What's new

meeting huriyat was a bad idea Pakistan

. .
no actually the whole point of it was a timing..its a message that Pakistan places higher priority on standing by Kashmir cause over bilateral ties with india -given that ties with india are CONTINGENT upon resolving bilateral matters in a clear-headed and sober fashion - sans absurdly old statements and sans the ignorance of ground realities

had Pakistan bent to the wishes of india - it would've sent a disastrous message to our Kashmiri comrades.....that Pakistan can be arm-twisted by indian vis-a-vis Kashmir matters

so frankly, such statements are invalid and not worthy of much discussion
 
.
no actually the whole point of it was a timing..its a message that Pakistan places higher priority on standing by Kashmir cause over bilateral ties with india -given that ties with india are CONTINGENT upon resolving bilateral matters in a clear-headed and sober fashion - sans absurdly old statements and sans the ignorance of ground realities

had Pakistan bent to the wishes of india - it would've sent a disastrous message to our Kashmiri comrades.....that Pakistan can be arm-twisted by indian vis-a-vis Kashmir matters

so frankly, such statements are invalid and not worthy of much discussion
what? the guy just take a u turn, seem to me pakistan is desperate for talks
 
.
Budha sathiya gaya hai, Like Kashmir issue was going to resolved without this meeting. That was only good step by PMLN govt. regarding Hindustan.
 
.
In Kashmir issue, apart from army of Pakistan, rest of the people and polotician does not count...So what does politician says is really irrelevant..These are purely for media consumption..
 
.
what? the guy just take a u turn, seem to me pakistan is desperate for talks

not "desperate" but we highly advise it for indians -- unless you want the continuing embarrassment and fake PR stunts from your side to continue

even many observer countries have supported our stance, such as Turkiye

In Kashmir issue, apart from army of Pakistan, rest of the people and polotician does not count...So what does politician says is really irrelevant..These are purely for media consumption..

beyond just army.....its actually the stance of the majority of public/polity
 
.
even many observer countries have supported our stance, such as Turkiye

What credibility does Turkey hold ? They are busy in supporting ISIS in Syria and here they want to be a negotiator to break a peaceful deal. India and Pakistan can sort it out. India is not going to engage anyone else and being strong because of economy and other factors world will stand with them.
 
.
no actually the whole point of it was a timing..its a message that Pakistan places higher priority on standing by Kashmir cause over bilateral ties with india -given that ties with india are CONTINGENT upon resolving bilateral matters in a clear-headed and sober fashion - sans absurdly old statements and sans the ignorance of ground realities

had Pakistan bent to the wishes of india - it would've sent a disastrous message to our Kashmiri comrades.....that Pakistan can be arm-twisted by indian vis-a-vis Kashmir matters

so frankly, such statements are invalid and not worthy of much discussion
If you want to talk on Kashmir then.....Pakistan has to get arm-twisted by indian.....Modi is like that..very stubborn :D
 
.
not "desperate" but we highly advise it for indians -- unless you want the continuing embarrassment and fake PR stunts from your side to continue

even many observer countries have supported our stance, such as Turkiye



beyond just army.....its actually the stance of the majority of public/polity
if u think OIC has a say in two country bilateral issue than good luck with that ,even sataj aziz saying for talks between indian & pakistan not turkey
 
.
if u think OIC has a say in two country bilateral issue than good luck with that ,even sataj aziz saying for talks between indian & pakistan not turkey

who said anything about OIC :laugh:

yeah OIC has been supportive, but we don't require their initiative in order to tackle the problem and provide our perspective on thie matter
 
.
i have a very big question to ask....
history says that some indians were rulling sub-continent..... after then they were veryyyyy badly beaten by aryans , then by turks , then by mughals , then by english and then pakistan was created in 1947.... there is no existence of independence of india in history..... SO WHY DO india celeberates its independance on 15th august.....????
 
.
If you want to talk on Kashmir then.....Pakistan has to get arm-twisted by indian.....Modi is like that..very stubborn :D

being stubborn didnt do anything for him......he's still only allowed to travel to US because he (an extremist) happens to be the prime minister. his history still haunts him everywhere he crawls

as for Pakistan - that's the whole point. We didnt allow ourselves to be arm-twisted by india and i'm damned proud of that fact
 
.
who said anything about OIC :laugh:

yeah OIC has been supportive, but we don't require their initiative in order to tackle the problem and provide our perspective on thie matter
where does turkey said it i think in OIC conference, this stunt is just to keep pakisatn happy :lol: nobody take seriously what they say in india
 
.
upload_2014-9-27_14-38-42.png
 
.
Back
Top Bottom