MiG-35 promo

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

(Frigates) hence it has a less weapons as compare to Destroyers, and its has no long range weapons like destroyer does like long range SAMs/torpedoes/Sonars etc etc and after expanding its weapons, it is easy target to enemy weapons and as for Subs what a laughter you have @undertakerwwefan Nuclear subs is far far more quiter than diesel Subs, do research before you bark here @undertakerwwefan

Nuclear subs louder because need to cool reactors and that makes noise.

The U.S. Navy would do well to consider augmenting its current submarine force with quiet, inexpensive, and highly capable diesel-electric submarines.

source https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2018-06/theres-case-diesels

 

[Ultima Thule]

Russia navy uses MiG-29K. You see the Russia navy flag on this one.

Recently, F/A 18/F-18 is operated by USN by 1980/ late 90s, whereas Mig-29K has that role after 2010, before that Su-33 filled that role for Russian Navy @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Recently, F/A 18/F-18 is operated by USN by 1980/ late 90s, whereas Mig-29K has that role after 2010, before that Su-33 filled that role for Russian Navy @undertakerwwefan

Russia uses small carriers. So MiG-29K is more suitable than the much bigger Su-33.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Nuclear subs louder because need to cool reactors and that makes noise.

The U.S. Navy would do well to consider augmenting its current submarine force with quiet, inexpensive, and highly capable diesel-electric submarines.

source https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2018-06/theres-case-diesels

And diesel Subs has its limitations they can't go far from country coasts its green water Subs (sea going) not blue water Subs (ocean going) and not has a global range like Nuclear subs has, and diesel engine has more noise than Nuclear subs @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

And diesel Subs has its limitations they can't go far from country coasts its green water Subs (sea going) not blue water Subs (ocean going) and not has a global range like Nuclear subs has, and diesel engine has more noise than Nuclear subs @undertakerwwefan

Nop. Nuclear is louder than diesel. These days diesel subs armed with cruise missiles that shoot thousands of km. Range is not that important anymore.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Russia uses small carriers. So MiG-29K is more suitable than the much bigger Su-33.

then tell me why Russian navy using Su-33 so long (from late 1980) to 2010) from small carriers, that's showing financial situation of Russia that can't sustain larger Su-33 to smaller MIG-29K @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

then tell me why Russian navy using Su-33 so long (from late 1980) to 2010) from small carriers, that's showing financial situation of Russia that can't sustain larger Su-33 to smaller MIG-29K @undertakerwwefan

Maybe.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Nop. Nuclear is louder than diesel. These days diesel subs armed with cruise missiles that shoot thousands of km. Range is not that important anymore.

then tell me one thing if diesel is such a powerful boats, why Russia developed Bori class SSBN and Yesen Class SSGN @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

then tell me one thing if diesel is such a powerful boats, why Russia developed Bori class SSBN and Yesen Class SSGN @undertakerwwefan

Yasen don't spew CO2 like Kilo does.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Maybe.

May be not its a Facts Russian financial conditions pursue them to Change Su-33 with smaller MIG-29K and Russian navy can't continue Su-33 carrier operations because of maintenance cost/expense @undertakerwwefan

Yasen don't spew CO2 like Kilo does.

not that reasons, if it will be any future war between USA/Russia Kilo has no range to attack USA that's the main reasons for developing Yasen SSGN as well as bori class SSBN and as per you CO2 is good for plants so what is the Problems @undertakerwwefan
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/prof...at-it-is-co2-is-good-and-why-its-good.601309/