You are applying secular principles to Pakistan. It's easy to get sucked into the Western Secular thinking.
I'm just thinking, something a lot of us aren't doing.
If there was a problem with his suitability for the role in terms of his economic understanding/perspective, then he should never have been offered the role.
If he was unwilling to meet the criteria required to accept the role (ie recognise himself as a non Muslim on the paperwork), then he should have never been offered the role.
If there was a problem with his politics and his political suitability (ie he's too unpopular) then he shouldn't have been offered the role.
He was offered the role, it was then retracted after public pressure from bigots who don't like his religious views. Others may have also not liked his economic views, which is valid criticism. The official govt spokesperson has stated they took away the offer to avoid disunity and then went on to speak about the governments religious credentials.
This is not insaaf. At the very least the person responsible for putting him forward, or agreeing the decision to offer the role should be forced to resign too.
---
As Muslims in the UK, whenever a public figure speaks out against Islam, islamaphobic hate crimes rise. This is statistically proven. Boris was defending the rights of women who wear Niqab when he called them letter boxes - yet this led to a rise in Muslim women being attacked/abused in the streets.
What impact do you think this action will have on the security of Qadiani's in Pakistan? When right wing trolls can force the government to revoke a job offer, do you think people of this cult can get justice in our legal system?