to another design. (right: The Sperry Torpedo on its launch system)

In the meantime, Charles F. Kettering was directing the US Army's own aerial torpedo project. Kettering wanted to build a simpler, cheaper torpedo than the Sperry brothers' version. Orville Wright contributed to the building of the Kettering torpedo's airframe, and another engineering team designed the motor, a 30kW (40hp) V4 which ultimately cost about $50. A third team designed a cheap and portable launch system - a four-wheeled cradle on rails. However, Kettering was unable to build his own autopilot system, and had to have Elmer Sperry lend his assistance. Ultimately the Kettering Aerial Torpedo consisted of a wood-reinforced papier-mache fuselage and 12-foot cardboard wings, costing about $400 per torpedo. It featured much of the same technical aspects as the Sperry torpedo (gyroscope, barometer, revolution counter...)



The first test flight, in 1918, when it was given the name 'The Bug', did not go well. Subsequent tests were more successful, to the point that the Army ordered a large amount of prototypes. As the armistice took effect, however, the Navy and Army programs were combined. Later competitive tests favored the Curtis-Sperry torpedo, and the Kettering Bug was abandoned. Over the next few years, official interest in unmanned aerial torpedoes generally decreased.
Kettering Bug Specs:
300px-Kettering_Bug.jpg

wingspan 4.6 m
length 3.8 m
total weight 240 kg
warhead weight 80 kg
speed 195 KPH
range 120 KM source: vectorsite.net
(right)
The Kettering Bug ready for take-off

Long-Range Gun with Lynx Engine (RAE LARYNX) (UK, 1925-27)
In September 1925, work on this new British unmanned aerial vehicle began. It featured a radial engine and a gyroscopic control engine, built by the Royal Aeronautical Establishment for the Royal Navy.
Larynx.png
It was powered by an Armstrong Siddeley Lynx IV engine producing 200Hhp; its top speed was 320kph faster than fighters of the time. Its autopilot principles were developed by professor A. Lowe, who had already designed the autopilot apparatus for the Aerial Target (AT).
In 1927, the LARYNX had its first test, launched from a catapult fitted on to the Destroyer HMS Stronghold. It was tested six more times over the course of the following two years, producing few fully-successful launches. Its last test in May of 1929 was from land, and was a success. A number of LARYNX missiles were seemingly also tested in the deserts of Iraq, armed with a 113 kg warhead. Results were, however, reportedly inconclusive.
(right) The RAE LARYNX on the cordite-fired catapult on the HMS Stronghold.

1910s & 1920s - UAV universe

The Royal Aircraft Establishment Larynx (from "Long Range Gun with Lynx engine") was an early British pilotless aircraft, to be used as a guided anti-ship weapon. Started in September 1925, it was an early cruise missile guided by an autopilot.

A small monoplane powered by a 200 hp Armstrong Siddeley Lynx IV engine, it had a top speed of 200 mph (320 km/h); faster than contemporary fighters
RAE Larynx - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DH82B_queen_bee.jpg


The de Havilland D.H.82B Queen Bee was a radio controlled target aircraft based on the Moth Major, but with Tiger Moth wings. Here we see a Queen Bee at the point of taking to the air.
How to cite this article: Rickard, J (26 February 2010), De Havilland D.H.82B Queen Bee, De Havilland D.H.82B Queen Bee
De Havilland D.H.82B Queen Bee

'Queen' and 'Queen Bee' (UK, 1931-35)

In 1931 the British developed the Fairey 'Queen', an RC target, from a Fairey IIIF floatplane. It was produced in a batch of three.
uavs_queenbee.jpg

In 1935, a larger target was developed that was produced in much larger quantities: the 'DH.82B Queen Bee'. This target was derived from the de Havilland Tiger Moth biplane trainer and was the first re-usable and returnable target. It was constructed of spruce and plywood, and was fitted with wheels or floats depending on whether it was launched from land (an airfield) or water (at sea). It could fly at an altitude of 5,182m at speeds of over 160 km/hr and for up to 482 km. 380 of these targets were used by the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force until they were retired from service in 1947. (vectorsite) It is said that the Queen Bee somehow led to the term 'drone' for unmanned aerial targets. (NOVA, vectorsite)
Right: The Queen Bee

US Navy Curtiss 'N2C-2' (USA, 1937)
By the outbreak of WWII, unmanned aerial vehicles were given designations based on their design and function: 'A' series denoted Attack drones, 'PQ' designated 'full-sized' target drones, and 'OQ' denoted a 'sub-scale' target. The Navy, during the 1930's, converted some obsolete Curtiss N2C-2 Fledgling biplanes to unmanned, radio-controlled target drones.
a-3.jpg

The drones were fitted with a tricycle landing gear, and could be remote-controlled from the ground or another aircraft. The Army tested at least one of these, designating it the A-3 target.

left: The N2C-2

Culver PQ-8 (formerly A-8) (USA, 1939-41)
culver-pq8.jpg


The Culver PQ-8 drones, developed and used by the US Army Air Forces (USAAF) were radio-controlled versions of the small two-seat civil sportplane, the Culver Cadet. The USAAF acquired hundreds of these throughout the war. They later also acquired thousands of the improved 'PQ-14', derived from the PQ-8, with new features such as retractable landing gear.




Right: The Culver PQ-8


RP-1 and RP series (USA, 1935-41)
OQ-2A-Radioplane.jpg

Reginald Denny was a WWI British Royal Flying Corps veteran who became an actor in the USA. He then founded the Radioplane company in Los Angeles. He saw drones as critical tools in training and combat techniques, and in 1935 he demonstrated a prototypes target drone to the US Army: the RP-1. This then led to subsequent tests of the RP-2, in 1938, and the RP-3 and RP-4 in 1939. The US Army ordered five RP-4s, designating them 'OQ-1'. As Denny produce an improved version, the RP-5, the Army ordered a greater amount of these, designating them 'OQ-2'. The US Navy also ordered several of these, naming it 'Target Drone Denny 1' (TDD-1). Thousands of these drones were built, all manufactured in a plant in Van Nuys airport, in the Los Angeles region of CA, USA. It was powered by a 2-cylinder, 2-cycle engine producing 6HP. Eventually the OQ-2 led to subsequent drones OQ-3/TDD-2 and OQ-14/TDD-3 (US Army/US Navy designations). The drones took off from a sling-shot mechanism, and landed using a large parachute. (vectorsite, designation-systems)

left: the OQ-2A drone

RADIOPLANE OQ- SPECS: (source: vectorsite)

wingspan 3.73 meters
length 2.65 meters
maximum speed 137 KPH
takeoff weight 47.2 kilograms
endurance 70 minutes
service ceiling 2,440 meters
launch scheme Conventional runway takeoff
recovery scheme Parachute or runway landing
guidance system Radio control


McDonnell 'T2D2-1 Katydid' (USA, c. 1942)
DSC_6687.jpg


Although the main form of propulsion at the time was piston engines, certain manufacturers were also developing drones powered by pulsejet engines. McDonnel built one of these pulsejet-propulsion drones, naming it the T2D2 Katydid (shown right), to later become the 'KDD-1' and 'KDH-1'. It was and air launched drone with a cigar-shaped fuselage, mid-mounted straight wings and a V-tail straddling the engine. Developed in mid-war, a modest number were put into service by the US Navy. It does not appear that the US Military put large numbers of pulsejet-powered drones into service.
 
Last edited:
Program OPTION - mainly TDN-1 and TDR-1 US Navy drones (USA, 1937-1944)

A senior US Navy admiral had seen the Queen Bee and found it very interesting. He then set up a US Navy program led by Lt. Commander Delmar S. Farnhey to produce radio-controlled unmanned aircraft. By 1937, the program had converted several aircraft to unmanned drones.
TND-1+Drone.JPG




Interest was not very high in bomb carrying assault drones until the attack on Pearl Harbor, in 1941. At this point, the USA was pushed into joining the war and was looking into novel weapon ideas. A program code-named OPTION was begun under Commodore Oscar Smith, and with the help of Farnhey and Zworykin to develop effective assault drones. By April of 1942, they had conducted a successful torpedo attack using a drone, and planned on producing 5,000 more, split into 18 squadrons.
Interstate_TDR.png


A low-cost drone project was begun, producing the low-cost drone TDN-1 . The TDN-1 was constructed by the US Naval Factory and was mostly built of wood. The TD stood for torpedo-drone, and the N designated the Naval Factory as its manufacturers. The TDN-1 featured a high wing, twin piston engines, and fixed tricycle landing gear. It had a load capacity of a torpedo or 900 kg bomb and could reach speeds of 280 km/hr. Ultimately only 114 were built, mainly because the design did not lend itself well to mass-production. (vectorsite)



Below: The TDR-1
interstate_tdr-1_1.jpg

Another drone was then developed, designated as the TDR-1 assault drone. It was built by the Interstate Aircraft Company, based in Los Angeles (the R in the name designated this company). It had a similar external design to the TDN-1, but was mad of a steel tubing frame (manufactured by Schwinn Bicycle) covered in wood. The main feature to set apart the TDR-1 from the TDN-1 was its low-mounted wing. It also featured twin Lycoming flat-six air-cooled piston engines.

It was controlled by a modified Grumman Avenger, renamed TBM-1C. The antennas were stored in a retractable antenna dome under the rear belly of the bomber. It had a joystick and a remote-control system for the autopilot. The autopilot remote control was based on a telephone dial, with each autopilot control code corresponding to a specific number on the keypad (one for dropping a torpedo, or for arming a bomb, etc). The system only had four channels, allowing only four TDR-1s to fly at a time, on the same mission. (vectorsite)
interstate_tdr-1_2.jpg


Between September 26 and October 26 of 1944, 46 TDR-1s were deployed, of which 37 were in attacks and at least 21 hit the target, all as part of the 'Special Task Air Group 1' (STAG-1). Despite these relatively good results, the program was cancelled and the TDR-1 decommissioned. This was not entirely uninspired as the TDR-1 had a number of flaws: its TV system was crude and had poor contrast and resolution, the electronics systems were bulky and complex, and the TV signal could be easily jammed.


Right: the TDR-1, clearly showing the low-mounted wing setting it apart from the TDN-1
'Hoop-La' (UK, 1940)
In 1941, Miles Aircraft, a British company, proposed their aerial torpedo, the 'Hoop-la'. This was a high-wing aircraft carrying a 450kg bomb and powered by a Gipsy Major air-cooled 4-cylinder engine. The Hoop-la had a wingspan of 4.3m and a maximum speed of 480 km/hr. Due to its design, however, it had poor accuracy - still, its manufacturers asserted it could hit a city, and that swarms of Hoop-la's flying low in an urban attack at night would be very difficult to defend. It would seem that at the time there was still much hesitation about bombing an entire city, and the Hoop-la did not go into production. Even though this hesitation clearly did not last long as general bombing of cities at night became relatively common with the RAF, the Hoop-la project remained dead.
GM A-1 (USA, 1941-43)
In 1941, about 20 years after the original Kettering Bug, the USAAF awarded a contract to Kettering and General Motors for a new flying bomb, designated as the GM 'A-1'. The A-1 consisted of a radio-controlled monoplane, able to carry a 225 kg bomb for 640 km and at a top speed of 320 km/hr. Like the original Kettering Bug, it was launched from rails on a wheeled trolley. Although several of these were built, the program suffered from poor organization, and was cancelled in 1943.
'Controllable Bomb, Ground Launched' ('BQ') Series - mainly BQ-7 and BQ-8 (USA, 1941-44)
The USAAF continued work on other aerial torpedoes, namely the 'Controllable Bomb, Ground Launched' series, designated as the 'BQ' series. This was a very diverse series, including a radio-controlled conversion of the Fairchild AT-21 jet and a TDR-1, which was re-designated XBQ-4 by the USAAF.
The two most important and ambitious projects in the BQ series were radio-controlled conversions of the Boeing B-17 Fortress (designated BQ-7) and the Consolidated B-24 bombers (BQ-8), both filled with explosives.

The converted Fortresses, or BQ-7s, were filled with 9 tonnes of Torpex explosives. Theyt would take-off under the control of a human pilot and copilot, who would then bail once the aircraft was airborne. At this point, the aircraft was flown by remote-control. Approximately 25 of these were produced, under the code-name APHRODITE. They were intended to be used in attacks on 'Hardened' German military bases, as part of a project code-named PERILOUS. However, they yielded poor results, with one crashing on British soil and creating a large crater, and another said to have lost radio contact. Thus the project was abandoned.
The B-24 Bombers, or BQ-8, were produced under a joint US Navy/USAAF project. They were radio-controlled, filled with 11,340 kg of Torpex, and fitted with a radio-control center and video camera in the nose. Two of these were to be used for project ANVIL, which also focused on attacks on 'Hardened' German bases. They would be accompanied by a Ventura control craft, which would have the television control station as well. The first ANVIL flight in 1944 was a complete disaster, with the planes exploded in mid-air and the two crewmen killed. In a subsequent mission, some damage was inflicted on a German base in Heligoland, but the target was missed due to poor television reception. Official interest began to drastically wane at this point, partly due to the poor performance of these drones, and partly because the move was being made to jet-powered targets.
German Composite Torpedoes (Germany, 1941-44)
Germany began working on a different form of unmanned aerial torpedoes, derived from studies conducted by the Soviet Union in the 1930's on 'composite' aircraft (a larger aircraft carrying a smaller jet).
mistel.gif



In 1941, the German Air Ministry (Reichluft Ministerium or RLM) began to investigate the potential uses of such composite aircraft and found they could be used to allow a fighter to guide an unmanned bomber, such as the Junkers Ju-88, rigged with explosives. This idea was seen as that of a 'piggyback fighter'. RLM then authorized a project code-named 'Beethoven', which led to the Mistel (Mistletoe) composite flying bomb (shown bottom right) being built. Its first flight occurred in July of 1943. The Mistel consisted of a Messerschmitt BF-109E fighter mounted on top of a Ju-88A bomber. The fighter pilot would fly towards the selected target and release the bomber, which would continue on to the target on autopilot. Thus it wasn't strictly speaking unmanned for the entire flight. Later, the RLM experimented with other configurations and used the Focke-Wulf Fw-190A fighter above a Ju-88G or Ju-88A bomber. The Mistel remained in operation until June 1944, with many variants being produced over the years.
mistel-1.jpg


Above: The Mistel 3-C
1930s & 1940s - UAV universe

RP-1/2/3/4/5
wr2DEnD.jpg


Curtiss N2C-2
w8cgRNQ.jpg

 
Northrop / Radioplane Basic Training Target (BTT) Family (USA, late 1940's-50's)
In the late 1940's, Radioplane began developing a new line of unmanned aerial targets, from the OQ-19A to the OQ-19D (Army) and the US Navy Quail KD2R-1 to KD2R-5. The 'BTT' designation only came into effect in the 1980's. While early models of the line had a metal fuselage and
radioplane_kd2r5_3view_500.jpg

300px-Radioplane_Shelduck.JPG
wooden wings, later ones were fully metal. Radioplane also developed an experimental drone, the XQ-10, made of plastic, but it did not go into production. In 1963, the US Military developed a standardized designation system; the remaining BTT variants in the US Army became 'MQM-33's and the KD2R-1 (the only remaining Navy BTT) acquired the designation 'MQM-36 Shelduck', shown left. (vectorsite)

The MQM-36 was powered by a McCulloch flat 4-stroke piston engine producing 95HP, and featured radar enhancements on its wingtips. Over 73,000 were built, going into service in over 18 nations. (vectorsite, designation-systems)

A BTT variant built for battlefield reconnaissance the 'MQM-57 Falconer' first flew in 1955 (Shown below). The Falconer was slightly longer and stockier than the Shelduck and featured an autopilot with a remote-control backup system, video cameras, and illumination flares for night-time surveillance. About 1,500 were built, despite a short endurance of approximately 30 minutes. The Falconer remained in service until the 1970's.

In 1952, Radioplane was bought by Northrop to become the Northrop Ventura Division.


radioplane_oa3_duxford_500.jpg






Northrop Ventura GAM-67 Crossbow (USA, late 1940's-57)

Northrop Ventura continued making improved targets, predominantly rocket and jet-powered. In the late 1940's, they began the design and manufacture of a set of prototype drone, the Q-1 target series. The Q-1 drones were powered by pulse jet, or small turbojet engines. Although the Q-1 was never put into production, it evolved into the US Air Force (USAF) 'RP-54D / XB-67 / XGAM-67 Crossbow' anti radar missile, with first flight in 1956. The XGAM-67 Crossbow was a cigar-shaped missile with straight wings and a twin-fin straight tail, and had an air inlet under its belly. It was powered by a Continental J69 turbojet en
9e3a03a9d21eafa66f02bd03d2297f66.jpg
gine producing 4.41 kN of thrust.

Only 14 Crossbows were built before the program was canceled in 1957 for a more sophisticated technology that ended up also being canceled.

NORTHROP GAM-67 CROSSBOW SPECS: (sources: designation-systems and vectorsite). Note: where two values are given, this is due to slight variations in data found from different sources; thus range of data is shown
Length5.85-6.10 m (approx 20 ft)
Wingspan3.81-3.86 m (approx 12 ft 7 in)
Diameter81 cm (32 in)
Height1.52 m (5 ft)
Weight1220-1270 kg (approx 2700 lb)
SpeedMach 0.86 (1,090KPH)
Ceiling12200 m (40000 ft)
Range480 km (300 miles)
Endurance30 min
PropulsionContinental J69-T-17 turbojet; 4.4 kN (1000 lb)
launch scheme RATO booster or air launch
recovery scheme Parachute
guidance system Autopilot with radio control backup
Beechcraft 'Model 1001' (USA, 1955-1959)
As technologies became cheaper and more accessible, it became much easier to build effective and cheap aerial targets that could be mass-produced.
In 1955, Beechcraft designed the 'model 1001'. Production began in 1959, where it was designated 'KDB-1' and later 'MQM-39A' in
Twuav_01_06.jpg
the US Navy. (designation-systems)
This led to the 'Model 1025', built for the US Army and designated as 'MQM-61A'. It was laucnhed with an RATO booster, recovered by parachute, and featured an autopilot system with radio back-up.
The target was a simple monoplane with a vee tail an a two-blade propeller. It was larger than the Shelduck (see above) and powered by a J-2 flat-six air cooled two-stroke piston engine producing 125HP (94kW).
About 2,200 were built and put in service in the US Navy, US Army, and Spanish military.
mqm-61a.jpg

BEECHCRAFT MQM-61A CARDINAL SPECS: (sources: designation-systems and vectorsite)
Length4.60 m (15 ft 1 in)
Wingspan3.95 m (12 ft 11.5 in)
Height1.02 m (3 ft 4 in)
Diameter45 cm (17.75 in)
Weight301 kg (664 lb)
Speed560 km/h (350 mph)
Ceiling13100 m (43000 ft)
Endurance> 60 min.
Range> 500 km (300 miles)
PropulsionMcCulloch TC6150-J-2 flat-six turbocharged piston engine; 93 kW (125 hp)

Northrop Ventura AQM-38 (USA, 1957-1970's)

Northrop Ventura developed a rocket-propelled target designed to train anti-aircraft missile crews and Navy fighter pilots. The project was begun in 1957, under the Navy contract 'RP-70 / XKD4R-1'. It flew for the first time in January of 1958, and went into service in 1959. The Army version was initially named 'RP-76', with the name changing to 'AQM-38A' in 1963. Similarly, the Navy version, initially named 'RP-78' became the 'AQM-38B'. The AQM-38A was capable of slightly subsonic speeds, while the 38B, fitted with a more powerful engine, could reach Mach 1.25.
aqm-38a.jpg


The AQM-38, shown right,(Photo: Western Museum of Flight. Source: designation-systems) had a cigar-shaped fuselage and also featured an autopilot with backup radio-control system. It was much smaller than the Crossbow and powered by a solid rocket engine, with exhaust nozzles behind the shoulder-mounted delta wings. It was fitted with three fins at the nose, and a downward-mounted 'tee' tail with a dorsal fin at its rear. It was air launched and recovered by parachute. The main material used in its construction was plastics, and it featured radar enhancement to simulate larger aircraft. Over 2,000 of these targets were built.

SPECS: (sources: designation-systems and vectorsite)

AQM-38AAQM-38B
Length2.95 m (9 ft 8 in)
Wingspan1.52 m (5 ft)
Height0.46 m (1 ft 6.2 in)
Diameter30 cm (12 in)
Weight136 kg (300 lb)
SpeedMach 0.94Mach 1.25
Ceiling18300 m (60000 ft)24000 m (78700 ft)
Endurance23 min. (powered: 9 min.)
Range?70 km (44 miles)
PropulsionAerojet 530NS35 solid-fuel rocket; 160 N (37 lb)Solid-fuel rocket; 440 N (100 lb)
Lockheed 'X-7' & XQ-5 Kingfisher / AQM-60 (USA, late 1940s-1960s)
Lockheed began developing a ramjet target for the US Air Force (USAF) in the late 1940's. It was named the 'X-7' and was a long dart with trapezoidal wings.
It was fitted with one large solid-fuel booster rocket to get it up to very high ramjet speeds, and was used through the 1950s for engine and flight research. Its first flight in 1951 was unsuccessful, but subsequent flights yielded better results.
It was air-launched from a B-29 or B-50 carrier aircraft, and had quite a unique recovery system. A multi-stage parachute would slow the drone down to a nose-down vertical descent, at the end of which the drone would plant itself into the ground on its nose.
This avoided any damage to the rest of the drone (fuselage, tail assembly, etc.) (vectorsite)
aqm-60a.jpg

In 1954, Lockheed introduced a significantly modified version, the 'X-7A-3' (the original X-7 having been re-designated 'X-7A-1'). It featured a redesigned wing, and was fitted with to smaller solid-fuel
rocket boosters on the side of the fuselage, under each wing.
It also had an improved instrumentation and control system. The USAF ordered a relatively unmodified X-7A-3 target drone (it was slightly longer), designating it 'XQ-5 Kingfisher'. It was later
re-designated 'AQM-60'.
The program was transferred to the US Army, where the target was re-designated 'AQM-60' in 1963. The program was then shut down after 61 missiles, including all variants, had been built.
This was possibly due to the fact that it was becoming redundant considering the various Mach-2 target drone projects in development at this time (see below).
3066991501_1678283f3d_b.jpg


(right) The AQM-60
(left) The XQ-5 / AQM - 60
(Photos: Lockheed Martin
Source: designation-systems.net)


SPECS: (sources: designation-systems and vectorsite)
LengthX-7A-1: 9.98 m
X-7A-3: 11.3 m
XQ-5: 11.6 m
WingspanX-7A-1: 3.7 m
X-7A-3, XQ-5: 3.0 m
Height2.1 m
Diameter61 cm
Weight3,600 kg
SpeedMach 4.3; 4500 km/h
Ceiling30,000 m
Range210 km
Propulsion
Booster:X-7A-1: Alleghany Ballistics Lab. X202-C3 (4DW105000) solid-fuel rocket; 467 kN (105000 lb) for 4 s
X-7A-3/XQ-5: 2x Thiokol XM45 (5KS50000) solid-fuel rocket; 222 kN (50000 lb) each for 5 s


Sustainer: X-7A-1/X-7A-3: Ramjet (various types)
XQ-5: Marquardt XRJ43-MA ramjet
 
Northrop Q-4 / AQM-35 (USA, late 1950s-60s)
Northrop began developing a turbojet-powered target capable of reaching supersonic speeds in 1953, initially named 'Model RP-61'.
In June
xq-4.jpg
of 1954, the US Air Force (USAF) started a contract with Nothrop to build the supersonic target under the name 'MX-2144'. It had both
ground and air-launch capability, although its ground-launch was never tested. A XJ81-turbojet engine provided the power, and the drone was
launched from B-50D or GC-130A aircraft. It featured radio-controlled guidance systems and radar tracking, and a 3-stage parachute for recovery.
(vectorsite) The recovery scheme also included four inflatable bags to soften the landing. It was mainly deigned for testing with air-to-air and
surface-to-air missiles, but could also be fitted with TV or reconnaissance systems (designation-systems).
Twuav_01_05.png

In 1959, the USAF awarded another contract to Northrop for a significantly improved
drone, the Q-4B, or XQ-4B, which first flew in March of 1961. It featured a significantly
more powerful engine, the J85-GE-5 (General Electric), and a slightly redesigned
airframe.
In 1963, the XQ-4 and XQ-4B were re-designated AQM-35A (shown above - photo: Northrop. Source: designation-systems) and AQM-35B respectively. The AQM-35 was dart-shaped and fitted with
stubby swings and a swept conventional tail assembly.
The AQM-35 was, h
xq-4b.jpg
owever, never fully operational, and only 25 XQ-4/Q4-B
drones were produced.
(right) The XQ-4B / AQM-35B
photo: USAF (source: designation-systems)






SPECS (note: data from several sources shows slight variations, so the data below may not be fully accurate)


(sources: designation-systems and vectorsite)

XQ-4Q-4B (AQM-35B)
Length10.06 m (33 ft)10.77 m (35 ft 4 in)
Wingspan3.38 m (11 ft 1 in)3.86 m (12 ft 8 in)
Diameter51 cm (20 in)
Height1.69 m (5 ft 6.7 in)1.88 m (6 ft 2 in)
Weight900 kg (1985 kg)1540 kg (3400 lb)
SpeedMach 1.55Mach 2
Ceiling18300 m (60000 ft)21300 m (70000 ft)
PropulsionWestinghouse XJ81-WE-3 turbojet; 8.0 kN (1810 lb)General Electric J85-GE-5 turbojet; 17.1 kN (3850 lb)


North American MQM-42A Redhead/Roadrunner (USA, 1950s-60s)
This was another Mach 2 drone for which development began in the late 1950s, initially as 'Model NA-273'. . It was also dart shaped but had mid mounted delta wings and an inverted vee tail. It was powered by a Marquardt ramjet engine, and performed its first
flight in 1961. This drone was mainly used for training with the MIM-23 Hawk air-defense missile system of the US Army. 'Redhead' designated the high-altitude variant of the drone, and the low-altitude variant was named the 'Roadrunner'. It operated at
speeds between Mach 0.9 and Mach 2+ , and had an operational altitude ranging from 90m to 18,000m. The target drone was fitted with an altitude hold system for stable flight, but this could be overridden by radio commands from ground
control. The recovery scheme for the NA-273, triggered manually or automatically (in the case of systems failure or fuel depletion) consisted of a retro rocket and one parachute. In 1963, it was renamed MQM-42A, and was used by the US Army until the mid
1970s. (designation-systems)
mqm-42a.jpg
It was significantly smaller than the AQM-35; it is shown right. (photo: designation-systems)
SPECS (note: data from several sources shows slight variations, so the data below may not be fully accurate)


(sources: designation-systems and vectorsite)

Length7.57 m (24 ft 10 in)
Wingspan1.90 m (6 ft 3 in)
Diameter30 cm (12 in)
Weight400 kg (900 lb)
Speed> Mach 2
Ceiling18000 m (60000 ft)
Range400 km (250 miles)
PropulsionBooster: Rocketdyne solid-fuel rocket; 26.7 kN (6000 lb)
Sustainer: Marquardt MA-74 ramjet



AQM-34 Ryan Firebee (USA, 1960s)

With the coming of the Cold War, and the Vietnam War, the need for effective surveillance and stealth missions was growing. In 1960, the USAF began a Stealth unmanned aircraft program and began modifying combat UAVs to use them for stealthy reconnaissance missions. By fitteing a specifically designed screen over the engine's air intake, by covering the fuselage in anti-radar blankets, and using anti-radar paint, its radar signatured was reduced. This modified plane was now the 'AQM-34 Ryan Firebee' drone, and was air-launched and controlle
aqm-34l.jpg
d from a DC-130 aircraft. It was recovered using a parachute, and brought back to base by a helicopter. Between October of 1964 and April of 1975, over 1,000 of these drones flew in over 34,000 surveillance missions over SouthEast Asia, (NOVA) in a variety of missions: daytime and nighttime surveillance, leaflet distribution, and surface-to-air missile radar detection. With 83% of the drones returning from missions able to fly again, the AQM-34 was very reliable.


Several variants of the AQM-34 were built, spanning sub-classification letters A through V, and with variants in the AQM, BQM, and MQM categories (the majority being AQM) (designation-systems) .





(left) The AQM-34 (source: designation-systems)





Lockheed D-21 (USA, 1960s)

In the 1960s, the CIA awarded a contract to Lockh
Palmdale_D21_Drone.jpg
eed for a high-speed, ultra-stealthy UAV.
A single D-21 was produced by Lockheed in 1965. Reaching speeds up to Mach 4, it was one of the fastest UAVs in history (NOVA). Once launched from a piloted Lockheed M-12 aircraft, it had a range of 4,830km and an operational ceiling of 24,385m (NOVA). It was covered in Lockheed's proprietary plastic anti-radar coating, a precursor to modern aircraft's stealth 'skin'. After flying three failed missions however, the D-21 crashed and sank on its fourth mission in an undisclosed location.
201108252000.jpg
The remaining parts were moved to storage at Lockheed.






d21b38.jpg


1950s & 1960s - UAV universe
 
Firebee 1241 (1970s, Israel)

After the success of the Firebee in the US, in 1970 Israel secretly purchased 12 of the drones from the United States, modified them, and re-designated them 'Firebee 1241'. These drones proved vital in the 1973 Yom Kippur war between Israel, Egypt, and
uavs_firebee.jpg
Syria, both as reconnaissance drones, and as decoys, a function not yet used much for drones. On one occasion, Israel deployed a squadron of Firebee 1241s in order to make Egypt fire their surface-to-air missiles. The Firebees were able to evade or destroy all of the 43 missiles fired (NOVA).




The Firebee 1241 (Source: NOVA)

Ryan SPA 147 (1970s, USA)

After an American COMMINT (Communications and intelligence) aircraft was shot down over the yellow sea in 1970, killing all of the crew, the US military set out on developing UAVs capable of working as COMMINT aircraft. The contract was awarded to Ryan Aeronautical, and Firebee drones were modified
uavs_ryan.jpg
to give them the ability to listen to radio communication and take photographs from over 18,300m (approx 60,000 ft) (NOVA). The Ryan Special Purposes Aircraft (SPA) had an autonomy of eight hours, carrying a 136-kg (300lb) camera. The Ryan SPA is shown, left (source: NOVA).









IAI Scout (1978-79, Israel)

In 1978, Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) developed a small, piston-engine powered UAV named 'Scout'. The scout was first presented at the Paris air show in 1979. As it was made of fiberglass and other composite materials and was very small (wingspan just under 4m), it had a minimal radar signature. Due to its size, it was cheap to produce and difficult to shoot down. The Scout took and transmitted real-time 360-dgree surveill
scaut2.jpg
ance data, via a TV receiving assembly in its central turret, and had
scaut.jpg
numerous infrared systems. Scouts were used in the Bekaa valley conflict, including on one occasion to make Syria use its radars to start an assault. It was controlled from the ground.

SPECS: (sources: NOVA and israeli-weapons) Note: data for wingspan varied slightly, range shown below.
Wingspan: 3.60-3.90 m
Length: 3.68 m
Height: 0.94 m
Maximum speed: 160 kph
Endurance: 7.5 hours
Control range: 100 km
Weight Empty: 76 kg
Weight, Max. loaded: 118 kg
Photos: israeli-weapons
Pioneer (1984-86, Israel & USA)

In 1984, IAI and Tadiran, Ltd formed a joint subsidiary company, Mazlat, Ltd, to construct a new and improved drone: the Pioneer. The pioneer airframe featured a twin-tail, two vertical stabilizers, and a conventional wing setup on a stub fuselage. Its fixed tricycle landing gear contained small inflatable tires on the main 2 wheels, but the nose gear had a catering, solid plastic wheel. The Pioneer was constructed of Carbon-fiber composites, fiberglass, Kevlar, aluminum, and Balsa wood. (Smithsonian Air & Space). Due to the light weight of these materials, the Pioneer was able to carry its payload
pioneer.jpg
effectively with a 2-cycle piston engine developing 26HP. (Smithsonian Air & Space) As well as this, its large proportion of non-metal materials gave it a very small radar cross-section. Capable of carrying 47L of 100-octane aviation gasoline, it had an autonomy of 5.5 hours. The Pioneer could either fly autonomously on autopilot, on a pre-programmed flight path, or controlled from a Ground Control Station (GCS). A Tracking Control Unit (TCU) was required to maintain a communication link with, and monitor the position of, the drone. The transmitter had a ranger of 185km, was jam-resistant, and included a back-up mode in case it was somehow jammed. (Smithsonian Air & Space)

Pioneer%20104.JPG


Two people could assemble and disassemble the Pioneer. A rocket booster or catapult was used on take-off to propel the drone to flying speeds, and it was capable on taking off on a ground or water (ship) runway. Recovery of the drone consisted of flying it into a large net, or landing it on a runway with a wire stretched across it, onto which the drone hooks. The Pioneer could carry up to 41.4kg of camera and surveillance equipment. (israeli-weapons)

The US Navy received the first part of a large order of pioneers in June of 1986. Eventually, the US Army and Marines also purchased several Pioneers. US forces extensively used the Pioneer in the Gulf War of 1991, where about 40 Navy, Marine, and Army drones flew over 300 missions as part of 'Operation Desert Storm'.(NOVA) During this war, some Iraqis even surrendered to the drone itself. (NOVA, Smithsonian Air & Space)

SPECS: (source: Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum)
Wingspan: 5.1 m (16 ft 10 in),
Length: 4.4 m (14 ft 4 in), right - The Pioneer. Source: Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum
Height: 1.2 m (4 ft)
1970s & 1980s - UAV universe
 
Ababil (Swallow) (Iran, 1995)
ababil-uav.jpg


Launched from a modified Benz utility truck, the Ababil featured a tubular fuselage with small wings, making it similar to a 'rocket with wings'. It is recovered via skids and a parachute system. The Ababil has been used in the field by Iran and by Hezbollah. Very few specs of this drone are known with any accuracy.

The Ababil is shown, right






Firebird 2001 (Israel, 1996)
uavs_firebird2001.jpg

One of the first exclusively civilian UAVs, the Firebird 2001 was designed to transmit real-time, highly accurate data on the size, spread, perimeter and movement of wildfires. It was fitted with a Global Positioning System (GPS), geographical information systems mapping, and forward-looking infrared cameras. Tests for this drone were carried out in Montana (USA) under the supervision of the US Department of Agriculture. The Firebird 2001 operated with a Ground Control Station and one other plane, had an autonomy of 6 hours, and operated at about 4,570 meters of altitude.(military factory)

The Firebird (Source: NOVA)

AeroVironment Corporation / NASA Pathfinder series (USA, 1990s-2000s)
748px-Pathfinder_solar_aircraft_over_Hawaii.jpg


The Pathfinder is a solar powered, ultra-lightweight research UAV. It was tested for environmental research, and in 1997 it set the altitude record for a solar-powered aircraft, reaching 20,528m. The Pathfinder gathers wind and other weather data through the use of various high-precision sensors, and records digital high-resolution images. As well as helping with research, it could serve as a communication platform (NOVA). First powered by eight electric motors, and later six, it has a wingspan of 30m. As well as solar cells covering the entire top of the wing, powering the motors and equipment, backup batteries were provided to allow for limited-duration flight after dark. It flies only at about 24-40 km/hr. Pitch control is obtained by use of elevators on the wing edges, and turns and yaw are achieved by increasing of decreasing power in the motors on the outer edges of the wings. (Pathfinder shown left)

In the same series as the Pathfinder, the Pathifinder Plus, Centurion, and Helios drones were also developed - these drones form a series of solar- or fuel-cell-powered drones designed for environmental research and as communication platforms for broadband networking.
800px-Helios_in_flight.jpg


The Helios prototype (right) has a wingspan of 75m, longer than that of a Boeing 747, and constructed from composite materials including carbon fiber, graphite epoxy, Kevlar, styrofoam, and a thin, transparent plastic skin. The chord length of the wings is a mere 2.4m, giving the wings a length/chord ratio of nearly 31 to 1. The all-wing drone is assembled in six sections (NOVA). While cruising, the Helios wings arch slightly, with the wing tips higher than the center (concave upwards), so increasing power on outer motors pus the Helios into descent, and increasing power of central motors cause it to rise (as the outer motors are higher than the center ones). In June of 2003, the Helios crashed into the Pacific ocean.


675px-Schematic_of_HP03_Hydrogen-Air_Fuel_Cell_Configuration.png


Plans of the Helios (left)
The Helios just before breaking - note the
800px-Pages_from_64317main_helios-1.jpg

estensive dihedral. (right)


Boeing/Lockheed Martin Dark Star (USA, 1990s)

Sporting a relatively unusual design, the Dark Star has been described as a 'clamshell with wings' (NOVA). It was developed as part of a set of three high-tech stealth surveillance UAVs (with the Global Hawk and Predator) in the late 90's under a US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) initiative to produce new UAVs
darkstar.jpg
by 2015 (NOVA, military factory) It was designed for day and night reconnaissance, and could operate in all weather conditions. The first prototype flew successfully in March of 1996, but crashed one month later. More than two years passed until a second prototype performed an autonomous take-off, flight plan, and landing. Five flight later, the program was cancelled in 1999. The Dar Star was expected to fly at about 14,000m and take close-up pictured of soldiers on the ground (NOVA). The exhaust and air inlet version now on display at the Smithsonian National Air & Space museum has been sealed due to the classified nature of the design(Smithsonian Air & Space).
 
General Atomics Aeronautical Systems RQ-1 Predator (USA, 1996)

Perhaps the most widely known drone in use today, the Predator was developed in the mid 1990's for a first field flight in 1996.
predator-7.jpg
Costing about $40 million per system, it is relatively expensive but nonetheless an integral part of the US UAV arsenal. Initially designed for reconnaissance, it was given the designation RQ-1 (R for reconnaissance, Q for unmanned). The Predator was operated by a team of three: one pilot and two sensor operators, and was flown by joystick using a forward-mounted video camera (Lee, 161). A full team to operate the drone consists of 55 people. With a range of about 730km and an autonomy of 14-16 hours, the predator is a powerful reconnaissance and surveillance tool. (NOVA). Control link was established either by line-of-sight radio or via a satellite link (Smithsonian Air & Space). The Predator was fitted with a number of cameras and sensors including synthetic aperture radar (SAR), HD color television cameras, infrared cameras, etc. Although initially designed for reconnaissance, it has been fitted with Hellfire anti-tank missiles and successfully delivered them to targets, which then changed its designation to 'MQ-1' (M for multi-role) in 2002.(military factory)

SPECS (source: militaryfactory)
Length: 8.22m
Wingspan: 14.80m
Height: 2.10m
Weight (empty): 512kg
Powerplant: Rotax 914F 4-cylinder engine, 115HP
Maximum speed: 217 kph
Service ceiling: 7,620m
Max. Range: 730km

Many variations of the Predator were later produced. The 'Predator B', later renamed 'MQ-9 Reaper', developed in 2007, was designed from its conception to carry weapons and was larger than the Predator. Capable of both reconnaissance/target identification and combat, the drone was among the first to receive the 'hunter/killer' drone nickname. The MQ-1C Sky Warrior (or Grey Eagle), also developed from the Predator, features an extensive range, and was developed between 2004 and 2009. The Avenger (formerly Predator C) is currently in development as the next-generation Predator, planned for deployment along with the USAF's 5th generation fighters. It was derived from the Reaper and features a stockier appearance, a much more powerful Pratt & Whitney PW545B jet-engine, and internal bomb bay, and specially designed curves to deflect radar (Lee, 162). It flew for the first time in 2009 and is planned for deployment around 2025. (military factory)

Bell Eagle Eye (Model 918) (USA, 1998)
bell-eagle-eye.jpg

The Eagle Eye was a tilt-rotor UAV capable of vertical take-off and landing, developed for the Vertical Take-off UAV (VT-UAV) competition of the US Navy. Capable of real-time battlefield assessment in adverse weather conditions, the Eagle Eye also presented many advantages inherent in tilt rotor designs, namely the fact that not runway launch/recovery scheme is required due to vertical take off/landing, the ability to 'loiter' in place in the air (fixed-rotor craft would have to circle around a given location), and the fact that it has much the same stability and speed characteristics as fixed-wing craft. Work was started in 1993, and in 1998 two demonstration examples were built and tested, powered by an Allison 250-C20 series turboshaft engine. in 2002 a full-size prototype was built, using the Pratt & Whitney Canada PW207D turboshaft engine. The US Coast Guard expressed interest ad worked with Bell to develop an improved version, the HV-911, but the project was put on indefinite hold. The Eagle Eye still has not been put into service, although certain programs in Europe are also expressing interest in it. It features a centralized fuselage, straight wings with one rotor system each, and air intake scoop on the top of the fuselage, horizontal stabilizer fins, a vertical tail fin, and two double-tired landing gear legs (one at the nose and one on the fuselage). It has an autonomy of about 6 hours. (military factory)



EMT Luna X-2000 (Germany, 2000)
emt-luna-x2000-uav_2.jpg


The X-2000 is a short-range, all-weather reconnaissance and surveillance drone in use by the German military. It has a tardrop fuselage tapered at the rear, straight wings, vertical and horizontal tail fins, as well as additional downward oriented vertical tail fins. Its engine sits on a roof extension on the fuselage's spine and it is catapult-launched and parachute-recovered. The engine, a 2-cycle 2-stroke engine, drives a 3-blade propeller assembly. It is ffuly autonomous (ie, can make trajectory changes in mid-air on its own) and it modular, allowing it to have fully variable payloads.

AeroVironment RQ-14A Dragon Eye (USA, 2001-2003)

The Dragon Eye is a fully autonomous, mini UAV launched either by hand or by catapult, designed for tactical reconnaissance and surveillance in the field. Its very quiet electric motor and smll wingspan make it difficult to detect. It records and transmits real-time data in the form of hi-resolution color and infrared images. One system of Dragon Eyes consists of three UAVs and a ground control system, and can all be carried in a Marine's backpack. The Naval Research Laboratory and Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory first designed the drone in 2001, and its first field flight occurred in Iraq in 2003 for reconnaissance and battle damage assessment.





Northrop-Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk (USA, 2001)
globalhawk_4.jpg


Developed by Teledyne Ryan (which had been bought by Northrop-Grumman), he Global Hawk is a long range, long endurance UAV designed for intelligence gathering, target identification, and reconnaissance. Although still considered experimental at the time, it was deployed in Afghanistan. It is in use by the US and German military, and about 20 are in service with the USAF. Fitted with a sensor suite and sensor system, it transmits data via a satellite-provided data link. The Global Hawk was the first unmanned aircraft to cross the Pacific ocean, from the USA to Australia.

SPECS (source: militaryfactory)
Length: 13.40m
Wingspan: 35.3m
Height: 4.60m
Weight (empty): 3,850kg
Powerplant: Allison Rolls-Royce AE3007H turbofan engine delivering 31,400N of thrust
Maximum speed: 650kph
Service ceiling: 19,812m
Max. Range: 22,224km

A 'naval version' of the Global Hawk is currently in development, name the MQ-4C Triton with significant modifications to better suit its maritime role.

Boeing X-45 Joint Unmanned Combat Air System (J-UCAS) (USA, 2002-05)

The J-UCAS was the first modern UAV designed specifically for combat strike missions. It featured a swept wing, stealthy design, fully retractable landing gear, and was built in composite fibers and a reinforced epoxy skin. Two internal weapons bays were held in the fuselage. First managed by DARPA, in 2003 the USAF and Navy consolidated the X-45 and X-47 projects under the Joint Unmanned Combat Air Systems Office. The X-45 became the first UAV to release weapons, among other firsts recorded in its flight tests. Tests were concluded in 2005.

aerovironment-rq11-raven-suav_2.jpg

AeroVironment RQ-11 Raven (USA, 2003)

Another small UAV similar to the Dragon Eye, the Raven is designed for intelligence gathering and reconnoiter. About 13,000 have already been produced, most in use by military, notably by US SOCOM special forces, the USAF and the US Army. Yemen recently revealed that they were purchasing several of these UAVs. (military factory)


Raven shown left, being launched by a US soldier



photo%2B1.jpg











Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel (USA, 2007)

A 'Low-observable' unmanned aerial system (UAS), the Sentinel was designed for reconnoiter and surveillance by the highly secretive Lockheed Martin Advanced Development Programs Unit, formed to develop low-cost UAS's for the Department of Defense (DoD). A true 'flying wing' design, the Sentinel has no vertical fins or planes and an extremely smooth and featureless fuselage. It has a similar appearance to a B-2 Bomber, and has a conventional tricycle undercarriage. It also features several modification to enhance stealth, such as a specifically designed grilling on its air intake. Very few specifications have been released as it was a secretive project.











SELEX Galileo Falco (Falcon) (Italy, 2003-09)
images


With a first flight in 2003, the Falco was first unveiled publicly in 2009. About 50 were produced, with Pakistan as the only known purchaser, where it has been field-operational. Classified as a 'medium-class' UAV, it was designed for reconnaissance and surveillance and had good endurance and low-altitude performance qualities. Aesthetically similar to a high-end civilian sports aircraft, the Falco has high-mounted straight wings, an aerodynamic airframe. tail booms, vertical tail fins, and a three-blade propeller assembly in 'pusher' configuration (Military Factory). Payloads could vary depending on the mission, and it is powered by an 85HP engine. Due to its quiet operation and low profile, it is relatively hard to detect.

DARPA Falcon HTV-2 (USA, 2003-10)

HTV stands for 'Hypersonic Technology Vehicle', and the HTV-2 is a long duration hypersonic concept designed for the USAF. The design objective for the HTV-2 was to get it able to reach any location on Earth within 60 minutes; DARPA said it could go from New York to LA in 12 minutes. It was started under the
picture2.jpg
'Prompt Global Strike' program in 2003, at which point wind tunnel testing and computer simulations verified that the concept was sound and potentially achievable. The flight plan of the HTV-2 would consist of several phases:
  • Launch Phase: A Minotaur IV Lite Launch vehicle (3-stage solid-fuel rocket) was used as the rocket booster to launch the drone to near-orbital speed and altitude.
  • Re-entry orient phase: The drone then separates itself from the booster, and uses its 'Reaction Control System' (RCS) to orient itself correctly
  • Re-entry Phase: The HTV-2 re-enters the atmosphere and returns Earth-bound in a controlled dive
  • Pull-up phase: The HTV-2 re-orients itself upwards in order to fly level.
  • Glide Phase: The drone is flying level to its destination, and at this point reaches unheard-of speeds of about Mach 20.
  • Terminal Phase: After the mission is completed, the HTV-2 rolls over and lands in the ocean in a predetermined location, whre it can then be recovered for re-use
It was successfully launched twice in 2010, then crashed due to a loss of communication. It did, however, reach a top speed between Mach 17 and Mach 22. (military factory)


Boeing MQ-18 A160 Hummingbird (USA, 2002-12)

The MQ-18 is a rotary wing, small, fast UAV with a highly efficient engine. It was designed for intelligence gathering, reconnaissance, precision payload delivery, and is fully autonomous, with first flight occurring in January 2002. It is powered by a gas fuelled 4-cylinder and 6-cylinder engine driving a 3 blade rotor assembly. in 2003 DARPA awarded a $75 million contract to Frontier Systems (later purchased by Boeing) to produce and test up to 4 A160s. In 2007, flight testing began. Over the years, flight tests had a mixed success record and three of the prototypes were lost to crashes. Despite this mixed record, production of the A160 began in Boeing's Arizona branch in 2010, fitted with a Pratt & Whitney PZ207D turboshaft engine.
boeing-a160-hummingbird.jpg










all photos on this page (1990s to today) taken from Military Factory, unless otherwise stated
1990s onwards - UAV universe


Miles Hoop-la

The British had some experience with the operation of flying bombs, and aerial torpedoes as they were also called, is already in the twenties, when the project was tested larynx. At the beginning of the Second World War, returned to this idea by FG Miles, who created the project, hoop-la. It was a little hornoplošný letounek milesovských classic shapes, which was at the bottom of the fuselage bomb bay open for a 1000lb (450 kg) bomb and a double tail. This project has been served a physical realization, albeit in the form of models in its actual size. The available (Internet) sources is not clear whether he had the radio controlled, or simply exploded in the desired direction and then left to their fate, like the V-1 , but should probably be launched from aircraft. According to one of the sources had even just drop the bomb and then return for further use, in the absence of any chassis to mock me, but it does not seem likely. But Air Force expressed interest, the official reason for refusal was that like flying bomb had reasonable accuracy the impact of intervention to avoid the risk of residential areas or hospitals ... The Air Force on this project has not returned even after itself started carpet bombing, and the hoop-la and forever remain only a scale model.


Name:Miles Hoop-la
Category:flying bomb project
Manufacturer:Phillips and Powis, Woodley, Reading
Manufactured:1940-1943
Made pieces.:A mock
Crew:0
Drive:1 inline engine de Havilland Gipsy Queen 97 kW power
Takeoff weight:
Max takeoff weight:
Wingspan:
4.3 m
Length:
Height:
Wing Area:
Max Speed:
480 km / h
Speed of travel:
Ceiling:
Range:
600 km
Armament:1x 450 kg bomb
BAciP3C.jpg
 
Dassault nEUROn (France & others, 2003-2012)
Although the primary contractor for this project is France's Dassault, also contributing are SAAB AB (Sweden), Alenia Aeronautica (Italy), EADS CASA (Spain), EAB (Greece), RUAG (Switzerland), Thales (France) and EADS (France). The Base design, avionics and fuel system is designed by SAAB; the final assembly and flight testing is done by Dassault; Alenia developed the weapons systems; and EADS CASA and Thales designed the
images
communications systems (military factory). The nEUROn is fitted with one engine and has a delta-wing design with managed protrusions,
dassault-neuron-ucav.jpg
making it quite flat and featureless. The engine is placed in the center-top of the fuselage and has a trapezoidal intake for its aspiration, fitted with a radar-reducing exhaust. It resembles a typical 'flying wing' design, and features a fully retractable tricycle undercarriage. and an internal weapons bay. It has been built ans assembled, and flight testing is planned for this month (November 2012).

SPECS: (source: Military Factory)
Length: 9.50m
Wingspan: 12.5m
Weight (empty): 4,900kg
Powerplant: Rolls Royce Turbomeca Adour / SNECMA M88 Turbofan engine
Maximum speed: 980kph
Service ceiling: 14,000m

Denel Dynamics Bateleur (Republic of South Africa, 2004-)
denel-dynamics-bateleur-uav.jpg


The Bateleur is a Medium-Altitude, Long-Endurance (MALE) drone similar to the Predator. The prgram began in 2004. It is designed for reconnoiter and surveillance and is fitted with a propeller engine. As it has no direct military requirement, its specifications are quite broad, and it can (and most likely will) be used for a variety of purposes including Search & Rescue, laser designation of ground targets, patrol, etc. It will mainly carry cameras, both electro-optical and infrared, and will have a variable payload and modular fuselage allowing for it to be tailored to various missions. It sports a relatively featureless fuselage, a large nose, mid-mounted straight wings, horizontal tail planes, and two vertical tail fins. The 3-blade propeller is fitted between these fins, powered by a 4-cylinder 115HP engine. It will be able to manage pre-set waypoints autonomously using a GPS system. Unveiled in 2004, it still has not had its first flight.

Sukoi Zond series (Russia, late 2000's-)
sukhoi-zond-uav.jpg


The Zond series is a series of drones designed exclusively for civilian use, and expected to be in use by 2015. The Zond 1 was designed as a communications relay and to provide TV signals, with an operational ceiling of 18,000m. It would be fitted with a radar, phased array antenna (PAA), and a TV link. The ZOnd 2, designed for environmental monitoring, would have a higher service ceiling of 24,000m and is fitted with a sideways-looking synthetic aperture radar system, and Infrared and TV cameras. The Zond 3 would be smaller and only fly at altitudes up to 15,000m, to be used for atmospheric surveillance. All three drones share the same basic design featuring low-mounted straight wings and bulbous nose profile.

SPECS:(source: Military Factory)
Length: 13m
Wingspan: 35m
Height: 5.5m
Powerplant: 1 x turbofan engine (Zond 1 & 2), 1x propeller engine in pushr configuration (Zond 3)
Maximum speed: 250kph
Service ceiling: Zond 1: 18,000m. Zond 2: 24,000m. Zond 3: 15,000m

Guizhou Soar Eagle / Soar Dragon (China, 2006-)
guizhou-soar-eagle-uav.jpg


The Soar Eagle / Soar Dragon is a H.A.L.E. drone with a full-scale body and turbojet propulsion, currently in development for deployment in the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) by 2014. It is designed for reconaissance with the possibility of eventual weapons support, and resembles the Global Hawk, with a few notable difference such as the single vertical tail fin, or the tandem wing configuration. The Guizhou Aircraft Industry Corporation (GAIC) is the lead contractor in this drone's development, with the design being led by Chengdu Aircraft Corporation. It was first presented in model form in 2006.

SPECS: (source: Military Factory)
Length: 14.33m
Wingspan: 24.86m
Powerplant: Guizhou WP-13 Turbojet eith 43,145N of thrust
Maximum speed: 750kph
Service ceiling: 18,000m
Max Range: 5,625km


SAAB Skeddar (Sweden, late 2000s-)

The Skeddar is a rotary wing UAV powered by a 55HP engine and fitted with a two-blade main rotor and a two-blade tail rotor. It will fly up to 2,400m and is capable of intelligence gathering, equipment payload delivery, maritime patrol, light transport, electronic warfare and surveillance, making it a powerful tool both civilian and military. It is not, however, fully autonomous in that Ground Control is needed to make mid-air flight changes and course corrections. The Skeddar is scheduled for deployment in 2013.







BAe Systems Taranis (Unted Kingdom, late 2007-)
tanaris.jpg

The Taranis is an Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle (UCAV) and technology demonstrator developed by BAe. It is designed for long-range precision guided munitions delivery, but is, for now, a technology demonstration and not a military-end product. It is designed to have the ability to make 'decisions' in-flight (with an eventual Ground Control override), making it a flexible tactical system that can respond to various threats and change mission paramters autonomously. It has a stealthy, triangular based platform with one turbofan engine embedded into the fuselage, and a triangular intake for engine aspiration above the nose, making it a basic 'all-wing' design. The weapons bay is internal, and the tricycle undercarriage is fully retractable. For increased stealth properties, it has a special skin coating, minimal structural protrusions, specifically designed engine exhaust, and very slim profiles. Although BAe is the prime contractor, Rolls-Royce, GE Aviation and QinetiQ are also contributors. Production began in 2007; in July 2010 a model was showcased at Warton Aerodrome; and ground testing began in 2010.

SPECS: (source: Military Factory)
tanarisuvac.JPG

Length: 9.10m
Wingspan: 11.35m
Height: 4m
Weight (loaded): 8,000kg
Powerplant: Rolls-Royce turbofan engine - 28,824N of thrust









Boeing Phantom Eye (USA, 2010-)
boeing-phantom-eye-uav.jpg

The Phantom Eye is a next-generation UAV using an innovative Hydrogen-based propulsion system meant to give the drone excellent efficiency and range. As well as this, it does not produce excessive exhaust and there is no inherent fuel waste; the only output in water, making it a 'green' UAV. It has been designed for reconaissance and surveillance. Thin wings are placed high on a bulbous, (American) football-shaped fuselage, with a tail assembly comprised of a vertical and two angled horizontal fins, resembling an upside down Y. It is designed to be powered by two Ford 2L, 4-cylinder engine systems developing 150HP and propelling it up to 275 kph. It will have a service ceiling of about 20,000m or higher. The Phantom Eye was unveiled on JUly 12, 2010, and is categorized as a High Altitude, Long Endurance (H.A.L.E.) drone, boasting a four-day loiter time.





(right) The Phantom Eye

Future UAVs - UAV universe
 

Concept model of the Sino-Waverider being displayed at the Beijing Aviation Museum which seems similar to the American X-51 WaveRider unmanned scramjet hypersonic demonstration aircraft.


 
US Navy launches UAV from submerged submarine


xfc-uav.jpg


navylaunches.jpg



The U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) with funding from SwampWorks at the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Department of Defense Rapid Reaction Technology Office (DoD/RRTO) demonstrated the launch of an all-electric, fuel cell-powered, unmanned aerial system (UAS) from a submerged submarine. From concept to fleet demonstration, this idea took less than six years to produce results at significant cost savings when compared to traditional programs often taking decades to produce results

The successful submerged launch of a remotely deployed UAS offers a pathway to providing mission critical intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities to the U.S. Navy's submarine force.

Operating under support of the Los Angeles class submarine USS Providence (SSN 719)and the Naval Undersea Warfare Center-Newport Division (NUWC-NPT), the NRL developed XFC UAS - eXperimental Fuel Cell Unmanned Aerial System - was fired from the submarine's torpedo tube using a 'Sea Robin' launch vehicle system. The Sea Robin launch system was designed to fit within an empty Tomahawk launch canister (TLC) used for launching Tomahawk cruise missiles already familiar to submarine sailors.

Once deployed from the TLC, the Sea Robin launch vehicle with integrated XFC rose to the ocean surface where it appeared as a spar buoy. Upon command of Providence Commanding Officer, the XFC then vertically launched from Sea Robin and flew a successful several hour mission demonstrating live video capabilities streamed back to Providence, surface support vessels and Norfolk before landing at the Naval Sea Systems Command Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (AUTEC), Andros, Bahamas.

"This six-year effort represents the best in collaboration of a Navy laboratory and industry to produce a technology that meets the needs of the special operations community," said Dr. Warren Schultz, program developer and manager, NRL. "The creativity and resourcefulness brought to this project by a unique team of scientists and engineers represents an unprecedented paradigm shift in UAV propulsion and launch systems."

The NRL Chemistry and Tactical Electronic Warfare Divisions team includes the design-builder of the Sea Robin, Oceaneering International Inc., Hanover, Md.; the fuel cell developer Protonex Technology Corp., Southborough, Mass.; and NUWC-NPT's Autonomous and Defensive Systems Department for Temporary Alteration (TEMPALT) and test demonstration support.

The XFC is a fully autonomous, all electric fuel cell powered folding wing UAS with an endurance of greater than six hours. The non-hybridized power plant supports the propulsion system and payload for a flight endurance that enables relatively low cost, low altitude, ISR missions. The XFC UAS uses an electrically assisted take off system which lifts the plane vertically out of its container and therefore, enables a very small footprint launch such as from a pickup truck or small surface vessel.

Navy launches UAV from submerged submarine

Navy's ocean-powered drone helps it wage underwater war | TIME.com

The Navy’s Amazing Ocean-Powered Underwater Drone

Fact is, the Navy has been seeking—pretty much under the surface—a way to do underwater what the Air Force has been doing in the sky: prowl stealthily for long periods of time, and gather the kind of data that could turn the tide in war.

The Navy’s goal is to send an underwater drone, which it calls a “glider,” on a roller-coaster-like path for up to five years. A fleet of them could swarm an enemy coastline, helping the Navy hunt down minefields and target enemy submarines.

Unlike their airborne cousins, Navy gliders are not powered by aviation fuel. Instead, they draw energy from the ocean’s thermocline, a pair of layers of warm water near the surface and chillier water below.

The glider changes its density, relative to the outside water, causing the 5-foot (1.5m)-long torpedo-like vehicle to either rise or sink—a process called hydraulic buoyancy. Its stubby wings translate some of that up-and-down motion into a forward speed of about a mile (1.6 km) an hour in a sawtooth pattern. As it regularly approaches the surface, an air bladder in the tail inflates to stick an antenna out of the water so it can transmit what it has learned to whatever Captain Nemo dispatched it to the depths.

Much of the work such gliders do is oceanographic in nature, collecting data about the water’s temperature, salinity, clarity, currents and eddies. Such information is critical for calibrating sonar to ensure it provides the most accurate underwater picture possible. But there are additional efforts underway to convert such data into militarily-handy information.

97dx.png


Slocum Gliders rise and fall as they traverse the ocean’s depths, transmitting what they learn via tail-mounted antennas that periodically break through the water’s surface.

The Navy’s Sunday contract announcement added a scant $203,731 to a contract it has with Teledyne Benthos, Inc., for continued “research efforts” into its Slocum Gliders (named for Captain Joshua Slocum, who sailed alone around the world in a 37-foot sloop between 1895 and 1898). “Carrying a wide variety of sensors, they can be programmed to patrol for weeks at a time, surfacing to transmit their data to shore while downloading new instructions at regular intervals, realizing a substantial cost savings compared to traditional surface ships,” the company’s Webb Research division says. The Webb unit is located in East Falmouth, Mass., and its Slocum Glider is the brainchild of Douglas Webb, a former researcher at the nearby Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.

In 2009, the Navy issued a $56.2 million contract for up to 150 of the “Littoral Battlespace-Sensing” gliders to be delivered by 2014. The Navy has said it is investing in the field because such information could prove vital “for mine countermeasures and other tasks important to expeditionary warfare. . .ultimately reducing or eliminating the need for sailors and Marines to enter the dangerous shallow waters just off shore in order to clear mines in preparation for expeditionary operations.”

A NATO report last year examined the feasibility of launching Slocum Gliders from torpedo tubes instead of T-AGS oceanographic surveillance ships. “Operating gliders from submarines represents a step forward to embedding this technology into naval operations,” it said. “Unlike surface ships, submarines are stealth platforms that could transit denied areas while releasing a glider fleet.”

Navy Captain Walt Luthiger, a submariner, said an exercise using such gliders proved their mettle in yet another arena. “the environmental information provided by the gliders has proved valuable,” he said in 2011, “and helped everyone in that very difficult job of finding submarines that don’t want to be found.”
 
"Altair" - Russian analogue of U.S. MQ-9 Reaper
f_aW1nLWZvdGtpLnlhbmRleC5ydS9nZXQvOTgyNy84MTIzNzE3OS5lYi8wXzk4ZTEzX2JkNTU3MzAxX29yaWc_X19pZD00ODIwOQ==.jpeg


f_aTcucGl4cy5ydS9zdG9yYWdlLzUvNy84LzNqcGdfODM0MjI2N18xMTQwNjU3OC5qcGc_X19pZD00ODIwOQ==.jpeg
 
Air Force Plans Next Gen Drone Fleet
by KRIS OSBORN on JUNE 19, 2014

reaper-night.jpg



Air Force leaders are in the early stages of planning the service’s next-generationdronefleet that could reshape the Air Force’s entire fleet and continue to lower the number of airborne pilots, service officials said.

TheAir Force’s drone fleet has taken over a much more prominent role in combat operations over the past ten years, but the technologies incorporated into the Air Force’s drone fleet still lag woefully behind the most advanced manned fighters and bombers.

This could change over the next 25 years if the service can execute itsRemotely Pilot Aircraft Vector, which spells out the next 25-years of anticipated drone developments.

Col. Ken Callahan, A2 director of remotely piloted aircraft capabilities, said the service wants to see its future drone fleet to incorporate stealth and network capabilities similar to its manned aircraft fleet.

Future Air Force drones will also need to be modular, meaning engineers can exchange sensor payloads when mission requirements change or new technology emerges, Callahan explained.

Some drones will likely get much smaller, as new technology continues to enable platforms to do more functions such as carry sensors at smaller, more compact sizes, he added.

The RPA Vector addresses the changing conceptual landscape as the Air Force continues to shift focus a more challenged or “contested” operating environment that could include advanced Chinese and Russian radar systems.

“Our focus in Iraq and Afghanistan was ground-centric. It was a counter-insurgency, counter terrorism kind of fight,” Callahan said.

While drones and their pilots will continue their focus on surveillance missions, they will also become increasingly cognizant of air-to-air threats and potential engagements, he said.

Callahan explained that drones are not likely to perform air-to-air combat missions over enemy territory at first. However, he did say future air-to-air superiority fighters could very well be unmanned or optionally-manned.

In fact, the Air Force’s new Long Range Strike Bomber is being engineered to fly unmanned and manned missions, senior Air Force officials have said.

Service officials are exploring numerous concepts and researching some of the next-generation aircraft already built by major defense manufacturers, Callahan said.

Lockheed Martin’s RQ-170 Sentinelstealth drone flew intelligence missions over Pakistan ahead of the mission that killed Osama bin Laden in 2011.

Boeing has also unveiled its Phantom Ray, a fighter-sized unmanned combat air vehicle which first flew in 2011. The aircraft has a 50-foot wingspan, can climb to 40,000-feet and reach speeds of Mach .85.

Air Force drone developers and strategist say technological progress over the last ten years has helped the service more fully realize the strategic vision of air power outlined by retired Air Force Col. John Warden.

Warden was known for advocating what came to be described as “effects based” warfare, the concept that a desired battlefield effect could be achieved through a strategic and precise use of air power.

For example, attacking enemy command and control centers, leadership headquarters, or supply lines, could paralyze an enemy without destroying large portions of the infrastructure of the attacked area or killing large numbers of civilians.

“If you look at Warden’s work and go back to the very beginning of air power from WWI to where we are today conceptually, it is about the idea that air power can solve combat problems in a different manner, meaning we don’t need to destroy every force that is in front of us,” Callahan said.

Warden’s air power theories are credited with having influenced military air bombing campaigns in the the first Gulf War, Kosovo and Operation Iraqi Freedom. In particular, the so-called “shock and awe” approach and the “decapitation strikes” of the air campaign in Iraq in 2003 included elements of Warden’s “effects based” air power strategy.

Callahan, who credited Warden for influencing air power theory, said Warden’s vision has largely been achieved and made easier through the advent of unmanned aircraft systems, precision weaponry and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance technologies.

“What you are seeing is the early work that Warden did has been realized,” Callahan explained.



Air Force Plans Next Gen Drone Fleet | Defense Tech
 
these threads really decrease my thanks to posts ratio ---- but they are informative and interesting anyway

Not on my watch!!! ;)

IDK why people dont thank informative posts especially if they have no political, religious or other implications. People should thank posts based on the information being helpful.
 

Back
Top Bottom